Amnesty International criticizes case against German climate group
Amnesty International and other organizations have criticized charges against members of the former climate group Last Generation (Letzte Generation), over allegations of forming a criminal organization.
The actions of the Munich Public Prosecutor's Office are disproportionate, said Julia Duchrow, Secretary-General of Amnesty International, adding that the move unfairly stigmatizes and criminalizes the entire climate movement.
Duchrow emphasized that even uncomfortable protest is protected by the German constitution and human rights law. Civic engagement can be stifled by such disproportionately repressive measures, leading to deterrence and intimidation, she warned.
Prosecutors have charged five members of the former Letzte Generation with suspicion of forming a criminal organization. A district court will decide whether to proceed to trial.
If convicted, the activists could face up to five years in prison, or 10 years in severe cases.
The group, known for blocking roads and targeting museums in its protests, announced at the end of last year that it was changing its strategy and its name.
A nationwide raid in the case in May 2023 sparked sharp criticism and court disputes. At that time, 170 police officers searched 15 properties in seven countries.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
2 hours ago
Iran for the first time acknowledges detaining a German bicyclist as its war with Israel rages on
DUBAI, United Arab Emirates -- Iran for the first time acknowledges detaining a German bicyclist as its war with Israel rages on.
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Trump sets deadline of two weeks to decide if US will join Israel's war on Iran
Donald Trump has set a two-week deadline to decide whether the US will join Israel's war with Iran, allowing time to seek a negotiated end to the conflict, the White House has said. The decision to leave a window for diplomacy came after Israel's defence minister openly embraced regime change in Tehran as a war aim. On a visit to a hospital hit by an Iranian missile, Israel Katz said Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, 'cannot be allowed to exist' and that he had ordered a surge in attacks to 'undermine' the Iranian government. The Israeli prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, later insisted that toppling Iran's leaders was 'not a stated or formal goal', as the conflict entered its seventh day. The White House said on Thursday that the US president would 'make a decision on whether to attack Iran within two weeks'. It added that correspondence with Tehran had continued and there was still hope of negotiations. Trump's decision on whether to join the assault against Iran hinged in part on whether America's most powerful conventional 'bunker buster' bombs would be able to take out Iran's most heavily protected nuclear facility, sources familiar with the deliberations said. Israel does not have weapons capable of destroying the Fordow complex, which is buried up to 100 metres below a mountain near the holy city of Qom. Netanyahu and his allies have been encouraging the US to shift from backing Israel's defence to joining the attack, telling Trump that he alone can 'finish off' Iran's nuclear project. Strike plans have been drawn up, but Trump is waiting to see if Tehran will make a last-minute deal to abandon its nuclear programme, sources said. Amid global warnings against further escalation, Europe is pushing for a diplomatic solution to the war. Iran's foreign minister is travelling to Geneva to meet his British, French and German counterparts on Friday. There have also been offers of mediation from the Russian president, Vladimir Putin, and regional powers including Oman. On Thursday the UK foreign secretary, David Lammy, met his US counterpart, Marco Rubio, at the White House, with the focus on the Middle East. They were joined by the British ambassador, Lord Mandelson, and Trump's special envoy to the Middle East, Steve Witkoff, for the meeting. Lammy said later: 'The situation in the Middle East remains perilous. We are determined that Iran must never have a nuclear weapon … we discussed how a deal could avoid a deepening conflict. A window now exists within the next two weeks to achieve a diplomatic solution.' He added: 'Now is the time to put a stop to the grave scenes in the Middle East and prevent a regional escalation that would benefit no one.' When Israel launched the conflict a week ago, Netanyahu described it as a focused operation to halt Iran's progress towards making a nuclear bomb, but he has been increasingly vocal about his desire for the government in Tehran to fall. On a visit to the Soroka hospital in Beersheba on Thursday, after it was hit by an Iranian missile overnight, Netanyahu said Israel was creating conditions for regime change but that Iranians needed to rise up. Referencing a story from the Bible about the Persian emperor Cyrus the Great liberating Jewish people enslaved in Babylon, Netanyahu told journalists: 'Today, a Jewish state is creating the means to liberate the Persian people.' Netanyahu later said the fall of the Iranian regime was for the country's people to decide. 'It could be a result, but it's not a stated or formal goal that we have,' he told Israeli public broadcaster Kan. Iranians have repeatedly attempted to topple or reform their government over decades, and thousands have paid with their lives or freedom. Many opposition figures, including political prisoners, have rejected the idea that an Israeli war which has already killed hundreds of civilians represents a path to liberation for their country. They have a grim warning in the fate of neighbouring Iraq after US forces toppled Saddam Hussein. His downfall was celebrated by many Iraqis, but was followed by decades of extreme and often sectarian violence which paved the way for the rise of Islamic State. Katz visited Soroka hospital before Netanyahu and effectively called for Khamenei's assassination. He had earlier said he ordered increased attacks on government targets to undermine the regime. 'Khamenei openly declares that he wants Israel destroyed, he personally gives the order to fire on hospitals. He considers the destruction of the state of Israel to be a goal,' Katz told journalists. 'Such a man can no longer be allowed to exist.' After its initial focus on military and nuclear sites, Israel recently attacked targets, including the state broadcaster, with no links to the nuclear project, but which Katz described as 'symbols of the regime'. Iran's early morning hit on Soroka hospital in Beersheba did not cause any serious injuries because all staff and patients were in protected areas, the director, Shlomi Kodesh, said. But images of shattered wards and stunned medics examining the damage caused outrage in Israel. Other missiles landed around Tel Aviv, injuring more than 200 people across the country as a whole, four of them seriously. One hit the base of a skyscraper in Ramat Gan, close to central Tel Aviv and about 200 metres from the city's diamond exchange. 'It was like an atom bomb. An earthquake,' said Asher Adiv, 69, who lives in a nearby block of flats. His mother was an Iranian Jew from Isfahan and Asher grew up speaking Farsi. 'The Iranian people should make a revolution, and kick out the ayatollahs,' he said. 'We are not just fighting for Israel. We are fighting for the whole world. We ask Trump to go inside and finish the problem.' Trump, who initially distanced himself from the conflict, has increased the US military presence in the region as he weighs up ordering US forces to join attacks on Iran. The US president was the first subject most Tel Aviv residents wanted to discuss, as they gathered at the police cordon to watch first responders work among the rubble and shattered glass. Adiv's wife, Anny, who immigrated from Morocco in 1969, said: 'Tell Donald Trump to be beside us. He has to bomb them to finish the nuclear sites.' Khamenei warned on Wednesday that the US would face 'irreparable damage' if it shifted from supporting Israel's defence to an active role in assaults on its territory. Iran's military has moved missiles to prepare for attacks on US assets if it joins the war, and officials are considering other options to respond to one of the most serious threats since the 1979 revolution that brought the country under the control of clerics. A member of the national security committee in Iran's parliament, Behnam Saeedi, said Iran could attempt to close the Strait of Hormuz, Reuters reported. The narrow passage is used by vessels carrying a fifth of the world's daily oil needs. Israeli planes bombed a partly built heavy-water reactor near Arak on Thursday and returned to strike the Natanz nuclear complex. There was no radiation risk from the strike on the reactor, state TV said. Israeli warnings meant the area had been evacuated. Heavy-water reactors are considered a proliferation risk because they can produce plutonium, an alternative to enriched uranium for the core of a nuclear weapon. Israel also targeted the Natanz site, which has been hit several times. Iran says its nuclear programme is for peaceful purposes. It was censured by the International Atomic Energy Agency just before the war began and is the only state without nuclear weapons that enriches uranium to 60%, one technical step away from weapons-grade levels. Israel, which has not signed the nuclear non-proliferation treaty, is the only nuclear-armed power in the region. It has never officially confirmed or denied having nuclear weapons but its status has been an open secret for years. Several countries are preparing to evacuate their citizens from Iran and Israel, while flights to bring back tens of thousands of Israelis stranded outside the country get under way. Israel's main airport has been closed since the first attacks on Iran. Quique Kierszenbaum contributed to the reporting
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
World Bank and IMF climate snub 'worrying', says COP29 presidency
The hosts of the most recent UN climate talks are worried international lenders are retreating from their commitments to help boost funding for developing countries' response to global warming. Major development banks have agreed to boost climate spending and are seen as crucial in the effort to dramatically increase finance to help poorer countries build resilience to impacts and invest in renewable energy. But anxiety has grown as the Trump administration has slashed foreign aid and discouraged US-based development lenders such as the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund from focussing on climate finance. Developing nations, excluding China, will need an estimated $1.3 trillion a year by 2035 in financial assistance to transition to renewable energy and climate-proof their economies from increasing weather extremes. Nowhere near this amount has been committed. At last year's UN COP29 summit in Azerbaijan, rich nations agreed to increase climate finance to $300 billion a year by 2035, an amount decried as woefully inadequate. Azerbaijan and Brazil, which is hosting this year's COP30 conference, have launched an initiative to reduce the shortfall, with the expectation of "significant" contributions from international lenders. But so far only two -- the African Development Bank and the Inter-American Development Bank -- have responded to a call to engage the initiative with ideas, said COP29 president Mukhtar Babayev. "We call on their shareholders to urgently help us to address these concerns," he told climate negotiators at a high-level summit in the German city of Bonn this week. "We fear that a complex and volatile global environment is distracting" many of those expected to play a big role in bridging the climate finance gap, he added. - A 'worrisome trend' - His team travelled to Washington in April for the IMF and World Bank's spring meetings hoping to find the same enthusiasm for climate lending they had encountered a year earlier. But instead they found institutions "very much reluctant now to talk about climate at all", said Azerbaijan's top climate negotiator Yalchin Rafiyev. This was a "worrisome trend", he said, given expectations these lenders would extend the finance needed in the absence of other sources. "They're very much needed," he said. The World Bank is directing 45 percent of its total lending to climate, as part of an action plan in place until June 2026, with the public portion of that spilt 50/50 between emissions reductions and building resilience. The United States, the World Bank's biggest shareholder, has pushed in a different direction. On the sidelines of the April spring meetings, US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent urged the bank to focus on "dependable technologies" rather than "distortionary climate finance targets." This could mean investing in gas and other fossil fuel-based energy production, he said. Under the Paris Agreement, wealthy developed countries -- those most responsible for global warming to date -- are obliged to pay climate finance to poorer nations. Other countries, most notably China, make voluntary contributions. - Money matters - Finance is a source of long-running tensions at UN climate negotiations. Donors have consistently failed to deliver on past finance pledges, and have committed well below what experts agree developing nations need to cope with the climate crisis. The issue flared up again this week in Bonn, with nations at odds over whether to debate financial commitments from rich countries during the formal meetings. European nations have also pared back their foreign aid spending in recent months, raising fears that budgets for climate finance could also face a haircut. At COP29, multilateral development banks (MDBs) led by the World Bank Group estimated they could provide $120 billion annually in climate financing to low and middle income countries, and mobilise another $65 billion from the private sector by 2030. Their estimate for high income countries was $50 billion, with another $65 billion mobilised from the private sector. Rob Moore, of policy think tank E3G, said these lenders are the largest providers of international public finance to developing countries. "Whilst they are facing difficult political headwinds in some quarters, they would be doing both themselves and their clients a disservice by disengaging on climate change," he said. The World Bank in particular has done "a huge amount of work" to align its lending with global climate goals. "If they choose to step back this would be at their own detriment, and other banks like the regionally based MDBs would likely play a bigger role in shaping the economy of the future," he said. The World Bank declined to comment on the record. klm/np/mh/jj
