logo
Rijiju says Arunachal to become richest state in coming years

Rijiju says Arunachal to become richest state in coming years

Itanagar, June 10 (UNI) Union Minister Kiren Rijiju on Tuesday said Arunachal Pradesh is on a fast track to development under the leadership of Prime Minister Narendra Modi, and projected that the state will become the 'richest in the country' within the next seven to eight years if the current momentum is maintained.
Addressing a gathering in Itanagar to mark the completion of 11 years of the Modi-led NDA government, the Union Minister for Parliamentary Affairs and Minority Affairs highlighted the transformative changes brought to the frontier state in the last decade and said it was time to accelerate progress.
'We have all the natural resources. We only need to bring the necessary reforms to our society. Under PM Modi and CM Pema Khandu's leadership, we must move even faster. The work done over 11 years will be wasted if we do not continue to win people's trust,' Rijiju said.
On the contentious Siang Upper Multipurpose Project (SUMP), Rijiju reiterated its status as a strategic necessity and a well-thought-out initiative vital for both national security and regional development.
'This is not just a power project; it is essential for managing water resources and countering China's hydropower developments upstream of the Yarlung Tsangpo (Brahmaputra) river,' he stated.
'This project is vital not just for power but also for flood control in Arunachal Pradesh, Assam, and even Bangladesh,' he said, underlining the broader regional impact.
The Union Minister warned of the potential threat posed by Chinese engineering capabilities. 'China can divert rivers and build 1,000-km-long tunnels. That's the level of risk we face,' he cautioned.
Addressing the concerns of the indigenous Adi community and residents living in the Siang basin, Rijiju emphasized that their culture, tradition, and agricultural livelihoods will be fully protected.
'The project has to be built, but it must benefit the people in front of it. Their identity should not be harmed in any way,' he said.
Rijiju acknowledged the opposition to the project, stressing that the protestors are 'not enemies, but our own people.' He urged dialogue, patience, and empathy. 'They are protesting with emotion. We must talk to each of them, explain properly. It is our responsibility to take them along,' he said.
The Union Minister also cautioned against what he called 'external elements' allegedly influencing local sentiments. 'Some are coming from outside and misleading people. They must be checked. We have to address misinformation without confrontation,' he added.
Referring to past challenges in securing investment, Rijiju said, 'There was a time we had to beg for investment in hydropower, but under Modi ji, things changed. Now, we are making Arunachal self-reliant and economically strong.'
He concluded by calling for collective effort and unity, saying that Arunachal's journey towards becoming a state with the highest per capita income must not be derailed. 'We must work even harder to win the hearts of our people,' he said.
The SUMP, with a proposed capacity of 11,000 MW, is being implemented by NHPC and has drawn both support and resistance from local communities over concerns of displacement and environmental impact.
UNI TD BD

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Rare-earth crunch: India's quest for critical minerals must race the clock
Rare-earth crunch: India's quest for critical minerals must race the clock

Mint

time43 minutes ago

  • Mint

Rare-earth crunch: India's quest for critical minerals must race the clock

Aditya Sinha , Aatman Shah Our EV makers face a rare-earth magnet scarcity while the country faces a steep challenge in securing local supplies of various rarely found critical minerals. But a Quad-led effort could forge a realistic action plan to create a supply chain independent of China. India should advocate a partnership within the Quad, anchored by an Indo-Pacific Rare Earth Processing Hub in India. Gift this article Globally, critical mineral development is marked by long gestation cycles, taking 15–25 years from discovery to production, given the inherently uncertain nature of exploration and hurdles at multiple stages of mine development. Australia's Olympic Dam project took 13 years and Mongolia's Oyu Tolgoi took 20 years. Globally, critical mineral development is marked by long gestation cycles, taking 15–25 years from discovery to production, given the inherently uncertain nature of exploration and hurdles at multiple stages of mine development. Australia's Olympic Dam project took 13 years and Mongolia's Oyu Tolgoi took 20 years. Even in the US, the Thacker Pass lithium project was delayed by about a decade as it faced environmental litigation. These delays reflect universal geological, regulatory, social and financial constraints. India's critical mineral strategy faces added hurdles from legacy inefficiencies, under-resourced exploration and fragmented institutional coordination. Geologically rich areas like Bastar Craton and Karbi Anglong are yet to move beyond early-stage exploration. The Geological Survey of India has historically focused on bulk commodities, resulting in inadequate pre-auction data on rare minerals under the post-2015 regime. Our lack of fully validated reserves tends to deter private sector participation. Infrastructure gaps, tribal rights issues and delayed clearances further slow progress. Also, India faces steep technical barriers in downstream processing. Rare earth separation requires up to 180 solvent extraction steps, demanding precision in chemical parameters and contamination control. Australia, while mining over half the world's lithium, processes only a fraction domestically and relies heavily on China. Indonesia's efforts to process nickel through 'high-pressure acid leach' (HPAL) plants have been marred by shutdowns, cost overruns and corrosion-related technical failures. Also Read: Rare earths: China is choking its own prospects of leadership India suffers from five critical deficits. First, process R&D infrastructure is minimal, with pilot-scale capability available only with a handful of government labs like CSIR-NML and BARC. Second, India lacks commercial-scale plants for key processing methods like 'solvent extraction-electrowinning' (SX-EW) or HPAL that are essential for extracting materials like copper, lithium or nickel from complex ores. Third, Indian facilities don't offer the ultra-high purity needed for battery-grade lithium or rare-earth magnets. Fourth, our hazardous waste handling is inadequate; the processing of some rare earths generates radioactive tailings and acidic sludge that require advanced containment systems. Finally, India lacks digitized continuous process control systems that are essential for safe, consistent and scalable refining. Without addressing these gaps, India won't be able to capture value beyond raw extraction (whenever mining starts). Also Read: China risks overplaying its hand by curbing rare earth exports Fortunately, there have been a slew of reforms lately. The Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Amendment Act of 2023, for instance, empowers the Centre to exclusively auction mineral concessions for 24 critical minerals. It also removes six minerals from the restrictive list of atomic minerals, thereby opening them up to the private sector. The Act also introduces a new category of exploration licences through reverse bidding, allowing private and foreign firms to undertake reconnaissance and prospecting for deep-seated, high-value critical minerals. Aimed at attracting foreign investment and explorers with advanced technology and risk capital, the regime was launched in March 2025, with auctions for 13 blocks across eight states. The government also aims to introduce viability gap funding, ease regulatory norms and fast-track rare-earth mine auctions. The aim is to capture 10% of global rare-earth processing capacity supported by incentives under the National Critical Mineral Mission (NCMM) 2025 and a proposed ₹ 1,500 crore recycling incentive scheme. While state-run firms are being mobilized, the real thrust must come from private participation. Magnet imports doubled in 2024-25 and tightening Chinese export controls have added to the urgency. But this is too little too late. While China has mastered the entire value chain, India has not even scratched the surface. Our processing technology is primitive and concentrated in a single state-owned company, Indian Rare Earths Ltd. Recent reforms cannot compensate for decades of lost time, inadequate research and strategic inertia. By the time we catch up, the geopolitical window may shut. Without speed and global alignment, current efforts risk being symbolic. India should advocate a partnership within the Quad, anchored by an Indo-Pacific Rare Earth Processing Hub in India. Each member can offer a unique strength: Australia has raw materials, Japan has technology and India could do the processing, while the US invests and generates demand. Under the NCMM 2025, a research stream led by the Anusandhan National Research Foundation should drive innovation across the value chain. This would include scaling advanced extraction methods like bio-leaching and solvent extraction, developing capabilities for rare earth separation and ultra-high-purity fabrication, and building digital infrastructure. Further, while restricting exports to promote downstream industries is a valid strategy, it should be pursued only after India has developed adequate processing capacity. At the same time, the planning and construction of processing facilities must begin in parallel with mining and exploration, rather than waiting for their completion. Even these efforts would barely scratch the surface. What India needs are radical, time-bound disruptions. The authors are public policy professionals. Topics You May Be Interested In

President Lai Ching-te asserts Taiwan's sovereignty, slams China's ‘separatist' label
President Lai Ching-te asserts Taiwan's sovereignty, slams China's ‘separatist' label

First Post

time43 minutes ago

  • First Post

President Lai Ching-te asserts Taiwan's sovereignty, slams China's ‘separatist' label

Taiwan President Lai Ching-te reaffirmed Sunday that Taiwan is 'of course' a country, rejecting China's sovereignty claims as lacking legal and historical basis. Beijing continues to dismiss Lai as a separatist and has refused repeated offers for dialogue read more Taiwan is 'of course' a country and China lacks both the historical evidence and legal proof to back up its sovereignty claims, President Lai Ching-te said on Sunday in a strong rebuke to Beijing and its stepped up political and military pressure. China says democratically-governed Taiwan is 'sacred' Chinese territory that has belonged to the country since ancient times, and that the island is one of its provinces with no right to be called a state. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Lai and his government strongly reject that view, and have offered talks with China multiple times but have been rejected. China calls Lai a 'separatist'. Giving the first of 10 speeches in a series called 'uniting the country', Lai drew on Taiwan's history, including the millennia-long connection of its indigenous people to other Austronesians, like native Hawaiians, to show what he said was Taiwan's separate and distinct development from China. Taiwan's people have a record of opposing invasion, like uprisings against Japan's 1895-1945 colonial rule, and under the last imperial Chinese dynasty, the Qing, Taiwan was only considered a Chinese province for eight years, he added. 'Of course Taiwan is a country,' he said at a speech to a Taiwan branch of Rotary International, pointing also to its presidential elections. 'But China says no, that Taiwan is not a sovereign country.' China's Taiwan's Affairs Office did not respond to a request for comment outside of office hours. China says the 1971 United Nations resolution, which took away Taipei's seat in the body and gave it to Beijing, is one of the legal bases of its claims. Lai, who in March called China a 'hostile foreign force', said it was 'totally wrong' for Beijing to say that U.N. resolution had anything to do with Taiwan's sovereignty as it was only about which government was represented at the body. China's threat to Taiwan is real, added Lai, pointing to its daily military activities around the island. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'Taiwan's future can only be decided by its 23 million people - does everyone approve of this?' he said, to a round of applause. The defeated Republic of China government fled to Taiwan in 1949 after losing a civil war with Mao Zedong's communists, and that remains the island's formal name.

U.S. bombs Iran: What we know about the nuclear sites that were hit
U.S. bombs Iran: What we know about the nuclear sites that were hit

The Hindu

timean hour ago

  • The Hindu

U.S. bombs Iran: What we know about the nuclear sites that were hit

In a major escalation of the Israel-Iran conflict, the United States has launched airstrikes on three key Iranian nuclear and military facilities: Natanz, Fordo, and Isfahan. U.S. President Donald Trump, flanked by Vice-President J.D. Vance, Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth, confirmed the strikes, calling them 'very successful.' Iran's state news agency also acknowledged the attacks. Natanz is Iran's primary uranium enrichment site and the uranium had been enriched to up to 60% purity at this site. Part of the site lies underground, to protect it from airstrikes. The aboveground part of the facility were already destroyed when Israel conducted airstrikes targeting this facility earlier, the International Atomic Energy Agency or the IAEA which is the U.N.'s nuclear watchdog, said. Next, the U.S. struck Fordo, located deep beneath a mountain southwest of Tehran. It is a heavily fortified facility that hosts centrifuge cascades, but isn't as big as Natanz. Experts say only advanced U.S. 'bunker buster' bombs—like the latest GBU-57 A/B Massive Ordnance Penetrator bomb —can reach such a target, suggesting direct American military involvement was essential. The third site, Isfahan, houses thousands of nuclear scientists. It is also home to three Chinese research reactors and laboratories associated with the country's atomic programme. While Israel had previously struck parts of this site, there are no current signs of radiation leaks. Trump, while calling Iran 'the bully of the Middle East', warned of additional attacks if it didn't make peace. He warned Iran that there are many targets left. 'If peace does not come quickly, we will go after those other targets with precision, speed, and skill. Most of them can be taken out in a matter of minutes,' he said. Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi warned that the U.S. attacks 'will have everlasting consequences' and that Tehran 'reserves all options' to retaliate. In a post on X, he wrote, 'The events this morning are outrageous and will have everlasting consequences', adding, 'In accordance with the U.N. Charter and its provisions allowing a legitimate response in self-defence, Iran reserves all options to defend its sovereignty, interests and people.' These strikes follow Israel's offensive on June 13, which it said was meant to prevent Iran from developing a nuclear bomb. Iran launched a wave of drone and missile strikes into Israeli territory in retaliation. So far, the U.S. had only helped intercept attacks, but this is the first time in the current war that Washington has directly struck Iranian territory. This marks an unprecedented escalation of a war in West Asia, in a region already on the edge.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store