Knowledge Nugget: Thug Life controversy — How is freedom of speech and films certification relevant for UPSC Exam
Take a look at the essential events, concepts, terms, quotes, or phenomena every day and brush up your knowledge. Here's your knowledge nugget for today.
(Relevance: In light of the Thug Life movie controversy and the the Supreme Court's recent ruling, it is important to understand what the Constitution of India says on freedom of speech and expression, as fundamental rights form an important part of the UPSC syllabus, and previously, questions have been asked on various rights. Also, it is crucial to understand how films are certified in India and what the role of the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) is in film certification.)
On June 17, the Supreme Court came down heavily on the 'extra-judicial ban' on the Tamil film Thug Life in Karnataka — it underlined that any film that has received a CBFC certificate must be screened. The Mani Ratnam-directed movie opened on June 5 across India except in Karnataka, where its release was stalled following outrage over lead actor Kamal Haasan's remark that Kannada was born from Tamil. In this context, let's understand what exactly the constitutional position is on free speech and how films are certified in India.
The Supreme Court has characterised a 'ban' on the Tamil film Thug Life in Karnataka as an infringement on the filmmakers' constitutionally guaranteed right to freedom of speech and expression. It directed the state government to uphold the 'rule of law' and ensure the film's smooth release.
In directing the release of Thug Life in Karnataka, the Supreme Court has underlined that upholding freedom of speech means protecting and extending the space for a diversity of views. As it pointed out, 'It's not just the screening of a film, it's much bigger than this.'- Express View: On Thug Life and freedom of speech, listen to the Supreme Court
1. Article 19(1)(a) in Part III of the Constitution guarantees the fundamental right to freedom of speech and expression. It is a right invoked against the state. Some fundamental rights such as those prohibiting untouchability, trafficking and bonded labour are explicitly against both the state and other individuals.
2. It is available only to citizens and not to foreigners. Article 19 (1) provides 'Protection of certain rights regarding freedom of speech etc.' It says, 'All citizens shall have the right:
(a) to freedom of speech and expression;
(b) to assemble peaceably and without arms;
(c) to form associations or unions;
(d) to move freely throughout the territory of India;
(e) to reside and settle in any part of the territory of India; and
(f) omitted
(g) to practise any profession, or to carry on any occupation, trade or business
(Note: Originally, Article 19 (1) (f) and article 31 contained the right to property, i.e. to acquire, hold and dispose of property subject to the right of State to compulsory acquisition for public purposes by authority of law. However, right to property ceased to be a fundamental right when the Constitution (44th Amendment) Act, 1978 omitted sub-clause(f) of Article 19 (1) and Article 31 from the Constitution.)
3. The freedom provided in Article 19 (1) is not absolute or unfettered. It is followed by Article 19(2), which lists exceptions or 'reasonable restrictions' on free speech under following heads:
→ Security of the State,
→ Friendly relations with foreign States
→ Public Order,
→ Decency and Morality,
→ Contempt of Court,
→ Defamation,
→ Incitement to an Offence,
→ Sovereignty and Integrity of India.
1. In India, all films must have a Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) certificate if they are to be released theatrically, telecast on television, or displayed publicly in any way.
2. The CBFC certifies films under four categories:
📌U: Unrestricted public exhibition (Suitable for all age groups)
📌U/A (UA 7+, UA 13 + and UA 16 +): Parental guidance for children
📌A: Restricted to adults(Suitable for 18 years and above)
📌S: Restricted to a specialised group of people, such as engineers, doctors or scientists.
Why is film certification necessary?
3. The film certification process is governed by The Cinematograph Act, 1952, The Cinematograph (certification) Rules, 1983, and the guidelines issued by the Central government under section 5B of the Act, which says that-
'A film shall not be certified for public exhibition, if, in the opinion of the authority competent to grant the certificate, the film or any part of it is against the interests of the sovereignty and integrity of India, the security of the States, friendly relations with foreign State, public order, decency or morality or involves defamation or contempt of court or is likely to incite the commission of any offence'.
4. Certification of films is carried out by the CBFC through an Examining Committee, appointed by the Regional Officer, which submits its recommendations after viewing the film.
5. The decision is based on the committee's majority or unanimous opinion. A split or divided opinion, or a contentious matter, may be referred to a Revising Committee or decided by the CBFC Chairperson.
6. The CBFC can also deny certification a film. On several occasions when a filmmaker or producer has not been satisfied with the CBFC's certification, or with a denial, they appealed to the Film Certification Appellate Tribunal (FCAT), which overturned the CBFC decisions. However, since the dissolution of the FCAT in 2021, such appeals can be made directly to the High Courts.
1. The Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) is a statutory body under the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting. It regulates the public exhibition of films under the provisions of the Cinematograph Act 1952.
2. Films can be publicly exhibited in India only after they have been certified by the CBFC.
3. According to the official site of CBFC, 'The Board consists of non-official members and a Chairman (all of whom are appointed by Central Government) and functions with headquarters at Mumbai.'
4. CBFC has nine Regional offices, one each at Mumbai, Kolkata, Chennai, Bangalore, Thiruvananthapuram, Hyderabad, New Delhi, Cuttack and Guwahati. The Regional Offices are assisted in the examination of films by Advisory Panels. The members of the panels are nominated by Central Government by drawing people from different walks of life for a period of 2 years.
📌 Article 19(1) of the Constitution says that all persons shall have 'freedom of speech and expression'. However, Article 19(2) of the Constitution lays down provisions for imposing reasonable restrictions on the exercise of this right.
📌 The Cinematograph Act, 1952.
📌 The Cinematograph (Certification) Rules, 2024.
📌 The Guidelines issued by the Government under Section 5B of the Cinematograph Act.
📌 The Cable Television Networks (Regulation) Act, 1995 r.w. The Cable Television Network Rules, 1994 (Programmes and Advertising Codes therein).
📌 The Cigarettes and other Tobacco Products Act (COTPA) , 2003 & Rules 2004.
📌 The Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act. The Emblems and Names (Prevention of Improper Use) Act, 1950.Th
📌 Prevention of Insults to National Honour Act, 1971.
📌 The Drug and Magic Remedies Act.
📌 The Scheduled Castes and Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.
📌 The Indecent Representation of Women (Prohibition) Act 1986.
📌 The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO Act) 2012, Etc.
1. The government recently notified age-based categories certification of films to promote age-appropriate viewing, particularly for the parental guidance group.
2. In a gazette notification, the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting amended the rules notified in December 1991 laying down principles for sanctioning films for public exhibition.
3. The rules allow the Central Board of Film Certification to allow certification of films for unrestricted public exhibition with an endorsement in accordance with the nature.
4. 'Content suitable for a child aged seven years and above and under the age of seven years with parental guidance shall be classified as 'U/A 7+' rating… child aged thirteen years and above and under the age of thirteen years with parental guidance classified as 'U/A 13+'… child aged sixteen years and above and under the age of sixteen years… as 'U/A 16+' rating,' the notification read.
(1) The provisions under Article 19 of the Constitution of India are:
1. to assemble peaceably and with arms
2. to form unions
3. to reside and settle in any part of the territory of India
4. to carry on any occupation
Select the correct answer using the codes given below:
(a) 1, 2 and 3 only
(b) 2, 3 and 4 only
(c) 3 and 4 only
(d) 2 and 4 only
(2) Consider the following statements:
1. The Central Board of Film Certification is a statutory body.
2. There is no CBFC certification for T.V programs and serials.
Which of the statements given above is/are not correct?
(a) 1 only
(b) 2 only
(c) Both 1 and 2
(d) Neither 1 nor 2
(Sources: Constitution of India, Express View: On Thug Life and freedom of speech, listen to the Supreme Court, Certification of films, Explained: The role, significance of film certification tribunal, now abolished, cbfcindia.gov.in)
Subscribe to our UPSC newsletter. Stay updated with the latest UPSC articles by joining our Telegram channel – Indian Express UPSC Hub, and follow us on Instagram and X.
🚨 Click Here to read the UPSC Essentials magazine for June 2025. Share your views and suggestions in the comment box or at manas.srivastava@indianexpress.com🚨
Roshni Yadav is a Deputy Copy Editor with The Indian Express. She is an alumna of the University of Delhi and Jawaharlal Nehru University, where she pursued her graduation and post-graduation in Political Science. She has over five years of work experience in ed-tech and media. At The Indian Express, she writes for the UPSC section. Her interests lie in national and international affairs, governance, economy, and social issues. You can contact her via email: roshni.yadav@indianexpress.com ... Read More
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Nani's 'HIT 3' faces plagiarism controversy; a writer moves court against Sailesh Kolanu's directorial
Actor Nani 's film 'HIT 3,' which was released on May 1st, garnered a lot of attention in the Telugu film industry. Srinidhi Shetty of 'KGF' fame played the female lead in the film. Additionally, actor Karthi also appeared in a cameo role. The film, directed by Sailesh Kolanu , was produced by Nani himself. The film released in various languages, including Telugu, Tamil, and Hindi, was well received by the audience. 'HIT 3' established itself as a unique thriller film. 'HIT: The Third Case' faces plagiarism complaint. In this situation, the film 'HIT 3' is embroiled in a story plagiarism case. According to Nakkheeran, writer Sonia Vimal has filed a case in the Madras High Court . She has alleged that the story of the film 'HIT: The Third Case' is very similar to the story of 'Agent 11 and Agent 5' that she wrote. Although Sonia Vimal has not yet published her story, she registered it with the South Indian Writers' Association on August 4, 2021. Sonia Vimal's narration to Nani Then, on August 8, 2022, Sonia Vimal said that she told Nani the summary of the story and was hoping for a good response. But she said she was shocked when she didn't get any response. Later, when she watched the film 'HIT 3,' she said she was shocked to see that some changes were made to the story without her permission and the film was filmed as is. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Florida New Policy for Senior Drivers The Quote General Learn More Undo She stated in her petition that she had also complained about this to the Writers' Association, but no action was taken. Hearing scheduled on July 7 Furthermore, Sonia Vimal has listed the similarities between her story and the film 'HIT 3' and submitted it before the judge. She has also demanded that 20 percent of the film's revenue be paid as compensation. The Madras High Court, which heard the case, ordered a notice to be sent to the film's production team. The court adjourned the case for hearing on July 7. The matter has become a major topic of discussion in the film world.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Throwback to Rajnikanth and Kamal Hassan lending heartfelt support to Thalapathy Vijay's film, Sarkar.
Despite getting mixed reactions, Thalapathy Vijay 's movie Sarkar was released in cinemas in 2018 and gained wide acclaim. The movie quickly garnered the attention of the audience and went on to gross Rs. 256 crores worldwide. When the movie was released, many AIADMK ministers and party cadres expressed their displeasure over certain scenes in the film. Several party cadres even went on to protest outside various theaters in Tamil Nadu and indulged in damaging the banners of the film and cutouts of Vijay. They demanded that certain scenes from the movie be removed immediately. Later, in an act of camaraderie and support, legendary actors Rajnikanth and Kamal Hassan lashed out on their Twitter platforms, condemning the behavior and unlawful acts of violence, such as damaging the film's banners and Vijay's cutouts. Rajinikanth lashed out against these acts. He took to Twitter and wrote in Tamil, "To protest for the removal of certain scenes from the movie and stop it from being screened after the Censor Board has certified it is against the law. I strongly condemn this act." Actor-politician Kamal Haasan had also strongly objected to the actions of the AIADMK government regarding the issue. "It isn't new for this government to act and pressurize against a film like Sarkar, which has completed its censor formalities properly. A government that can't face criticism can go off on a tangent. Commercialized politicians will soon vanish, and the good people will win," Haasan tweeted. In the film, Vijay plays an NRI who returns to India to vote, only to realize his vote has been cast illegally. He then digs deep into the matter, stirring up a political turmoil. Actor Thalapathy Vijay was last seen on the silver screen with his blockbuster movie, Greatest of All Time (released in 2024). He has decided to lean into politics after the completion of his next big project. One of the most anticipated movies of the actor, Jana Nayagan, directed by H. Vinoth, is scheduled to release on 9th January, 2026.
India.com
an hour ago
- India.com
Indian-Origin Rapper Genesis Yasmine Mohanraj Faces Backlash Over Kali Maa Depiction In Explicit Music Video
New Delhi: Indian-origin rapper Tommy Genesis has come under fire from netizens over her latest music video. Tommy Genesis — whose real name is Genesis Yasmine Mohanraj — released the video for her song True Blue recently, and it has sparked widespread outrage online, with many accusing her of cultural appropriation. In the video, Mohanraj appears to portray the Hindu goddess Kali Maa, wearing blue body paint, heavy gold jewelry, and a red bindi. The Canada-based artist is also seen holding a crucifix, licking it, and posing with it suggestively — actions that further fueled the controversy. The song True Blue is part of her upcoming album, Genesis. In the now-viral clip, she wears a gold bikini, golden stilettos, and is seen folding her hands in a 'namaste' gesture at one point, while performing explicit moves in other scenes. View this post on Instagram A post shared by Tommy Genesis (@tommygenesis) How Did the Internet React? Reactions across social media were swift and scathing: One user called the video 'disrespectful' Another wrote, 'Our goddess is not your costume... what validation are you seeking?' A third commented, 'This is PATHETIC! Stop appropriating Hindu culture for likes.' 'Appropriating Hindu culture is the new trend for these so-called Westerners,' another user added. A commenter wrote, 'Yikes. And the fact that you thought this was cool — lmao.' Another said, 'You're literally using Hindu gods for aesthetic and clout. Delete this.' One tweet read: 'This is Genesis Yasmine Mohanraj. She is a Canadian citizen of Malayalam, Tamil, and Swedish descent. Her Indian heritage makes it very likely that this portrayal was deliberate. This is blasphemy.' Another person expressed disappointment: 'She is a Canadian artist with Indian roots — from Kerala and Tamil Nadu. Her new song openly mocks both Hindu and Christian faiths. This isn't creativity, it's pure disrespect.' Who is Genesis Yasmine Mohanraj? Genesis Yasmine Mohanraj, known professionally as Tommy Genesis, was born in Vancouver, Canada. She is of Tamil and Swedish descent, with roots tracing back to Kerala and Tamil Nadu. Her music often explores themes of gender, sexuality, and rebellion. She has previously described herself as a 'fetish rapper.' In 2016, she was dubbed 'the internet's most rebellious underground rap queen' by an international publication.
