SS Rajamouli salutes the Indian Armed Forces; urges people not to shoot footage: ‘You might be helping the enemy'
RRR and Baahubali director SS Rajamouli has spoken up about the ongoing India-Pakistan conflict and saluted the Indian Armed Forces for their bravery. He also urged people not to shoot footage of the Army's movements and post it on social media, as it could be a security issue. (Also Read: Kamal Haasan postpones Thug Life audio launch due to India-Pakistan tensions: 'Art can wait, India comes first')
After the escalating tensions between both countries and the way India responded to Pakistan's attack from Thursday evening to Friday morning, Rajamouli lauded the armed forces for handling it well, writing on X (formerly Twitter), 'Saluting our Brave Indian Armed Forces for their unwavering courage in protecting our nation from terrorism. Let's stand together as a nation, inspired by their valor, to build a future of peace and unity. Jai Hind!'
Then, mirroring the directive by the Ministry of Defence, he also urged people from sharing videos and unverified news, writing, 'If you see any movement of the Indian Army, don't take pictures or videos. Don't share them as you might be helping the enemy. Stop forwarding unverified news or claims. You'll only create noise, which the enemy wants. Stay calm, alert and positive. Victory is ours.'
For the unversed, the Defence Ministry's directive posted on X reads: 'All media channels, digital platforms and individuals are advised to refrain from live coverage or real-time reporting of defence operations and movement of security forces. Disclosure of such sensitive or source-based information may jeopardize operational effectiveness and endanger lives.'
They added: 'Past incidents like the #KargilWar, 26/11 attacks, and the #Kandahar hijacking underscore the risks of premature reporting. As per clause 6(1)(p) of the Cable Television Networks (Amendment) Rules, 2021, only periodic briefings by designated officials are permitted during anti-terror operations. All stakeholders are urged to exercise vigilance, sensitivity, and responsibility in coverage, upholding the highest standards in the service of the nation.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Eega makers issue copyright infringement notice to Lovely team
The makers of SS Rajamouli's 2012 film Eega have sent a notice to the team behind the Malayalam film Lovely, which released this May, alleging 'unauthorised use of copyrighted character. ' Lovely, directed by Dileesh Nair and featuring Mathew Thomas , features a housefly, the design of which the Telugu filmmakers claim has been stolen from their film. Lovely features a housefly by the same name who befriends a youngster who has been wrongfully imprisoned. What the notice says? In the legal notice, Eega makers allege that the housefly design is their sole property and, "Our client (the production house) holds exclusive rights to all visual, artistic, and narrative elements of the film (Eega), including the said character. Any reproduction or imitation of this character, without our client's explicit consent, constitutes copyright infringement under said law." They claim, "The central character, a reincarnated housefly, was conceived and developed through advanced VFX methodologies including macro photography, anatomical modelling and behavioural studies of real flies. These visual effects were led by professionals including RC Kamalakannan and Pete Draper of Makuta VFX, establishing the housefly as a unique and recognisable creation owned solely by our client (the production house). by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Your Finger Shape Says a Lot About Your Personality, Read Now Tips and Tricks Undo " How can one say that we can't use anything in housefly category as a character? Dileesh Nair Speaking to us, Dileesh Nair said, "How can one say that we can't use anything in the housefly category as a character? We have all the properties related to the development of this character, including the mesh. Also, Eega was released in 2012. Why would we take an outdated model? There is a big difference in quality (of the visuals of the housefly). We will respond to the notice suitably. Stating that the character announcement for the housefly was made two years back, the director adds, "They are demanding royalty from our film's revenue, but it didn't do that well theatrically. Filing a suit this close to OTT release of the film seems like a planned move to us."
Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
Mamitha Baiju REVEALS whether ‘Jana Nayagan' will be Vijay's final film: ‘He said it depends on…'
(Picture Courtesy: Facebook) As speculation grows around 'Jana Nayagan' being Thalapathy Vijay 's final film before stepping into full-time politics, co-star Mamitha Baiju has shed new light on the actor's future in cinema. During a recent interaction at the Kerala Carnival in Ireland, Mamitha Baiju revealed her emotional exchange with Vijay during the shoot of their upcoming film, scheduled to release on January 9, 2026. "It depends on...": Vijay's reply Speaking about a moment from the sets of 'Jana Nayagan', Mamitha Baiju shared, 'I just asked him whether 'Jana Nayagan' would truly be his last outing. Vijay sir responded by saying that it all depends on how elections go. He also said that we'll see what happens.' Thug Life | Song - Anju Vanna Poove The superstar, who recently announced his political entry with the Tamilaga Vettri Kazhagam party, has yet to make a definitive call on his acting career. Emotional farewell on the sets - Everyone got emotional - Mamitha Baiju Mamitha also described the emotional atmosphere during the final days of filming. 'Including Vijay sir, everyone got emotional. On the last day, he was so moved that he couldn't even pose for pictures with the cast and crew,' she said. About 'Jana Nayagan' Directed by H Vinoth, Jana Nayagan is billed as a political action drama, with Vijay reportedly playing a powerful police officer. On the last day, during the superstar's birthday, the makers of 'Jana Nayagan' unveiled the first glimpse from the most-awaited movie, featuring Vijay as a stylish and 'Massy' cop. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Free P2,000 GCash eGift UnionBank Credit Card Apply Now Undo The glimpse was titled 'First Roar' and received good responses from the audiences. On the other hand, Vijay was last seen in the actioner 'GOAT' which failed to impress the audiences, even though it did decent box office business. Vijay also teamed up with Lokesh Kanagaraj for the action flick 'Leo' which received good reviews from the audiences.
Indian Express
a day ago
- Indian Express
Knowledge Nugget: Thug Life controversy — How is freedom of speech and films certification relevant for UPSC Exam
Take a look at the essential events, concepts, terms, quotes, or phenomena every day and brush up your knowledge. Here's your knowledge nugget for today. (Relevance: In light of the Thug Life movie controversy and the the Supreme Court's recent ruling, it is important to understand what the Constitution of India says on freedom of speech and expression, as fundamental rights form an important part of the UPSC syllabus, and previously, questions have been asked on various rights. Also, it is crucial to understand how films are certified in India and what the role of the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) is in film certification.) On June 17, the Supreme Court came down heavily on the 'extra-judicial ban' on the Tamil film Thug Life in Karnataka — it underlined that any film that has received a CBFC certificate must be screened. The Mani Ratnam-directed movie opened on June 5 across India except in Karnataka, where its release was stalled following outrage over lead actor Kamal Haasan's remark that Kannada was born from Tamil. In this context, let's understand what exactly the constitutional position is on free speech and how films are certified in India. The Supreme Court has characterised a 'ban' on the Tamil film Thug Life in Karnataka as an infringement on the filmmakers' constitutionally guaranteed right to freedom of speech and expression. It directed the state government to uphold the 'rule of law' and ensure the film's smooth release. In directing the release of Thug Life in Karnataka, the Supreme Court has underlined that upholding freedom of speech means protecting and extending the space for a diversity of views. As it pointed out, 'It's not just the screening of a film, it's much bigger than this.'- Express View: On Thug Life and freedom of speech, listen to the Supreme Court 1. Article 19(1)(a) in Part III of the Constitution guarantees the fundamental right to freedom of speech and expression. It is a right invoked against the state. Some fundamental rights such as those prohibiting untouchability, trafficking and bonded labour are explicitly against both the state and other individuals. 2. It is available only to citizens and not to foreigners. Article 19 (1) provides 'Protection of certain rights regarding freedom of speech etc.' It says, 'All citizens shall have the right: (a) to freedom of speech and expression; (b) to assemble peaceably and without arms; (c) to form associations or unions; (d) to move freely throughout the territory of India; (e) to reside and settle in any part of the territory of India; and (f) omitted (g) to practise any profession, or to carry on any occupation, trade or business (Note: Originally, Article 19 (1) (f) and article 31 contained the right to property, i.e. to acquire, hold and dispose of property subject to the right of State to compulsory acquisition for public purposes by authority of law. However, right to property ceased to be a fundamental right when the Constitution (44th Amendment) Act, 1978 omitted sub-clause(f) of Article 19 (1) and Article 31 from the Constitution.) 3. The freedom provided in Article 19 (1) is not absolute or unfettered. It is followed by Article 19(2), which lists exceptions or 'reasonable restrictions' on free speech under following heads: → Security of the State, → Friendly relations with foreign States → Public Order, → Decency and Morality, → Contempt of Court, → Defamation, → Incitement to an Offence, → Sovereignty and Integrity of India. 1. In India, all films must have a Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) certificate if they are to be released theatrically, telecast on television, or displayed publicly in any way. 2. The CBFC certifies films under four categories: 📌U: Unrestricted public exhibition (Suitable for all age groups) 📌U/A (UA 7+, UA 13 + and UA 16 +): Parental guidance for children 📌A: Restricted to adults(Suitable for 18 years and above) 📌S: Restricted to a specialised group of people, such as engineers, doctors or scientists. Why is film certification necessary? 3. The film certification process is governed by The Cinematograph Act, 1952, The Cinematograph (certification) Rules, 1983, and the guidelines issued by the Central government under section 5B of the Act, which says that- 'A film shall not be certified for public exhibition, if, in the opinion of the authority competent to grant the certificate, the film or any part of it is against the interests of the sovereignty and integrity of India, the security of the States, friendly relations with foreign State, public order, decency or morality or involves defamation or contempt of court or is likely to incite the commission of any offence'. 4. Certification of films is carried out by the CBFC through an Examining Committee, appointed by the Regional Officer, which submits its recommendations after viewing the film. 5. The decision is based on the committee's majority or unanimous opinion. A split or divided opinion, or a contentious matter, may be referred to a Revising Committee or decided by the CBFC Chairperson. 6. The CBFC can also deny certification a film. On several occasions when a filmmaker or producer has not been satisfied with the CBFC's certification, or with a denial, they appealed to the Film Certification Appellate Tribunal (FCAT), which overturned the CBFC decisions. However, since the dissolution of the FCAT in 2021, such appeals can be made directly to the High Courts. 1. The Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) is a statutory body under the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting. It regulates the public exhibition of films under the provisions of the Cinematograph Act 1952. 2. Films can be publicly exhibited in India only after they have been certified by the CBFC. 3. According to the official site of CBFC, 'The Board consists of non-official members and a Chairman (all of whom are appointed by Central Government) and functions with headquarters at Mumbai.' 4. CBFC has nine Regional offices, one each at Mumbai, Kolkata, Chennai, Bangalore, Thiruvananthapuram, Hyderabad, New Delhi, Cuttack and Guwahati. The Regional Offices are assisted in the examination of films by Advisory Panels. The members of the panels are nominated by Central Government by drawing people from different walks of life for a period of 2 years. 📌 Article 19(1) of the Constitution says that all persons shall have 'freedom of speech and expression'. However, Article 19(2) of the Constitution lays down provisions for imposing reasonable restrictions on the exercise of this right. 📌 The Cinematograph Act, 1952. 📌 The Cinematograph (Certification) Rules, 2024. 📌 The Guidelines issued by the Government under Section 5B of the Cinematograph Act. 📌 The Cable Television Networks (Regulation) Act, 1995 r.w. The Cable Television Network Rules, 1994 (Programmes and Advertising Codes therein). 📌 The Cigarettes and other Tobacco Products Act (COTPA) , 2003 & Rules 2004. 📌 The Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act. The Emblems and Names (Prevention of Improper Use) Act, 📌 Prevention of Insults to National Honour Act, 1971. 📌 The Drug and Magic Remedies Act. 📌 The Scheduled Castes and Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. 📌 The Indecent Representation of Women (Prohibition) Act 1986. 📌 The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO Act) 2012, Etc. 1. The government recently notified age-based categories certification of films to promote age-appropriate viewing, particularly for the parental guidance group. 2. In a gazette notification, the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting amended the rules notified in December 1991 laying down principles for sanctioning films for public exhibition. 3. The rules allow the Central Board of Film Certification to allow certification of films for unrestricted public exhibition with an endorsement in accordance with the nature. 4. 'Content suitable for a child aged seven years and above and under the age of seven years with parental guidance shall be classified as 'U/A 7+' rating… child aged thirteen years and above and under the age of thirteen years with parental guidance classified as 'U/A 13+'… child aged sixteen years and above and under the age of sixteen years… as 'U/A 16+' rating,' the notification read. (1) The provisions under Article 19 of the Constitution of India are: 1. to assemble peaceably and with arms 2. to form unions 3. to reside and settle in any part of the territory of India 4. to carry on any occupation Select the correct answer using the codes given below: (a) 1, 2 and 3 only (b) 2, 3 and 4 only (c) 3 and 4 only (d) 2 and 4 only (2) Consider the following statements: 1. The Central Board of Film Certification is a statutory body. 2. There is no CBFC certification for T.V programs and serials. Which of the statements given above is/are not correct? (a) 1 only (b) 2 only (c) Both 1 and 2 (d) Neither 1 nor 2 (Sources: Constitution of India, Express View: On Thug Life and freedom of speech, listen to the Supreme Court, Certification of films, Explained: The role, significance of film certification tribunal, now abolished, Subscribe to our UPSC newsletter. Stay updated with the latest UPSC articles by joining our Telegram channel – Indian Express UPSC Hub, and follow us on Instagram and X. 🚨 Click Here to read the UPSC Essentials magazine for June 2025. Share your views and suggestions in the comment box or at Roshni Yadav is a Deputy Copy Editor with The Indian Express. She is an alumna of the University of Delhi and Jawaharlal Nehru University, where she pursued her graduation and post-graduation in Political Science. She has over five years of work experience in ed-tech and media. At The Indian Express, she writes for the UPSC section. Her interests lie in national and international affairs, governance, economy, and social issues. You can contact her via email: ... Read More
