"Illegal occupiers should return their illegally occupied parts to rightful owner: EAM Jaishankar on PoK
Amsterdam [Netherlands], May 22 (ANI): External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar on Thursday reiterated India's claim over Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK), stating that the region rightfully belongs to India outlining a historical context that Jammu-Kashmir joined India during the partition in 1947.
During an interview with 'de Volkskrant' in Netherlands, Jaishankar said, 'As for Jammu and Kashmir, it is a historical fact that it joined India when India and Pakistan separated in 1947. Our position is that the illegal occupiers should return their illegally occupied parts to the rightful owner. And that is us.'
Further he condemned terrorism, stating that 'no, for us terrorism is an independent, completely unacceptable international crime that should not be condoned or justified.'
'The terrorists targeted the vibrant tourism industry in Jammu and Kashmir with their attack. So they are prepared to destroy things in Kashmir for their own, very limited, selfish purposes. They also deliberately gave the attack a very religious tint (Hindu versus Muslim, ed.). The world should not accept such practices,' he added.
Jaishankar also made it clear that the Kashmir issue is a 'bilateral issue' between India and Pakistan, rejecting any offer of mediation by the international community. 'No, it is a bilateral issue between the countries involved,' Jaishankar said, emphasizing India's stance on the matter.
Emphasising India's aspirations to expand its manufacturing capabilities, citing new technology as a potential entry point.
'Our hope is indeed that the manufacturing of products in India will grow and that we will be more integrated into global production chains. New technology can be an entry point. So our interests in market access cover a much broader spectrum of modern products, such as electronic hardware, chemicals or all kinds of pharmaceuticals,' said Jaishankar when asked about India's ambition to take China's place as the world's factory.
On imposing sanctions on Russia, Jaishankar affirmed that 'that sanction culture is a very Western way of maintaining international relations. We do not do national sanctions.'
'India has a position that many countries in the Global South probably share. We strive for a peaceful solution to this conflict. If we can do something about it, we are open to it. But of course, this depends on the parties involved,' Jaishanakr said on India's playing a mediating role in ending the Russian war against Ukraine.
Jaishankar also underlined India's aspirations for a permanent seat on the UN Security Council, citing the country's growing economic and global influence.
'That permanent seat on the Security Council is indeed one of our goals. We believe that if the much-needed reform of the UN and the Security Council finally comes about, we will receive a lot of support for our claim,' he said.
'Many international initiatives have come from India in recent years. We understand what our position entails. We are now the fourth largest economy in the world, we have just overtaken Japan. And we know that comes with responsibilities. We are ready,' he added.
In response to the Pahalgam attack, Indian Armed Forces launched Operation Sindoor in the early hours of May 7, targeting nine terror sites in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Jammu and Kashmir (PoJK), leading to the death of over 100 terrorists affiliated with terror outfits like the Jaish-e-Mohammed (JeM), Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT) and Hizbul Mujahideen (HM).
Following the attack, Pakistan retaliated with cross-border shelling across the Line of Control and Jammu and Kashmir as well as attempted drone attacks along the border regions, following which India launched a coordinated attack and damaged radar infrastructure, communication centres and airfields across airbases in Pakistan. On May 10, India and Pakistan reached an understanding on the cessation of hostilities.
Notably, EAM Jaishankar is on an official visit to the Netherlands, Denmark, and Germany from May 19 to 24. (ANI)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
31 minutes ago
- Time of India
Mideast governments condemn Syria church bombing as death toll jumps to 25
Mideast governments condemn Syria church bombing as death toll jumps to 25 (Image: AP) DAMASCUS: The death toll from an attack on a church in Syria has gone up to 25, state media said Monday. The attack Sunday on the Mar Elias Greek Orthodox church during a Divine Liturgy in Dweil'a near Damascus was the first of its kind in Syria in years, and comes as Damascus under its de facto Islamist rule is trying to win the support of minorities. As President Ahmad al-Sharaa struggles to exert authority across the country, there have been concerns about the presence of sleeper cells of extremist groups in the war-torn country. The ministry and most witnesses said a gunman entered the church, and started firing at the people there before detonating his explosive vest. SANA, citing the Health Ministry, said 63 other people were wounded in the attack. Father Fadi Ghattas told The Associated Press after the attack that some 350 people were praying at the church. The United States, the European Union and governments across the Middle East condemned the attack, decrying it as a terrorist attack. No group immediately claimed responsibility, but the Syrian Interior Minister has blamed the extremist Islamic State group. Since the toppling of Bashar Assad and his family's decades-long dictatorial rule of Syria last December in a lightning insurgency, al-Sharaa has been pushing to win the support of Syria's non-Sunni-Muslim minority groups who are concerned about life under Islamist rule.
Mint
34 minutes ago
- Mint
‘US lost its credibility': China raps Donald Trump govt over attacks on Iran nuclear sites
China claimed the US attack on Iran's nuclear facilities had damaged the Donald Trump-led government's credibility and warned that the situation "may go out of control", its state broadcaster reported, following a UN Security Council meeting on Sunday. The US on Sunday bombed multiple nuclear sites of Iran, including Fordow, which is Iran's most important nuclear enrichment facility. President Donald Trump said the US had "obliterated" Tehran's main nuclear sites, joining Israel in the biggest Western military action against Iran since its 1979 revolution. The UN Security Council met on Sunday to discuss US strikes on Iran's nuclear sites. Russia, China and Pakistan urged the 15-member body to call for an immediate and unconditional ceasefire in the Middle East, reported Reuters. China's UN Ambassador Fu Cong said the involved parties should avoid the "impulse of force, avoid exacerbating conflicts and adding fuel to the fire," as per the news report. Fu said parties, especially Israel, "should immediately cease fire to prevent the situation from escalating and avoid the spillover of war." Iran was hurt, but "the United States' credibility was also damaged - both as a country and as a participant in any international negotiations', Fu added. State media commentary late on Sunday said the US move was extremely dangerous and provocative. Reuters said, citing the Global Times newspaper, that the external military interference would never bring peace, and only "deepen regional hatred and trauma." Guo Jiakun, a spokesperson for China's foreign ministry, said on Monday that attacking nuclear facilities that were under the supervision of the International Atomic Energy Agency was "a serious violation of the United Nations Charter," the news agency said. China has proposed to help strengthen communication and coordination with all parties, and restore peace in the Middle East, Guo said at a regular press briefing. Guo also said Chinese citizens in Iran who were willing to leave had all been evacuated to safe areas. With the help of China's foreign ministry, the Chinese embassy in Iran and other authorities, "3,125 Chinese citizens have been safely evacuated from Iran," Reuters reported, citing Guo. The evacuated residents are from Hong Kong and Taiwan. China considers democratically governed Taiwan as its own territory. In Israel, the Chinese embassy has organised the evacuation of more than 500 citizens from the country, reported the news agency.
The Print
34 minutes ago
- The Print
Will Russia & China back Iran after US strikes? They're quiet, calculating allies
The Russian foreign ministry, in a wordy statement , condemned American strikes on 'several nuclear facilities in the Islamic Republic of Iran.' Russia even reiterated its previous statement – that the US attack stood in 'violation of international law, the UN Charter, and relevant resolutions by the UN Security Council, which has consistently and unequivocally deemed such actions unacceptable.' How does this play out for powers like Russia and China, which have continued to speak out against any military action? In March this year, Russia, China, and Iran jointly stated that Tehran's nuclear programme is 'exclusively for peaceful purposes, and not for the development of nuclear weapons.' Israel's Operation Rising Lion seemed to be an independently led series of strikes against Iran. But after six bombers flew 18 hours to attack three nuclear sites in Iran, Israel's action now seems to have been part of a broader deception strategy—which the United States utilised to dismantle Iran's nuclear programme. In its call for peace, Russia further demanded 'an immediate end to aggression and for stepping up efforts to bring the situation back onto a peaceful, diplomatic track.' Russia's position on the crisis remains standard—calling for peace, negotiations, and diplomacy as effective channels for a resolution. Meanwhile, no part of Russia's statement claims direct intervention in the crisis, which must come as no surprise. Although a strategic partner of Iran, Russia's offerings have been more implicit, such as supporting Tehran's civilian nuclear programme or defence exports. While the Kremlin itself is fighting a war next door, it may still offer to play the role of a cardinal peacebroker between the US and Iran—and prove to be the most effective of all. Russia remains the best-suited friend for Iran in the present crisis. Moscow stands as Iran's most strategically placed partner in the region. It not only possesses deep regional expertise but has operated militarily and diplomatically across the Middle East for decades. And if Iran is to receive any meaningful backing against the US and its allies, it can come only from a capable nuclear power like Russia. A most unlikely situation. Meanwhile, as Iranian foreign minister Abbas Araghchi proceeds to meet President Vladimir Putin, Russia could project a few probable security guarantees on Iran's behalf. This could include assurances against regime-change operations—an option President Donald Trump has openly considered on his social media—recognition of Iran's sovereignty and right to self-defence, and possible military non-aggression agreements brokered through multilateral channels. As for the United States and its allies, Russia may push for Iran's recommitment to nuclear limits under renewed international supervision, ending any proxy attacks on American and allied forces and perhaps securing more regional support for Iran. Aside from peace brokerage, Russia can offer its military-technical cooperation—which can include upgrading Iran's advanced air defence systems, sharing real-time satellite surveillance data to help Iran monitor US troop movements or detect incoming attacks, and providing space surveillance support. But what about this conflict's likely impact on Russia? It's less of a blow and more of an opportunity. As global crude oil prices surge, Moscow might return as the most reliable oil exporter globally. Second, there will likely be reduced American attention toward the Black Sea, Eastern Europe, and the Arctic—which are fundamental to the Kremlin's strategic vision for the region. It has also restored Russia's position in the global power lexicon, which had weakened after the Ukraine war. Also read: Trump tried to belittle India, but his Iran gamble has handed Modi unexpected diplomatic space China's response China, too, has condemned the attack, citing violation of the UN charter and international law. While this seems to be the standard response, Tehran values solidarity. China, however, would not directly engage in the conflict for two big reasons. First, Beijing likes to maintain strategic ambiguity over military risks and prefers to exert influence through diplomacy, economic leverage, and other indirect means. Directly confronting the US—whose prominence, mainly in terms of naval presence, has only grown—offers little advantage. Second, China's primary concern is energy stability. Direct involvement in a Gulf conflict would jeopardise its vital oil imports. While disruptions to Iranian oil exports would undoubtedly impact China, any direct military involvement would force Beijing to undertake a substantial and risky reconfiguration of its broader energy import strategy with other Gulf partners—which would be risky and unaffordable. However, there are other possible ways for Beijing to support Iran. While China avoids overt arms transfer to hot zones, it can covertly share technology that may include missile guidance technology, drones, cyber tactics, and so on. There was a strong role of space technology in the US's attacks on Iran, allowing it to strike nuclear bases with precision and without being detected. China could covertly offer limited space technology to support Iran, which Russia is also likely to offer. As permanent members of the United Nations Security Council, Russia and China possess significant diplomatic influence that they can jointly utilise to advocate for Iran's position and pressure the UN to take meaningful actions. Meanwhile, the effectiveness of this diplomatic support against America's non-concessional stance on Tehran's nuclear ambitions remains to be seen. But both Russia and China are well-positioned to lead global efforts through multilateral institutions such as the UN and the International Atomic Energy Agency. They can push for an international recognition of the potential radioactive and humanitarian consequences of further escalation, and urge a shift from punitive frameworks to preventive diplomacy. Rishi Gupta is a commentator on global affairs. Views are personal. (Edited by Zoya Bhatti)
