Oswego may relocate dog park
Oswego trustees as a committee of the whole Tuesday evening will discuss the feasibility of relocating the dog park in the village due to declining use and revenue.
Trustees in 2021 expressed support for the creation of a dog park in the village as a way for families to have a 'spot for recreation' with their pets. Concept plans were prepared for construction of a dog park at the northeast corner of Plank Drive and Theodore Drive on 1.5 acres near the Public Works facility on the village's southeast side.
It cost the village $110,000 to build the Happy Tails Dog Park, which included fencing, a fountain, shade sail and sidewalks, village officials said.
The dog park opened in 2023 and was initially well-received, officials said. However, an analysis shows there is declining use of the facility, according to officials.
'Since that time, participation has gradually declined,' Oswego Management Analyst Alejandro Hardaway said in a report to trustees.
The village eliminated the annual dog park fee at the start of the current fiscal year due to its anticipated closure because of the eventual expansion of the village's nearby Public Works facility, he said.
'There are currently 133 active card holders, a decline in the peak total number of unique users since the dog park's inception of 451,' he said.
Revenues from the park dropped from $11,238 in 2023 to $7,194 in 2024, officials said.
Operational expenses are minimal, totaling about $3,200 per year in Public Works staff time and materials, according to officials. Additional facility maintenance costs are between $500 to $700 annually.
The 2025 Oswego Community Survey shows only 5% of respondents report visiting the dog park, with 95% of respondents saying they do not use the site, Hardaway said in a report to trustees.
'These findings reflect that while the dog park is recognized by a majority of the community, actual utilization remains low,' Hardaway said.
Village staff has suggested relocating the dog park if trustees are interested in keeping it open. Possible sites include an area near Venue 1012, a 2-acre park east of the Oswego Police Department and a 4-acre area at the Hunt Club water tower property.
The Oswegoland Park District was approached about taking ownership of the village's roughly $18,225 in equipment to open its own dog park, but the offer was declined, village officials said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Chicago Tribune
a day ago
- Chicago Tribune
Oswego may relocate dog park
Oswego trustees as a committee of the whole Tuesday evening will discuss the feasibility of relocating the dog park in the village due to declining use and revenue. Trustees in 2021 expressed support for the creation of a dog park in the village as a way for families to have a 'spot for recreation' with their pets. Concept plans were prepared for construction of a dog park at the northeast corner of Plank Drive and Theodore Drive on 1.5 acres near the Public Works facility on the village's southeast side. It cost the village $110,000 to build the Happy Tails Dog Park, which included fencing, a fountain, shade sail and sidewalks, village officials said. The dog park opened in 2023 and was initially well-received, officials said. However, an analysis shows there is declining use of the facility, according to officials. 'Since that time, participation has gradually declined,' Oswego Management Analyst Alejandro Hardaway said in a report to trustees. The village eliminated the annual dog park fee at the start of the current fiscal year due to its anticipated closure because of the eventual expansion of the village's nearby Public Works facility, he said. 'There are currently 133 active card holders, a decline in the peak total number of unique users since the dog park's inception of 451,' he said. Revenues from the park dropped from $11,238 in 2023 to $7,194 in 2024, officials said. Operational expenses are minimal, totaling about $3,200 per year in Public Works staff time and materials, according to officials. Additional facility maintenance costs are between $500 to $700 annually. The 2025 Oswego Community Survey shows only 5% of respondents report visiting the dog park, with 95% of respondents saying they do not use the site, Hardaway said in a report to trustees. 'These findings reflect that while the dog park is recognized by a majority of the community, actual utilization remains low,' Hardaway said. Village staff has suggested relocating the dog park if trustees are interested in keeping it open. Possible sites include an area near Venue 1012, a 2-acre park east of the Oswego Police Department and a 4-acre area at the Hunt Club water tower property. The Oswegoland Park District was approached about taking ownership of the village's roughly $18,225 in equipment to open its own dog park, but the offer was declined, village officials said.
Los Angeles Times
12-06-2025
- Los Angeles Times
Cypress withholds records from TimesOC related to city manager allegations
In the aftermath of 'unlawful acts of misconduct' allegations made against Cypress City Manager Peter Grant, the city is refusing to turn over related records to TimesOC. Since former Public Works Director Doug Dancs first made the accusation while calling for Grant's firing during the April 28 Cypress City Council meeting, concerned residents and council members have pushed for more transparency. On May 15, TimesOC filed a public records request seeking documents detailing allegations of misconduct or harassment involving Grant and Dancs. The request also asked for invoices from the Los Angeles-based Liebert, Cassidy, Whitmore firm, as an attorney with the firm signed off on Dancs' $183,000 separation agreement. The city's payment register also shows nearly $105,000 in fees paid to the firm for legal services dating back to May 2024. It remains unclear if the payments were related to any human resources issue involving Dancs and Grant. Either way, Cypress cited attorney-client privilege first and foremost in withholding all responsive records — including invoices — from disclosure. 'Any invoices or related records maintained by the city regarding [the firm's] advice regarding any workplace investigations are exempt from disclosure,' City Clerk Alisha Farnell wrote in an emailed response to TimesOC's public records request. 'These invoices contain descriptions of confidential legal services and matters, and their disclosure would reveal privileged attorney-client communications and legal strategy.' David Loy, executive director of the First Amendment Coalition, said that Cypress' exemptions raised questions on both sides. He pointed to a case in Petaluma were an appellate court eventually ruled that an investigative report into a woman firefighter's claims of sexual harassment and discrimination by an outside firm was privileged. 'On the right facts, privilege can potentially apply to outside counsel doing investigation, depending on the situation,' Loy said. 'It's very fact-sensitive.' With regard to withheld invoices, Loy turned to a California Supreme Court ruling in a case involving the ACLU's efforts to obtain invoices from Los Angeles County related to payments made to private law firms in lawsuits against its sheriff's department. 'The court ruled that invoices are not always privileged, but drew a distinction between open cases and closed cases,' Loy said. 'When a matter is active and ongoing, the court held that the invoice, as a whole, is subject to privilege — even the total amount spent. Once a case is closed, the invoices are no longer completely privileged.' Farnell claimed that the firm is providing 'ongoing advice' to Cypress. The city, she said, would be disclosing the total amount of legal billing by the firm since May 2024 in connection with any workplace investigations. TimesOC already tallied that figure through Cypress' payment register. 'With respect to invoices, the issue is not whether the law firm is on a permanent retainer, the issue is whether that particular case or matter is done,' Loy said. All parties signed Dancs' separation agreement by October. His last day of employment with Cypress was Dec. 31. The city paid him out in January. To whatever degree privilege is legally applicable to documents related to Dancs' allegations, Cypress City Council, as the client, would have the authority to waive it. In a recent high-profile case, Anaheim waived attorney-client privilege in 2023, which cleared the way for the release of a redacted anti-corruption report to its city council and the public. Cypress Mayor David Burke called a special meeting on May 19 to direct City Atty. Fred Galante to turn over any such documents to the council. The question of waiving attorney-client privilege did not appear on the agenda. With Councilmember Leo Medrano absent because he was attending a Democratic club meeting at a Cerritos IHOP instead, the council deadlocked 2-2 on the question. During the June 9 Cypress City Council meeting, a former council member, Frances Marquez, advocated for the item to be brought back for discussion at a future meeting. 'You need to hand that investigation over to the mayor,' she told Galante. 'Everybody in this community is still watching.' But for the second straight council meeting since the special meeting deadlock, no council member took any action to revive the discussion. Instead, a review of Grant's job appeared on the agenda. Galante reported during the meeting that the City Council discussed the city manager's performance evaluation and provided direction in closed session. 'No further reportable action was taken,' he said.
Yahoo
11-06-2025
- Yahoo
Jackson City Council passes water and sewage rate hike
LANSING, Mich. (WLNS) — The Jackson City Council approved a hike in the city's water and sewage rates for the next two fiscal years at a meeting Tuesday night. On average, Jackson residents will see a $5 increase to water and a $6 increase to sewage each month, for a total of $33 per quarter, according to a memo to City Manager Jonathan Greene from Mike Osborn, the city's Director of Public Works. This would come out to $132 a year on average, though the exact amount on your bill would come down to your water usage. These rates were Option #1 of three rate hikes presented to the City Council. Option #1 was the steepest hike of the three, raising the average homeowner's bill by $33 a quarter in comparison to Option #2, raising it by $27, and Option #3 by $21. Osborn's memo says the rate increases would help the city invest and improve its aging water systems, including treatment facilities and collection and distribution infrastructure, and ensure the city complies with the Lead and Copper Rule. The Council also discussed the possibility of switching from quarterly billing to monthly billing, with Ward 3 Councilmember Angelita Gunn and Ward 4 Councilmember Conner Wood saying they spoke with constituents who brought that to their attention as a possibility. Wood said one of his constituents told him monthly billing would make the rate increases 'more tolerable.' Greene says the city has been inching toward monthly billing for the past five years. He says the city has been buying and installing meter parts that allow for remote reading to make the switch, but the process is ongoing. When Gunn asked if there was a specific reason the rate hikes were over 2 years, Greene said that the City has 'gotten into the habit' of two-year rates, as they assist with planning long-term projects. Jackson Mayor Daniel Mahoney brought up the possibility of creating a flexible long-term plan, alternating between rate increases and decreases per year, depending on the funding needs of the city, which would avoid large rate hikes. Ward 6 Councilmember Will Forgrave said that one of the things that made him more comfortable in supporting the rate increases was that, even with the proposed rate increases, the city would still be far below the state average. In the end, Option #1 of the three increases was approved by the city 4-3 by the council. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
