Top 3 AI Voice Agents Integrated with Zadarma VoIP Telephony for First Time in Europe

LONDON, United Kingdom, June 9, 2025 (EZ Newswire) -- Three major AI voice agents are now fully integrated with the Zadarma, opens new tab cloud-based phone system, enabling businesses to use AI-powered voice assistants in their daily communications. This milestone marks the first large-scale integration of its kind in Europe.
The integration allows combining live human support with AI within Zadarma's free virtual PBX system, opens new tab (Cloud PBX). Businesses can easily route calls to the appropriate AI voice agent by simply transferring the call to the corresponding extension, just like they would transfer it to a human colleague, allowing businesses to gradually delegate certain tasks to AI. Additionally, the AI agent can also transfer calls to a human team member when needed.
The AI-powered voice bot can automatically interact with customers and execute certain tasks without human agent involvement. It can also receive calls if all other agents are busy or unavailable, or be used as one of the agents, participating in a call flow.
The integration is compatible with existing PBX infrastructure, requiring no major changes to be made in the PBX configuration, and user-friendly setup guides are also available. All three AI voice agents, opens new tab can now be integrated with the Zadarma's platform, supporting inbound and outbound calls, participation in call queues, handling calls during off-hours and holidays, and more.
AI-powered voice agents are made using some of the most popular chat AI platforms and businesses can choose the technology that suits their needs. Each voice agent can match a company's communication style, objectives, and tone of voice.
One of the biggest advantages of these AI agents is their adaptability. Businesses can define the information the agent uses so that the AI agent can match the style of the brand. The setup does not require advanced technical knowledge, making AI technology accessible to businesses of all sizes.
Additionally, businesses can create dedicated agents for specific tasks—for example, one for sales inquiries and another for technical support. This flexible approach to AI integration offers greater control, improved results, and easier automation.
Integrating AI-powered voice assistants with the phone system is a major advancement for companies aiming to enhance communication without added costs. Businesses can now reduce employee workloads with just a few clicks. Adding an AI agent to the team has never been easier—what once seemed like fiction is now a reality.
About Zadarma
Established in 2006, Zadarma is an independent VoIP provider operating globally, with offices located in Burgas (Bulgaria), London (UK), Wroclaw (Poland), and Valencia (Spain). With seven main data centers spread across seven countries on three continents, Zadarma focuses on offering reliable cloud communication services for businesses and individuals around the world.Their services include virtual phone numbers in over 100 countries, worldwide calling, a cloud-based PBX system, CRM, and a wide range of communication tools developed in-house. Supporting eight languages and offering multilingual technical support, Zadarma makes it easy for users around the globe to stay connected.For more information, visit zadarma.com
Media Contact
Iryna Kadiievskaik@zadarma.com
###
SOURCE: Zadarma
Copyright 2025 EZ Newswire
See release on EZ Newswire

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

The Sun

27 minutes ago

• The Sun

John Healey says NATO must 'step up' and increase its military might amid plan to spend 5% of GDP on defence

JOHN Healey today says NATO must 'step up' and increase its military might - as he pushes for defence spending to hit 5 per cent of GDP. The Defence Secretary said this week's NATO summit will be a 'defining moment for our alliance and for Britain's security' as we confront a more dangerous world. 2 And as war between Iran and Israel rages, he said 'Britain stands ready' to send more RAF jets to protect UK bases in the Middle East. Keir Starmer is meeting fellow NATO leaders for crunch talks this week as the bloc is poised to agree a new target to spend 5 per cent on defence and security by 2032. It comes after Donald Trump said the bloc is shirking its responsibilities and the days of America paying for Europe's protection are over. Writing in The Sun on Sunday, Mr Healey said: 'We're living in a more dangerous and unpredictable world. 2 This Summit is a defining moment for our alliance and for Britain's security. 'It's a moment where NATO allies will pledge to step up on defence spending to boost our collective security. 'President Trump and NATO chief, Mark Rutte, are right: the current NATO spending pledge – to spend at least 2 per cent of GDP on defence – is a relic of a past era. 'We are now in a new era of threat. And as threats increase, defence spending must too.' He added: 'It's why this week, at NATO we will discuss a new, higher spending target. And Britain is up for that discussion.' NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte is pushing for the bloc to spend 5 per cent of GDP on a new defence and security by 2032. This would be made up of 3.5 per cent for core military spending and 1.5 per cent on broader security related areas like infrastructure resilience. Spain is reportedly kicking off at the new target and may try to block it. But while Mr Healey does not explicitly commit to the new target in today's article, he backs talking about hiking spending. Britain faces a more 'dangerous and unpredictable world' as Iran and Israel trade missiles and Russian troops continue to fight in Ukraine, he warned. Amid spiralling tensions in the Middle East, the PM has already sent Typhoon fighter jets to the region. Mr Healey said he is prepared to send more there if security fears grow. He writes: 'Force protection for our bases and personnel is at the highest level and I won't rule out sending more capabilities if needed. Because Britain stands ready.'

Times

an hour ago

• Times

Leprechaun economics? Ireland's pot of gold could vanish any time

T wo headlines from recent weeks offered conflicting pointers. On June 6, David Murphy, RTE's economics and public affairs editor, posted a report headlined: 'Latest GDP figures hint at return of Leprechaun Economics'. A day later, Michael Murphy wrote a piece for The Daily Telegraph headed 'No more leprechaun economics: Ireland's tax swindle is finally ending'. You pays your money, you takes your choice. In fairness, David Murphy's piece for RTE was tentative in its conclusion and built heavily on the remarkable news from the Central Statistics Office that the Irish economy had grown by a staggering 9.7 per cent in the first three months this year. This was an example of leprechaun economics at its best: showing the vulnerability of Irish economic data to American multinational decisions that have little to do with domestic developments.

Telegraph

2 hours ago

• Telegraph

Marriage Diaries: Should I get a prenup for my second wedding or trust my husband-to-be?

Should you be planning the end of your marriage before you've even tied the knot? This is the question that's been plaguing me for the past few weeks. I'm 58 years old, and next March will be marrying Steve, 60. It will be a second wedding for both of us: I have three young adult daughters and he has a son. Steve and I are taking great pleasure in planning the next stage of our lives together. But – in between conversations about which location would suit our intimate ceremony, and what dress I should wear as a 50-something bride – I can't help but wonder whether we should get a prenuptial agreement. I'm so preoccupied about this decision that it's been keeping me awake at night. I've been fully open with Steve about my dilemma. He's quite relaxed about the subject, and isn't offended (at least, that's what he tells me) but doesn't think a prenup is necessary. I think this comes down to how we both experienced the end of our last marriages. My divorce from my ex-husband came through six years ago. It was nasty and protracted and expensive, mostly because my ex tried to hide money abroad and attempted to bully me into submission when I was hoping to appeal to his – ultimately absent – better nature. In the end, I had to hire a top family law firm. After a draining process – which ended up in court with a finance dispute resolution – I received a fair settlement. But it cost me the best part of £50,000 and a whole lot of tears. On the other hand, Steve's experience of divorce was far more pleasant. He and his wife had an amicable 'no fault' settlement, which barely involved lawyers. His son was also grown up, so it was less traumatic for everyone. After the sale of the London marital home, my children and I moved into a small cottage in West Sussex which I decorated with great care: I feel happy and settled here. I love my current home so much that Steve has agreed to move in with me while he rents out his Yorkshire house. When it comes to our respective finances, Steve and I are comfortable, but neither of us are rich: I'd say that financially, we are in a similar situation. We are both self-employed in the arts world and our properties are worth about the same. Prenuptial agreements didn't used to be binding in the UK, but I've consulted a lawyer who has told me that – done the right way – they can be. The problem is, setting up a legally watertight agreement could cost up to £4,000. My best friend is telling me that I'm being cynical and defeatist. Having known me for most of my life, she agrees that Steve is a far nicer man than my ex. I should embrace this happy new path with joy, she says, and not throw shade on the occasion by being negative. But she hasn't been through the pain of divorce: she hasn't seen how a white-wedding day can turn into a miasma of bitterness and hatred. I'm just not sure I could go through all that again. All I really care about is keeping this well-loved roof over my head, should we separate – this basic security is everything to me. 'We're both nice people,' says Steve. 'In the worst-case scenario we would sort it out, and I would never take your home from you.' But is it naive to believe this statement, uttered when things are at their rosiest? Surely one of the gifts of reaching midlife is learning from experience, and not making the same mistakes again. Should I listen to my gut and instruct a lawyer? Or am I being negative and doomy – and would my time (and money) be better spent on booking a super-luxurious honeymoon?