Keswick Dam too full will send 5 times more water down Sacramento River due to storms
Colleen Palmer spent Wednesday scrambling to get guests and tenants at Marina RV Park packed and safely to higher ground before the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation quintuples the amount of water flowing out of Keswick Dam into the Sacramento River.
After heavy rainstorms raised Lake Shasta waters more than 12 feet in two days, the bureau announced it would increase water releases from Keswick Dam into the Sacramento River starting Thursday. Water releases will jump from 7,500 cubic feet per second on Wednesday, to 20,000 cfs by Thursday morning, then to 40,000 cfs on Friday.
The Redding Fire Department will arrive in the evening to make sure all of Palmer's tenants safely evacuated, she said, as she rushed to help people move from the lower level of Marina RV Park, along the Sacramento River, on Wednesday afternoon.
Palmer said she plans to make sure every resident has a place to drive their RV: To Marina RV's upper level, in front of a nearby friend's house or a space at another trailer park.
'We've got to be out by 6 p.m.,' she said, ''cause you can't do nothin' in the dark.'
Read more: A dry January, then rain from atmospheric rivers, now snow forecast near Redding
Lake Shasta's water level stood at 1,044.64 feet above sea level on Tuesday, up from 1,032.05 feet on Sunday, according to the Bureau of Reclamation.
The lake as of Tuesday was about 23 feet from reaching full capacity.
As of Tuesday, the amount of water flowing into the lake from the recent rains was 102,213 cubic feet per second, according to state data.
That's when the Bureau of Reclamation announced it had to release some of the rainwater that flowed into the Lake Shasta during the storms. That water will pour into the Sacramento River starting around 2 a.m. Thursday, flooding some low-lying areas in and near Redding.
People visiting the river banks should watch for fast moving and cold water, the bureau cautioned.
Read more: Widespread flooding reported in Shasta County after record rainfall
2025 is the second year in a row Marina RV Park guests needed to evacuate after heavy rains, said Palmer, whose long-term tenants include people on a fixed income.
Some guests consider the evacuation a semi-annual adventure, she said. 'Some people are doing this for the fifth time. They keep coming back,' she said laughing.
Palmer plans to keep tabs on her tenants until it's safe for them to come home. 'I know where all of them are. They keep in touch with me,' she said.
Record Searchlight Reporter David Benda contributed to this story.
Jessica Skropanic is a features reporter for the Record Searchlight/USA Today Network. She covers science, arts, social issues and news stories. Follow her on Twitter @RS_JSkropanic and on Facebook. Join Jessica in the Get Out! Nor Cal recreation Facebook group. To support and sustain this work, please subscribe today. Thank you.
This article originally appeared on Redding Record Searchlight: Shasta County dam too full after storms to release more water
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
4 days ago
- Newsweek
Lake Mead's Water Projected to Hit Lowest Point on Record
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Lake Mead's water levels are projected to be the lowest in recorded history by 2027, according to the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation. The lake, which was first filled in 1930, is already only 31 percent full after dropping to a low of 1,041.71 feet of water above sea level in July 2022. Its levels have risen since that low in 2022, but are expected to fall again to 1,041.06 feet as of May 2027. Why It Matters Lake Mead is the nation's largest reservoir and is part of the Colorado River Basin network which supplies water to seven U.S. states, 30 tribal nations, and also parts of Mexico. Approximately 25 million people, including residents of the major cities of Las Vegas, Phoenix, and Los Angeles, rely on water from Lake Mead. Millions also rely on the lake's ability to create electricity across Arizona, Colorado, and Nevada. What To Know Lake Mead's water levels are determined by a number of factors including natural conditions and demand. A major reason is climate change, as unpredictable weather patterns, hotter summers which not only dry out the lake but also increase demand for water, and more arid winters are leaving the basin empty. Now, despite a snowy past winter in Colorado, the basin is still struggling. Kyle Roerink, executive director of the Great Basin Water Network, told 8NewsNow that the levels represent "the uncertainty we face year after year." A boat that was once submerged sits on cracked earth hundreds of feet from the shoreline of Lake Mead on May 10, 2022, near Boulder City, Nevada. A boat that was once submerged sits on cracked earth hundreds of feet from the shoreline of Lake Mead on May 10, 2022, near Boulder City, Nevada. John Locher, File/AP Photo Further Water Restrictions? The lessening levels mean that people in the states reliant on Lake Mead, predominantly, California, Nevada, and Arizona, may be put under water restrictions. These states are already under Tier 1 water restrictions, meaning people cannot use free-flowing hoses, must reduce hours for landscaping, and must have conservation plans in place. If the water levels continue to drop, they will be placed under Tier 2 restrictions, which could see the water allocations for each state being limited. Millions of people rely on this basin for water and electricity as President Donald Trump's administration has withdrawn the U.S. from the Paris Climate Agreement again and has opened up the country for more fossil fuel drilling. Trump has signed several executive orders to revive fossil fuel production by declaring an "energy emergency," and the Environmental Protection Agency led by Lee Zeldin has worked to remove clean air standards. The Department of Government Efficiency also laid off several Lake Mead workers during its mass-firing drive. However, many of these employees have now been reinstated. Jennifer Shoulders, center, protesting the layoffs of National Park Service employees, at the Lake Mead National Recreation Area Visitor Center on March 1, 2025, near Boulder City, Nevada. Jennifer Shoulders, center, protesting the layoffs of National Park Service employees, at the Lake Mead National Recreation Area Visitor Center on March 1, 2025, near Boulder City, Nevada. Steve Marcus/Las Vegas Sun via AP What People Are Saying Kyle Roerink, executive director of the Great Basin Water Network, told media: "This report underscores the arid shifts we are seeing across the West and the uncertainty we face year after year. Much of the Upper Colorado River region had normal to above-average snowpacks this winter. But that is not translating to water for Lake Mead. Even in good years, we are seeing bad results." What Happens Next Lake workers are working to expand surrounding recreation areas, as lowering water levels has resulted in a change in where people can enjoy time at the lake. As temperatures rise in the region and little evident action to combat climate change, residents who rely on water from Lake Mead can expect to endure more restrictions on their water access.
Newsweek
24-05-2025
- Newsweek
Grand Canyon Flooding Move Sparks Backlash: 'We Are Failing'
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Controversy has erupted after federal officials at the Bureau of Reclamation announced they don't plan to release floodwaters from Lake Powell this spring to restore the Grand Canyon because of work taking place on Glen Canyon Dam and further down the Colorado River. Newsweek contacted the Bureau of Reclamation for comment via email on Saturday outside of regular office hours. Why It Matters Since 1963 the Glen Canyon Dam has obstructed the flow of water and accompanying sand into the Grand Canyon via the Colorado River. In response the Glen Canyon Dam Adaptive Management Program, which falls under Bureau of Reclamation jurisdiction, has opened the dam's bypass tubes 12 times since 1996 according to local media outlet AZ Central. Critics argue that failing to flood the Grand Canyon on a regular basis causes its beaches to wash away and has a devastating impact on its wildlife. What To Know The Bureau of Reclamation has said it will not flood the Grand Canyon this spring because of ongoing work around the Glen Canyon Dam and Colorado River. In April the bureau said it would recommend Interior Secretary Doug Burgum not approve a spring flood because of work being conducted by a National Park Service contractor, which is digging a slough downstream from the dam in a bid to prevent non-native fish, such as smallmouth bass, from spawning. On May 22 the agency said it stood by this decision and that it was final. However critics have argued this could violate the Grand Canyon Protection Act of 1992, which requires government to conserve the National Park's wildlife and ecosystem. A stock image shows the Grand Canyon being flooded via water from the Glen Canyon Dam on November 21 2004. A stock image shows the Grand Canyon being flooded via water from the Glen Canyon Dam on November 21 2004. Jeff Topping/GETTY Environmental campaigners had been pushing for a spring flood to mimic the natural movement of the river and to restore the Grand Canyon's beaches. Groups representing anglers were also in favor as tailwater rainbow trout stocks have been hit in recent years by low water in Lake Powell, which has also caused temperatures to rise. Trout Unlimited spokesperson Jim Strogen said a "deeper, colder lake" would be better for fishing. However, major power consumers had warned spring floods would cut hydroelectric energy production. Leslie James, executive director of the Colorado River Energy Distributors Association, claimed a spring flood could cost between $1 million and $2 million in lost electricity output. What People Are Saying Speaking to AZ Central Ben Reeder, the Grand Canyon River Guides representatives at a technical group in collaboration with the Reclamation Bureau, said federal authorities were "looking for any excuse" not to have a flood. Reeder added: "It really kind of bothers me, honestly, that we talk about the Grand Canyon in these economic terms as if it's there for human consumption." Larry Stevens, an ecologist who represents the Grand Canyon Wildlands Council and Wild Arizona, said he was "deeply disappointed." What Happens Next The decision not to have a spring flood at the Grand Canyon could raise pressure for one later in the year, even though this wouldn't match the Colorado River's natural cycle so closely. Tensions around flooding the Grand Canyon are likely to continue between environmentalists, government and electricity producers.
Yahoo
24-05-2025
- Yahoo
Agency responsible for irrigation and flood control in Middle Rio Grande looks toward its next 100 years
May 24—The Middle Rio Grande Conservancy District has been preventing floods, providing drainage and releasing irrigation waters for 100 years. Facing a future with increased urbanization, lighter snowpacks and heavier monsoons, MRGCD is focused on strategies to keep agricultural traditions alive. The Rio Grande's flows have been shaped by human intervention. With drains, canals and dams, entities like MRGCD, the Bureau of Reclamation and the Army Corps of Engineers have made the river's flow more predictable, reducing flood risk and ensuring the river could run without drying through Albuquerque for most of the year. The levee system has also reduced the width of the Rio Grande's flooding, creating a continuous cottonwood forest within the Rio Grande Valley State Park. "When the district was formed, one of their primary problems was flooding," said Jason Casuga, MRGCD chief executive officer. "We find ourselves now in a period of time of extreme drought, water scarcity." Approximately 84% of New Mexico is in some state of drought, with 38% of the state in extreme drought and almost 10% in the most drastic state of exceptional drought. Mountain snows act as a natural reservoir for water, feeding rivers as snow melts in spring and summer. Since the 1950s, snowpack has been decreasing in New Mexico, as well as in Colorado, Utah and Wyoming where the headwaters for the Rio Grande, San Juan, Colorado and Navajo rivers are located, according to a report from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Snowpack and snowpack runoff are projected to decline substantially by 2070, while average temperatures in the state are expected to increase 5 to 7 degrees over the next 50 years, making the state more arid, according to a 2022 report from the New Mexico Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources. In 1925, there were more than 70 acequia diversions off the Rio Grande from the area where Cochiti Dam was later built to the San Acacia Reach. MRGCD was created to replace that system, consolidating down to four diversions and focusing on equitably sharing water from north to south. It owns canals and levees across four counties, as well as land adjacent to the river, like Albuquerque's bosque. MRGCD is funded by tax dollars from people who own property within the district and benefit from it. It is run by an elected board and the next election will be in October. The board holds monthly meetings, and much like a city council or school board meeting, the public can attend and weigh in. For interagency decisions and debates on water management, which usually involve federal heavyweights like the Bureau of Reclamation or the Department of the Interior, being locally and democratically run sometimes makes MRGCD the government agency in the room with the most direct relationship to the people it serves. A new hydrological reality One of the wettest periods on record for New Mexico was the 1980s and 1990s. Water was spilling out of reservoirs like Elephant Butte, Casuga said. The Natural Resources Conservation Service recently published a revised 30-year average for snowpack conditions, and across the board the average is much lower than it was for the previous 30-year period, according to Anne Marken, MRGCD's river operations and telemetry manager. As temperatures rise, even in years when there is an average snowpack, less of that water ends up in the river. Higher temperatures also cause higher depletions within the river. The irrigation system in New Mexico is driven by snowmelt. In the spring, when snow melts in the mountains and rushes down the Rio Grande, there is typically more water in the river than Middle Rio Grande Valley farmers need. So MRGCD would hold some of that spring pulse at El Vado Dam or Abiquiu Lake. As the supply of water begins to dwindle, MRGCD would begin to release water to augment farmers' supply. "There are a lot of forecasts that show that we'll probably be getting a similar amount of precipitation in the year, but a lot of that will be shifting to monsoon events in the summer, and we have seen an uptick in some very high-intensity rain events in the summer," Marken said. "So we are also thinking proactively about, 'How can we shift our infrastructure to be prepared for that potential shift in how we receive precipitation?' Because the way we're currently set up is to capitalize on that snowmelt runoff, and in the future, the opportunities might be elsewhere." Long term, that change in weather patterns could call for new reservoirs in different locations and the ability to store water within channels, so if rain comes in after irrigation water has been released, the released water could be temporarily held in the channel, Marken said. Monsoons also deposit more sediment into the river than snowpack runoff, which is slower and less intense. So MRGCD will likely need to manage increased sediment in the Rio Grande, said Casey Ish, MRGCD's conservation program and special projects manager. Rio Grande Compact New Mexico has a water debt of 124,000 acre-feet through the Rio Grande Compact, a legal agreement that shapes water management along the river. Signed in 1938, the compact is an agreement between Colorado, New Mexico and Texas about how to share water, and it looms over MRGCD's day-to-day work. When New Mexico is 200,000 acre-feet in debt, the state has violated the agreement. Unlike some other water-sharing agreements in the West, the compact does not dictate a set amount of water has to be sent along the river each year. Instead, the states' have to deliver a percentage of the water in the river system to their downstream neighbor. The percentage is larger in wet years and smaller in dry years. "We try to characterize how much water the farmers need, and make sure we're not diverting more," Marken said. "While we're balancing what the farmers need, we're also looking at environmental species' needs, and also Rio Grande Compact compliance. So we're always balancing all these competing uses for this water." Endangered species like the silvery minnow and willow flycatcher are protected by the Endangered Species Act, at times mandating that water be used to boost their survival. This May, the decision of whether to store water or release it is an easy one, because legally at this moment, New Mexico can't store native Rio Grande water for non-Pueblo use, because New Mexico owes too much water to Texas to store any for itself. The pueblos have older water rights, giving them priority. New Mexico's current compact debt began in 2019. The following year, there was not much snowpack and not many monsoons, so the stored water New Mexico had was quickly gone, Marken said. But the state was holding a store of water for Texas — 30,000 acre-feet — to meet its compact obligations. Water managers in New Mexico asked Texas officials if that earmarked water could be used in the Middle Rio Grande Valley. Texas said yes, further growing the compact debt. In subsequent years, the debt has crept higher. This lack of storage ability creates uncertainty for irrigators about how much water will be available. Typically, the natural summer inflows are not enough to meet farmers' needs, making them reliant on monsoon events, Marken said. In the spring, farmers are trying to make planting decisions based on water availability in the summer, but when storage is unavailable, it makes predicting what to plant more challenging. To improve its operations, MRGCD is exploring a new way of operating, where it evaluates compact delivery on a month-to-month scale to ensure it's not falling behind on water delivery, Marken said, something Colorado already does. The rules around who gets what water from the Rio Grande could shift in the coming years. There is ongoing litigation around the Rio Grande Compact because of past compact violations by New Mexico. The states came to a settlement agreement, but the federal government objected, so settlement discussions are ongoing. Within the next 100 years, Casuga expects an Indian water rights settlement for the six Middle Rio Grande Pueblos, which would likely come with an adjudication of water in the Middle Rio Grande Valley, a legal determination of exactly how much water belongs to whom. "That'll change the dynamic in the middle valley, but it'll also bring surety to priority of water and what those priorities are in terms of how much there is, whose it is, and what the priority of that is, which I think is important," Casuga said. The pueblos' prior and paramount water rights were recognized by the U.S. government in the early 1900s. In 2022, the six pueblos started a legal process for the formal determination of water rights in the Middle Rio Grande. Urbanization As a new Interstate 25 interchange is being built near Tomé, and Los Lunas sees an influx of new residents and big investments from companies like Facebook, Valencia County is likely to become more urban. Bernalillo County is also likely to continue increasing density in its existing urban areas. To promote agriculture and green space within the valley, MRGCD's elected board has directed Casuga to protest if someone is trying to transfer water from within the valley to an area outside the district, said MRGCD Board Member Stephanie Russo Baca. When someone is trying to take water outside the district, it is generally related to municipal development and private residential development, said Technical Services Director Eric Zamora. If someone is adding a subdivision within a municipality, the municipality will typically require the developer to prove they have enough water rights for the subdivision. MRGCD will play a role in maintaining the agricultural character of Valencia County and be an advocate for Albuquerque's agriculture by supporting policies to protect green spaces, Casuga said. "Let's make good subdivision standard decisions on how dense we're going to make the places right along the river and in the green spaces," Casuga said. Cathy Cook covers the federal government for the Albuquerque Journal. Reach her via email at ccook@
