Hospital employee with Tourette syndrome says he was fired for ‘making faces' at boss
A hospital employee with Tourette syndrome got fired after just a week on the job when the head of HR allegedly became offended that the man — whose persistent tics, such as squinting, grimacing, and eye-blinking are totally involuntary — was 'making faces' at him.
In a federal civil rights lawsuit filed Friday and obtained first by The Independent, former project manager Adam Thompson accuses the White Plains Hospital Medical Center of violating the Americans with Disabilities Act by terminating him over a physical condition he cannot control.
The suit says Thompson disclosed his condition to hospital officials during the interview process and even provided a letter from his doctor that 'unequivocally' confirmed his fitness for duty.
Still, it contends, the VP of human resources mistook Thompson's spontaneous facial movements as 'confrontational' and called for his immediate termination.
In an email, White Plains Hospital's senior director of communications, Michael Gelormino, said, 'It is our policy not to comment on pending litigation.'
Thompson began working at White Plains Hospital on October 28, 2024 as a senior 'MEP' project manager, responsible for overseeing all mechanical, electrical, and plumbing systems throughout the facility, according to the complaint filed with his lawsuit.
His previous experience as an MEP manager, coordinator, and superintendent meant he'd easily be able to ensure all new construction met design specifications, safety codes, and deadlines, the complaint states.
Before he took the job, Thompson informed his supervisor-to-be that he suffers from Tourette syndrome as well as ADHD, but takes medication to control both and neither interfere at all with his ability to work, the complaint continues, adding that Thompson's personal physician confirmed as much in writing.
It says this 'proactive approach' met with 'positive feedback' from higher-ups, who recognized Thompson's 'competence and commitment.'
'However,' the complaint goes on, Thompson's 'situation took a troubling turn on November 4, 2024, during a mandatory New Hire Orientation.'
While at the orientation, Thompson briefly texted with his wife about 'urgent' childcare arrangements, according to the complaint.
'He was then abruptly confronted by… the Assistant Vice President of Human Resources, demanding that [he] put his phone away because he was 'disrespecting' the speakers,' the complaint states.
It says Thompson 'immediately complied,' offered an apology, and explained why he had been using the phone. But, the complaint alleges, the assistant VP of HR was unmoved, and instructed Thompson to leave the orientation.
During his interaction with the assistant VP of HR, Thompson 'exhibited typical symptoms' of Tourette syndrome, which the complaint describes as 'eye blinking, squinting, facial grimacing, twitching, and mouth movements.'
'All of these were symptoms out of [Thompson's] control,' the complaint states. 'Immediately after the orientation ended, [Thompson] met with [the assistant VP of HR] to apologize again and reiterated the circumstances, seeking to resolve the misunderstanding amicably. [The assistant VP] assured [Thompson] that the matter was resolved.'
Thompson then returned to the orientation, where, to his 'utter shock,' his supervisor told him that the assistant VP of HR was escalating the issue to his own bosses, according to the complaint.
The next day, Thompson met with the director of HR, who said his assistant VP 'remained upset,' and that the hospital's senior leadership was now involved, the complaint says.
The assistant VP had portrayed Thompson as 'confrontational,' and claimed he had been 'making faces' at him, the complaint states. But the faces were 'a direct result of' Thompson's Tourette syndrome, something he had 'openly disclosed' to the hospital, according to the complaint.
'On November 6, 2024, just two days after the incident… White Plains Hospital terminated [Thompson] from employment because he was allegedly 'confrontational' and 'making faces' at [the assistant VP of HR], with no further explanation provided,' the complaint says.
In recent years, numerous famous names have revealed their own Tourette syndrome diagnoses, including singer Billie Eilish, boxing champion Tevin Farmer, and comedian Dan Aykroyd. Most Tourette symptoms manifest themselves as Thompson's; very few people with Tourette syndrome blurt out curse words and swear uncontrollably.
Thompson is seeking damages to be determined by a jury, including compensation for mental anguish, emotional distress, humiliation, embarrassment, anxiety, and loss of self-esteem, self-confidence and personal dignity, plus reinstatement to his position at White Plains Hospital.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBS News
2 hours ago
- CBS News
Firefighter forced to retire early due to Parkinson's cannot sue Florida city for health benefits discrimination, U.S. Supreme Court rules
The U.S. Supreme Court on Friday ruled against a firefighter who retired early because of Parkinson's disease and alleged the city of Sanford violated the Americans with Disabilities Act by limiting a health-insurance subsidy. Justices upheld a decision by the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in the lawsuit filed by Karyn Stanley, a fire-department lieutenant who retired in 2018 at age 47 because of the effects of the disease. The dispute stemmed from Stanley losing a health-insurance subsidy two years after she retired and involved questions about whether the city violated part of the Americans with Disabilities Act aimed at preventing discrimination in employment. Friday's main opinion, written by Justice Neil Gorsuch, focused heavily on wording in the law that bars discrimination against a "qualified individual on the basis of disability." The opinion said the definition of a "qualified individual" in what is known as Title I of the law applied only to current employees or people seeking jobs. Gorsuch wrote that the law "protects people, not benefits, from discrimination. And the statute also tells us who those people are: qualified individuals, those who hold or seek a job at the time of the defendant's alleged discrimination." But Justice Kentanji Brown Jackson wrote a blistering dissent, arguing the law "says nothing — zero — about the preemployment or postemployment timing of an act of disability discrimination." "Disabled Americans who have retired from the workforce simply want to enjoy the fruits of their labor free from discrimination," she wrote. "Congress plainly protected their right to do so when it crafted Title I. Yet, the Court ignores that right today." A civil servant demanding better post-retirement health benefits Stanley began working as a firefighter for the city in 1999 but was diagnosed with Parkinson's disease in 2016. When Stanley was hired in 1999, the city provided health-insurance subsidies up to age 65 for firefighters who retired after 25 years of service or who retired because of disabilities, according to court documents. The city changed the policy in 2003 to scale back the benefit to two years for employees who retired early because of disabilities. As a result, Stanley received the subsidy for two years after she retired, rather than up to age 65. A brief filed in the case said the end of the subsidy resulted in Stanley facing an additional $1,000 a month in health-insurance costs. Stanley challenged the city in court, but a U.S. district judge dismissed the Americans with Disabilities Act claim. A panel of the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld that decision, saying Stanley, as a former employee, could not sue under Title I of the law. The Biden administration and organizations such as the AFL-CIO, the International Association of Fire Fighters and AARP filed briefs at the Supreme Court backing Stanley. Meanwhile, groups such as the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, the National Association of Counties and the National League of Cities supported Sanford in briefs. Gorsuch was joined Friday in parts of his opinion by Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, Elena Kagan, Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett. He was joined in another part by Alito, Kagan and Justice Sonia Sotomayor. Sotomayor joined part of Jackson's dissent.
Bloomberg
6 hours ago
- Bloomberg
Not All Ritalin Is Created Equal: Why Some Generics Fail to Work
Stanford University researchers have discovered why some people with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder may do well on their medicine for a while but struggle down the road. Researchers tested how generic Ritalin and other versions of the drug known as methylphenidate dissolve and found some dissipated much more quickly or slowly than they should have, according to a study, the final version of which is set to be published in the Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry.
USA Today
6 hours ago
- USA Today
Supreme Court sides against disabled firefighter suing for discrimination over health benefits
WASHINGTON – The Supreme Court on June 20 ruled against a retired firefighter who wants to sue her former employer for reducing health care benefits for disabled retirees. The court ruled that Karyn Stanley can't sue the city of Sanford, Florida, under the Americans with Disabilities Act. That upheld a lower court's ruling that the ADA didn't apply to Stanley because she no longer worked for the city when she filed her challenge. The Americans with Disabilities Act was designed to protect active employees and job applicants from discrimination. It was not intended as a law that extended to employers' relationships with former employees, the business groups and associations representing cities and counties against Stanley's allegations argued. The law covers someone who 'with or without reasonable accommodation, can perform the essential functions of the employment position that such individual holds or desires.' Stanley's lawyers argued she was employed – and thus covered by the law − when her future benefits were curtailed in 2003. When Stanley became a firefighter in 1999, the city paid for $1,000 of her approximately $1,300 monthly premium for health insurance. Anyone retiring after 25 years of service or because of a disability would continue to receive the benefit until age 65. After Stanley left the department in 2018 at 47 due to Parkinson's disease, she discovered that benefits for disabled retirees were reduced in 2003. The city covered $1,000 of her $1,300 monthly health insurance premium for only two years, after which she was required to pay the whole premium herself. Arguing that the city discriminated against her because of her disability, Stanley sued, asking the city to continue to pay $1,000 of her monthly insurance premium until she turns 65. The city countered that even though Stanley's benefits were reduced, the company treated her better – not worse – than non-disabled employees who retired with less than 25 years of service because those employees get no subsidy while she retained it for two years. The case is Stanley v. City of Stanford.
