Jaysley Beck inquest prompts flood of testimonies of abuse in UK military

A soldier left suicidal after complaints about a senior officer were ignored. Two women told that they needed to grow up, or their heads would be banged together after they complained about sexual harassment by their major. A servicewoman raped and left with PTSD, while her attacker was given a slap on the wrist.
Online army forums have been flooded with testimonies of abuse – and the military's failure to tackle it – this week, sparked by the inquest into the death of 19-year-old gunner Jaysley Beck. The head of the army, General Sir Roly Walker, has expressed his disgust and suggested that senior ranks may even be 'actively complicit' in abusive behaviour. The Ministry of Defence has promised that lessons will be learned.
But longtime campaigners for change in the way sexual complaints in the military are dealt with have heard this all before. After an inquest this week found that the army played 'more than a contributory part' in the teenager's death, they have accused defence chiefs of paying 'lip service' to reform.
Beck's family have led calls for the most serious complaints to be removed from the military entirely, calling directly on the prime minister to force change. The teenager killed herself after the army botched an investigation into her complaint of a sexual assault making her reluctant to report her boss when he launched an 'onslaught' against her.
'Too often, servicewomen and men don't feel able to speak up out of fear of being victimised and even when they do, the army is left to investigate itself,' said her family. 'This cannot continue.'
Sarah Atherton, a former chair of the House of Commons defence subcommittee and an ex-servicewoman, is tired of promises. She points to other scandals, like women being treated as 'property' in the Red Arrows, submariners subjected to 'intolerable' misogyny. She notes a major review in 2019 and the damning parliamentary inquiry she led in 2021, which found that almost two-thirds of women in the armed forces had experienced bullying, sexual harassment and discrimination.
'I've spoken to countless service chiefs who are appalled at this abhorrent behaviour, who say it can't continue,' she says. 'They introduce initiatives, they introduce policies – yet nothing changes. It's lip service.'
Evidence from more than a thousand people who shared testimonies on the military site Fill Your Boots and in closed forums after the inquest has been harrowing.
One woman described a group of male soldiers trying to open her door after a night out: 'The next minute my door was flung open and they had used a boxing bag to barge the door,' she wrote. 'I was told it was my word against theirs.' Another described not wanting to leave her room after being hounded by an aggressive colleague. 'The [Royal Military Police] told me unless he had 'actually committed a crime' there was nothing they could do,' she wrote. A former commanding officer who had worked in complaints said weak leadership 'allowed poor behaviour to continue and at times flourish – often under the guise of workplace banter and fun'.
The majority of testimonies appear to have come from women, but many men have also spoken out. One anonymous senior figure described his regret at not officially reporting an incident that saw two junior officers 'pull a bloke's trousers down and jam a finger right up his arse'. Another man described fellow soldiers forcing 'objects and parts of their own body into me', saying he sometimes slept outside to stay safe.
The MoD has said that reforms have been made: the chain of command has been removed from the complaints system, anonymous hotlines have been introduced and 'zero-tolerance policies' made clear. After the inquest the veterans minister, Alistair Carns, said the MoD was 'deeply sorry for the failure' to protect Gunner Beck, the army would 'learn lessons' and 'substantive changes' were making the military safer.
But the testimonies show that the complaints process can still be manipulated, says Atherton. 'The collusion, the loss of evidence, the misogyny, the old boy network, [it] is still going on,' she says. 'This has to be a moment for the MoD to look at itself and say: 'Did we do enough?' And the answer to that is, clearly, no.'
Emma Norton, the founder of the Centre for Military Justice and a lawyer for Beck's family, argues that changes to the appeals system have made it more difficult to challenge an outcome, with only 6% of complainants the centre deals with now able to appeal, compared with about a quarter previously.
'Our experience of supporting women that go through the service complaints process to report discrimination, harassment and bullying is that it is appalling and brutalizing,' she says.
Diane Allen, a retired lieutenant-colonel from the Independent Defence Authority, which helps victims in the military, hopes a promised independent defence commissioner, announced by the government earlier this month, will help. 'If the MoD is unable or unwilling to enact change, we need an independent figure to mandate it,' she says. 'Either there has to be some real backbone in military leadership, or parliament has to say we're not willing for the UK's reputation to keep being trashed by this.'

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Spectator

29 minutes ago

• Spectator

They will say this was ‘parliament at its best'. And they will be lying

The portents this morning were grim. The Grim Leadreaper was doing her HR manager of Hades act, buzzing around with faux sincerity like a wasp that had discovered LGBT History Month. Jess Philips took a great huff on her vape in the lobby before walking into the chamber. Perhaps it was sulphur flavour. Inside the House of Commons the obviously sham last-minute 'switcher' Jack Abbott from the bill committee, as spineless a backbench toady as you ever did see, was there being all chummy with the unparalleled toad Jake Richards. Were they bonding perhaps over their new-found enthusiasm for death? It was Brokeback Mountain meets The Zone of Interest. Voting began on amendments. A glut of ambitious backbench MPs rejected a safeguard brought forward by a coalition of MPs as diverse as Dame Karen Bradley for the Tories, Jim Allister for the TUV and brave and doughty Labour MPs Rachel Maskell and Jonathan Davies. It was designed to stop people from killing themselves because they felt like a burden. Then Leadbeater herself spoke. 'It's not often that we get to debate morality issues in parliament', she said; just three days after parliament voted to decriminalise abortion up to birth via a sneakily tacked-on amendment and a few minutes of debate. The Leisure Centre operative turned supreme arbiter of life and death likes to talk about how she and her bill represent 'parliament at its best'. The irony being that anyone who truly believes this would fail any reasonable capacity test. The concerns of the key royal colleges of experts, who'd made repeated interventions in opposition to the bill, were shrugged off as 'different views'. Wera Hobhouse, the Lib Dem MP for Bath complained that some members of the public had suggested that the current crop of MPs were too stupid to discuss an issue of this magnitude. For all their faults sometimes the General Public really do hit the nail on the head. Not only were many demonstrably too stupid to engage properly, some of them couldn't even be bothered to stay awake. Wearing a pair of dark glasses, Lib Dem MP Tessa Munt openly dozed through several speeches. Certain moments added to the general atmosphere of despair. Jake Richards rolled his eyes and performatively scoffed as Naz Shah explained the bill's failure to close the anorexia loophole. Labour MP Lewis Atkinson commended the work of the hospice movement in alleviating suffering at the end of life. His praise was treacly, sweet and insincere. Almost diabetes-inducing in its efforts – another disease which will no doubt qualify for state sanctioned death in due time. While scrutinising the bill on the committee, the same Lewis Atkinson also rejected conscience amendments that would have prevented hospices and care homes from being forced to provide assisted dying The walking embodiment of the banality of evil, Lib Dem MP Luke Taylor said that voting in favour was a good way to 'bookend the week'. That's the level of import MPs gave to this issue of life and death: bump off the weak to bookend your week. Many impassioned MPs never got to speak at all; Rosie Duffield left the chamber in disgust after trying to catch the Deputy Speaker's eye for several hours, with no success. There was some debate about whether the Prime Minister – a long term death enthusiast – would turn up to vote. In the end, he did. It was nice of Esther Rantzen to send her own personal proxy. Bump off the weak to bookend your week It's worth naming those Labour MPs who have gone above and beyond in their attempts to make their colleagues see sense. Those, like Rachael Maskell, who worked behind the scenes to try and put down amendments that would safeguard the vulnerable. Jess Asato, who made probably the best and most forensic speech of the debate. Diane Abbott who, despite obvious illness, rose to speak movingly about the risks of compulsion. And Adam Jogee, who left a dying relative's bedside to come and vote because the bill's 'compassionate' proposer refused to find him a supporter to pair with and so spend the last moments he had with a loved one. Do remember them: they have been principled exceptions to the otherwise disgraceful rule. Given we are now a culture which embraces and promotes death, perhaps a post-script on political deaths. When the inevitable national inquiry delves into the abuse and shortcomings of this law – which it will – the Labour backbenchers and Tory grandees who made this possible, these back-slapping middle-management Molochs will have their names etched in history as the people who brought this about. They will achieve a sort of immortality; just not as the progressive liberators they vainly imagine themselves to be. Secondly, while much has been written about the impending death of the Tory party, what seems to have gone unnoticed is the death of Labour as well. What once made claims to be the party of working people, a force in politics on the side of the needy and the vulnerable, has in just under a year become a death cult for comfortable progressives. The tragedy is that they will drag down the very people they purport to protect with them.

The Independent

32 minutes ago

• The Independent

James Cleverly emotional as he tells MPs of best friend's death

James Cleverly spoke in the House of Commons on Friday during the debate on the assisted dying bill. He revealed that his closest friend recently passed away "painfully" from esophageal cancer, after Mr Cleverly spent the final weeks of his life with him. Mr Cleverly, a leading opponent of the Bill, stated his concerns are practical and not based on faith or ignorance. He expressed a desire to alleviate suffering but said the Bill, which was voted through with a narrow margin, was not a good enough piece of legislation to pass. Watch the video in full above.

The Independent

37 minutes ago

• The Independent

Watch: The moment MPs vote in favour of assisted dying bill after emotional debate

MPs in the House of Commons have voted in favour of the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill. The vote was 314 in favour to 219 against. The bill aims to legalise the right for terminally ill individuals in England and Wales to end their lives with medical assistance. The legislation will now proceed to the House of Lords for further scrutiny, with proposer Kim Leadbeater expressing emotion as it passed. Watch the video in full above.