logo
Katie Price 'heartbroken' as kids 'advised to stay away' due to 'toxic brand'

Katie Price 'heartbroken' as kids 'advised to stay away' due to 'toxic brand'

Daily Mirror04-06-2025

Former glamour model Katie Price's children Junior and Princess, who she shares with ex-husband Peter Andre, are said to be keeping a 'professional distance' from their mum
Katie Price has reportedly been left heartbroken after suggestions emerged that two of her eldest children, Princess and Junior, should publicly distance themselves due to worries over her unpredictable behaviour.
The former glamour model's eldest two children, who she had with ex-husband Peter Andre, are carving their own niches in the limelight but are seemingly steering clear from being associated with their mum's celebrity status.

A source confided in Express.co.uk: "There's been a clear shift. Princess and Junior love their mum but have been advised not to mix business with family, especially when it comes to joint red carpet appearances or interviews. It's not about cutting her off, it's about protecting their own brands."

These revelations come in the wake of Katie, 47, facing a variety of legal woes, including a warrant for her arrest issued in March when she failed to attend a court date concerning her bankruptcy case.
Despite owing in excess of £750,000 to creditors, Katie defended herself saying she was abroad at the time of the hearing. After being detained at Heathrow Airport upon her return to the UK, Katie made an appearance at the High Court.
The star has been discharged of her tax debts since, with her overdue payments comprising income tax, VAT, surcharges and interest, as reported by the Express, all accumulated from self-assessments in the two years leading up to 2022.
Katie Price has recently come under fire from animal rights campaigners after she shared a video showing her new puppy Rookie looking distressed during horse riding activities.
"She's constantly in the headlines for the wrong reasons," an insider commented.

"It's tough for her kids who are trying to build their own reputations. No one wants to see their parent branded 'toxic' online, but it's the reality they're navigating."
Asked for a statement by Express.co.uk, Katie's representative declined to comment.
Princess, 17, is carving out her niche with multiple beauty deals and is rumoured to be putting together a reality show separate from her mother's fame.

Her brother Junior, 19, is forging ahead with his music ambitions, often appearing alongside his dad Peter and stepmum Emily at events.
Despite any possible friction, Katie opened up about her relationship with her children on The Katie Price Show podcast, expressing: "They're doing their own thing, they're busy, but I'm always here for them."
Regarding co-parenting with ex-husband Peter Andre, she admitted: "I don't always agree with things, but at the end of the day we both love the kids and that's what matters."
Sources say there might be a "professional distance" between Katie and her children's burgeoning careers for some time yet.
The source added: "They'll never turn their backs on Katie, but when it comes to their careers, they're being smart. They want to be seen as individuals, not as part of the circus."

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Rod Stewart and Penny Lancaster 'held responsible' for spoiling radio host's proposal plans
Rod Stewart and Penny Lancaster 'held responsible' for spoiling radio host's proposal plans

Daily Record

timean hour ago

  • Daily Record

Rod Stewart and Penny Lancaster 'held responsible' for spoiling radio host's proposal plans

Rod Stewart and Penny Lancaster's wedding anniversary celebrations this weekend brought up an awkward memory for a Heart Radio presenter as he explained the famous pair spoiled his proposal plans. Sir Rod Stewart and his wife Penny Lancaster have been accused of spoiling a Heart Radio presenter's proposal plans. To mark their 18th wedding anniversary this week, the pair boarded the Venice Simplon-Orient-Express to revisit their engagement, wedding and honeymoon spots. Six years into dating in 2005, the Maggie May hitmaker got down on one knee at the top of the Eiffel Tower. They tied the knot in a small town just outside of Portofino, Italy two years later. ‌ Their 2007 wedding was followed by a honeymoon off the coast, which included celebrations on a yacht. Discussing the couple's anniversary on Heart Radio's Breakfast Show on Friday, Jamie Theakston hilariously accused Rod of ruining his own proposal plan. ‌ Around the same time that the singer asked Penny for her hand in marriage, the presenter recalled being on a train to Paris with his then girlfriend Sophie, who he was about to pop the question to. Jamie explained his plan had been to propose to his now wife on the Eiffel Tower, until he discovered her true feelings about that idea, Glasgow Live reports. Speaking to his co-stars Amanda Holden and Ashley Roberts, he said: "I thought the Eiffel Tower might be romantic, at the Eiffel Tower, on one knee, pop the question, job done. "It was a beautiful weekend, the sun was shining, we'd been to Paris a couple of times before, so it was a special place." ‌ Jamie recalled how "nervous" he was about getting the ring he had secretly packed through customs without Sophie seeing it, which was thankfully a success. However, his next problem came when he had to rethink his proposal plan. He explained: "Anyway, she's reading a copy of Hello! Magazine, she goes, 'OMG. Do you know Rod Stewart has just got engaged to Penny Lancaster?' I said, 'Oh, really?' ‌ "She said, 'How naff is this, they did it in Paris on the Eiffel Tower'." After Amanda and Ashley expressed their shock, he admitted he debated whether to scrap the plan completely. ‌ However, he decided to go ahead with the proposal but carried it out in a more private setting - their hotel room. He joked: "It wasn't as special as it might've been. So essentially, I hold Rod and Penny personally responsible for the complete collapse of my wedding proposal." While the engagement he had imagined didn't quite go to plan, the main thing was that Sophie gladly accepted his proposal. ‌ The pair went on to wed in Ditchling, Sussex and now have two sons together; Sidney, 17, and Kit, 16. As for Rod and Penny, the Loose Women star is the singer's third wife who he has two sons with; Alastair, 19, and Aiden, 14. Sir Rod has eight kids in total across five different women. His other children are Sarah, 61, Kimberly, 45, Sean, 44, Ruby, 38, Renee, 33, Liam, 30. Before Penny, he was married to Alana Stewart from 1979 to 1984, followed by Rachel Hunter from 1990 to 2006.

Cardiff University students threatened with jail if they protest without permission on campus
Cardiff University students threatened with jail if they protest without permission on campus

Wales Online

timean hour ago

  • Wales Online

Cardiff University students threatened with jail if they protest without permission on campus

Cardiff University students threatened with jail if they protest without permission on campus Cardiff University has obtained a High Court injunction in response to the now-disbanded Palestine camp outside its main building Protesters occupied a site at Cardiff University's main building for 56 days in support of Palestine in 2024 (Image: John Myers ) Anyone picketing on Cardiff University property risks being jailed following a High Court injunction obtained in response to the now-disbanded Palestine camp outside the main building. The injunction effectively bans any protest and pickets taking place on university property without executive approval. Critics say they realise it was sought in response to the Palestine protest but fear it has much wider-ranging impacts on future protests. ‌ The university denied it is banning free speech or legitimate protest and said the injunction was needed to keep the campus secure. ‌ The High Court injunction gives the university the right to prohibit all protest activity on 10 sites across its campus. The injunction applies both to university property and to adjoining public highways and was granted until July 2026. The injunction warns: 'Anyone in breach of the order will be in contempt of court and may be imprisoned, fined, or have their assets seized.' Pro-Palestine protesters outside Cardiff University's Centre for Student Life in February 2025 (Image: What's Occurin' CUTV ) Article continues below Never miss a Cardiff story by signing up to our daily newsletter here The Caerdydd Students for Palestine first set up the encampment calling for peace in Palestine outside the main university building in May 2024. They returned in May this year but were forced to leave after an eviction notice was served by the university. The successful injunction application was opposed by the European Legal Support Centre (ELSC) which argued, among other points, that there was no need for an injunction as the Palestine camp had disbanded.. Sir Peter Lane rejected all the ELSC's arguments and awarded the university the injunction on June 13. ‌ Notices have now been put up around the university warning staff and students about the injunction which was described as "draconian" by an academic at another institution. Dr Val Aston, lecturer in criminal and human rights law at Swansea University, and an expert in how protest is policed, said: 'It is very concerning that Cardiff University has resorted to the use of protest injunctions. These are draconian measures which impose potentially severe penalties for activities which are otherwise entirely lawful and legitimate." She said universities should be a place of open discussion and the injunction potentially encompasses any form of assembly on university grounds that is not agreed by the university. Cardiff University branch of the UCU union said staff had raised concerns too. "Now that we have seen the full wording of the injunction we think it raises serious worries about staff and students' right to protest as well as potentially endangering legitimate trade union activities such as picketing and holding rallies," a spokesman said. ‌ But in a message to staff and students Cardiff University chief operating officer Dr Paula Sanderson said the injunction does not prevent the right of staff and students to take part in legal and peaceful protest or supporting a political view or cause within the law. She said any suggestion the university has banned every form of protest is wrong. She said: "Cardiff University has a strong and proud tradition of protest. It's a vital tenet upon which our community operates and which we respect. The court order recognises and preserves that. We remain absolutely committed to free speech – peaceful protest is part of the DNA of our university and the court order enables our staff and students to continue to do so peacefully and safely. ‌ "When summing up the evidence the judge was explicit – there was compelling evidence for the order however it does not prohibit conduct or protest which is lawful." The Palestine protest outside Cardiff University in June 2024 (Image: Rob Browne / Media Wales ) Dr Sanderson and a university spokesperson said the reason the injunction was sought was, in part, prompted by the recent Palestine encampment "and associated disruption" outside the university's main and other key buildings. ‌ The recent protest, and a previous Palestine protest encampment in Horseshoe Drive at the Main Building, was set up without the university's consent and raised safety, wellbeing, and safeguarding issues, they said. Efforts were made to engage but members of the encampment had largely refused to identify themselves and chose to conceal their identities, the spokesman said, and this meant it wasn't even clear if they were students. As well as occupying Horseshoe Drive without consent protesters had blocked both entrances to the main building in recent weeks preventing staff and students from work, study, and preparing for exams, the university added. That meant buildings being closed, tabled exams and other events being moved, and research activity disrupted. Events and external visitors had also been targeted by protesters. ‌ Rooms in the Glamorgan Building and other buildings were also occupied by members of the Palestine protest. "These recent incidents – as well as other incidents over the last 12 months – have had an adverse impact on university business. They have caused disruption and distress to members of our university community resulting in a number of complaints which we have a duty to investigate and take appropriate action," the spokesman added. "We did not take this decision lightly. However this action became necessary to bring an end to disruption and deter others from seeking to risk day-to-day university business. The action is also in line with that taken at other universities in Wales and across the UK. ‌ 'Following careful consideration the university issued a notice to vacate to the encampment on Friday, May 16. The deadline to leave was ignored and they continued to occupy without permission to do so, in breach of that notice. 'As a result we were left with little option other than to seek an order for possession and an order for precautionary injunctive relief from the court. This was not a decision we took lightly. However this action is necessary to bring an end to the ongoing disruption. "We appreciate that some may disagree with this action and it could be interpreted as curtailing the right to protest and freedom of speech but this is not the case. This decision is about ensuring the safety of everyone in our university community – including those within the encampment itself – and is similar action to that taken by other universities who have experienced unauthorised encampments.' Article continues below

Belfast court quashes decision to proceed with A5 road upgrade
Belfast court quashes decision to proceed with A5 road upgrade

BreakingNews.ie

time2 hours ago

  • BreakingNews.ie

Belfast court quashes decision to proceed with A5 road upgrade

An Executive decision to proceed with the A5 road upgrade has been quashed at the High Court in Belfast. Mr Justice McAlinden told the court that he was aware his ruling would bring 'fresh anguish' to the families of those who lost loved ones on the road. Advertisement But he said the proposed scheme breached elements of the Climate Change Act 2022. Infrastructure Minister Liz Kimmins was at the Royal Courts of Justice to hear the ruling on Monday. The Northern Ireland Executive gave the green light for the long-awaited upgrade to the A5 in October. However, judicial review proceedings were brought against the Department for Infrastructure by nine applicants, including residents, farmers and landowners opposed to the £1.2 billion scheme. Advertisement There have been more than 50 deaths on the A5, which links Derry with Aughnacloy in Co Tyrone, since 2006. A scheme to turn the road into a dual carriageway was first approved by the Executive in 2007 but it has been held up by legal challenges and uncertainty over funding.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store