Will Russia & China back Iran after US strikes? They're quiet, calculating allies

The Russian foreign ministry, in a wordy statement , condemned American strikes on 'several nuclear facilities in the Islamic Republic of Iran.' Russia even reiterated its previous statement – that the US attack stood in 'violation of international law, the UN Charter, and relevant resolutions by the UN Security Council, which has consistently and unequivocally deemed such actions unacceptable.'
How does this play out for powers like Russia and China, which have continued to speak out against any military action? In March this year, Russia, China, and Iran jointly stated that Tehran's nuclear programme is 'exclusively for peaceful purposes, and not for the development of nuclear weapons.'
Israel's Operation Rising Lion seemed to be an independently led series of strikes against Iran. But after six bombers flew 18 hours to attack three nuclear sites in Iran, Israel's action now seems to have been part of a broader deception strategy—which the United States utilised to dismantle Iran's nuclear programme.
In its call for peace, Russia further demanded 'an immediate end to aggression and for stepping up efforts to bring the situation back onto a peaceful, diplomatic track.'
Russia's position on the crisis remains standard—calling for peace, negotiations, and diplomacy as effective channels for a resolution. Meanwhile, no part of Russia's statement claims direct intervention in the crisis, which must come as no surprise.
Although a strategic partner of Iran, Russia's offerings have been more implicit, such as supporting Tehran's civilian nuclear programme or defence exports. While the Kremlin itself is fighting a war next door, it may still offer to play the role of a cardinal peacebroker between the US and Iran—and prove to be the most effective of all.
Russia remains the best-suited friend for Iran in the present crisis. Moscow stands as Iran's most strategically placed partner in the region. It not only possesses deep regional expertise but has operated militarily and diplomatically across the Middle East for decades. And if Iran is to receive any meaningful backing against the US and its allies, it can come only from a capable nuclear power like Russia. A most unlikely situation.
Meanwhile, as Iranian foreign minister Abbas Araghchi proceeds to meet President Vladimir Putin, Russia could project a few probable security guarantees on Iran's behalf. This could include assurances against regime-change operations—an option President Donald Trump has openly considered on his social media—recognition of Iran's sovereignty and right to self-defence, and possible military non-aggression agreements brokered through multilateral channels.
As for the United States and its allies, Russia may push for Iran's recommitment to nuclear limits under renewed international supervision, ending any proxy attacks on American and allied forces and perhaps securing more regional support for Iran. Aside from peace brokerage, Russia can offer its military-technical cooperation—which can include upgrading Iran's advanced air defence systems, sharing real-time satellite surveillance data to help Iran monitor US troop movements or detect incoming attacks, and providing space surveillance support.
But what about this conflict's likely impact on Russia? It's less of a blow and more of an opportunity. As global crude oil prices surge, Moscow might return as the most reliable oil exporter globally. Second, there will likely be reduced American attention toward the Black Sea, Eastern Europe, and the Arctic—which are fundamental to the Kremlin's strategic vision for the region. It has also restored Russia's position in the global power lexicon, which had weakened after the Ukraine war.
Also read: Trump tried to belittle India, but his Iran gamble has handed Modi unexpected diplomatic space
China's response
China, too, has condemned the attack, citing violation of the UN charter and international law. While this seems to be the standard response, Tehran values solidarity. China, however, would not directly engage in the conflict for two big reasons.
First, Beijing likes to maintain strategic ambiguity over military risks and prefers to exert influence through diplomacy, economic leverage, and other indirect means. Directly confronting the US—whose prominence, mainly in terms of naval presence, has only grown—offers little advantage. Second, China's primary concern is energy stability. Direct involvement in a Gulf conflict would jeopardise its vital oil imports.
While disruptions to Iranian oil exports would undoubtedly impact China, any direct military involvement would force Beijing to undertake a substantial and risky reconfiguration of its broader energy import strategy with other Gulf partners—which would be risky and unaffordable.
However, there are other possible ways for Beijing to support Iran. While China avoids overt arms transfer to hot zones, it can covertly share technology that may include missile guidance technology, drones, cyber tactics, and so on. There was a strong role of space technology in the US's attacks on Iran, allowing it to strike nuclear bases with precision and without being detected. China could covertly offer limited space technology to support Iran, which Russia is also likely to offer.
As permanent members of the United Nations Security Council, Russia and China possess significant diplomatic influence that they can jointly utilise to advocate for Iran's position and pressure the UN to take meaningful actions.
Meanwhile, the effectiveness of this diplomatic support against America's non-concessional stance on Tehran's nuclear ambitions remains to be seen.
But both Russia and China are well-positioned to lead global efforts through multilateral institutions such as the UN and the International Atomic Energy Agency. They can push for an international recognition of the potential radioactive and humanitarian consequences of further escalation, and urge a shift from punitive frameworks to preventive diplomacy.
Rishi Gupta is a commentator on global affairs. Views are personal.
(Edited by Zoya Bhatti)

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Indian Express

17 minutes ago

• Indian Express

F, M, and J visa applicants to US must make social media accounts public, says Indian embassy

The United States Monday announced a new requirement for all individuals applying for F, M, or J non-immigrant visas: they must adjust the privacy settings on all their personal social media accounts to 'public'. The move is aimed at enhancing national security through more thorough vetting procedures. 'Every visa adjudication is a national security decision. Effective immediately, all individuals applying for an F, M, or J non-immigrant visa are requested to adjust the privacy settings on all of their personal social media accounts to 'public' to facilitate vetting necessary to establish their identity and admissibility to the United States,' the US Embassy in India (@USAndIndia) said in a post on X. In a follow-up slide in the same post, the embassy noted that the US has already been requiring all visa applicants to provide social media identifiers on both immigrant and non-immigrant visa forms. It added that this data is used in visa screening and vetting processes to identify those who may pose a threat to US national security and would therefore be deemed inadmissible. Effective immediately, all individuals applying for an F, M, or J nonimmigrant visa are requested to adjust the privacy settings on all of their social media accounts to public to facilitate vetting necessary to establish their identity and admissibility to the United States… — U.S. Embassy India (@USAndIndia) June 23, 2025 The change comes amid the imposition of a new travel ban by the US government, which now completely restricts citizens from 12 countries and partially restricts those from seven others. These restrictions cover access to non-immigrant visas, including those for tourism, education, and employment, and are primarily aimed at countries in the Middle East and Africa considered high-risk for security and terrorism-related concerns. However, Indian nationals are not affected by the new travel ban. Despite ongoing tensions in parts of the Middle East, the US has clarified that India is not on the list of countries facing the restrictions. Applications from Indian citizens across categories, including B1/B2 tourist visas, H1B work permits, and F1 student visas, continue to be processed. India, now the largest source of international students in the US for the first time since 2008-09, had over 3.31 lakh students enrolled in American universities in 2024, overtaking China.

Mint

18 minutes ago

• Mint

US and UK warn their citizens in Qatar to ‘shelter in place' amid Iran retaliation threats

Amid fears of Iranian retaliation following US strikes on its nuclear sites, both the United States and the United Kingdom on Monday (June 23) advised their citizens in Qatar to 'shelter in place'. 'Out of an abundance of caution we recommend American citizens shelter in place until further notice,' the US Embassy in Doha said in a statement. Soon after, the UK Embassy followed with similar advice: 'Following a US security alert for US nationals in Qatar, out of an abundance of caution, we recommend that British nationals in Qatar shelter in place until further notice.' While neither embassy cited a specific threat, the coordinated messages have heightened public concern in a region already on edge due to the escalating Iran-Israel conflict. Iran's military on Monday (June 23) reiterated its threat to strike back, warning of 'serious, unpredictable consequences' for the US following the recent attacks on its nuclear facilities. The latest warning echoes a growing chorus of Iranian officials vowing a firm response, deepening fears of a broader regional conflict. Responding to the alerts, Qatari Foreign Ministry spokesperson Majed Al Ansari sought to reassure residents. "The security situation in the country remains stable," he said in a statement, noting that the embassy advisories did not indicate a specific threat. 'Qatar is ready to take all necessary measures to ensure the safety of its citizens and residents,' he added. Qatar is home to Al Udeid Air Base, the largest American military installation in the region and the forward headquarters of the US Central Command (CENTCOM). The base houses around 9,000 US troops and plays a critical role in operations across the Middle East. Given its strategic location just across the Persian Gulf from Iran, Qatar is seen as a key player in any unfolding military dynamics. In neighbouring Bahrain, which hosts the US Navy's Fifth Fleet, the American embassy said it had 'temporarily shifted a portion of its employees to local telework.' Bahraini authorities had already instructed most government employees to work from home 'until further notice,' citing 'regional circumstances.'

Time of India

19 minutes ago

• Time of India

Qatar assures security after US embassy issues advisory to its citizens following Iran bombings

Following US airstrikes on Iranian nuclear sites, the US Embassy in Qatar issued a safety advisory to its citizens, urging them to stay indoors. In response, Qatari officials asserted that the security situation is stable and under control, dismissing any specific threats. Qatar is actively engaged in diplomatic efforts to de-escalate regional tensions and emphasizes the need for dialogue. The authorities in Qatar affirmed that the security situation in the country is under control. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Hours after the United States issued an advisory to American nationals in Qatar over safety concerns, the authorities of the gulf nation affirmed the security situation is under control. The US Embassy in Qatar on Monday, June 23, 2025, sent emails to its nationals asking them to remain indoors until further to the US embassy advisory, Advisor to the Qatari Prime Minister and Foreign Ministry spokesperson Majed Al Ansari asserted that these notices do not give any indications about the presence of any specific or credible threats within the its advisory to American nationals, the US Embassy recommended that they shelter in a place until further notice. The embassy also clarified that the message was issued 'out of an abundance of caution' and did not provide any further advisory was issued after Washington bombed Iran's three nuclear sites in the wee hours of Sunday, June 22, 2025, further escalating tension in the Middle reassured both citizens and residents that security services are closely monitoring the situation and are completely prepared to take any necessary action to safeguard public safety."These advisories do not necessarily reflect the existence of specific or credible threats. We would like to reassure the public that the security situation in the State remains stable. The relevant authorities are closely monitoring the situation and remain fully prepared to take all necessary measures to ensure the safety and security of citizens, residents, and visitors. The public will be kept informed of any developments that may warrant notification or action, and we stress the importance of obtaining information from official sources," Al Ansari wrote on Qatari official further stated that the country continues to make active diplomatic efforts to de-escalate tensions in the Middle East and maintain regional security and stability by engaging with key stakeholders and regional and international on Sunday, June 22, 2025, reacted to the deteriorating situation in the region and the US bombing in Iran and expressed the urgent need to halt military operations, Qatar said that the country's government is closely monitoring developments with deep concern in the aftermath of the recent attacks on Iran. It asserted that there is a need to immediately return to dialogue and diplomatic channels to resolve outstanding issues.