Latest news with #InsolvencyandBankruptcyBoardofIndia
Mint
15 hours ago
- Business
- Mint
IBC's weak spot: Slow, difficult recovery from dubious pre-bankruptcy deals
New Delhi: Companies on the brink of collapse tend to do certain transactions that benefit the promoters or close partners but are detrimental to the organization and its creditors. While such 'dubious transactions' can later be set aside during bankruptcy proceedings by tribunals, getting the money back is proving an uphill task. Data from regulator Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI) reviewed by Mint showed that in FY25, just ₹1,322 crore or a tenth of the amount involved in 'avoidance transactions' disposed of by tribunals were recovered. And overall, just 12% of the ₹65,650 crore worth voidable deals executed by promoters and management of 368 companies–and where tribunals have given their verdict–were recovered, according to IBBI. Such deals could include paying off a friendly creditor just before bankruptcy proceedings while ignoring others, moving assets to related parties or hiding them, selling assets for less than they're worth, or taking loans on unfair or excessive terms. Also read | A series of court orders changed bankruptcy rules. Now, the govt is amending the law 'There is often misconduct by earlier management pre-insolvency and it might be a reason for the insolvency in some cases," said Dhananjay Kumar, partner (head-insolvency and restructuring) at law firm Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas. 'Recovery of such amounts is a fundamental function of a law like IBC (Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code)," added Kumar. Other challenges pointed out by Kumar include lack of data to challenge these transactions, lack of funds with resolution professionals, and slow movement in National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT). The matter assumes significance because money recovered from dubious transactions adds to the pool of resources available for a corporate restructure plan. According to IBBI's estimates, on a conservative scale, a decision on avoidance transactions by tribunals would add recovery to creditors by at least 10%. Yogendra Aldak, partner at Lakshmikumaran and Sridharan Attorneys, said the high amounts being flagged as avoidance transactions highlight an alarming trend of promoters deliberately using such transactions 'to deprive a company of its resources for self-serving purposes leading to a snowball effect during times of stress". Read this | Scrapping a key bankruptcy rule may yield faster liquidation, better recovery Further, Aldak said IBC has not been designed as a debt-recovery machine and, instead, prioritises resolution of distressed companies. So, to avoid delays in rescuing businesses, taking decisions on avoidance transactions has been kept independent of corporate debt resolution. However, this makes it hard to recover money from avoidance transactions. For example, only deals made within two years before the insolvency process can be reviewed, which means many questionable transactions are never examined, Aldak explained. Another problem, he said, is tracking the money, as it is often moved through shell companies or hidden in other countries, making recovery even harder. Anisha Jhunjhunwala, senior consultant-IBC at NPV Insolvency Professionals Pvt. Ltd, said that despite clear evidence, enforcing clawbacks from avoidance transactions is a lengthy legal battle, with promoters delaying proceedings through litigation, and tracing diverted assets is complex, especially when routed through layers of related entities or parked overseas. Also read | NCLT member crunch slows down bankruptcy resolution 'The high quantum of flagged transactions reflects serious lapses and, in some cases, wilful misconduct by promoters, particularly during the twilight period before insolvency," said Jhunjhunwala. 'It shows that promoters, anticipating distress, often prioritize asset stripping over stakeholder interest, highlighting the need for stricter pre-insolvency oversight and faster adjudication timelines." The fact that it often takes considerable time for a bankruptcy petition by a creditor to be admitted in a tribunal only allows more time for such unscrupulous activities to take place. Till the end of March 2025, close to 1,200 bankrupt enterprises have been restructured under IBC and their creditors got the chance to recover ₹3.89 trillion or about a third of their admitted claims. This is in addition to proceeds from companies liquidated and the recoveries made by lenders who struck settlement deals with corporate borrowers before tribunals initiated insolvency proceedings. And read | Bankruptcy resolution professionals face creditor fury as cases reach courts
Business Standard
3 days ago
- Business
- Business Standard
M S Sahoo
M S Sahoo is an acclaimed thought leader in financial markets and served as the first Chairperson of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India. He has held several significant positions in the Indian financial sector.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
5 days ago
- Business
- Business Standard
IBC in stress: Survival depends on commitment to its core principles
Public laws aim to keep the crime proceeds beyond the reach of criminals while punishing the criminals. Although these proceeds were never the state's property, state benefits from their confiscation M S Sahoo Ashish Makhija Listen to This Article The Indian Parliament in 2016 enacted the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) to address the country's persistent challenges of financial stress and managing bad debts, with the overarching objective of driving economic growth. In its initial years, the IBC benefited from rare institutional alignment. The legislature amended the code six times in the first five years to address implementation challenges and respond to the evolving economic environment. With alacrity, the executive issued the rules and regulations, established the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI) and National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), accredited insolvency professionals, and built the supporting ecosystem. The
The Hindu
05-06-2025
- Business
- The Hindu
Is IBC an effective resolution tool?
The story so far: More than eight years have passed since the enactment of India's Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC). According to data from the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI), creditors have realised ₹3.89 lakh crore under the framework, with a recovery rate of over 32.8% against admitted claims. Why was the IBC enacted? India enacted the IBC, its first comprehensive bankruptcy law, in 2016 to improve the overall corporate insolvency resolution process. Shifting control from debtors to creditors, the IBC introduced a time-bound resolution mechanism to streamline bankruptcy proceedings, reduce judicial delays, and improve creditor recoveries. According to current provisions, a maximum timeline of 330 days is allowed to find a resolution for a company admitted into the insolvency resolution process. Otherwise, the company goes into liquidation. So far, the Code has rescued 1,194 companies through resolution plans. Is IBC a preferred route for debt recovery? As per the Reserve Bank of India report on Trend and Progress of Banking in India released in December 2024, the IBC emerged as the dominant recovery route, accounting for 48% of all recoveries made by banks followed by the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest (SARFAESI) Act (32%), Debt Recovery Tribunals (17%), and Lok Adalats (3%) in the Financial Year 2023-24. The realisation under IBC is more than 170.1% as against the liquidation value. Resolution plans, on average, are yielding 93.41% of the fair value of the Corporate Debtors (CDs), IBBI said. Further, 1,276 cases have been settled through appeal, review, or settlement, and 1,154 cases have been withdrawn under section 12A. The Code has referred 2,758 companies for liquidation, as per IBBI data. Nearly 10 companies are being resolved against five going into liquidation. Has IBC been an effective recovery mechanism? Akshat Khetan, Founder, AU Corporate Advisory and Legal Services, pointed out that IBC has changed the underlying credit culture. As the Supreme Court once observed, 'the defaulter's paradise is lost' and the Code has created a credible threat that ensures timely repayment. On the recovery rate of 32.8%, Mr. Khetan pointed out that it must be interpreted in light of the distressed nature of the assets that come into the IBC process, often after years of erosion. As the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal has rightly remarked in one of its rulings, 'IBC is not a recovery mechanism; it is a resolution framework.' Compared to legacy systems, where recovery rates were often below 20% with timelines extending into decades, a 32.8% realisation is a leap forward, he said. Mr. Khetan also stated that the statistic does not capture qualitative gains, such as job preservation, improved enterprise value, and restored investor confidence. In a framework designed to balance resolution over liquidation, the broader economic impact of IBC far outweighs numerical recovery alone, he said. The provisions of the IBC have prompted debtors to take early action in distress situations, marking a shift in their behaviour. National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) data show that 30,310 cases were settled prior to admission, covering underlying defaults worth ₹13.78 lakh crore till December 2024. A study by the Indian Institute of Management, Bangalore, submitted to IBBI, said IBC has injected discipline in the credit allocation process and has prompted borrowers to adhere to stipulated payment schedules. The gross non-performing assets of the scheduled commercial banks have declined from a peak of 11.2% in March 2018 to 2.8% in March 2024. A part of that reduction is attributable to resolution processes enabled under IBC, it said. The study also indicated a 3% reduction in the cost of debt for distressed firms post-IBC, compared to non-distressed firms , indicating an improved credit environment for distressed firms. The IBC has had a positive impact on corporate governance, reflected in the increased proportion of independent directors on the boards of companies resolved under the Code. What are the major challenges? In a recent report, India Ratings and Research said that judicial delays and post-resolution uncertainties continue to affect confidence in the IBC framework. Even when resolution applicants are ready and the Committee of Creditors has granted approval, delays at the NCLT continue to push recovery timelines. In several cases, such delays result in extended litigation or failed implementation, increasing the risk of liquidation for a viable asset that requires timely execution, it said. The future insolvencies also raise questions about the Code's readiness to handle non-traditional enterprise defaults. While the IBC is legally broad enough to accommodate various resolution strategies, key commercial elements such as intellectual property valuation, treatment of employee dues, and tech continuity require a clearer treatment under the framework to make it future-ready, India Ratings said. To enhance its effectiveness, India must invest in strengthening tribunal infrastructure, allow for pre-packaged insolvency, and establish jurisprudential guardrails to protect bona fide commercial decisions from post-resolution uncertainty, Mr. Khetan said. While challenges persist, including process delays and recovery rates below expectations, the Code's foundational structure remains sound. As implementation matures and jurisprudence evolves, the IBC is well-positioned to overcome these hurdles and fully realise its transformative potential in India's financial ecosystem, IBBI Chairman Ravi Mital said in the recent quarterly newsletter. Does the SC verdict on Bhushan Steel pose a challenge to IBC? The recent developments in the Bhushan Power and Steel Ltd. case have reignited concerns around the finality of resolution outcomes and the predictability of the framework. While the decision upholds compliance standards, its timing and implications highlight the need for judicial clarity and faster adjudication to sustain investor confidence in the process in the long term, India Ratings said. By questioning a transaction that had been closed and operational for years, it risks unsettling the core principle of commercial certainty. If resolution applicants fear judicial reversals even after significant investment, they may hesitate to bid, undermining the IBC's very purpose. The Bhushan verdict thus underscores the need for legal sanctity once a resolution plan is approved and implemented, Mr. Khetan said. The IBC is not merely a piece of economic legislation, it is the backbone of India's credit ecosystem. Its future lies in striking a fine balance between judicial oversight and economic pragmatism. As India aspires to become a $5 trillion economy, robust and predictable insolvency mechanisms are indispensable. The Code must remain nimble, continually evolving to meet emerging realities while ensuring that commercial wisdom is not second-guessed endlessly, he said. Almost 78% of the ongoing Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) cases have exceeded 270 days, post-admission by the NCLT, as on March 31, 2025, ratings agency ICRA said. A sustained momentum would be needed to minimise haircuts for lenders, which remain high at 67%, it said. Nevertheless, some of the recent judgments reinforce the need for timely and transparent resolution, thereby putting greater onus on the Committee of Creditors (CoC) and NCLT. However, such rulings may also impact investor confidence in stressed assets setting precedents that the decision made by the CoC and the NCLT may be challenged and overturned by the judicial system, thus impacting the effectiveness of the resolution process, ICRA said.
Time of India
02-06-2025
- Business
- Time of India
IBBI notifies amendments to streamline corporate insolvency process
The IBBI has notified amendments to the regulations governing corporate insolvency , aiming to streamline procedures, protect creditor interests, and encourage greater investor participation in resolution processes. The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI) notified the Insolvency Resolution Process for Corporate Persons Fourth Amendment regulations, 2025 on May 26, according to a release. Among the significant change introduced is a provision for allowing resolution professionals with the Committee of Creditor's (CoC) approval, to invite expressions of interest not only for the entire corporate debtor but also for individual assets or a combination of both. By enabling concurrent invitations, the resolution process can reduce timelines, prevent value erosion in viable segments, and encourage broader investor participation, IBBI said. The regulations also revise the framework for payments under resolution plans executed in stages. In such cases, financial creditors who did not support the resolution plan will now receive payments at least on a pro rata basis and ahead of those who voted in favour. Live Events The Board said this approach balances the legitimate rights of dissenting creditors with the practical constraints of phased implementation. In another notable amendment, the CoC has been empowered to direct resolution professionals to invite the interim finance providers to attend its meetings as observers without voting rights. As per IBBI, this measure is aimed to provide interim finance providers with a better understanding of the corporate debtor's operational status, thereby enabling them to make well-informed decisions regarding funding requirements. The amended norms also mandate the resolution professionals to present all received plans, including non-compliant ones to the CoC along with relevant details, it said. This provision ensures that the CoC has access to comprehensive information for decision-making, which may lead to more informed choices and ultimately contribute to a more transparent and effective resolution process, IBBI added.
