Latest news with #NickyFox
India Today
10-06-2025
- Politics
- India Today
We're consolidating: Nasa trims digital presence as Trump's budget cut hits
American space agency, Nasa, which has been known for its transparency and massive social media presence has begun trimming its digital presence as it archives big-ticket mission handles on X and other social media platforms."Important Update: As part of NASA's effort to streamline communications, this account will be archived in the coming weeks – but don't worry, my mission isn't going anywhere," read several of the handles on X. These included social media handles of Perseverance rover, Curiosity rover, Voyager Missions and social media handle of Dr. Nicky Fox, NASA's Science Associate Administrator read the message, "We're consolidating our X presence." The latest developments come as Nasa continues to function without a full-time administrator as the Trump administration pulled its support for Jared Issacman, who was due senate clearance to become to next Nasa chief. The White House ended its support over reports of Issacman donating money to the Democrats in the Trump administration's fiscal year 2026 budget proposal for NASA paints a grim picture for the agency's future. It calls for a staggering 47% cut to NASA's science funding and slashes nearly one-third of its workforce — reducing staff from 17,391 to 11, the budget still requires Congressional approval, its implications are alarming. According to the Planetary Society, the proposal would cancel 41 science missions, including the Mars Sample Return (MSR) program — despite years of effort by the Perseverance rover to collect crucial Martian on the chopping block is OSIRIS-APEX, the probe currently en route to asteroid Apophis after successfully delivering asteroid Bennu samples to casualties include the Jupiter-orbiting Juno mission and NASA's second withdrawal from the Rosalind Franklin rover, a joint Mars project with ESA. If passed, the FY26 budget could mark a dramatic retreat in American space exploration and planetary Watch
RNZ News
27-05-2025
- General
- RNZ News
NASA senior scientist Dr Nicky Fox
NASA's Dr Nicky Fox was just 9 months old when Neil Armstrong first walked on the moon. In England, Nicky's father is said to have propped her up in front of the TV to watch those famous first steps while giving her a running commentary as the event unfolded. It was the start of a life-long interest in science and space. Dr. Nicky Fox joined NASA in 2018 as the director of the Heliophysics Division in the Science Mission Directorate (SMD) and is now the associate administrator for NASA's SMD. Prior to August 2018, Dr. Fox worked at the Applied Physics Lab at the Johns Hopkins University. She has authored numerous scientific articles and papers, in addition to delivering science presentations worldwide. To embed this content on your own webpage, cut and paste the following: See terms of use.
Yahoo
15-05-2025
- Science
- Yahoo
Why NASA's VIPER Lunar Rover Is Still in Limbo
The only consistent thing about NASA's VIPER lunar rover is that the road to the moon has been a rocky one. And now the space agency has nixed its attempt to find a commercial partner to launch VIPER moonward, leaving the nearly complete little space vehicle in a continued state of limbo. VIPER (Volatiles Investigating Polar Explorer Rover) was intended to launch this year to explore the lunar south pole in search of buried ice and other chemical compounds. But NASA canceled it in July 2024 after delays led to cost overruns. This is the second time NASA has nixed a lunar rover mission in recent years, says Philip Metzger, a planetary physicist at the University of Central Florida (UCF). In 2018 NASA axed the Resource Prospector rover, which would have done similar exploration. In January NASA raised hopes that VIPER might somehow still see space when it put out a call for proposals for private aerospace companies to launch and operate the rover. On May 7, however, NASA canceled that call for proposals. [Sign up for Today in Science, a free daily newsletter] The agency says it is exploring new strategies for VIPER in the future. 'We look forward to accomplishing future volatiles science with VIPER as we continue NASA's Moon to Mars exploration efforts,' said Nicky Fox, associate administrator of NASA's Science Mission Directorate, in a recent statement. The rover's budget problems started with supply chain disruptions during the COVID pandemic, says Casey Dreier, chief of space policy at the Planetary Society. It was also slated to launch on a platform built by aerospace company Astrobotic, which failed its first landing of a scaled-down version of that platform The mission was unusually far along when NASA pulled the plug: the rover was fully assembled and was in the final stages of testing for a launch. By that point, NASA had sunk nearly $800 million into its construction and the contract with Astrobotic. It's not clear why NASA has been unable to find a private partner to launch the rover, but such a company would have assumed the costs of the mission and agreed to share the data freely with the space agency. That made for a tough business case for private companies, SpaceNews reported earlier this month. The 2.5-meter-tall rover was designed to search for resources such as water ice, carbon dioxide and helium in the lunar subsurface. The goal, says Clive Neal, a lunar expert at the University of Notre Dame, is to find resources that humans could use to establish a permanent research base on the moon. The data on where such volatiles might be and whether they're accessible and extractable are crucial for the Artemis program's plans for long-term human presence on the moon. The rover carries four instruments: a neutron spectrometer to detect water as deep as a meter below the surface, a near-infrared spectrometer to determine the makeup of samples, a mass spectrometer to analyze gases in the environment at touchdown and a drill called TRIDENT (The Regolith and Ice Drill for Exploring New Terrains). The drill is one of VIPER's blockbuster features, designed to pull samples from up to a meter deep. The cancelation of VIPER, after 2018's loss of Resource Prospector, is short-sighted, given NASA's goals, Neal says. 'Is NASA actually serious about getting humans back to the moon?' he says. 'Are they actually serious about enacting our current space policy? Have they actually read it?' VIPER could also answer basic science questions about the origin of the water on the moon, says UCF's Metzger. It may have been part of the lunar core from the moment of its formation, or the water could have arrived with planetary dust or large impactors over time, among other possibilities. 'Understanding those processes is crucial for understanding our solar system,' Metzger says. The answers could reveal more about how common water-rich bodies are in the galaxy and how many planets or moons might host life. That's the big question. Until NASA releases more details on potential future partnership structures, the project remains in a state of suspended animation. 'I don't know what to make of it because there is so little information,' Dreier says. It's possible NASA could reopen negotiations with Astrobotic, the company that was originally going to launch the rover, Neal says. Or, Metzger suggests, the agency might be seeking international partners that could take on some of the operational costs. There are no other U.S. missions on the horizon with the drilling capabilities of VIPER. If the rover doesn't find a way to the moon, Neal says, two other lunar explorers from China could pick up the banner of volatiles science: Chang'e 7 and 8. As uncertain as things are looking for VIPER, though, it's an optimistic sign that NASA hasn't dropped the rover outright, Dreier says, given that the White House has proposed a 50 percent cut to NASA's science programs and a more than 20 percent cut to the agency overall in 2026. 'If it's not openly identified as being canceled,' Dreier says, 'you are winning as a NASA science mission right now.'
Scientific American
15-05-2025
- Science
- Scientific American
Remember VIPER, NASA's Off-Again, On-Again Lunar Rover? It's Still in Limbo
The only consistent thing about NASA's VIPER lunar rover is that the road to the moon has been a rocky one. And now the space agency has nixed its attempt to find a commercial partner to launch VIPER moonward, leaving the nearly complete little space vehicle in a continued state of limbo. VIPER (Volatiles Investigating Polar Explorer Rover) was intended to launch this year to explore the lunar south pole in search of buried ice and other chemical compounds. But NASA canceled it in July 2024 after delays led to cost overruns. This is the second time NASA has nixed a lunar rover mission in recent years, says Philip Metzger, a planetary physicist at the University of Central Florida (UCF). In 2018 NASA axed the Resource Prospector rover, which would have done similar exploration. In January NASA raised hopes that VIPER might somehow still see space when it put out a call for proposals for private aerospace companies to launch and operate the rover. On May 7, however, NASA canceled that call for proposals. On supporting science journalism If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today. The agency says it is exploring new strategies for VIPER in the future. 'We look forward to accomplishing future volatiles science with VIPER as we continue NASA's Moon to Mars exploration efforts,' said Nicky Fox, associate administrator of NASA's Science Mission Directorate, in a recent statement. Why can't VIPER get off the ground? The rover's budget problems started with supply chain disruptions during the COVID pandemic, says Casey Dreier, chief of space policy at the Planetary Society. It was also slated to launch on a platform built by aerospace company Astrobotic, which failed its first landing of a scaled-down version of that platform The mission was unusually far along when NASA pulled the plug: the rover was fully assembled and was in the final stages of testing for a launch. By that point, NASA had sunk nearly $800 million into its construction and the contract with Astrobotic. It's not clear why NASA has been unable to find a private partner to launch the rover, but such a company would have assumed the costs of the mission and agreed to share the data freely with the space agency. That made for a tough business case for private companies, SpaceNews reported earlier this month. What kind of science was VIPER supposed to do? The 2.5-meter-tall rover was designed to search for resources such as water ice, carbon dioxide and helium in the lunar subsurface. The goal, says Clive Neal, a lunar expert at the University of Notre Dame, is to find resources that humans could use to establish a permanent research base on the moon. The data on where such volatiles might be and whether they're accessible and extractable are crucial for the Artemis program's plans for long-term human presence on the moon. The rover carries four instruments: a neutron spectrometer to detect water as deep as a meter below the surface, a near-infrared spectrometer to determine the makeup of samples, a mass spectrometer to analyze gases in the environment at touchdown and a drill called TRIDENT (The Regolith and Ice Drill for Exploring New Terrains). The drill is one of VIPER's blockbuster features, designed to pull samples from up to a meter deep. The cancelation of VIPER, after 2018's loss of Resource Prospector, is short-sighted, given NASA's goals, Neal says. 'Is NASA actually serious about getting humans back to the moon?' he says. 'Are they actually serious about enacting our current space policy? Have they actually read it?' VIPER could also answer basic science questions about the origin of the water on the moon, says UCF's Metzger. It may have been part of the lunar core from the moment of its formation, or the water could have arrived with planetary dust or large impactors over time, among other possibilities. 'Understanding those processes is crucial for understanding our solar system,' Metzger says. The answers could reveal more about how common water-rich bodies are in the galaxy and how many planets or moons might host life. What's next for VIPER? That's the big question. Until NASA releases more details on potential future partnership structures, the project remains in a state of suspended animation. 'I don't know what to make of it because there is so little information,' Dreier says. It's possible NASA could reopen negotiations with Astrobotic, the company that was originally going to launch the rover, Neal says. Or, Metzger suggests, the agency might be seeking international partners that could take on some of the operational costs. There are no other U.S. missions on the horizon with the drilling capabilities of VIPER. If the rover doesn't find a way to the moon, Neal says, two other lunar explorers from China could pick up the banner of volatiles science: Chang'e 7 and 8. As uncertain as things are looking for VIPER, though, it's an optimistic sign that NASA hasn't dropped the rover outright, Dreier says, given that the White House has proposed a 50 percent cut to NASA's science programs and a more than 20 percent cut to the agency overall in 2026. 'If it's not openly identified as being canceled,' Dreier says, 'you are winning as a NASA science mission right now.'
Gizmodo
09-05-2025
- Science
- Gizmodo
NASA Has a Badass Moon Rover but No Way to Get It to the Moon
NASA's VIPER is designed to search for water ice around the Moon's south pole. But instead of exploring the lunar terrain, the fully assembled four-wheeled robot is in storage at the Johnson Space Center in Houston. After canceling its VIPER mission last year, NASA is still searching for alternatives to launch its lunar rover, and the agency just took another step backward in making it happen. NASA canceled a solicitation for partnership proposals it had sent out earlier this year, calling on the private sector to take over its VIPER mission. This week, the agency announced it would explore alternative options to deliver its lunar rover to the Moon. 'We appreciate the efforts of those who proposed to the Lunar Volatiles Science Partnership Announcement for Partnership Proposals call,' Nicky Fox, associate administrator of NASA's Science Mission Directorate, said in a statement. 'We look forward to accomplishing future volatiles science with VIPER as we continue NASA's Moon to Mars exploration efforts.' VIPER, or Volatiles Investigating Polar Exploration Rover, was originally scheduled to launch in 2023. The launch date was first pushed back to 2024 and later to 2025 due to additional schedule and supply chain delays. In July 2024, the space agency decided to cancel the mission altogether, stating that it threatens to disrupt other commercial payload missions to the Moon. At first, NASA's plan was to disassemble the VIPER rover and use its parts for future missions. The decision, however, sparked outrage from the science community over the loss of the lunar explorer. In response, NASA abruptly put together a call for the private sector to take over its robot and send it to the Moon. Space startups, such as Intuitive Machines, stepped up to put together a plan to respond to NASA's request for information. It's unclear why NASA has reversed earlier decision to pursue a private partnership to send VIPER to the Moon. NASA has already spent $450 million developing its VIPER mission, and the agency declared that it wouldn't spend any more money on getting the rover to land on the lunar surface. Without the help of the private sector, NASA's alternatives for VIPER, at no additional cost from its own pocket, seem rather limited. 'The agency will announce a new strategy for VIPER in the future,' NASA wrote in its statement.
