Amkor (NASDAQ:AMKR) Misses Q4 Analysts' Revenue Estimates, Stock Drops
Semiconductor packaging and testing company Amkor Technology (NASDAQ:AMKR) fell short of the market's revenue expectations in Q4 CY2024, with sales falling 7% year on year to $1.63 billion. Next quarter's revenue guidance of $1.28 billion underwhelmed, coming in 14.1% below analysts' estimates. Its GAAP profit of $0.43 per share was 16.2% above analysts' consensus estimates.
Is now the time to buy Amkor? Find out in our full research report.
Revenue: $1.63 billion vs analyst estimates of $1.66 billion (7% year-on-year decline, 2.1% miss)
EPS (GAAP): $0.43 vs analyst estimates of $0.37 (16.2% beat)
Adjusted EBITDA: $302 million vs analyst estimates of $287.2 million (18.5% margin, 5.1% beat)
Revenue Guidance for Q1 CY2025 is $1.28 billion at the midpoint, below analyst estimates of $1.48 billion
EPS (GAAP) guidance for Q1 CY2025 is $0.09 at the midpoint, missing analyst estimates by 70.6%
Operating Margin: 8.3%, in line with the same quarter last year
Free Cash Flow Margin: 22%, up from 19.2% in the same quarter last year
Inventory Days Outstanding: 20, in line with the previous quarter
Market Capitalization: $6.00 billion
'In 2024, weakness in the automotive and industrial and communications end markets contributed to a full year decline. In contrast, we achieved record revenue in our computing end market with growth in ARM-based PCs and AI devices,' said Giel Rutten, Amkor's president and chief executive officer.
Operating through a largely Asian facility footprint, Amkor Technologies (NASDAQ:AMKR) provides outsourced packaging and testing for semiconductors.
The semiconductor industry is driven by demand for advanced electronic products like smartphones, PCs, servers, and data storage. The need for technologies like artificial intelligence, 5G networks, and smart cars is also creating the next wave of growth for the industry. Keeping up with this dynamism requires new tools that can design, fabricate, and test chips at ever smaller sizes and more complex architectures, creating a dire need for semiconductor capital manufacturing equipment.
Examining a company's long-term performance can provide clues about its quality. Any business can put up a good quarter or two, but the best consistently grow over the long haul. Thankfully, Amkor's 9.3% annualized revenue growth over the last five years was decent. Its growth was slightly above the average semiconductor company and shows its offerings resonate with customers. Semiconductors are a cyclical industry, and long-term investors should be prepared for periods of high growth followed by periods of revenue contractions.
We at StockStory place the most emphasis on long-term growth, but within semiconductors, a half-decade historical view may miss new demand cycles or industry trends like AI. Amkor's recent history marks a sharp pivot from its five-year trend as its revenue has shown annualized declines of 5.6% over the last two years.
This quarter, Amkor missed Wall Street's estimates and reported a rather uninspiring 7% year-on-year revenue decline, generating $1.63 billion of revenue. Company management is currently guiding for a 6.6% year-on-year decline in sales next quarter.
Looking further ahead, sell-side analysts expect revenue to grow 8.5% over the next 12 months, an improvement versus the last two years. This projection is above average for the sector and implies its newer products and services will fuel better top-line performance.
Today's young investors likely haven't read the timeless lessons in Gorilla Game: Picking Winners In High Technology because it was written more than 20 years ago when Microsoft and Apple were first establishing their supremacy. But if we apply the same principles, then enterprise software stocks leveraging their own generative AI capabilities may well be the Gorillas of the future. So, in that spirit, we are excited to present our Special Free Report on a profitable, fast-growing enterprise software stock that is already riding the automation wave and looking to catch the generative AI next.
Days Inventory Outstanding (DIO) is an important metric for chipmakers, as it reflects a business' capital intensity and the cyclical nature of semiconductor supply and demand. In a tight supply environment, inventories tend to be stable, allowing chipmakers to exert pricing power. Steadily increasing DIO can be a warning sign that demand is weak, and if inventories continue to rise, the company may have to downsize production.
This quarter, Amkor's DIO came in at 20, which is 10 days below its five-year average. Flat versus last quarter, there's no indication of an excessive inventory buildup.
We were impressed by how significantly Amkor blew past analysts' EPS expectations this quarter. On the other hand, its revenue guidance for next quarter missed significantly and its revenue fell short of Wall Street's estimates. Overall, this quarter could have been better. The stock traded down 7.6% to $22.51 immediately following the results.
Amkor underperformed this quarter, but does that create an opportunity to invest right now? The latest quarter does matter, but not nearly as much as longer-term fundamentals and valuation, when deciding if the stock is a buy. We cover that in our actionable full research report which you can read here, it's free.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Why Mondelez's Dividend Stands Strong in Uncertain Markets
Mondelez International, Inc. (NASDAQ:MDLZ) is one of the best dividend stocks for a bear market. Mondelez International, Inc. (NASDAQ:MDLZ) ranks among the top global snack makers and belongs to the consumer staples sector. During economic downturns, consumers typically continue buying food at consistent levels, and even tend to favor discounted options more, making large food companies like Mondelez appealing, especially when spending declines in more discretionary areas. A colourful array of products like candies, chocolates and gums on a supermarket shelf. Another reason investors are drawn to Mondelez International, Inc. (NASDAQ:MDLZ) is its strong dividend and reliable cash flow. In the latest quarter, the company generated $1.1 billion in operating cash flow and $0.8 billion in free cash flow, while returning $2.1 billion to shareholders through dividends and buybacks. Mondelez International, Inc. (NASDAQ:MDLZ) has also garnered attention on the dividend front. The company has been rewarding shareholders with growing dividends for the past 11 consecutive years. It offers a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.83% The company has expressed confidence in its future earnings potential, which may support the strength and stability of its dividend payments. It has reaffirmed its outlook for the year, expecting organic net revenue to grow by around 5%. However, adjusted earnings per share are projected to decline by roughly 10% on a constant currency basis, mainly due to an unusual surge in cocoa prices. Despite this, the company anticipates generating over $3 billion in free cash flow for 2025. Since recessions often go hand in hand with falling stock markets, investors with shorter time horizons may find value in holding companies that offer steady or growing dividend yields. While we acknowledge the potential of MDLZ as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: and Disclosure. None. Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Buffett's Telecom Pick Could Shine on Dividends
T-Mobile US, Inc. (NASDAQ:TMUS) is one of the best dividend stocks for a bear market. The company began paying dividends in 2023, starting at $0.65 per share, and has since raised the payout to $0.88 per share. A customer checking out their new device at a T-Mobile store, illustrating the convenience and accessibility of retail stores. T-Mobile US, Inc. (NASDAQ:TMUS) initially gained ground by undercutting legacy carriers on pricing, gradually capturing market share. It also expanded through key acquisitions, including Sprint and, more recently, UScellular. The Sprint deal was especially significant, giving T-Mobile access to valuable wireless spectrum that underpins its network infrastructure. As for its dividend outlook, the future appears promising. T-Mobile US, Inc. (NASDAQ:TMUS)'s growth-through-acquisition strategy is expected to boost revenue, while strong cash flow supports further dividend potential. In the first quarter of 2025, the company reported $6.84 billion in operating cash flow and $4.39 billion in free cash flow. For the full year, it projects adjusted free cash flow, including merger-related expenses, to range between $17.5 billion and $18 billion, fueled by margin gains and efficient capital use. This is translating into one of the best service revenue-to-free cash flow conversion rates in the industry. Warren Buffett's investment team took notice of T-Mobile US, Inc. (NASDAQ:TMUS)'s performance as well, initiating a position in the third quarter of 2020. The company offers a quarterly dividend of $0.88 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.59%, as of June 17. While we acknowledge the potential of TMUS as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: and Disclosure. None. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
CNBC
29 minutes ago
- CNBC
Encountered a problematic response from an AI model? More standards and tests are needed, say researchers
As the usage of artificial intelligence — benign and adversarial — increases at breakneck speed, more cases of potentially harmful responses are being uncovered. These include hate speech, copyright infringements or sexual content. The emergence of these undesirable behaviors is compounded by a lack of regulations and insufficient testing of AI models, researchers told CNBC. Getting machine learning models to behave the way it was intended to do so is also a tall order, said Javier Rando, a researcher in AI. "The answer, after almost 15 years of research, is, no, we don't know how to do this, and it doesn't look like we are getting better," Rando, who focuses on adversarial machine learning, told CNBC. However, there are some ways to evaluate risks in AI, such as red teaming. The practice involves individuals testing and probing artificial intelligence systems to uncover and identify any potential harm — a modus operandi common in cybersecurity circles. Shayne Longpre, a researcher in AI and policy and lead of the Data Provenance Initiative, noted that there are currently insufficient people working in red teams. While AI startups are now using first-party evaluators or contracted second parties to test their models, opening the testing to third parties such as normal users, journalists, researchers, and ethical hackers would lead to a more robust evaluation, according to a paper published by Longpre and researchers. "Some of the flaws in the systems that people were finding required lawyers, medical doctors to actually vet, actual scientists who are specialized subject matter experts to figure out if this was a flaw or not, because the common person probably couldn't or wouldn't have sufficient expertise," Longpre said. Adopting standardized 'AI flaw' reports, incentives and ways to disseminate information on these 'flaws' in AI systems are some of the recommendations put forth in the paper. With this practice having been successfully adopted in other sectors such as software security, "we need that in AI now," Longpre added. Marrying this user-centred practice with governance, policy and other tools would ensure a better understanding of the risks posed by AI tools and users, said Rando. Project Moonshot is one such approach, combining technical solutions with policy mechanisms. Launched by Singapore's Infocomm Media Development Authority, Project Moonshot is a large language model evaluation toolkit developed with industry players such as IBM and Boston-based DataRobot. The toolkit integrates benchmarking, red teaming and testing baselines. There is also an evaluation mechanism which allows AI startups to ensure that their models can be trusted and do no harm to users, Anup Kumar, head of client engineering for data and AI at IBM Asia Pacific, told CNBC. Evaluation is a continuous process that should be done both prior to and following the deployment of models, said Kumar, who noted that the response to the toolkit has been mixed. "A lot of startups took this as a platform because it was open source, and they started leveraging that. But I think, you know, we can do a lot more." Moving forward, Project Moonshot aims to include customization for specific industry use cases and enable multilingual and multicultural red teaming. Pierre Alquier, Professor of Statistics at the ESSEC Business School, Asia-Pacific, said that tech companies are currently rushing to release their latest AI models without proper evaluation. "When a pharmaceutical company designs a new drug, they need months of tests and very serious proof that it is useful and not harmful before they get approved by the government," he noted, adding that a similar process is in place in the aviation sector. AI models need to meet a strict set of conditions before they are approved, Alquier added. A shift away from broad AI tools to developing ones that are designed for more specific tasks would make it easier to anticipate and control their misuse, said Alquier. "LLMs can do too many things, but they are not targeted at tasks that are specific enough," he said. As a result, "the number of possible misuses is too big for the developers to anticipate all of them." Such broad models make defining what counts as safe and secure difficult, according to a research that Rando was involved in. Tech companies should therefore avoid overclaiming that "their defenses are better than they are," said Rando.
