Foes on the ice, not in the oilpatch: Danes, Canadians to collab on carbon capture
Social Sharing
After Denmark's stunning upset over Canada in the hockey world championship, Danish and Canadian researchers are teaming up for a different sort of high-stakes challenge: developing carbon capture technology.
Denmark's Ministry of Climate, Energy and Utilities has signed a memorandum of understanding (MOU) with Alberta Innovates to collaborate on advancing the technology and driving down costs.
The agreement will last four years. During that time, both sides will meet regularly to compare notes.
Bryan Helfenbaum, associate vice-president of clean energy for Alberta Innovates, joked the two countries' budding hockey rivalry won't stand in the way of much-needed collaboration.
"As a Calgary Flames fan, I frankly wasn't aware hockey was being played anywhere anymore," he said at a media availability on Thursday.
Helfenbaum added that Alberta has many of the key ingredients needed to develop carbon capture, utilization and storage (CCUS), including reservoirs for storage and incentives offered by both the federal and provincial governments.
"As much as we have all those key ingredients, we still need to bring down the cost of CCUS to really enable widespread adoption," he said.
"And so this MOU provides a four-year framework for collaboration between Alberta and Denmark to advance those CCUS opportunities, to facilitate those cost reductions."
The partnership opens the door for cross-border research projects and exchange trips for students and professionals, Helfenbaum said.
Denmark ambassador to Canada, Nikolaj Harris, signed the agreement on behalf of his country, which has set an emissions reductions target of 70 per cent by 2030 compared to 1990 levels.
The country aims to be a climate-neutral society by 2050 at the latest, according to Harris.
"The Danish government has very, very ambitious goals in terms of emission reductions," he said. "In order to achieve these goals and achieve the targets that we set in the emission area, CCUS is a very important instrument and a very important tool."
Alberta Innovates facing funding cut
The new partnership comes on the heels of another much more sombre announcement from Alberta Innovates.
On Wednesday, CEO Mike Mahon revealed the Crown corporation is facing a $53-million funding cut starting next year — about one-fifth of its roughly $250-million annual budget.
The organization plans to cut and merge some of its programs as a result, but will look for other funding sources, including the federal government, private sector and international partners, Mahon added.
"In the world of innovation, we all recognize that things move rapidly," he told CBC News. "Things that might have been priorities five or seven years ago really are no longer priorities in the same way."
Even as the Crown corporation looks for savings, Alberta Innovates said it's open to deepening ties with Denmark in other areas of mutual interest, like hydrogen development and energy storage.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Calgary Herald
an hour ago
- Calgary Herald
Opinion: To build Alberta, we must protect our innovation funding
As the federal government looks to fast-track nation-building projects and critical infrastructure, Alberta's experience and technical expertise in advancing major projects that balance decarbonization and economic development must be leveraged. Even more notably, Alberta is actually one of the best places to dream up new ways of developing Canada sustainably. Article content Article content But the province must maintain its competitive edge by protecting and investing in its existing comprehensive innovation funding channels. Article content Article content Article content The Government of Alberta is engaging stakeholders on the Technology Innovation and Emissions Reduction program ahead of its legislated review by the end of 2026. Although there is plenty of conversation around TIER as it relates to carbon pricing, we would do better to acknowledge its support of Emission Reduction Alberta, which funds innovative technologies and the jobs that come with them across the province. Article content Separately, the province also provides funding for early stage technology through Alberta Innovates. Between ERA and Alberta Innovates, the province can support innovation in the energy sector from the beginning to the end of its development cycles. Article content As the provincial government undertakes its review, Alberta's industries recognize that TIER might change. However, it is important to reflect on the major investment success stories that were achieved due to this program. Article content Article content This support — plus Alberta's business-friendly environment, natural resources, existing technical expertise and well-established regulatory framework — makes the province an obvious destination of choice for clean tech project developers and innovators. Article content With all the uncertainty facing innovators around the world, this is a great time to celebrate their contributions to the province. Article content For example, since its inception, funds from the TIER system have enabled ERA to invest more than $1 billion into Alberta projects, many of which would not have happened without it. This funding has created an innovation ecosystem. It has helped close the funding gap faced by all new technologies, derisked and leveraged private-sector investment, and shown the international community that Alberta is open for business. Article content While other provinces struggle with piecemeal approaches to economic diversification, Alberta has created a self-sustaining model where industry payments fund the very innovations that strengthen industry competitiveness. This approach has allowed the province to support jobs and economic activity without taxpayer dollars — a fiscally responsible strategy that any government should be proud to champion.
Globe and Mail
an hour ago
- Globe and Mail
If Canada is seeking an ideal nation-building project, it should invest in First Nations infrastructure
Cindy Woodhouse Nepinak is national chief of the Assembly of First Nations. At a time of growing global uncertainty – amid trade disruptions, rising inflation, climate change and international instability – Canada is looking for ways to strengthen its economy, create good jobs and build lasting resilience. Investing in First Nations infrastructure directly supports these national priorities and represents one of our greatest collective nation-building opportunities. Every person in Canada deserves clean water to drink, reliable infrastructure to support their families and a strong foundation to build a future. Yet for far too many First Nations, these basic needs remain out of reach owing to generations of underinvestment. According to the Assembly of First Nations' report "Closing the Infrastructure Gap," an estimated $349.2-billion is needed to bring First Nations infrastructure in line with the rest of Canada by 2030. Delays would only increase the cost and limit the potential returns. And there would be significant returns. Additional research, supported by the Conference Board of Canada, shows that improving First Nations infrastructure would generate $635-billion in economic output, boost GDP by $308.9-billion, and create 330,000 jobs annually across Canada over seven years. Prime Minister Mark Carney has even acknowledged the 'potential economic opportunity' of closing the infrastructure gap. On the campaign trail, Mr. Carney argued that doing so would, on its own, have a larger positive impact on Canada's economy than the negative effects of Donald Trump's tariffs, underscoring both the urgency and the scale of this opportunity. New federal legislation would cut internal trade barriers, advance 'nation-building' projects Beyond the economic data, these investments would also mean that children could sleep safely in their own homes, enjoy clean water in every community, use reliable transportation to access high-quality healthcare and education services, and take advantage of connectivity that allows young people to fully participate in Canada's economy. This would be nation-building in the fullest sense. First Nations are not waiting. Across the country, First Nations are already leading major nation-building projects, from the Clear Sky Connections broadband project linking 63 Manitoba First Nations, to new water systems in Listuguj Mi'gmaq territory, to the Squamish Nation's Sen̓áḵw housing project in Vancouver. These projects meet urgent needs while driving growth, clean energy, and digital connectivity that benefit the entire country. They show what's possible when communities have the resources to build. But to fully close the infrastructure gap nationwide, sustained federal investment is essential. Opinion: Canada needs to attract private investment in infrastructure – and Indigenous communities hold the key As governments put forward legislative proposals to advance major infrastructure projects, proposals that come at the expense of First Nations rights are not the path forward. Any development must respect inherent and treaty rights as recognized and affirmed by the Constitution, and must reflect the Crown's duty to consult and obtain free, prior, and informed consent, as affirmed in the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act. Today marks National Indigenous Peoples Day and the four-year anniversary of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act. Yet instead of advancing reconciliation, Canada is pushing legislation like Bill C-5 without hearing from First Nations rights holders. At this week's AFN National Virtual Forum, leaders raised serious concerns about the bill's impact on First Nations rights. Chiefs called for that same urgency to be directed toward the infrastructure our communities actually need – homes, schools, clean water, roads and internet. Chartrand on Bill C-5: 'We do have to have consent from Indigenous rights holders' Fast-tracking development while sidelining rights-holders doesn't advance reconciliation – it undermines it. Attempts to override rights and exclude First Nations from decision-making reflect a narrow and incomplete vision of nation-building, and risk sidelining one of Canada's most transformative opportunities for shared prosperity. The path forward is not to build first and address rights later. True national interest requires full participation and consent of First Nations rights-holders from the start. Canada must prioritize sustained investments in First Nations-led infrastructure that strengthen community resilience and contribute directly to Canada's economic, climate and long-term sustainability priorities. By any measure, investments in First Nations infrastructure meet the definition of national interest. The government's own proposed framework includes priorities like economic growth, resilience and clean growth, all of which would be directly advanced by such investments. If Canada is serious about building a stronger, more secure and more prosperous future, let's start with fast-tracking the construction of new homes, modern schools and clean water systems in First Nation communities. Let's fast-track internet access, all-season roads and community infrastructure that has long been neglected. Let's work in true partnership, through full consultation, shared legislative development, and recognition that Canada's future is tied to the success of its First Peoples. That is how you build a country – by ensuring the foundations are strong for everyone. The future of Canada depends on it.
Globe and Mail
an hour ago
- Globe and Mail
Reconciliation is not a return to the past – it's creating something new together
David A. Robertson is a Swampy Cree novelist and the author of 52 Ways to Reconcile. It will take longer to get to reconciliation if we don't fully understand what we're attempting to do. That statement might be self-evident, but it is no less relevant. When it comes to reconciliation, in my experience, I am not sure how effective our actions can be if they are actions based on a misnomer. The term reconciliation itself, within the context of this countrywide movement, in the relationship between Indigenous and non-Indigenous people, is most certainly an inaccurate description. What does reconciliation mean? It's essential to be clear: I don't want to discount Canadians' work on reconciliation. As with anything relatively new, there is a learning curve. But we have done well, although we can't rest on our laurels. We must forge ahead and look to the future, invested in the path and the length we need to walk it. Because this is a marathon, it is not a sprint. The Grandparents do not say that healing takes one generation; it takes seven. The dictionary definition indicates reconciliation is the restoration of friendly relations. That sounds nice, doesn't it? Indigenous people and non-Indigenous people want to have a friendly relationship. I have been around long enough and have been to enough places across Turtle Island to be sure of that. Is that what we're trying to do? Restore friendly relations? Restoration is returning to something. What do we want to return to? Here's a quick example of reconciliation: Two people meet, fall in love and everything is great. They move in with each other, have children, and look to the future with love and hope. But then something breaks, and the relationship falters. The couple splits. Years later, after a lot of work and healing themselves individually, they can, in turn, heal their relationship. They return to what they used to be. That is reconciliation. Here's my question: When was the relationship between Indigenous and non-Indigenous people right? It wasn't. Ever. So, there is nothing worth returning to. On one level of this journey, reconciliation is indeed proper terminology. Thanks to colonialism's historical and continuing effects, there is brokenness within Indigenous communities. The former principal at Jack River School in Kinosao Sipi (Norway House Cree Nation) once told me that you can't heal brokenness with brokenness. She meant that teachers needed to heal from their trauma, direct or passed down, before they could genuinely help the kids. Individually, in our families, and in our communities, we have work to do to heal before we can even think about the breadth of Indigenous and non-Indigenous relations. Opinion: We cannot let Pope Francis's efforts toward Indigenous reconciliation die with him But when we get there in seven generations (and keep in mind, with the impacts of colonialism still prevalent across Turtle Island, that clock hasn't quite started ticking yet), we will not be returning to anything. My father passed away in December, 2019, just a couple of months before the world shut down. At the time of his death, he had been working with a group of knowledge keepers, of Grandparents, on a new term for reconciliation, considering what it really entails, the work we really need to be doing. Their focus was not on returning to anything, but rather, on starting a dialogue. I found a paper in my dad's stuff entitled Guiding Principles for Working Together to Build Restoration and Reconciliation. The first point is 'Building Relationships through Mutual Respect and Understanding – respect enhances our ability to see, hear, and value others.' 'Nothing's off the table': AFN warns of potential legal action if Bill C-5 passes You sit across from me, we share with one another, we learn about one another, and through that respectful interaction we begin to see through the preconceptions we might have of each other. We see each other as human beings, first and foremost, and through knowledge transfer, we develop empathy, understanding and respect. That is how you build a good relationship. It's a foundational practice that ensures, going forward, you have something solid to stand on. Together. You and I. Collectively, it doesn't mean that we are returning to anything. What it means is that we are building something for the first time. It means that we are building community. Do you want to know the dictionary definition of community? It is a group of people with a shared interest living together within a larger society. We don't all have to do the same thing. Not at all. You have your life, and I have mine. But within the context of what we continue to call reconciliation, we do have a shared interest: coming together, working with and for each other, for equitable opportunities where everybody has a chance at success. Because we recognize that one person's victory is the victory of the community we have built, and that success, the stuff that comes from listening and learning, from empathy and action, will lead us to a better, strong and sustainable future. Whatever we want to call what we're doing, that's the way forward.
