Latest news with #SRB
TVA Nouvelles
3 days ago
- Politics
- TVA Nouvelles
SRB de Sam Hamad: le projet «d'un apprenti sorcier», selon Bruno Marchand
Bruno Marchand a qualifié le service rapide par bus (SRB) proposé par son rival à la mairie Sam Hamad de projet d'un «apprenti sorcier». «C'est le feeling de M. Hamad versus 20 ans d'études, de consultations, de sciences et de faits», a tonné le maire de Québec, jeudi matin, en point de presse. Ce dernier est en train d'énumérer tous ses griefs contre «Il faut arrêter de tergiverser. Il faut avancer», a ajouté M. Marchand. Plus de détails à venir... .wrapper_bandeau_scoop { width: 100%; margin: 40px auto; opacity: 0; transform: translateY(20vh); visibility: hidden; transition: opacity 1200ms ease-out, transform 600ms ease-out, visibility 1200ms ease-out; will-change: opacity, transform, visibility; } .wrapper_bandeau_scoop.visible { opacity: 1; transform: none; visibility: visible; } .wrapper_bandeau_scoop .espace_bandeau_scoop { position: relative; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: column; align-items: center; } .wrapper_bandeau_scoop .espace_bandeau_scoop .header_wrapper .header_scoop { display: inline-block; background-color: #e32402; padding: 4px 8px; font-family: "Heading Now Variable", "Barlow"; font-size: 26px; font-weight: 600; font-stretch: 400%; font-style: normal; text-decoration: none; text-transform: uppercase; letter-spacing: 0.25px; line-height: 28.6px; text-align: center; color: white; transform: translateY(50%); } @media (max-width: 1759px ) { .wrapper_bandeau_scoop .espace_bandeau_scoop .header_wrapper .header_scoop { font-family: "Heading Now Variable", "Barlow"; font-size: 26px; font-weight: 600; font-stretch: 400%; font-style: normal; text-decoration: none; text-transform: uppercase; letter-spacing: 0.25px; line-height: 28.6px; } } @media (max-width: 1299px ) { .wrapper_bandeau_scoop .espace_bandeau_scoop .header_wrapper .header_scoop { font-family: "Heading Now Variable", "Barlow"; font-size: 26px; font-weight: 600; font-stretch: 400%; font-style: normal; text-decoration: none; text-transform: uppercase; letter-spacing: 0.25px; line-height: 28.6px; } } @media (max-width: 1023px ) { .wrapper_bandeau_scoop .espace_bandeau_scoop .header_wrapper .header_scoop { font-family: "Heading Now Variable", "Barlow"; font-size: 24px; font-weight: 600; font-stretch: 400%; font-style: normal; text-decoration: none; text-transform: uppercase; letter-spacing: 0.25px; line-height: 26.4px; } } @media (max-width: 767px ) { .wrapper_bandeau_scoop .espace_bandeau_scoop .header_wrapper .header_scoop { font-family: "Heading Now Variable", "Barlow"; font-size: 26px; font-weight: 600; font-stretch: 400%; font-style: normal; text-decoration: none; text-transform: uppercase; letter-spacing: 0.25px; line-height: 28.6px; } } @media (max-width: 639px ) { .wrapper_bandeau_scoop .espace_bandeau_scoop .header_wrapper .header_scoop { font-family: "Heading Now Variable", "Barlow"; font-size: 26px; font-weight: 600; font-stretch: 400%; font-style: normal; text-decoration: none; text-transform: uppercase; letter-spacing: 0.25px; line-height: 28.6px; } } @media (max-width: 639px ) { .wrapper_bandeau_scoop .espace_bandeau_scoop .header_wrapper .header_scoop { background-color: transparent; padding: 0; } .wrapper_bandeau_scoop .espace_bandeau_scoop .header_wrapper .header_scoop span { background: #e32402; padding: 4px 8px; white-space: nowrap; } .wrapper_bandeau_scoop .espace_bandeau_scoop .header_wrapper .header_scoop span:last-child { padding-top: 0px; } } .wrapper_bandeau_scoop .espace_bandeau_scoop .contenu_scoop { width: 100%; background: #262626; padding: 40px 16px 24px; border-radius: 3px; } .wrapper_bandeau_scoop .espace_bandeau_scoop .contenu_scoop p { font-family: "Heading Now Variable", "Barlow"; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 300; font-stretch: 550%; font-style: normal; text-decoration: none; text-transform: none; letter-spacing: -0.25px; line-height: 21.6px; color: white; text-align: center; } @media (max-width: 1759px ) { .wrapper_bandeau_scoop .espace_bandeau_scoop .contenu_scoop p { font-family: "Heading Now Variable", "Barlow"; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 300; font-stretch: 550%; font-style: normal; text-decoration: none; text-transform: none; letter-spacing: -0.25px; line-height: 21.6px; } } @media (max-width: 1299px ) { .wrapper_bandeau_scoop .espace_bandeau_scoop .contenu_scoop p { font-family: "Heading Now Variable", "Barlow"; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 300; font-stretch: 550%; font-style: normal; text-decoration: none; text-transform: none; letter-spacing: -0.04px; line-height: 21.6px; } } @media (max-width: 1023px ) { .wrapper_bandeau_scoop .espace_bandeau_scoop .contenu_scoop p { font-family: "Heading Now Variable", "Barlow"; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 300; font-stretch: 550%; font-style: normal; text-decoration: none; text-transform: none; letter-spacing: -0.25px; line-height: 21.6px; } } @media (max-width: 767px ) { .wrapper_bandeau_scoop .espace_bandeau_scoop .contenu_scoop p { font-family: "Heading Now Variable", "Barlow"; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 300; font-stretch: 550%; font-style: normal; text-decoration: none; text-transform: none; letter-spacing: -0.25px; line-height: 21.6px; } } @media (max-width: 639px ) { .wrapper_bandeau_scoop .espace_bandeau_scoop .contenu_scoop p { font-family: "Heading Now Variable", "Barlow"; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 300; font-stretch: 550%; font-style: normal; text-decoration: none; text-transform: none; letter-spacing: -0.25px; line-height: 21.6px; } } .wrapper_bandeau_scoop .espace_bandeau_scoop .contenu_scoop p:last-child { margin-bottom: 0px; } .wrapper_bandeau_scoop .espace_bandeau_scoop .contenu_scoop p strong { font-family: "Heading Now Variable", "Barlow"; font-size: 24px; font-weight: 750; font-stretch: 400%; font-style: normal; text-decoration: none; text-transform: none; letter-spacing: 0px; line-height: 25.2px; } @media (max-width: 1759px ) { .wrapper_bandeau_scoop .espace_bandeau_scoop .contenu_scoop p strong { font-family: "Heading Now Variable", "Barlow"; font-size: 24px; font-weight: 750; font-stretch: 400%; font-style: normal; text-decoration: none; text-transform: none; letter-spacing: 0px; line-height: 25.2px; } } @media (max-width: 1299px ) { .wrapper_bandeau_scoop .espace_bandeau_scoop .contenu_scoop p strong { font-family: "Heading Now Variable", "Barlow"; font-size: 24px; font-weight: 750; font-stretch: 400%; font-style: normal; text-decoration: none; text-transform: none; letter-spacing: 0px; line-height: 25.2px; } } @media (max-width: 1023px ) { .wrapper_bandeau_scoop .espace_bandeau_scoop .contenu_scoop p strong { font-family: "Heading Now Variable", "Barlow"; font-size: 24px; font-weight: 750; font-stretch: 400%; font-style: normal; text-decoration: none; text-transform: none; letter-spacing: 0px; line-height: 25.2px; } } @media (max-width: 767px ) { .wrapper_bandeau_scoop .espace_bandeau_scoop .contenu_scoop p strong { font-family: "Heading Now Variable", "Barlow"; font-size: 24px; font-weight: 750; font-stretch: 400%; font-style: normal; text-decoration: none; text-transform: none; letter-spacing: 0px; line-height: 25.2px; } } @media (max-width: 639px ) { .wrapper_bandeau_scoop .espace_bandeau_scoop .contenu_scoop p strong { font-family: "Heading Now Variable", "Barlow"; font-size: 18px; font-weight: 750; font-stretch: 400%; font-style: normal; text-decoration: none; text-transform: none; letter-spacing: 0px; line-height: 18.9px; } } .wrapper_bandeau_scoop .espace_bandeau_scoop .contenu_scoop p a { color: white !important; } .wrapper_bandeau_scoop .espace_bandeau_scoop .contenu_scoop p a:first-child { color: #e32402 !important; font-weight: 750; } Vous avez un scoop à nous transmettre? Vous avez des informations à nous communiquer à propos de cette histoire? Écrivez-nous à l'adresse
Business Recorder
7 days ago
- Business
- Business Recorder
Only SRB submits Finance Bill feedback to Senate panel
ISLAMABAD: Except Sindh Revenue Board (SRB), provinces have not submitted their observations on the Finance Bill (2025-26) to the Senate Standing Committee on Finance. During review of the Finance Bill (2025-26) at the Senate Standing Committee on Finance, Chairman of the committee Senator Saleem Mandviwalla stated that the SRB has raised objections on certain proposed amendments in the Sales Tax Act 1990. 'Any other province has not submitted its comments on the SRB', he added. Saleem Mandviwalla pointed out that the SRB has objected amendment in section 8b of the Sales Tax Act 1990. This definition is combing both goods and services. Budget FY2025-26: Sindh announces to expand sales tax to all major services According to definition of 'courier' under Sales Tax Act, it means any entity engaged in the delivery of goods and collection of cash on behalf of a seller including logistic services, ride-hailing services, food delivery platforms and ecommerce delivery services. It is objected that the 'Courier' is a service and, therefore, not 'goods' and also outside the purview of federal sales tax. It is a provincial tax and cannot be defined under FBR Chairman said that the couriers would operate only as withholding agent and we have not included services in new law. '(5AC) 'courier' means any entity engaged in the delivery of goods and collection of cash on behalf of a seller including logistic services, ride-hailing services, food delivery platforms and ecommerce delivery services.' FBR Chairman said that we are ready to exclude ride-hailing services, food delivery platforms and ecommerce delivery services from the definition of 'courier'. SRB has also raised objection in the proposed amendments in section 8B of the Sales Tax Act on limit input tax allowance using database automated exchange system. Saleem Mandviwalla said that one objection was raised by Punjab Revenue Authority on the payment through intermediaries as PRA is also doing the same. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Business Recorder
13-06-2025
- Business
- Business Recorder
Budget FY2025-26: Sindh announces to expand sales tax to all major services
The Sindh government has announced to tax 'all services' excluding essential and social services, aiming to 'expand the sales tax base and also reduce possible tariff disputes and litigations', according to budget documents released on Friday. The provincial government announced its budget for the financial year 2025-26 on Friday, with Chief Minister Murad Ali Shah unveiling proposals for Rs3.45 trillion total outlay, with a deficit of Rs38.46 billion. According to Sindh Revenue Board (SRB) website, the general rate of Sindh Sales Tax on services is 15% with the exception of telecommunication services, which are liable to be taxed at 19.5%. Tax is levied at reduced or concessionary rates in certain cases. Sindh budget documents suggest the province is targeting to collect Rs388 billion in provincial sales tax on services and taxes from agriculture in FY26. The province is projected to collect Rs300 billion in Sindh Sales Tax on services in FY25, 35% higher compared to FY24. 'The Sindh Sales tax on services has been the mainstay of provincial revenues,' CM Murad Ali Shah said during his budget speech at the provincial assembly. 'Under the existing law, all major services are taxable and a smaller segment of services is not taxable. This situation creates disputes regarding taxability of services, which leads to unnecessary litigation and also problems for the taxpayers. 'Therefore, the decision is being made to transform to negative list regime by taxing all services but at the same time taking care that essential and social services are kept exempt that a significant part of new services is subjected to reduced rate,' he said. On the other hand, the Sindh government has proposed to completely remove five levies including professional tax, cotton fee, entertainment duty, local cess and drainage cess, according to budget documents. The tax relief measures would 'reduce the financial burden on both individuals and businesses,' Murad Ali Shah speech text read. Sindh govt presents Rs1.02trn Annual Development Programme for FY2025-26 'The professional tax affects salaried people and small businesses. The cotton fee adds cost to the agriculture and textile sectors.' Besides, the yearly tax under the Motor Vehicle Ordinance for commercial vehicle is being reduced to Rs1,000, 'giving relief to transport and goods carriers'. 'There is also a proposal to end the requirement for third party insurance for motorcycle. 'The mutation fee and sales certificate fees are being reduced to Rs500 from Rs1,000,' the chief minister said. According to Sindh Revenue Board (SRB) website, the general rate of Sindh sales tax on services is 15% with the exception of telecommunication services, which are liable to be taxed at 19.5%. Tax is levied at reduced or concessionary rates in certain cases.
News18
13-06-2025
- Politics
- News18
Delhi HC Asks Govt to Reconsider Life Convict's Release, Cites Kautilya & Ashoka
Last Updated: A man serving life imprisonment for murder had approached the Delhi High Court seeking premature release under the Delhi Government's 2004 remission policy. Rooting remission in ancient Indian jurisprudence, the Delhi High Court cited Kautilya's Arthashastra and Ashoka's edicts while directing the government to reconsider the premature release of a life convict who had once jumped parole. Observing that reformative justice must guide such decisions, a bench led by Justice Girish Kathpalia, in a 22-page judgment, remarked, 'There existed a conscious and consistent thought amongst ancient thinkers, aimed at reformation of criminals in order to achieve the larger goal of peace in society by minimisation of crime and criminogenic tendencies. Later, thinkers across the globe nurtured the idea that reformatory policies are more productive than a deterrent and retributory approach to crime and criminal." These observations came in a case where a man, booked under IPC Section 302 for murder and serving life imprisonment, had filed a plea before the high court seeking premature release under the Delhi Government's 2004 remission policy. It was the petitioner's case that he had already served over 18 years without remission and more than 21 years with remission. He added that he had applied for premature release; however, his request had been rejected five times by the Sentence Review Board (SRB). The said rejections were primarily based on the gravity and perversity of the offence, along with his 2010 parole jump. Further, the authorities had also pointed to his re-arrest in 2015 in two separate cases, although he was subsequently acquitted in both. The Board had further alleged a non-reformative attitude based on his past conduct, and the police had also consistently raised objections. Before the High Court, the petitioner, represented by Senior Advocate Arundhati Katju, argued that all of the SRB's orders were mere copy-paste versions and that the Board had ignored recent developments. While acknowledging that the petitioner had jumped parole, Katju contended that the incident occurred 15 years ago and should not, by any means, bar him from liberty or remission. Presenting commendation certificates from jail and other authorities, the senior counsel highlighted his consistent good behaviour and emphasised that the SRB had failed to re-evaluate the case. On the other hand, the State, represented by Sanjeev Bhandari, Additional Standing Counsel, emphasised the seriousness of the crime and noted that commendation certificates alone were not enough. Arguing that the SRB is a technical committee, the ASC contended that the high court's scope under Article 226 is limited when it comes to reviewing its discretionary decisions. Taking note of the submissions, the court, at the outset, noted that the SRB's repeated rejections showed no real application of mind and were 'virtually copy-paste" from earlier meetings. 'The SRB deals with human beings, that too those who have been deprived of liberty across a long span of time on account of their aggression which led to criminality. The approach of the SRB ought to be reformation-oriented and not a routine disposal/statistics-dominated exercise. The composition of SRB needs to be re-examined by the authorities concerned so as to make the exercise of sentence review meaningful and commensurate to the laudable philosophy of reformation of criminal…," the court added. Addressing the parole violation, the court noted that the incident had occurred way back in 2015 and that more than a decade had passed since. It emphasised that there had not been even a whiff of any allegation of jail misconduct on the part of the petitioner. Highlighting six commendation certificates issued by the jail and other authorities, the court remarked that these certificates reflected genuine reformative growth by the petitioner and should have been meaningfully considered. 'Commendation certificates are not just formalities; they are guiding tools for the SRB to assess real reform," the court added. Accordingly, the court allowed the petition and directed the respondent to reconsider the petitioner's case for premature release.
Indian Express
12-06-2025
- Politics
- Indian Express
Premature release of prisoners: Delhi HC suggests reconstitution of Sentence Review Board, fine-tuning 2004 policy
Hearing a murder convict's plea for premature release, the Delhi High Court on Wednesday referenced the reformatory policy of remission in Kautilya's Arthashastra and suggested that 'the competent authority' deliberate upon the composition of the Sentence Review Board (SRB) and reconstitute the same. It also suggested fine-tuning Delhi's 2004 sentence review policy. Justice Girish Kathpalia was dealing with a plea by a convict, who was serving life imprisonment for murder committed in 2001. He was seeking premature release after spending more than 21 years in prison with remission. The convict's case for premature release had been rejected by the SRB five times between 2020 and 2023, compelling him to then seek a direction from the Delhi High Court. On Wednesday, the Delhi High Court directed the SRB to consider his case afresh. It further directed the SRB, that in case it does not find it to be a fit case to grant premature release to the convict, 'the decision of SRB shall be worded in a manner that one can decipher as to what worked in the mind of SRB'. Holding that the SRB's decision of denial of premature release to the convict 'suffers from vices of non-application of mind and completely mechanical approach to such a sensitive issue', Justice Kathpalia noted, 'The composition of the SRB would make this court assume that each matter is discussed threadbare in such meetings. But unfortunately, the manner in which minutes of these meetings were worded, the allegation of non-application of mind cannot be brushed aside.' 'Every instrumentality of the State, be it judicial or administrative, while deciding an issue must author the decision in such manner that deciphers what worked in the mind of the authority concerned. The court must have material before it to examine as to whether there was proper application of mind or not. In the present case, there is nothing on record to suggest proper application of mind by the SRB,' he added. Placing faith in the convict's reformation, the court observed, 'I have no doubt that the petitioner stands substantially reformed and can become a useful member of the society. Keeping the petitioner in jail for further period would not yield any fruitful result towards his reformation or to the society at large.' Making a case for applying the reformatory tool of premature release or remission, the court recorded, 'Not that due to passage of time, the inherent perversity of the crime per se diminishes in any manner. But for the purposes of reformative sentencing, such long incarceration, as already suffered by the petitioner, the perversity must be visualised as faded. The wound suffered by the kith and kin of the deceased, which was fresh in the year 2001, would have by now reduced to scab.' 'Time heals all wounds. This is the only way to fathom in order to ensure purposive application of the reformatory tool of premature release, otherwise no convict would be ever granted an opportunity to reform himself. For, life imprisonment, by its very nature is awarded in gruesome offences where the appropriate punishment is a bit short of awarding capital sentence. A punishment, to be scientific has to have an end somewhere during lifetime of the convict,' Justice Kathpalia said. While the state had opposed the convict's plea, referring to his misconduct in 2015 when he had jumped parole and his re-arrest in two more criminal cases, the court did not concur with the state's view. '…citing this misconduct, the SRB has repeatedly denied premature release to the petitioner. Some point of time has to be there, when aftereffects of such misconduct must taper down. It has been more than a decade since the petitioner jumped parole and got involved in those two cases. After the year 2015, there is not even a whiff of any allegation of any jail misconduct on the part of the petitioner. Rather, as observed hereafter, subsequently the petitioner was awarded a number of commendations by the jail authorities. Most significantly, as discussed above, the petitioner stands acquitted in those two cases,' the court reasoned. The convict was issued six commendation certificates while in jail, which included appreciation for his work and performance on Republic Days, and his work in assisting jail administration in fighting COVID-19. Taking the commendation certificates into account, the court noted, '…the petitioner had done an extraordinary job in the jail in fight against Corona, due to which the jail administration succeeded in keeping Corona free the jail no.2, even while admitting and quarantining more than 8,200 newly admitted prisoners. These certificates, coupled with the fact that across a period of time, the petitioner was released on parole and furlough more than once show a substantial reformative growth of the petitioner, which is a vital indicator of reduced propensity to commit crime again.' 'As regards possibility of the petitioner committing crime again, merely because he has not physically attained old age, it cannot be said that there are higher chances of his committing crime again. Bodily strength has no
