Capital Jewish Museum reopens week after Israeli Embassy staffers killed
WASHINGTON () — Leaders from several faiths helped reopen the Capital Jewish Museum in Downtown D.C. Thursday morning, one week after two Israeli Embassy staffers were gunned down outside.
Since last week's antisemitic attack after an event for young diplomats held at the museum, calls for peace came from Jewish leaders, and continued Thursday as the museum reopened its doors.
Israeli Embassy suspect charged with murder of a foreign official
'Reopening is more than a ceremony, it's a defiant act of hope,' Rev. Thomas Bowen of Shiloh Baptist Church of Washington said during his remarks, prior to the official reopening.
Flowers remain outside the museum to honor Yaron Lischinsky and Sarah Milgrim, a young couple who were soon expected to be engaged.
Seven days after the pair were killed, grief continues to grip the Jewish community — including for Dr. Beatrice Gurwitz, the museum's executive director.
'I'm devastated, and I think we are all devastated, Gurwitz said. 'When you face antisemitic violence that grows out of dehumanization of the Jewish people, and we are telling stories of Jewish and the richest diversity of the Jewish world and that seems essential and I hope people will join us in visiting the museum.'
The shooting suspect, 31-year-old Elias Rodriguez, of Chicago, was chanting 'free Palestine' as he was being taken into custody by police.
'It doesn't matter who the attacker or attackers are, or what they claim, their actions are criminal, inhumane, and not condoned in neither Islam, Christianity, Judaism, or other beautiful faith communities,' Imam Talid Shareef of Masjid Muhammad, The Nation's Mosque said.
Who were the victims of the shooting outside the DC Jewish Museum?
Chris Wolf, president of the museum's board of directors, said future work being done at the museum will be dedicated to the memories of Lischinsky and Milgrim.
'Our celebration of Judaism and all it has contributed to society is perhaps the best antidote to antisemitism,' Wolf said.
'May we all do our part to rid our communities of hatred and violence,' said Rev. Mariann Edgar Budde, Bishop of the Episcopal Diocese of Washington. 'Help us to see one another in your eyes, and to live in hope of that day where there will be peace in this and every land.'
Rodriguez faces murder charges and is slated to appear in court on June 18.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Los Angeles Times
27 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
Trump says he's open to ‘regime change' in Iran, even as his aides insist otherwise
WASHINGTON — President Trump on Sunday called into question the future of Iran's ruling theocracy after a surprise attack on three of the country's nuclear sites, seemingly contradicting his administration's calls to resume negotiations and avoid an escalation in fighting. 'It's not politically correct to use the term, 'Regime Change,' but if the current Iranian Regime is unable to MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN, why wouldn't there be a Regime change???' Trump posted on social media. 'MIGA!!!' The post on his social media platform marked a stark reversal from Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth's Sunday morning news conference that detailed the aerial bombing of Iran early Sunday. 'This mission was not and has not been about regime change,' Hegseth said. The administration has made clear it wants Iran to stop any development of nuclear weapons, and Secretary of State Marco Rubio warned on Fox News' 'Sunday Morning Futures' that any retaliation against the U.S. or a rush toward building a nuclear weapon would 'put the regime at risk.' But beyond that, the world is awash in uncertainty at a fragile moment that could decide whether parts of the globe tip into war or find a way to salvage a relative peace. Trump's message to Iran's leadership comes as the U.S. has warned Iran against retaliating for the bombardment targeting the heart of a nuclear program that it spent decades developing. The Trump administration has made a series of intimidating statements even as it has called for a restart of negotiations, making it hard to get a read on whether the U.S. president is simply taunting an adversary or using inflammatory words that could further widen the war between Israel and Iran that began with Israeli attacks on June 13. Until Trump's post Sunday afternoon, the coordinated messaging by his vice president, Pentagon chief, top military advisor and secretary of State suggested a confidence that any fallout would be manageable and that Iran's lack of military capabilities would ultimately force it back to the bargaining table. Hegseth had said that America 'does not seek war' with Iran, while Vice President JD Vance said the strikes had given Tehran the possibility of returning to negotiate with Washington. But the unfolding situation is not entirely under Washington's control, as Tehran has a series of levers to respond to the aerial bombings that could intensify the conflict in the Middle East with possible global repercussions. Iran can block oil being shipped through the Strait of Hormuz, attack U.S. bases in the region, engage in cyberattacks or accelerate its nuclear program — which might seem more of a necessity after the U.S. strikes. All of that raises the question of whether the U.S. bombing will open up a more brutal phase of fighting or revive negotiations out of an abundance of caution. In the U.S., the attack quickly spilled over into domestic politics, with Trump spending part of his Sunday going after his critics in Congress. He used a social media post to lambaste Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.), a stalwart Trump supporter who had objected to the president taking military action without specific congressional approval. 'We had a spectacular military success yesterday, taking the 'bomb' right out of their hands (and they would use it if they could!)' Trump wrote. Boak and Pesoli write for the Associated Press.
Wall Street Journal
an hour ago
- Wall Street Journal
Oil Climbs, Asian Equity Markets Fall After U.S. Attacks on Iran
Oil climbed and Asian equity markets fell after the U.S. carried out strikes on Iranian nuclear sites over the weekend, raising concerns about an escalation of the conflict that began with Israeli attacks on Iran. Front-month WTI crude oil futures rose 2.8% to $75.89 a barrel on Monday, and front-month Brent crude oil futures added 2.7% to $79.09 a barrel
USA Today
2 hours ago
- USA Today
Oil hits five-month high after US hits key Iranian nuclear sites
SINGAPORE - Oil prices jumped on Monday, local time, to their highest since January as Washington's weekend move to join Israel in attacking Iran's nuclear facilities stoked supply worries. Brent crude futures rose $1.88 or 2.44% at $78.89 a barrel as of 1122 GMT. U.S. West Texas Intermediate crude advanced $1.87 or 2.53% at $75.71. Both contracts jumped by more than 3% earlier in the session to $81.40 and $78.40, respectively, five-month highs, before giving up some gains. The rise in prices came after President Donald Trump said he had "obliterated" Iran's main nuclear sites in strikes over the weekend, joining an Israeli assault in an escalation of conflict in the Middle East as Tehran vowed to defend itself. Iran is OPEC's third-largest crude producer. Market participants expect further price gains amid mounting fears that an Iranian retaliation may include a closure of the Strait of Hormuz, through which roughly a fifth of global crude supply flows. Iran's Press TV reported that the Iranian parliament approved a measure to close the strait. Iran has in the past threatened to close the strait but has never followed through on the move. "The risks of damage to oil infrastructure ... have multiplied," said Sparta Commodities senior analyst June Goh. Although there are alternative pipeline routes out of the region, there will still be crude volumes that cannot be fully exported out if the Strait of Hormuz becomes inaccessible. Shippers will increasingly stay out of the region, she added. Brent has risen 13% since the conflict began on June 13, while WTI has gained around 10%. The current geopolitical risk premium is unlikely to last without tangible supply disruptions, analysts said. Meanwhile, the unwinding of some of the long positions accumulated following a recent price rally could cap an upside to oil prices, Ole Hansen, head of commodity strategy at Saxo Bank, wrote in a market commentary on Sunday. (Reporting by Siyi Liu in Singapore; Editing by Himani Sarkar)
