Latest news with #Hackney
BBC News
4 hours ago
- BBC News
Boy, 16, detained for killing former friend in Hackney
A teenager who stabbed his 15-year-old former friend with a pocket knife in east London, and confessed to the killing to an online girlfriend, has been sentenced at the Old 16-year-old boy, who cannot be named due to his age, was given a custodial term of seven years for manslaughter, with a five-year extended licence period added for Garcia, 15, suffered a single stab wound to the heart during the incident in Stellman Close, Hackney, just before 16:00 BST on 23 July two boys had been friends but had fallen out and were planning a fight of some sort, the court heard. During the trial, it was heard the defendant had messaged the girl saying "I think I just killed Pharrell. I stabbed him in the heart by accident, but was meant to stab his leg".Sentencing, Judge Philip Katz KC said after stabbing Pharrell, the defendant had chased him away from the scene with the knife in his hand, and then after seeing him collapse, had run away."The victim's grandmother and uncle then arrived at the scene. That must have been a soul destroying event," he said."That a 15-year-old died is a tragedy, that he was killed by another child at 15 is another tragedy." 'Very high risk' The judge told the defendant: "You are a dangerous offender and the picture remains concerning. "You pose a very high risk of very serious harm to the public for further knife offending."The court heard the Pharrell's family would not be reading out victim impact statements because it was "too much" for Mark Fenhalls KC said of their experience: "The decimation of the family is unsurprising in these circumstances.""Having been at the scene when he died… it was too much for them. They can't cope any more."The defence barrister, Beth O'Reilly KC, said: "These young men knew each other and knew each other from primary school. This case has a real sense of hopelessness."At his trial the defendant had claimed he was acting in self-defence, but Judge Katz said: "This was never a case of self defence."
Times
6 hours ago
- Health
- Times
Assisted dying: MPs vote in favour of passing bill — watch live
Dame Meg Hillier said 'that's it' when asked what opposition MPs could do following the final Commons vote. 'We need to see funding is available for palliative care. We've had those assurances from government', the Labour and Co-operative MP for Hackney South & Shoreditch said. 'It's been a very draining exercise', she said. 'We've now got to hold everyone's feet to the fire', she said. Hillier, chair of the Treasury select committee, said she still had concerns over the safeguarding of vulnerable people, and for those who are 18 or are suffering from anorexia. The prime minister has voted in favour of Kim Leadbeater's bill to legalise assisted dying, which passed by 23 votes on Friday. The majority for assisted dying has decreased from 55 votes at the second reading to 23 today. The decrease reflects how some MPs have had disageements with the drafting of Kim Leadbeater's bill. MPs have voted to allow terminally ill adults to take their own lives in a historic vote. The Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill passed its third reading by 314 votes to 291, a majority of 23, and will now head to the House of Lords for a further vote. Outside parliament, supporters of assisted dying celebrated as they heard the news. Sir Keir Starmer has appeared in the House of Commons chamber just before MPs began the final vote on the assisted dying bill. The prime minister had refused to confirm whether he would vote on the bill. This morning, his official spokesperson said: 'I'm not going to get ahead of proceedings in the House or speculate on the prime minister's movements.' By Peter Jackson, Head of Engagement It's interesting to note that the reported shift among MPs against Kim Leadbeater's bill is echoed by Times readers in the results of our online polls, in which more than 100,000 votes have been cast. In September last year, just before the bill was proposed, 77 per cent of readers agreed with the principle that assisted dying should be legalised. After the bill had passed its first vote at the end of November, 69 per cent of readers backed the bill. But by February this year, after a group of cross-party MPs had heard detailed evidence from experts, the mood had changed, with 60 per cent of Times readers coming out against the bill. Here's today's poll, which you can vote on now: The Labour MP Chi Onwurah has said that the principles of public service would be altered if the state administered assisted dying. She told the Commons: 'This bill could change the founding principles of the NHS. Clinicians are trained to save lives; now they will also be able to kill people. 'Our police, our armed forces, their job is to protect life and liberty; now they will also protect those who take people's lives, because this marks a fundamental change in the relationship between state and citizen. 'It requires much more public and parliamentary debate, we have not even begun to interrogate all the social implications of this change. It will change the ethos of the NHS. It will enable private companies to kill private citizens.' The MP for Newcastle upon Tyne Central & West added: 'There seems to be an assumption that those who have been most unequal in life will suddenly be rendered equal in death, but the least valued by society are often those who value themselves the least.' There is a division in the Commons and MPs will now vote on the bill. Assisted dying could represent 'a huge shift in the relationship between the individual and the state', Tom Tugendhat, the Conservative former minister, has warned. 'It's about the power over life and death, not just over ourselves, because we already have the power to end our own lives, it's called suicide. It is not a crime — it hasn't been a crime in this country for decades. 'This is a different power. This is about the power of the state through its agents to exercise power over life and death … but when the state takes a life, even with consent, that is a huge shift in the relationship between the individual and the state.' Turning to fears of coercion, he claimed MPs have said 'that those who merely feel pressure are allowed to access this service'. In response, Labour MP Kim Leadbeater held up a printed copy of her bill and some of her supporters shouted 'no' and 'it's in the bill'. Yasmin Qureshi MP says the assisted dying bill had 'serious loopholes, ones that experts and 50 charities have warned us about'. She writes that people with anorexia could be eligible, as well as people with chronic but manageable conditions. Supporters of the bill say that it is only for people with six months left to live. She also warns that the bill had removed judicial oversight and 'replaces it with a panel that lacks independence', she said. Patrick Maguire, chief political commentator at The Times, tells Times Radio that Sir Keir Starmer's lack of input into the important debate on assisted dying is the 'perfect encapsulation' of the PM's administration so far. Please enable cookies and other technologies to view this content. You can update your cookies preferences any time using privacy manager. In 2022, Dave Sowry accompanied his wife Christy to the Dignitas clinic in Switzerland, where she chose an assisted death to end the suffering caused by her multiple sclerosis. Although her condition was not classified as terminal, Sowry and his wife believed it had become intolerable and left her with no quality of life. Following her death, Sowry was questioned by UK police but ultimately faced no legal action. He said: 'We got married in 2006. We'd been together for 20 years. 'The first conversation at Dignitas was very strange. I suddenly got this gut feeling where I just couldn't believe this was happening. 'The whole process, the legal system, encourages an unbelievable amount of anxiety and stress at what is the most difficult time in somebody's life, and that is really cruel. 'I think at the moment people only really have three options: They can continue to suffer intolerably until they die. They can go to Dignitas if they can afford to, but even then that's not an easy process. Or they can take life into their own hands. 'It's cruel. So not doing anything, not passing the law, is not a safe thing to do.' A Tory MP indicated he had changed his voting position on the assisted dying bill since it was first introduced. Mike Wood, the MP for Kingswinford & South Staffordshire, told the Commons: 'I didn't vote at second reading in November. 'The member for Spen Valley [Kim Leadbeater] in her opening speech this morning said that we could choose to vote with our head or with our heart. 'I am afraid it is that tension, that conflict, that I have been grappling with over the last few months.' He said his 'sympathy of the principle of assisted dying was as strong as it ever was', but later added he would be 'voting against this afternoon' because he did not believe the Bill offered enough safeguards. Downing Street declined to say whether Sir Keir Starmer will attend the Commons debate on the assisted dying Bill. A Number 10 spokesman said: 'I'm not going to get ahead of proceedings in the House or speculate on the prime minister's movements … the prime minister is working in Number 10, but as I say I'm not going to speculate on the PM's movements today.' Dame Prue Leith, who supports the bill, has said outside parliament: 'I'm both nervous and confident. I'm nervous to say 'we have won', because I'm superstitious. 'It's so moving to see all these people with placards of people they've lost or people who are dying of cancer. 'It's hard not to cry because I think they have done such a good job, let's hope we've won.' Leith is the mother of Daniel Kruger MP, a leading voice opposing the bill. Andrew Copson, Humanists UK chief executive, said he believes this is the moment for change. 'Parliament has been debating assisted dying for 90 years,' he said. 'Since then, the situation has only got more acute. People are living longer and more people are suffering from different conditions at the end of life. 'My grandmother had bowel cancer. She was a determined woman, knew her own mind. She knew what she wanted to do. She wasn't rich enough to go abroad. 'That made me realise there is still a taboo around talking about death, and I think we need to take death much more seriously and acknowledge the reality of it. 'And in order to have that conversation for ourselves and with the ones we love, we have to know we've got options. 'For me, it's all about freedom of choice. Every single person has the right to self determination over the most intimate of things they have, which is their own body.' Even if MPs vote to pass the assisted dying bill today, it is not the end of the process. The next step is the House of Lords, where the bill would face further scrutiny. Peers are expected to examine the details and propose amendments to the bill that will have to be debated and passed in the Commons. As this is a private members' bill put forward by Kim Leadbeater, Labour MP for Spen Valley, the Lords stages pose even more of a challenge. Private members' bills are not government business and have tight time restraints, which means there is the chance that too many amendments in the Lords could in effect see the whole bill cut off before the end of the parliament. Peers could also vote against the bill in its entirety. Longstanding convention is that the unelected House of Lords does not vote against manifesto promises that got the government into power. But as this is Leadbeater's bill and wasn't one of Labour's election pledges, peers might feel emboldened to block the bill as a whole. Supporters will hope that the bill could be granted royal assent — the final stage before completion — before the end of 2025. But even if the bill is finalised this year, the legislation comes with an implementation period of up to four years to allow the courts and the health service to catch up. This means there could be no legal assisted deaths in the UK this decade. The NHS is not ready to handle assisted dying, Sir James Cleverly has said. In a speech in the Commons, the former home secretary said the NHS would have to divert resources to deal with setting up assisted dying within the four-year period defined in the bill. He said the deadline would result in the writing of a 'blank cheque' for the service to get it up and running. 'Commencement dates matter, they are not just some arbitrary date on a piece of paper and I understand the desire of people to make sure this can't be lost down the back of the sofa when it comes to government work', he said. 'But when people upon whom we rely to deliver this say they are not ready and they don't feel they will be ready, they don't have enough people, they don't have enough capacity, they will have to take resource from current provisions to move across to this provision which will be driven by a statutory requirement and a locked in commencement date, we should listen. 'We should listen and if the people who are going to make this work and work as well as we hope it will if it becomes legislation say that they are not confident that they can make it happen, we should be very, very careful about demanding that they prioritise this and that is what this legislation says.' The chief executive of Care Not Killing called for MPs to reject the bill. Speaking outside Parliament, Dr Gordon Macdonald said: 'As this is a private members' bill, the MP in charge of the bill was able to choose who she wanted in the committee, choose who she wanted to give evidence and decide which amendments would be accepted and which wouldn't, so I believe the whole process is completely flawed and I believe the government needs to hold responsibility for this. 'Keir Starmer should have taken responsibility for this.' He added: 'We're seeing more MPs who are voting against it which doesn't surprise me as the more people think about this issue the more likely they are to support it.' Outside Parliment, more campaign groups have gathered with banners and placards with slogans ranging from 'no to assisted suicide', 'legalise assisted dying and let us choose' and 'don't make doctors killers.' At the rally is Louise Shackleton, 58, from North Yorkshire. She said her husband Anthony was diagnosed with motor neurone disease in 2018. He died by assisted suicide at Dignitas in December 2024 to avoid the suffering and loss of autonomy it would bring. Shackleton accompanied him to Switzerland and, upon returning, surrendered herself to police. Despite the ongoing investigation, she has no regrets and believes that if assisted dying was legal in the UK, their family could have been together during Anthony's final moments. 'Knowing the exact date when your loved one's going to die is difficult. But I had to weigh that up with if he didn't go there, what his death would be like for him. This journey wasn't about me. It was all about him. His choice, his decision,' she said. 'For me, ideally the bill goes through and that people are allowed to have autonomy in how they end their lives.' Teachers Catie and Becky Fenner joined a group of Dignity in Dying campaigners in Parliament Square ahead of this afternoon's vote. Their mother, who had motor neurone disease, flew to Dignitas in Switzerland to end her life. The sisters said that worrying about the legal implications of this meant they did not get to properly say goodbye and grieve. Catie, 37, from Oxfordshire, said: 'We were left quite traumatised by the whole experience — not only seeing a parent go through a really horrible disease but then the secrecy of the planning. 'We have had grief counselling. We don't want any other family to go through what we went through. 'We want families to be able to say goodbye in this country without the fear of prosecution.' Anorexia patients could still access assisted dying through a 'loophole', Labour MP Naz Shah has warned. Referring to her amendment 14, to prevent a patient meeting the requirements for an assisted death 'solely as a result of voluntarily stopping eating or drinking' — which MPs backed earlier today — and a further amendment 38 which was not added to the bill, Shah told the Commons: 'This is not the anorexia loophole that has been closed — that was another amendment. 'When people stop voluntarily eating and drinking, that is not what happens to people with anorexia. People with anorexia stop eating and drinking because they have a psychiatric illness. These are two categorically different issues. 'So I must make it clear, absolutely clear, even though amendment 14 has passed today, this amendment does not address concerns about anorexia or close that loophole.' Please enable cookies and other technologies to view this content. You can update your cookies preferences any time using privacy manager. Sir Roger Gale, who is standing in for the Speaker, has told MPs they have limited time to debate the third reading of the assisted dying bill. A vote must be called before 2.30pm, as per parliamentary procedure. Sir Roger said: 'It's understandable that a lot of members would wish to take part on both sides of the House and in both sides of the argument. 'Looking around, it's quite clear we cannot accommodate everybody. 'That means that inevitably, it is likely that will be quite a considerable number of interventions. 'All I would say — gently — is that interventions will be taken into account when considering the order of priority in which members are called.' Tracy Acheampong, 22, a nursing student at University of Birmingham, said it was important to be here today with the BLW Campus Ministry Church group in order to show her concerns around safeguarding with the law. She said: ' I believe that despite there being sickness and death, there is hope. As somebody who has worked in the healthcare field since the day I turned 18, I've seen countless deaths. And I don't think the failure of our healthcare system should warrant people deciding to take their own lives or because they feel like a burden or that they think there is no hope in their situation. 'But I don't think passing on this law will assist them. I've seen so many people deteriorate to their lowest point. I've worked in hospices and care homes where people stop seeing their relatives until the point of death.' Mother of the House Diane Abbott said she was not opposed to the principle of assisted dying, but urged MPs to reject the bill for fear that 'people will lose their lives who do not need to'. The Labour MP said: 'I came to this House to be a voice for the voiceless. Who could be more voiceless than somebody who is in their sickbed and believes they are dying? 'I ask members in this debate to speak up for the voiceless one more time, because there is no doubt that if this bill is passed in its current form, people will lose their lives who do not need to, and they will be amongst the most vulnerable and marginalised in our society.' Kim Leadbeater has warned the Commons the assisted dying bill 'is not a choice between living and dying — it is a choice for terminally ill people about how they die'. The Labour MP added: 'I fully appreciate that there are some colleagues who would never vote for any version of this bill due to their own fundamental beliefs — be they religious or otherwise. 'I am respectful of their views, despite disagreeing, but to those colleagues who are supportive of a change in the law but are hesitant about if now is the time — if we don't vote to change the law today — what does that mean? 'It means we will have many more years of heartbreaking stories from terminally ill people and their families, of pain and trauma, suicide attempts, PTSD, lonely trips to Switzerland, police investigations and everything else we have all heard over recent months.' Sir James Cleverly has said he was 'concerned about the practicalities' of the bill. The Conservative former minister also told the Commons: 'I have no doubt the vast majority … in this House is sympathetic with the underlying motivation of this bill.' Describing himself as an atheist, he added: 'I've had this said to me on a number of occasions, 'if you had seen someone suffering, you would agree with this bill'. 'Well, Mr Speaker, I have seen someone suffering — my closest friend earlier this year died painfully of oesophageal cancer and I was with him in the final weeks of his life. 'So I come at this not from a position of faith nor from a position of ignorance.' Sister Doreen Cunningham, who cares for elderly people, attended a gathering outside parliament to oppose the 'lazy' bill. The nun said: 'I feel the need to speak for the vulnerable people. This bill suppresses the people who do not receive proper care. 'It is the lazy way out instead of giving patients the proper care they deserve. 'A lot of work could be done in the NHS to reform it.' Sister Doreen said she worried people would be scared if the assisted dying bill was offered to them. Choosing not to support the assisted dying bill is 'not a neutral act', Kim Leadbeater has told the Commons. The Labour MP for Spen Valley said: 'It is an either/or decision for us today — either we vote for the safe effective workable reform contained in this bill or we say the status quo is acceptable. 'Over recent months I have heard hundreds of stories from people who have lost loved ones in deeply difficult and traumatic circumstances … along with many terminally ill people themselves.' She added: 'Not supporting the bill today is not a neutral act, it is a vote for the status quo … and it fills me with despair to think MPs could be here in another 10 years' time hearing the same stories.' Labour MP Kim Leadbeater has told parliament that the assisted dying bill had sparked 'different views'. She was responding to Conservative former minister Simon Hoare who intervened in her speech, and asked whether she was 'concerned' about 'the growing canon of professionals and their independent professional bodies' who 'have urged great caution' and were 'opposed to the details of this bill and believe it should be defeated?' Leadbeater, who tabled the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill, replied: 'I think what he's saying is people have got different views … we have different views in this House and different people in different professions have different views. 'Every royal college has a neutral position on assisted dying.' Jonathan Dimbleby has joined campaigners for assisted dying outside parliament, where the veteran presenter was photographed posing for selfies with activists from Dignity in Dying. His brother, the sculptor Nicholas Dimbleby, died with motor neurone disease. He said: 'Last year my younger brother Nicholas, who was a very fine sculptor, much loved by everyone, a very funny man who was a centre of everyone's attention, he was stricken by motor neurone disease. 'I watched him wither away physically. I watched him become a shell until he died with his mind intact, his body broken. 'And I talked to him about this, and I asked him, do you want to me campaign on this because he wanted to have that right, and he said 'yes, please do'.' • Jonathan Dimbleby's hardest interview: with his dying brother A black van passed by the crowds in Parliament Square with an electronic screen which read messages against the bill. It was set up by organisation and flashed: 'Kill the Bill, not the ill', 'No safeguards. No oversight. No compassion' and 'Stop the NHS from becoming the National Homicide Service.' Dame Prue Leith has joined campaigners outside Parliament showing their support for the assisted dying bill. The 85-year-old writer, restaurateur and Great British Bake Off presenter said she was 'quietly confident' about the vote's outcome after a lengthy, 'hard and uphill battle'. Leith added: 'I find it so moving to see all the photographs of people you've lost or who are dying of cancer as we speak. 'It is utterly disgraceful that in a civilised world, we should be allowing this. 'Today, I hope we are going to win. I try to be quietly confident. But whether we win or lose, you have done a fantastic job, and I hope we're not going to have to ask you to do it again.' Kim Leadbeater said the assisted dying bill she is sponsoring will 'offer a compassionate and safe choice to terminally ill people who want to make it'. Speaking at today's third reading, the Labour MP for Spen Valley told the Commons: 'I have been pleased to work with members on all sides of the debate to ensure that this legislation is something that parliament can be proud of. 'A cogent, workable bill that has one simple thread running through it — the need to correct the profound injustices of the status quo and to offer a compassionate and safe choice to terminally ill people who want to make it.' MPs have started the final debate on the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill. The outcome will lead to it either clearing the House of Commons and moving to the Lords, or falling completely — the latter of which could mean the issue might not return to Westminster for a decade. The relatively narrow majority of 55 from the historic yes vote last November means every vote will count today. The bill would fall if 28 MPs switched directly from voting yes to no, but only if all other MPs voted the same way as in November, including those who abstained. Outside the houses of Parliament, peaceful crowds have already gathered ahead of the vote, clutching banners and chanting 'our freedom, our choice, listen to our voice.' Among those is Catriona MacFarlan, 45, holding a blue sign with the words 'freedom of choice', who had travelled down from Edinbugh in the early hours of the morning to be here for the vote. She said: 'My dad is terminally ill. He is not able to to have a dignified ending. It's going to be horrible as he carries on. But there are no protections for people like him. So I just want to give people the choice to end their lives with dignity, surrounded by their family and loved ones, and not have to suffer a really horrible ending.' Dame Esther Rantzen's daughter has admitted she struggled to sleep last night in anticipation of today's vote on assisted dying. Rebecca Wilcox, who was outside Parliament to champion the Dignity in Dying campaign, said she hoped the bill would be passed. She said: 'This is such an important time for this bill, the third and final vote, and then hopefully it will go on to the House of Lords. 'It couldn't be more entrenched with safeguards; it couldn't be a kinder, more compassionate bill that respects choice at the end of life, that respects kindness and empathy and gives us all an option when every other option has been taken away. 'It would be the perfect tool for a palliative care doctor to have in their med bag.' A ban on advertising assisted dying would be extended to all of the UK, should the bill pass, MPs have agreed. They also voted for the UK-wide extension of regulations about approved substances intended to be used to help terminally ill patients to die. Politicians have this morning approved an opt-out for medical professionals being extended to Scotland. MPs voted 275 in favour, 209 against, majority 66. MPs have agreed to an amendment that requires the government to publish an assessment of palliative and end-of-life care within one year of the Act's passage. They have nodded through amendment 21 — one of multiple proposed tweaks to the bill. MPs called 'aye' to approve Liberal Democrat MP Munira Wilson's amendment. It means that ministers would have to consider the state of health services for patients near the end of their lives, covering pain and symptom management, psychological support and access to information. Religious leaders are making last-minute bids to sway undecided MPs, hoping to convince them to oppose assisted dying. The Bishop of London, the Right Rev Sarah Mullally, who is also England's former chief nursing officer, said it was an 'unsafe and unworkable' bill and said: 'If enacted, this bill would arrive amidst hugely inequitable access to palliative care and an NHS on life support. The potential for abuse and uninformed or coerced decisions is enormous. 'This is not about so-called progressivism versus conservatism, or atheism versus religion. This is about the kind of society we want to live in.' She said the parliamentary process had 'presented more unanswered questions, left more doubts, and seen so-called protections crumble away before even coming into law'. Cardinal Vincent Nichols, the Catholic Archbishop of Westminster, said: 'A right to assisted suicide given to individuals is highly likely to become a duty on care homes and hospices to facilitate it. We fear that this bill will thereby seriously affect the provision of social care and palliative care across the country.' A vote must be called before 2.30pm, as per parliamentary procedure. MPs in the House of Commons have this morning been voting on changes within the bill since it was last put to them in November. The proposed legislation would allow terminally ill adults in England and Wales, with fewer than six months to live, to apply for an assisted death. This request would be subject to approval by two doctors and a panel featuring a social worker, a senior legal figure and a psychiatrist. MPs have agreed that ministers should get powers to update the National Health Service Act 2006 as part of the bill, to include voluntary assisted dying services as part of the NHS's purposes. Amid fears the bill could become 'the Trojan horse that breaks the NHS', Dame Siobhain McDonagh, a Labour MP, pushed her amendment 12 to a vote, which would have blocked ministers from broadening the NHS's purposes without a fresh bill. But MPs rejected her proposal 269 votes to 223, majority 46. While there is no obligation on MPs to take part in the free vote, those present today in the House of Commons also have the option to formally abstain. Health Secretary Wes Streeting described bill sponsor Kim Leadbeater's work on the proposed legislation as 'extremely helpful', but confirmed in April that he still intended to vote against it. Vicky Foxcroft received hugs and other gestures of support from her Labour backbench colleagues as she appeared in the Commons a day after resigning as a government whip over welfare reform proposals she could not support. The Labour MP for Lewisham North was seen walking through the chamber as MPs took part in votes on the assisted dying bill this morning. Several colleagues approached her, offering warm words, hugs, an arm on the shoulder or a pat on the back, following her decision to resign from the government. Will Keir Starmer vote today? The prime minister is working from Number 10 and is yet to make a decision, despite the historic nature of the vote. There is a suggestion that Starmer, who is in favour of assisted dying, could enter into an informal 'pairing' arrangement with David Lammy, the foreign secretary who is opposed but currently in Geneva for negotiations with Iran. Officials insist that no decision has been made, and say he is still weighing up whether to attend. But in politics perceptions matter, and failing to take part in the vote could be viewed by some as a sign that he is cooling on the idea. A proposal to disapply the presumption that a person has capacity unless the opposite is established in cases of assisted dying requests has been rejected by MPs. The Commons voted 213 to 266, majority 53 to reject amendment 24, which was tabled by Daniel Francis, the Labour MP for Bexleyheath & Crayford. In November last year, MPs voted in favour of the assisted dying bill but some MPs have already indicated they will changes sides on Friday. This is how they voted in the last reading of the bill. MPs have this morning voted to reject an amendment which would have prevented a person who is substantially motivated by feeling they are a burden from qualifying for assisted dying. Conservative MP Rebecca Paul's new clause 16 stated that a wish to end one's own life should not be substantially motivated by factors such as a mental disorder, disability or suicidal ideation. The Commons voted 208 to 261, majority 53 against. Naz Shah, Labour MP for Bradford West, has told Times Radio that Kim Leadbeater's private member's bill to legalise assisted dying is 'dangerous' and a public safety issue'. Calling for its rejection, she said: 'The bill is ultimately flawed. Today we're not voting on the principle of this bill, we're voting on the legislation. 'That's my job and the amendments that I have tabled to close the anorexia loophole hasn't been closed, it's not been accepted, it won't be voted on and that leaves huge loopholes and it's not safe. For me it's a public safety issue, this bill.' Please enable cookies and other technologies to view this content. You can update your cookies preferences any time using privacy manager. Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch has urged her MPs to vote against the legislation, describing it as 'a bad bill' despite being 'previously supportive of assisted suicide'. She claimed it has 'not been done properly'. On Thursday, Badenoch said that although she had previously supported the idea, 'this is not how we should do legislation like this'. She also said she does not believe the 'NHS and other services are ready'. Badenoch added, 'I will be voting no and I hope as many Conservative MPs as possible will be supporting me in that'. MPs are entitled to have a free vote on the bill, meaning they decide according to their conscience rather than along party lines. If it is passed today, it will then be scrutinised by the House of Lords. Sky News said that it is hard to predict at this stage how the upper chamber will react to it, given the unusual combination of a free vote on a private member's bill. However, it warned there was a 'small chance' of upper chamber delays 'to stop it by keeping it in limbo until the king's speech to parliament later this year'. Decca Aitkenhead was nine when a GP risked jail to help her mother to die. Years later she watched her best friend succumb to the slow torture of Huntington's disease, and for a few days she found herself confronting her own death. She tells Jane Mulkerrins how those experiences have shaped her views on assisted dying. Public support for the bill remains high, according to the latest YouGov poll. The proportion of people who feel assisted dying should be legal in principle has risen slightly, to 75 per cent from 73 per cent in November. Its survey of 2,003 adults in Great Britain took place last month and the findings were published yesterday. Kim Leadbeater, the Labour MP behind the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill, has warned that defeat for the bill would end hopes of changing the law for another decade as she rejected claims of rushing through reform. She insisted her bill is 'the most robust piece of legislation in the world' and has argued dying people must be given choice at the end of their lives in a conversation which has seen support from high-profile figures including Dame Esther Rantzen. Leadbeater said it had 'gone through hours and hours and hours of scrutiny', adding: 'This is not being rushed through, this is not a quick thing that's happened overnight.' Four Labour MPs confirmed on the eve of today's vote that they will switch sides to oppose the proposed new law. Paul Foster, Jonathan Hinder, Markus Campbell-Savours and Kanishka Narayan wrote to fellow MPs to voice concerns about the safety of the proposed legislation. They branded it as being 'drastically weakened', citing the scrapping of the High Court Judge safeguard as a key reason. However, Bill sponsor Kim Leadbeater has insisted that replacing the judge's approval with multidisciplinary panels strengthens the legislation, as it will incorporate wider expert knowledge to assess assisted dying applications. Protesters and campaigners have been gathering this morning in Westminster before the vote on the assisted dying bill. Photos from the scene show supporters from campaign group Dignity in Dying holding pink placards with white letters urging 'legalise assisted dying, vote yes today.' Opponents of the bill are wearing white masks with the word 'euthanise' on the forehead, and they are holding white signs saying 'don't make doctors killers' and 'protect our NHS from becoming a national suicide service'. In 1937, Switzerland legalised assisted suicide provided those doing the assisting were not motivated by 'any selfish intent'. Six decades later, the US state of Oregon legalised physician-assisted suicide for people with less than six months to live. In 2001, the Netherlands became the first country in the world to decriminalise assisted dying. As MPs vote on the bill today, this is how other countries in the world compare. Read in full: Where is assisted dying legal? How the rules worldwide compare More than 7,500 terminally ill people a year could seek state support to end their life within a decade of the practice being legalised, the government estimates. Officials believe about 60 per cent of requests for assisted dying would be approved, equating to approximately 4,500 or 0.68 per cent of all deaths from 2039 onwards. The findings came in an impact assessment drawn up by the Department for Health and Social Care. Officials also estimated that legalising the practice in the UK could cost the NHS tens of millions of pounds. Staff time costs ranged from £412,000 to £1.98 million in year one, to between £2.6 million and £11.5 million in year ten. MPs will today take part in the final Commons vote on whether to back a bill to help terminally ill adults end their lives in England and Wales. Politicians supported legalising assisted dying when they first debated the issue in November by 330 votes to 275. However, since then the outcome has become too close to call, after analysis by The Times showed that margin eroding. The Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill has undergone months of scrutiny leading to some changes in the proposed legislation. One change is to replace the role of a High Court judge in signing off an application for an assisted death with a panel of experts. This panel would contain a senior lawyer, a psychiatrist, and a social worker. Advocates of assisted dying believe their bill will pass its final Commons vote on Friday, despite a shift among MPs against it. Kim Leadbeater, the MP who proposed the law change, denied the bill has been rushed and remained confident MPs would vote in favour of it. Read in full: Assisted dying vote 'too close to call' as MPs turn against bill Sir Keir Starmer has yet to decide whether he will take part in today's landmark vote on assisted dying as he deals with the Middle East crisis. The prime minister, who is in favour of assisted dying, is working from Downing Street today but could end up missing the vote depending on his commitments as he seeks to deescalate the conflict between Iran and Israel. A government source said no decision as been made He backed assisted dying in 2015 and has signalled that his view has not changed. The issue is deeply divisive and has split the Labour Party. Starmer said this week: 'It is a matter for individual parliamentarians, which is why I've not waded in with a view on this publicly, and I'm not going to now it's coming to a conclusion. 'There has been a lot of time discussing it, both in Parliament and beyond Parliament, and quite right too. It's a really serious issue. 'My own position is long-standing and well-known in relation to it, based on my experience when I was chief prosecutor for five years, where I oversaw every case that was investigated.'
The Sun
10 hours ago
- Health
- The Sun
Wrinkle-free 52-year-old woman who doesn't use Botox shares how she looks 25 thanks to secret that makes her skin glow
IF you're desperate to stay looking youthful and keep wrinkles at bay, you've come to the right place. Luckily for those on a mission to combat ageing, a woman who is mistaken for looking decades younger than she actually is has revealed the secret she swears by. 3 3 And don't worry, you won't have to worry about splashing the cash on posh beauty lotions, potions and serums and even better, there's no Botox or painful procedures in sight. Lorraine Pascale, a British TV chef, took to social media to share the secret behind her wrinkle-free skin - and it couldn't be simpler. Instead of loading up her skin with countless products or getting needles injected into her face, the model turned TV presenter, who first hit our screens in 2011, claimed that her youthful skin is all down to her diet. Responding to a question she often receives - 'How is your skin like that at 52?' - the stunner shared the food she always eats to get her face glowing. As she tucked into a large fruit bowl containing pineapple, strawberries, grapes and apple, the Hackney-born celebrity revealed her simple secret - fruit. Lorraine has . While she used to 'beat herself up' for eating the wrong things, now, Lorraine shares healthy dishes and recipes online. It's common knowledge that fruits and vegetables are beneficial to your health and according to The Dermatology Group, not only can such produce keep you feeling energised and healthy, but they are also imperative to your skin health. Without consuming fruit and vegetables, experts warn that your skin will deteriorate over time. The experts also revealed that fruits and vegetables contain a large number of vitamins, including Vitamins A, B, C, D, E, and K. I'm 50 next year & don't have a single wrinkle thanks to a product from Boots or TikTok shop - I've never had Botox Vitamins D, C, E, and K in particular are good for the skin. Not only this, fruits and veggies also contain antioxidants which are essential for good skin health and keeping our faces looking youthful and healthy. How to reverse ageing in just 2 weeks, according to royal go-to nutritionist LONDON -based Gabriela Peacock, who has helped the likes of Prince Harry and Princess Eugenie prepare for their weddings. She told Fabulous: 'The science is evident that we all have the power to make simple life changing alterations to better our future selves - no matter what genetic hand we might have been dealt with. 'The reality is, we all sometimes indulge in unhealthy eating habits like processed foods, smoking cigarettes, drinking too much alcohol, inhaling city pollutants, and even drinking water from plastic bottles – none of this is good for us. 'All this does is promote the ageing process, but we all have the potential to change this.' It may be hard, but try to keep away from sugary carbohydrates, because they feed chronic inflammation, which is one of the worst enemies of reversing ageing. Now only will you end up putting on weight if you consume them regularly, but your energy and hormonal levels will be affected and this will influence how you look and feel. Whatever your age or state of health, it's never too late to reverse how quickly you are ageing and embrace the energy and vigour of a younger you. Antioxidants, such as vitamins A, C, and E, are essential in neutralising free radicals—the culprits behind premature ageing. Integrating a spectrum of colourful fruits and vegetables into your diet provides a potent source of antioxidants. Omega-3 fatty acids, abundant in fatty fish like salmon and flaxseeds, are vital for maintaining skin elasticity and hydration. Omega-3s act as nourishment for your skin, locking in moisture and diminishing fine lines and wrinkles. Collagen, a structural protein dwindling with age, can be replenished through collagen-rich foods like bone broth and lean protein sources. Lorraine's TikTok clip, which was posted under the username @ lorrainepascaleofficial, has clearly left many open-mouthed, as it has quickly racked up 95,300 views in just 22 hours. Not only this, but it's also amassed 4,464 likes and 79 comments. Social media users were gobsmacked by Lorraine's age and many eagerly raced to the comments to express this. One person gasped: 'Ain't no way you are 52!!!' Another added: '52???? Wow.' A third commented: '52??? NEVER!' Meanwhile, someone else penned: 'Omg you look like 25.' Not only this, but one user shared: 'I'm 26 and you look younger than me!! Amazing skin.' Unlock even more award-winning articles as The Sun launches brand new membership programme - Sun Club Biggest skincare trends for 2025 Face The Future's Head of Clinic, Kimberley Medd, shared the five skincare trends predicted to take off in 2025. 1. Exosomes Exosomes are the buzzword for 2025, taking advanced skin regeneration to new heights. These micro-messengers signal skin cells to repair damage, boost collagen, and accelerate recovery, and they're a gamechanger for targeting ageing. 2. Streamlined Skincare The age of 12-step routines is fading as consumers shift to more intentional, multi-functional products. Streamlining skincare not only saves time but also reduces the risk of overloading your skin. In 2025, we'll see a rise in hybrid products that combine active ingredients for simplified, effective results. 3. Vegan Collagen Plant-based collagen will dominate the skincare world this year, providing a sustainable, ethical alternative to traditional animal-derived collagen. Expect vegan collagen in everything from moisturisers to serums. 4. The Rise Of AI AI is revolutionising the beauty landscape, making it possible for consumers to get truly personalised skincare solutions. In 2025, we predict a dramatic shift towards AI-powered tools that help people understand their skin on a deeper level. 5. Hair Loss Solutions - Hair loss is an issue that affects more men than we often realise, and it's no longer just something we're talking about behind closed doors. This year, expect to see a continued rise in demand for treatments that not only tackle hair loss but also nurture overall scalp health.
The Independent
2 days ago
- The Independent
Race and lack of accountability involved in Child Q strip search, tribunal hears
Race and lack of accountability are at the heart of why and how a 15 year-old black girl was strip-searched at school by police after being wrongly suspected of carrying cannabis was handled, a misconduct hearing has been told. The degree of failures surrounding the 'grossly disproportionate search', allegedly without an appropriate adult present, meant the Metropolitan Police officers did not look to protect a potentially vulnerable child, according to the Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC). Their actions could possibly undermine public trust and confidence in the police, the IOPC warned. The girl, known as Child Q, was strip searched by officers in Hackney, east London, on December 3 2020. She arrived for a mock exam smelling of cannabis and was taken to the medical room to be strip-searched while teachers remained outside. This involved the removal of her clothing including underwear, her bending over and having to expose intimate parts of her body while she was menstruating, the panel heard. Trainee detective constable (TDC) Kristina Linge, Pc Victoria Wray and Pc Rafal Szmydynski, who were all police constables at the time, all deny gross misconduct over their treatment of the girl. In closing submissions Elliot Gold, for the IOPC, said discrimination is not the sole ground the panel needs to consider, but added: 'The issue of race provides you with the only explanation that is left as to why the officers' failures were so great and why so much went wrong and the only explanation as to why it all went so badly.' He told the tribunal panel in south-east London, who could consider sacking the officers if gross misconduct is proved: 'The resolution of this case should primarily be forward-facing. 'It is about preventing similar misconduct from recurring in the future, with the consequent damage to trust and confidence in the police, especially within the black community, which these events have caused.' He added: 'This case shows, that members of racial groups need protection from conduct driven by unrecognised or unconscious bias as much as from conscious and deliberate discrimination.' Mr Gold also noted 'there are almost no contemporaneous documents or records of this case – why? That's because it is the officers who failed to make them.' No drugs were found by the teachers before the school's safeguarding deputy called police. They were called amid fears Child Q could have been carrying drugs for someone, being exploited or groomed in the community – which meant it was a safeguarding issue for her and other school pupils. Mr Gold said 'there is a potential evidential conflict as to whether the teachers were insistent there should be a search'. He added: 'There may be criticism of the school calling the police for advice on a safeguarding matter but that shows they did not know what to do, rather than being insistent (on a search) it shows uncertainty.' Child Q's mother, who was described as a 'supportive' parent, was not present during the strip search and neither was any appropriate adult. Mr Gold said that 'simply being questioned by two police officers, two white police officers for a young black girl may be daunting.' Mr Gold said: 'No adult was present to assist child Q during this time – whether during the conversation with child to decide on the search, when the decision was made to perform a search or when the decision was made to perform a strip search.' PC Linge told Child Q she would be arrested if she failed to consent to being searched, the panel heard. Child Q told the two officers who searched her that she was menstruating, but the search continued during which her sanitary pad was exposed, the panel was told. When no drugs were found after the strip search, Child Q's hair was also scoured. When Child Q said she was on her period this was 'a new piece of evidence' for the officers and it was a chance for the officers to consider the proportionality of what they were doing, according to the IOPC. Within days of the strip search, Child Q had gone to her doctor with symptoms of anxiety. Mr Gold went through a series of doctors' notes including one which suggested Child Q had the 'appearance of symptoms of anxiety consistent with PTSD'. He added: 'No one is likely to suggest that Child Q was anything other than distressed and shaken by a traumatic episode.' According to the allegations, Pcs Linge and Szmydynski performed a search that exposed the girl's intimate parts when this was 'disproportionate in all the circumstances'. Pcs Linge and Wray are also accused of performing or allowing the search in a manner which was 'unjustified, inappropriate, disproportionate, humiliating and degrading'. It is alleged that all of this happened without authorisation, in the absence of an appropriate adult, and with no adequate concern being given to Child Q's age, sex, or the need to treat her as a child, and that the child's race was an effective cause of this. Pcs Szmydynski and Linge are further accused of giving a 'misleading record' of the search afterwards. Outrage over Child Q's treatment led to protests outside Stoke Newington Police Station. Scotland Yard has previously apologised over the incident.
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Race and lack of accountability involved in Child Q strip search, tribunal hears
Race and lack of accountability are at the heart of why and how a 15 year-old black girl was strip-searched at school by police after being wrongly suspected of carrying cannabis was handled, a misconduct hearing has been told. The degree of failures surrounding the 'grossly disproportionate search', allegedly without an appropriate adult present, meant the Metropolitan Police officers did not look to protect a potentially vulnerable child, according to the Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC). Their actions could possibly undermine public trust and confidence in the police, the IOPC warned. The girl, known as Child Q, was strip searched by officers in Hackney, east London, on December 3 2020. She arrived for a mock exam smelling of cannabis and was taken to the medical room to be strip-searched while teachers remained outside. This involved the removal of her clothing including underwear, her bending over and having to expose intimate parts of her body while she was menstruating, the panel heard. Trainee detective constable (TDC) Kristina Linge, Pc Victoria Wray and Pc Rafal Szmydynski, who were all police constables at the time, all deny gross misconduct over their treatment of the girl. In closing submissions Elliot Gold, for the IOPC, said discrimination is not the sole ground the panel needs to consider, but added: 'The issue of race provides you with the only explanation that is left as to why the officers' failures were so great and why so much went wrong and the only explanation as to why it all went so badly.' He told the tribunal panel in south-east London, who could consider sacking the officers if gross misconduct is proved: 'The resolution of this case should primarily be forward-facing. 'It is about preventing similar misconduct from recurring in the future, with the consequent damage to trust and confidence in the police, especially within the black community, which these events have caused.' He added: 'This case shows, that members of racial groups need protection from conduct driven by unrecognised or unconscious bias as much as from conscious and deliberate discrimination.' Mr Gold also noted 'there are almost no contemporaneous documents or records of this case – why? That's because it is the officers who failed to make them.' No drugs were found by the teachers before the school's safeguarding deputy called police. They were called amid fears Child Q could have been carrying drugs for someone, being exploited or groomed in the community – which meant it was a safeguarding issue for her and other school pupils. Mr Gold said 'there is a potential evidential conflict as to whether the teachers were insistent there should be a search'. He added: 'There may be criticism of the school calling the police for advice on a safeguarding matter but that shows they did not know what to do, rather than being insistent (on a search) it shows uncertainty.' Child Q's mother, who was described as a 'supportive' parent, was not present during the strip search and neither was any appropriate adult. Mr Gold said that 'simply being questioned by two police officers, two white police officers for a young black girl may be daunting.' Mr Gold said: 'No adult was present to assist child Q during this time – whether during the conversation with child to decide on the search, when the decision was made to perform a search or when the decision was made to perform a strip search.' PC Linge told Child Q she would be arrested if she failed to consent to being searched, the panel heard. Child Q told the two officers who searched her that she was menstruating, but the search continued during which her sanitary pad was exposed, the panel was told. When no drugs were found after the strip search, Child Q's hair was also scoured. When Child Q said she was on her period this was 'a new piece of evidence' for the officers and it was a chance for the officers to consider the proportionality of what they were doing, according to the IOPC. Within days of the strip search, Child Q had gone to her doctor with symptoms of anxiety. Mr Gold went through a series of doctors' notes including one which suggested Child Q had the 'appearance of symptoms of anxiety consistent with PTSD'. He added: 'No one is likely to suggest that Child Q was anything other than distressed and shaken by a traumatic episode.' According to the allegations, Pcs Linge and Szmydynski performed a search that exposed the girl's intimate parts when this was 'disproportionate in all the circumstances'. Pcs Linge and Wray are also accused of performing or allowing the search in a manner which was 'unjustified, inappropriate, disproportionate, humiliating and degrading'. It is alleged that all of this happened without authorisation, in the absence of an appropriate adult, and with no adequate concern being given to Child Q's age, sex, or the need to treat her as a child, and that the child's race was an effective cause of this. Pcs Szmydynski and Linge are further accused of giving a 'misleading record' of the search afterwards. Outrage over Child Q's treatment led to protests outside Stoke Newington Police Station. Scotland Yard has previously apologised over the incident.
