Latest news with #RolyWalker
The Irish Sun
14 hours ago
- The Irish Sun
Brit AI-drone gunships to fly alongside Apache helicopters in war of the future
BRITAIN'S new AI-drone gunships will fly alongside Apache helicopters in future battles. Apache pilots will command up to six drones, known as mules, carrying missiles, sensors and jamming kit. Advertisement 1 Britain's new AI-drone gunships will fly alongside Apache helicopters in future wars The mules will also be programmed to fight autonomously and control swarms of smaller drones on the ground. This triple-layer system will give the Army far greater firepower and aims to protect our fleet of Apache AH-64Es, Challenger 3 tanks plus soldiers on the ground. More integration of crewed and uncrewed aircraft had been hinted at in the Strategic Defence Review announced earlier this month. Advertisement READ MORE ON DRONES 'Our Autonomous Collaborative Platforms (the mules) will fly alongside the Apache attack helicopters and enhance the Army's ability to strike, survive and win on the battlefield. 'This will be a game-changer. It will be applying the lessons from Ukraine in a world- leading way. It will be putting the UK at the leading edge of innovation in Nato.' Chief of the General Staff Sir Roly Walker said 80 per cent of the Army's weapons in future wars would be drones — as it could take months to build Apaches and tanks and years to train their crews. He said drones were vital as the Ukraine war had 'shown how a £20million tank and four experienced crew can be lost to a £1,000 drone operated by a kid with a few days' training'. Advertisement Most read in Tech He added of the mule drones: 'You don't want to lose them but, if you do, it's not a tragedy because, although sophisticated, they are uncrewed.' Israeli drones obliterate Iranian F-14 fighter jets in explosive aerial assault
Scottish Sun
14 hours ago
- Politics
- Scottish Sun
Brit AI-drone gunships to fly alongside Apache helicopters in war of the future
Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) BRITAIN'S new AI-drone gunships will fly alongside Apache helicopters in future battles. Apache pilots will command up to six drones, known as mules, carrying missiles, sensors and jamming kit. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 1 Britain's new AI-drone gunships will fly alongside Apache helicopters in future wars The mules will also be programmed to fight autonomously and control swarms of smaller drones on the ground. This triple-layer system will give the Army far greater firepower and aims to protect our fleet of Apache AH-64Es, Challenger 3 tanks plus soldiers on the ground. More integration of crewed and uncrewed aircraft had been hinted at in the Strategic Defence Review announced earlier this month. Defence Secretary John Healey told this week's RUSI land warfare conference in London: 'From this year, we will be investing more than £100million in new, initial funding to develop land drone swarms.' READ MORE ON DRONES GULF EXIT Brit & US spy planes quit Gulf amid fears of Iran reprisals over Israel's attack 'Our Autonomous Collaborative Platforms (the mules) will fly alongside the Apache attack helicopters and enhance the Army's ability to strike, survive and win on the battlefield. 'This will be a game-changer. It will be applying the lessons from Ukraine in a world- leading way. It will be putting the UK at the leading edge of innovation in Nato.' Chief of the General Staff Sir Roly Walker said 80 per cent of the Army's weapons in future wars would be drones — as it could take months to build Apaches and tanks and years to train their crews. He said drones were vital as the Ukraine war had 'shown how a £20million tank and four experienced crew can be lost to a £1,000 drone operated by a kid with a few days' training'. He added of the mule drones: 'You don't want to lose them but, if you do, it's not a tragedy because, although sophisticated, they are uncrewed.'
Scottish Sun
03-06-2025
- Business
- Scottish Sun
First non-pilot to lead RAF is picked to command all three armed forces
The married dad-of-two was picked by Sir Kier Starmer over Army Chief General Sir Roly Walker TOP APPOINTMENT First non-pilot to lead RAF is picked to command all three armed forces THE first non-pilot to lead the RAF has been picked to command all three armed forces. Air Chief Marshal Sir Rich Knighton – a career engineer and 'defence bureaucrat' – will take over as Chief of the Defence Staff this autumn. 3 The married dad-of-two was picked by Sir Kier Starmer over Army Chief General Sir Roly Walker, a former SAS commander Credit: AFP 3 Air Chief Marshal Sir Rich Knighton will take over as Chief of the Defence Staff this autumn Credit: @UK MoD Crown Copright 2024 3 The career engineer and 'defence bureaucrat' with Captain Paddy Hemingway.103, at Casement Air base Baldonnel near Dublin Credit: Arthur Edwards / The Sun The married dad-of-two was picked by Sir Kier Starmer over Army Chief General Sir Roly Walker, a former SAS commander. Knighton's only combat tour, according to his official bio, was 'a short stint as Senior Engineer Officer in Italy during the Kosovo campaign'. But he launched the RAF's Tempest plan to get a sixth generation fighter jet which is the government's flagship defence project. Pals insisted Knighton – who earned a 1st Class engineering degree from Cambridge University – was the perfect candidate for implementing Labour's defence reforms. They said: 'Rich is smart, popular and really good at getting sh*t done and he has bucket loads of integrity.' They added: 'For the hard yards of implementing a defence review, there's no one better to role up his sleeves hand get on with it. 'Naysayers would say his background is as engineer, he is a proper defence bureaucrat. 'There is no doubt Roly had a more operational experience but Rich will have plenty of people around him who can advise on that.' They were both on long list of four which included the first ever woman, General Dame Sharon Nesmith, and spychief General Jim Hockenhull. ACM Knighton, 56, will replace Admiral Sir Tony Radakin as the professional head of the forces and the PM's top military advisor. He will also take direct command of the Army, Navy and Air Force under a newly formed Military Strategic Headquarters. He joined the RAF as university cadet in 1988 and describes himself as 'a keen skier and a below-average sportsman who would like to do more sailing'. He maintains a 'private pilots license' and is president of the RAF Powerlifting, Winter Sports and Hockey clubs. Originally from Derbyshire, he lives with his lawyer wife Caitlin in Cambridge. Speaking before the appointment Knighton said engineering had shaped his style of leadership. His told a local newspaper: 'As an engineer in the air force, you are never, at any point, the leading expert in a thing. You rely on the advice of your technicians and your experts, and then you pull together that information, and you make a decision.' He described himelf as an optimist ands said: 'Nobody wants to work for a miserable bastard.' He added: "I'm very much a glass-half-full kind of character. I get a great deal of energy from working with other people. I've learned in my career that optimism and energy are infectious.' An MoD spokesperson said: 'This is speculation. The appointment process is ongoing and any announcement will be made in the usual way.' This comes as the UK will be forced to ramp up defence spending after Keir refused to commit to funding despite his "battle ready" promise. Labour's pledge to 'lead in Nato' would be blown to smithereens if Britain is left behind, a top defence insider said. Top Brass have been baffled by Kier Starmer's refusal to say when he will hit Labour's target of spending 3 per cent. The PM vowed to get Britain "battle ready" yesterday with new doomsday nukes and robotic fighter jets – but refused to say how he will fund it. Donald Trump has demanded allies spend 5 per cent of GDP on defence – and he has threatened to abandon nations that fail to pay their way. Nato's chief Mark Rutte has successfully lobbied allies to try and hit Trump's target by spending 3.5 per cent on core defence – including troops, tanks and ships – and 1.5 per cent on security and infrastructure, including spy agencies. France's President Macron has backed Rutte's demands. And Germany is already on course to hit the target within the next few years. A defence source said Britain's ministers have 'been in denial' about the looming Nato summit and pledges key allies will make. Starmer is expected to discuss the Nato target in a crunch meeting this week. A defence source said: 'Do we want to be lumped with Spain as the only allies that are complaining?' At the launch a landmark Strategic Defence Review Defence Secretary John Healey said: 'Our defence policy is Nato First." 'We will end the hollowing out of our Armed Forces and lead in a stronger, more lethal Nato.' Labour has pledged to increase defence spending from 2.3 per cent of GDP to 2.5 per cent by 2027. Starmer said: 'We have set the ambition to reach 3 per cent in the next Parliament, subject to economic and fiscal conditions.' But pressed on what that meant, he said: 'I'm not going to indulge in the fantasy politics of simply plucking dates from the air.' Defence Secretary Healey said the 3 per cent target was a "certainty". But he backtracked 24-hours later, insisting it was merely an "ambition". Britain's three biggest weapons programmes – including the Trident 2 nuclear deterrent, the new sixth generation fighter jets and new hunter killer submarines – will cost at least 3 per cent of GDP, a former defence minister told The Sun. More to follow... For the latest news on this story keep checking back at The Sun Online is your go-to destination for the best celebrity news, real-life stories, jaw-dropping pictures and must-see video. Like us on Facebook at and follow us from our main Twitter account at @TheSun.
Newsweek
28-05-2025
- Politics
- Newsweek
NATO Army Chief Sounds Alarm: 'The Threat Is Real'
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The "threat is real" to NATO, the chief of the British Army has said, warning of "serious challenges" to the alliance as worries swirl that Russia could launch an attack on NATO in the next few years. "We really have got some serious challenges to deal with collectively," General Sir Roly Walker, the head of the British Army, said during an address at the U.K.-based think tank, the Royal United Services Institute (RUSI) on Wednesday. "The biggest challenge we face, of many, is simply a lack of time," Walker said, adding a "sense of urgency" is needed to "respond to the threats we face." NATO officials have been increasingly ringing alarm bells over how much of a threat Russia will pose to the alliance in the next few years, particularly after inking a possible ceasefire deal in Ukraine that would free up hundreds of thousands of soldiers bogged down along the frontlines. Assessments vary, but one judgment from Denmark's Defense Intelligence Service, published in February, said it believed Russia would be able to wage a "large-scale war" against NATO in the next five years if the U.S. declines to be involved. Soldiers in the Russian Army on Red Square in Moscow on May 9, 2025. Soldiers in the Russian Army on Red Square in Moscow on May 9, 2025. The Kremlin Moscow/picture-alliance/dpa/AP Images Oleh Ivashchenko, the head of Ukraine's foreign intelligence service, said earlier this week Russia would be able to mount some form of attack on Europe two to four years after the end of the Ukraine war—but could be ready to do so much quicker if sanctions are lifted. The more than three years of full-scale war in Ukraine has wreaked havoc on Moscow's land forces, but other swathes of its military, like its air force and much of the navy stationed away from Ukraine, have been largely unscathed. Recent satellite imagery has indicated Russia is building out its bases close to the Finnish border. The construction appears to be part of a longer-looking effort to expand Russian military facilities in spitting distance of NATO, The New York Times reported earlier this month. Military personnel in Finland say they are well aware of Russia's activity close to the border. Officials across the alliance have warned Russia is adept at hybrid warfare, a term that broadly refers to tactics designed to undermine or destabilize opponents but falling short of open conflict. In recent months, several undersea cables in the NATO-dominated Baltic Sea have been cut or damaged in one of the most high-profile sets of hybrid incidents. Some observers feel Russia is more likely to up its more covert attacks or use troops formerly fighting in Ukraine to bite off a small chunk of NATO, taste-testing how the alliance might respond. Spurred on by vociferous criticism from President Donald Trump's administration, NATO members across Europe have pledged to up defense spending, which fell at the end of the Cold War. Trump, ahead of his re-election, suggested he would encourage Russia to attack NATO members he deemed to be falling short of their contributions to the alliance. Trump officials have proposed that European members of NATO dedicate 5 percent of their GDP to defense, far above the previous alliance-wide target of 2 percent that is still not met by a handful of members. The U.S., while the most important player in NATO, does not itself spend 5 percent of its GDP on defense. European officials concede the U.S. has long requested the continent invest more in its own armed forces and widely see dramatic spikes in defense spending as necessary and overdue. The U.S., which has provided long-running security for much of Europe, has indicated will make plans to reduce America's military footprint in Europe in the coming months. "We got the memo," Walker added. "It took a couple of attempts, but we got it."
The Guardian
21-02-2025
- Politics
- The Guardian
Jaysley Beck inquest prompts flood of testimonies of abuse in UK military
A soldier left suicidal after complaints about a senior officer were ignored. Two women told that they needed to grow up, or their heads would be banged together after they complained about sexual harassment by their major. A servicewoman raped and left with PTSD, while her attacker was given a slap on the wrist. Online army forums have been flooded with testimonies of abuse – and the military's failure to tackle it – this week, sparked by the inquest into the death of 19-year-old gunner Jaysley Beck. The head of the army, General Sir Roly Walker, has expressed his disgust and suggested that senior ranks may even be 'actively complicit' in abusive behaviour. The Ministry of Defence has promised that lessons will be learned. But longtime campaigners for change in the way sexual complaints in the military are dealt with have heard this all before. After an inquest this week found that the army played 'more than a contributory part' in the teenager's death, they have accused defence chiefs of paying 'lip service' to reform. Beck's family have led calls for the most serious complaints to be removed from the military entirely, calling directly on the prime minister to force change. The teenager killed herself after the army botched an investigation into her complaint of a sexual assault making her reluctant to report her boss when he launched an 'onslaught' against her. 'Too often, servicewomen and men don't feel able to speak up out of fear of being victimised and even when they do, the army is left to investigate itself,' said her family. 'This cannot continue.' Sarah Atherton, a former chair of the House of Commons defence subcommittee and an ex-servicewoman, is tired of promises. She points to other scandals, like women being treated as 'property' in the Red Arrows, submariners subjected to 'intolerable' misogyny. She notes a major review in 2019 and the damning parliamentary inquiry she led in 2021, which found that almost two-thirds of women in the armed forces had experienced bullying, sexual harassment and discrimination. 'I've spoken to countless service chiefs who are appalled at this abhorrent behaviour, who say it can't continue,' she says. 'They introduce initiatives, they introduce policies – yet nothing changes. It's lip service.' Evidence from more than a thousand people who shared testimonies on the military site Fill Your Boots and in closed forums after the inquest has been harrowing. One woman described a group of male soldiers trying to open her door after a night out: 'The next minute my door was flung open and they had used a boxing bag to barge the door,' she wrote. 'I was told it was my word against theirs.' Another described not wanting to leave her room after being hounded by an aggressive colleague. 'The [Royal Military Police] told me unless he had 'actually committed a crime' there was nothing they could do,' she wrote. A former commanding officer who had worked in complaints said weak leadership 'allowed poor behaviour to continue and at times flourish – often under the guise of workplace banter and fun'. The majority of testimonies appear to have come from women, but many men have also spoken out. One anonymous senior figure described his regret at not officially reporting an incident that saw two junior officers 'pull a bloke's trousers down and jam a finger right up his arse'. Another man described fellow soldiers forcing 'objects and parts of their own body into me', saying he sometimes slept outside to stay safe. The MoD has said that reforms have been made: the chain of command has been removed from the complaints system, anonymous hotlines have been introduced and 'zero-tolerance policies' made clear. After the inquest the veterans minister, Alistair Carns, said the MoD was 'deeply sorry for the failure' to protect Gunner Beck, the army would 'learn lessons' and 'substantive changes' were making the military safer. But the testimonies show that the complaints process can still be manipulated, says Atherton. 'The collusion, the loss of evidence, the misogyny, the old boy network, [it] is still going on,' she says. 'This has to be a moment for the MoD to look at itself and say: 'Did we do enough?' And the answer to that is, clearly, no.' Emma Norton, the founder of the Centre for Military Justice and a lawyer for Beck's family, argues that changes to the appeals system have made it more difficult to challenge an outcome, with only 6% of complainants the centre deals with now able to appeal, compared with about a quarter previously. 'Our experience of supporting women that go through the service complaints process to report discrimination, harassment and bullying is that it is appalling and brutalizing,' she says. Diane Allen, a retired lieutenant-colonel from the Independent Defence Authority, which helps victims in the military, hopes a promised independent defence commissioner, announced by the government earlier this month, will help. 'If the MoD is unable or unwilling to enact change, we need an independent figure to mandate it,' she says. 'Either there has to be some real backbone in military leadership, or parliament has to say we're not willing for the UK's reputation to keep being trashed by this.'
