logo
How do you coach a Hall of Fame basketball player? WNBA's Cheryl Reeve has the answers

How do you coach a Hall of Fame basketball player? WNBA's Cheryl Reeve has the answers

New York Times13-06-2025

Editor's Note: This story is a part of Peak, The Athletic's desk covering leadership, personal development and success through the lens of sports. Follow Peak here.
If you are looking for Hall of Fame basketball players, Cheryl Reeve is a good place to start. The head coach and president of basketball operations for the WNBA's Minnesota Lynx has coached four members of the Naismith Memorial Basketball Hall of Fame (Seimone Augustus, Sylvia Fowles, Maya Moore and Lindsay Whalen) and her current star (Napheesa Collier) is destined for enshrinement in the future. The list grows if you include all the members of the 2024 U.S. Olympic women's basketball team that Reeve coached.
Advertisement
Think about this: After this year's induction ceremony, four starters from Minnesota's 2015 and 2017 championship teams will be enshrined in the Hall of Fame. In an effort to gain insight into how to coach greatness, I spoke to Reeve about what she has learned about leadership during her four-decade coaching career.
You have coached multiple Hall of Famers. What have you learned that you need to do as a coach when it comes to coaching Hall of Fame-caliber players?
Hold them accountable to standards even beyond their wildest imagination for their own abilities. Great players want to be coached and great players never think that they're good enough. We have the Minnesota Hall of Famers, but I've also been around other Hall of Famers, and that is the common thread. They never think that they've arrived. There is always something else that they think they're not quite good enough at. It drives them. I think accountability is the greatest thing that a leader can do for that level of player. We would be doing them a disservice if we just let their own belief and drive in themselves be the only thing that they have. That's how I've approached coaching the Hall of Famers that we've had in Minnesota.
Did you always demand accountability as a coach from the beginning, or did you have to learn how to demand accountability out of great players?
I don't know the reason for it, but that's something that I've innately had. Jim Peterson was a longtime assistant for the Lynx, played in the NBA, played at the (University of Minnesota) and is now a full-time broadcaster for the Timberwolves. One of the things he said to me was, 'Cheryl, I can't believe your level of accountability.' It struck me as, this isn't normal. He said how non-existent it was in men's sports, in the NBA, the communication part of it. That was probably the first time my eyes were open to maybe that wasn't the norm. So I thought, well, how else do you do it? I don't know of any other way.
Advertisement
It's not for everybody. I do know that. I do well with those that are accountable to themselves, have high standards and are high achieving. I relate to that the best. I'm not going to hold anybody more accountable than I hold myself.
Can you give me a specific example of one of your Hall of Famers really defining accountability to you when you asked and demanded accountability?
Our local beat writer after a game once said, 'Cheryl, why do you get on Maya so much?' I said, 'Do you realize how much she's doing wrong? She's an incredible player, but I need her to do this and this and this and for her to be even greater.' I have this thing where it has to look perfect. Take a DIY project. Someone will walk in and say, 'Oh, my gosh, that's amazing.' But I'm going, 'No, you don't know what it was supposed to look like.'
Well, that, to me, is practices and games. The practices is where we are trying to hone our skills so that the game is the work of art. I am pretty critical of myself and of others. Again, that's me being Virgo or that's what I hide behind. I am a driver. The good, the bad, the ugly, I'm a driver. But I've learned how to drive a little more gracefully through the years than maybe my beginning days. I think the Hall of Famers now look at me and go, 'You weren't like that with us.' But times have changed, and there's an evolution there.
When you are coaching someone who is a Hall of Famer or Hall of Famer-to-be that you don't know as well, which would be the Olympic team, do you coach them the same way as you would the Hall of Famers who you coached every day and knew intimately?
Reeve: Bill Laimbeer was the one who brought this out of me, which was being able to be comfortable in your skin, to be yourself. That is the most important thing that you can be in any space, especially a leadership space. People allowing you to be able to be yourself is also important. In the national team space, I went into it having worked for and with Geno (Auriemma) on his staff and Dawn (Staley) on her staff. One of my biggest takeaways from that was if I get this (head coaching) opportunity, being myself is the most important thing that I could do even in that space, even though there's not those relationships that you described.
Advertisement
Sue Bird described this best about the national team experience and it is 1000 percent true: It's an uncomfortable space for everybody. Which is a really strange thing to say, but the national team experience is everyone not being able to fully be yourself. It's a fragmented version. So I tried to keep that component of leadership the same, which was holding them to the highest standards possible in the way that I felt like I best could do.
What is one thing that you learned from Maya Moore that helped you coaching someone who is not Maya Moore?
Patience. We all had to have patience with Maya. I remember playing the Phoenix Mercury at a time when they were launching 3s so the number one part of our game plan was controlling the tempo, making sure that we weren't fueling their ability to light us up. I'm a big shot-selection person. But Maya taught me that the shot selection for Maya Moore is different than shot selection for others.
Now, that made some others not as happy, but that's the way it goes. So off the jump ball, Maya launches a 3 and misses. Phoenix comes back down the court, boom, they splash a 3. We come up the floor again. Maya has another bad shot. Next thing you know, we are down double figures. Time out. Maya came off the court saying, 'Oh, so that's what you meant by shot selection thing and controlling the tempo.'
Maya did things that no one else in the league did, and that is a blessing and a curse at times. There had to be some give and take. It's just like Caitlin Clark. When she sprints up and shoots a 3, you gotta live with it most times. I think we all learned from Maya because she could take over a game. She could do things that nobody else could do. You might have to live through some tough times, but she was certainly going to make up for it in other ways. Maya was not just a scorer. Maya led our team in deflections and things like that. So I think what Maya taught was, I use the word patience, but it's more being open-minded about what a shot selection should be for a player like that.
If you could swipe a couple of leadership attributes or traits from some of the coaches that you've either worked with or that you have seen from afar, what comes to mind?
My college coach, John Miller, and (former WNBA coach) Dan Hughes were similar. They made me want to a better person. They were so patient and graceful in their criticism of a player. What we call coaching is what players call criticism. I only worked for Dan Hughes for one season, in 2003, but I felt like I worked for him for 10 years. I learned so much in a year. He would tell a player that didn't do something the way they needed to do it, and we would walk away from the conversation, and I'd go, 'I felt like you just complimented them.' He just had an unbelievable way of saying, 'Hey, you didn't do that very well.'
If I could just get an ounce of that, I would feel like a far better person and a far better coach for our players. It's something I still strive for, to be better and patient and use my words better. It's been a chase for me in my life.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Paris' iconic cauldron from the Olympic Games returns to light up summer nights

time17 minutes ago

Paris' iconic cauldron from the Olympic Games returns to light up summer nights

PARIS -- A year after it captivated crowds during the Paris Olympics, a centerpiece of the summer Games is making a comeback. The iconic helium-powered balloon that attracted myriads of tourists during the summer Games has shed its Olympic branding and is now just called the 'Paris Cauldron.' It is set to rise again into the air later Saturday, lifting off over the Tuileries Garden. Around 30,000 people are expected to attend the launch, which coincides with France's annual street music festival — the Fete de la Musique, the Paris police prefecture said. And it won't be a one-time event. After Saturday's flight, the balloon will lift off into the sky each summer evening from June 21 to Sept. 14, for the next three years. The cauldron's ascent may become a new rhythm of the Parisian summer, with special flights planned for Bastille Day on July 14 and the anniversary of the 2024 opening ceremony on July 26. Gone is the official 'Olympic' branding — forbidden under IOC reuse rules — but the spectacle remains. The 30-meter (98-foot) -tall floating ring, dreamed up by French designer Mathieu Lehanneur and powered by French energy company EDF, simulates flame without fire: LED lights, mist jets and high-pressure fans create a luminous halo that hovers above the city at dusk, visible from rooftops across the capital. Though it stole the show in 2024, the cauldron was only meant to be temporary, not engineered for multi-year outdoor exposure. To transform it into a summer staple, engineers reinforced it. The aluminum ring and tether points were rebuilt with tougher components to handle rain, sun and temperature changes over several seasons. Though it's a hot-air-balloon-style, the lift comes solely from helium — no flame, no burner, just gas and engineering. The structure first dazzled during the Olympics. Over just 40 days, it drew more than 200,000 visitors, according to officials. Now anchored in the center of the drained Tuileries pond, the cauldron's return is part of French President Emmanuel Macron's effort to preserve the Games' spirit in the city, as Paris looks ahead to the 2028 Olympics in Los Angeles.

How to watch the 2025 Men's College World Series between LSU and Coastal Carolina
How to watch the 2025 Men's College World Series between LSU and Coastal Carolina

New York Times

time27 minutes ago

  • New York Times

How to watch the 2025 Men's College World Series between LSU and Coastal Carolina

Fresh off an enlivening and altogether chaotic comeback, the LSU Tigers have a chance to win their eighth NCAA title in program history this weekend. On the other side, the Coastal Carolina Chanticleers will try to go 2-for-2 in College World Series appearances, and the team brings a 26-game winning streak into the championship action. We're primed for a good one in Cornhusker country. Advertisement College World Series broadcasts are also available on ESPN+. Chanticleers coach Kevin Schnall rightfully insists on the proper pronunciation. 'It's SHON-ta-cleers, not CHAN-ta-cleers,' he clarified after another momentous win, this time over Oregon State. With two more wins, they can also call themselves national champs. Catcher Caden Bodine, a top-round prospect, leads Coastal Carolina's balanced and intimidating lineup. Right-handers Jacob Morrison and Cameron Flukey make for a strong 1-2 punch atop the mound. And first baseman Colby Thorndyke comes in with a searing swing. He recorded five RBIs last time out in Wednesday's 11-3 demolition of Louisville. The Chanticleers made their maiden World Series trip in 2016, dropping the opener to Arizona before bouncing back with consecutive wins. Their opponents, meanwhile, have won the series seven times, more than any school in the country except USC (which hasn't made a final since 2001). LSU last won it all in 2023, when current MLB superstar Paul Skenes led his team past Florida. This year's iteration has a flair for the dramatic, reaching the World Series off an 11th-hour comeback against SEC rival Arkansas. The Tigers were down 5-3 in the ninth inning, before a pair of defensive mishaps by the Razorbacks put Jared Jones in walk-off position. LSU's first baseman had previously tied the game up with a solo moonshot in the eighth inning. He followed that up with the decisive base hit into straightaway center field. The Tigers enjoy tone-setting starting pitching. Southpaw Kade Anderson is a contender for the No. 1 pick in the upcoming MLB Draft, while right-hander Anthony Eyanson more than holds his own. The duo racks up strikeouts and has delivered in pressurized situations, and will have to do it again. Streaming, betting and ticketing links in this article are provided by partners of The Athletic. Restrictions may apply. The Athletic maintains full editorial independence. Partners have no control over or input into the reporting or editing process and do not review stories before publication. (Photo of Jared Jones: Steven Branscombe / Imagn Images)

NASCAR Cup Series at Pocono Raceway odds, expert predictions for Great American Getaway 400
NASCAR Cup Series at Pocono Raceway odds, expert predictions for Great American Getaway 400

New York Times

time27 minutes ago

  • New York Times

NASCAR Cup Series at Pocono Raceway odds, expert predictions for Great American Getaway 400

The NASCAR Cup Series is in Pennsylvania this weekend for The Great American Getaway 400 at Pocono Raceway. As drivers prepare to face NASCAR's 'Tricky Triangle,' we're getting race insights from our motorsports experts, Jeff Gluck and Jordan Bianchi. They'll fill us in on NASCAR's future in San Diego, the roiling feud between Carson Hocevar and Ricky Stenhouse Jr., and of course, favorites and long shots for Sunday's race. Take it away, guys! Jordan reported that NASCAR is nearing a deal for a Cup Series street course race in San Diego. Will this replace Chicago, or will it be an additional street race? What are your thoughts on the increasing street course races in the NASCAR schedule? How does it shift strategy among teams? Jeff: Personally, I think there's only room for one street course race per year in NASCAR. A street course needs to be highlighted in its own way, and it could quickly become less special if there are multiple per season. It's sort of like the NHL's Winter Classic when it was diluted with the Stadium Series; there's a careful balance when it comes to these special events. NASCAR is not traditionally a road racing series (it only had two road course races per season for decades) and certainly wasn't a circuit with street races until a couple of years ago, with the addition of Chicago. Fans are already weary of too many non-ovals anyway, but it's certainly an opportunity for teams like Trackhouse Racing, who can hire a road course ace to launch them into the playoffs. Advertisement Jordan: While NASCAR's original three-year contract with the city of Chicago is up at the end of the year, the possibility is there that NASCAR could return next year by exercising the option it holds. But to Jeff's point, having two street courses on the schedule could potentially take away some of the novelty, which is part of the appeal of doing this. Plus, there is the cost to consider when staging two such races. It certainly isn't cheap. Looking at it from the team perspective, it's a further indication that the schedule going forward, consisting of five to six road/street courses and six drafting tracks, will continue to feature a good mix of various tracks. Whew, Carson Hocevar really can't keep himself out of trouble, can he? (Though it seems he's good at apologies!) What do you think will happen with him and Ricky Stenhouse Jr.? Is it really just a coincidence that Stenhouse was the one Hocevar had a run-in with? Is that just bad luck or intentional? Could this boost performance for either of them? Is this a powder keg about to blow? Jeff: Yeah, Stenhouse is not going to let this one go. Unfortunately for Hocevar, that was the worst possible person he could have collided with, and it shows bad judgment on his part, because it was completely unnecessary. Hocevar was a lap down at the time, and he shouldn't have even let himself get close enough to Stenhouse for them to have contact; Hocevar wasn't racing for anything but cleaned Stenhouse out. Whoops. So now Stenhouse is going to have to enact some sort of revenge, or he'll come across as not being a man of his word, which is antithetical to his personal code. In other words, Hocevar either needs to watch his back or his rear-view mirror. Jordan: Word of advice for Carson Hocevar: If you see Ricky Stenhouse Jr. this weekend and he's wearing his shorts with the camo design, quickly walk in the other direction. I believe this is the final race to determine seeding for the in-season challenge. What should we know about this process, and what are the stakes at Pocono for that tournament? Do the drivers care? Is this on the teams' minds? Jeff: This has been such a silly way to seed the in-season tournament. Instead of just taking the point standings and going 1 vs. 32, 2 vs. 31, etc., NASCAR has been seeding the top 32 drivers over a three-week stretch based on their best finish. So the No. 1 seed right now is Denny Hamlin, who won at Michigan and then didn't even race last week at Mexico City. Meanwhile, Joey Logano is the No. 27 seed — so would it be an 'upset' if he knocked off a No. 6 seed in Round 1? Of course not, and he'll probably be heavily favored. So, again, doing it this way is a miss and will only confuse bettors. As for whether the teams care, the answer is no — not until next week, anyway. Once we start seeing the matchups and they start getting asked about it, then it could be on their minds more. Advertisement Jordan: In addition to what Jeff said about the seeding, keep in mind that the opening tournament race is at Atlanta, a track with a well-deserved reputation for generating chaos where multi-car accidents are commonplace. There's a good chance the bracket will see some notables knocked out early, with a good number of 'Cinderellas' moving forward. Additionally, the fact that the Chicago Street Course follows Atlanta only creates additional opportunities for upsets to happen. It will be very interesting to see what this bracket looks like after a couple of races. Who is your favorite to win this weekend and why? Who has been dominant here in the past? Jeff: Denny Hamlin is Pocono's all-time wins leader — yes, all-time, not just among active drivers — with seven victories. That's almost too easy, and he's a heavy favorite after going win-win-second in the three Next Gen races there. Oh, what's that you say? You're not seeing a win for Hamlin in 2022? That's because he got disqualified for a very minor infraction (still illegal, but minor) after winning that year. For betting purposes, you need to view it as a win. But again, that seems like a pretty obvious pick, so if you're looking for slightly better value? Perhaps go with William Byron, who is Pocono's all-time leader in average finish despite never actually winning there. He has +800 odds. Jordan: That William Byron doesn't have another win or two or three this season is surprising, considering how dominant he's been at times. He's due, overdue, to finally get that second victory, and Pocono represents a great place to do it. He's finished in the top 10 in over 50 percent of his starts here, and this is one of those tracks where the best teams in a given season tend to shine. Also, don't be surprised if Kyle Larson puts a tough few weeks behind him by putting a classic No. 5-team stomping on the field where he sweeps the stages, leads a ton of laps and rolls to the win. Who is a long shot you like here? Jeff: Pocono is the type of race where we could see an upset if fuel mileage plays out the right way. But that doesn't help you much, because there are a lot of people to choose from in that regard. A better play might be to see if you can parlay a couple of plus-money top-10 picks together. Like, is it a stretch to think AJ Allmendinger (+10000 to win) and Michael McDowell (+20000) could both be in the top 10? Not at all. So maybe play around with that and see if you can come up with a combination that might work. After all, it would have been a great strategy last week when John Hunter Nemechek and Cole Custer landed surprising top-10s in Mexico City. Jordan: Legacy Motor Speedway has shown considerably more speed in its cars recently, and if this speed is again present on Sunday, Erik Jones at +8000 makes for a great sleeper pick. Among active drivers, he has the fifth-most top-five finishes and seventh-best average finish, and with Pocono being a track known for long green-flag runs, the opportunity could be there for LMC to gamble with a Hail Mary strategy to score an upset win. Betting/odds links in this article are provided by partners of The Athletic. Restrictions may apply. The Athletic maintains full editorial independence. Partners have no control over or input into the reporting or editing process and do not review stories before publication. (Photo of Denny Hamlin: Chris Graythen / Getty Images)

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store