With next year's panchayat elections in Uttar Pradesh, parties gear up to test waters for 2027

ALTHOUGH PANCHAYAT elections in the state are not contested on symbols of political parties, considering the significant role played by the grassroot representatives in the Assembly elections, major political parties — both national and regional — have already begun preparations for the 2027 Assembly polls, treating the grassroots polls as a key battleground to show their strength.
In the recent past, several parties, be it NDA allies such as Apna Dal, NISHAD party, SBSP or INDIA alliance partners such as the Congress, announced that candidates they support should be fielded separately.
Although this sparked speculation over potential trouble for alliances for both the ruling BJP party and the INDIA alliance, leaders across party lines spoke to The Indian Express about the reasons for their parties to strongly pitch for supporting their own candidates in these polls while continuing with the alliances in the Assembly polls.
A mammoth affair
Panchayat elections in Uttar Pradesh are a mammoth affair, covering over 8 lakh posts, at different levels of panchayat. There are over 12 crore voters for the forthcoming polls in Uttar Pradesh. In the 2021 polls, elections were held for 7.32 lakh wards across 58,189 Gram Panchayats, 75,855 wards of 826 Kshetra Panchayats, and 3,051 members of 75 Zila Panchayats. Despite being held during the pandemic, parties like the BJP had officially declared their list of supported candidates.
However, this time, it is not just the national parties but even the regional parties who are eying the polls to strengthen their ground and 'bargaining power'. With elections expected around January-February 2026, as per sources, preparations have begun much earlier.
Why parties are keen on chipping in
Both the NDA alliance partners and the INDIA alliance have emphasised the importance of clearly announcing their intention to contest these elections separately. They believe that strengthening their parties at the grassroots level is crucial, which includes supporting their grassroots workers, some of whom will contest these polls.
To address concerns that their participation in these elections might negatively impact their alliance partners, these parties clarified that since the elections are not held under party symbols, they can still form alliances for assembly polls. They believe their ground strength will ultimately benefit their alliance partners. Additionally, some partners of the NDA expressed willingness to support BJP-backed candidates for chairman positions while allowing their own candidates to run for grassroots-level positions.
'It is a small election focused on the workers. For the BJP to return to power in 2027, it is essential that the workers stay active. If alliance partners like myself, Ashish Patel, or SBSP each have 10,000 supporters in any segment, then our combined efforts would benefit the alliance,' explained Sanjay Nishad, Chief of the NISHAD party and a minister in the state government.
He cited an example from the previous panchayat elections, noting that the BJP and the NISHAD party had contested separately. In some segments of Sultanpur, candidates backed by the NISHAD party received more support than those from the BJP. However, when it came time for the Jila Panchayat Chairman election, most voters supported candidates aligned with the BJP. 'It is difficult for our workers to reach the level of contesting MLA elections, but these are their elections, and our candidates would certainly weaken the Samajwadi Party (SP),' he added.
'All smaller parties empower themselves, and we are also preparing for the panchayat elections,' said Apna Dal leader and Union Minister Anupriya Patel. She assured they would remain allied with NDA.
Direct block pramukh elections this time?
Uttar Pradesh's Panchayati Raj Minister and Chief of the Suheldev Bharatiya Samaj Party, Om Prakash Rajbhar, recently announced that following multiple discussions with Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath, an agreement has been reached to conduct Block Pramukh elections directly through public voting. At present, these elections are held indirectly, with candidates being selected by Block Development Committee members, which has led to concerns about corruption.
Rajbhar said the chief minister has agreed to send this proposal to the central government. 'After four rounds of dialogue, he has given his approval for the proposal to be forwarded to the centre. The goal is to eliminate the influence of money and muscle power,' Rajbhar explained. Although an official decision is still pending, both NDA allies and opposition parties have expressed their support for the proposal.
Sanjay Nishad affirmed their backing for direct elections, stating, 'This change would reduce the likelihood of candidates winning through financial means and provide opportunities for grassroots workers.'
Previously, Samajwadi Party chief Akhilesh Yadav has also backed this proposal. 'What do we, as opposition or regional parties, have to lose? It is the BJP that has a bigger stake in this election and faces significant infighting since they are in power. By contesting these elections independently, we can strengthen our presence on the ground. We have already asked all our leaders interested in running for the 2027 Assembly polls to identify and nominate their candidates for pradhans and other posts. This would not only enhance their chances but also represent the party effectively,' said a senior Congress leader.
The ruling BJP has also begun its preparations by forming committees. These committees will aid in the ongoing delimitation process, which is being closely monitored by opposition parties.
However, party leaders claim that their allies' decision to field candidates separately will not impact them. 'Every alliance partner has the right to grow and develop independently, and we see no issue with that. We are strong at the grassroots level,' said senior BJP leader Vijay Bahadur Pathak.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

India Gazette

15 minutes ago

• India Gazette

"Multiple schemes have zero money like PM Awas Yojna, Jal Jeevan Mission.." :BJD slams BJP govt's first year in Odisha

Bhubaneswar (Odisha) [India] June 22 (ANI): Biju Janata Dal (BJD) leader Bhrugu Baxipatra has criticised the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP)- led government for its performance in Odisha during its first year, claiming that the state has not received any substantial benefits. Speaking to the ANI, Baxipatra highlighted that the grant allocated to Odisha has decreased compared to the previous year. He also claimed that several major schemes, including the PM Awas Yojana and Jal Jeevan Mission, have been allocated zero funds. 'One year has been completed, but Odisha received no benefits... The grant that Odisha had to get decreased since last year... Multiple schemes have zero money like PM Awas Yojna, Jal Jeevan Mission...', Baxipatra said on Saturday. The BJD leader also expressed concern over the rising incidents of crimes against women and children in the state, with 15 rapes reported daily and over 26,000 FIRs filed in the past year. 'In the last year, Odisha has topped in atrocities on women and children. 15 rapes are happening each day and 26 to 28 thousand FIRs have been filed,' he added. Further, the BJD leader also expressed concern over the state's health crisis, citing the deaths of over 100 people from cholera and diarrhoea. He claimed that investment in the state has come to a standstill, with a significant drop from Rs 37,000 crores last year to just Rs 40 crores this year. Baxipatra also criticised the BJP government's vision for the state. 'Over 100 people have died from Cholera and Diarrhoea in the state... Investment has stopped - investment of Rs 37,000 crores came in last year, while not even Rs 40 crore was received this year, and Jharkhand has surpassed us in this... We worry that the truth of the state is not somehow reaching the Prime Minister.', Baxipatra stated. The BJD leader slammed the BJP government, saying it lacks vision. 'Odisha has witnessed 16% growth under Naveen Patnaik and according to the present vision document, there will be only 9% growth in 2036 when the state completes 100 years. The government has no vision, it does not know how to function, has no experience in administration and it is not ready to learn... They should take a tutorial class to run this government,' he said. Earlier, it was announced that in the absence of former Odisha Chief Minister and Biju Janata Dal (BJD) president Naveen Patnaik, the duties of the party office will be managed by its Political Affairs Committee. Additionally, Debi Prasad Mishra, Senior Vice President, Headquarters, will oversee the coordination of activities and programmes. The former CM has announced that he will undergo a medical procedure for cervical arthritis in Mumbai. In an office order issued on Wednesday, Patnaik stated that during his absence, the day-to-day affairs of the BJD will be managed by the party's Political Affairs Committee. Additionally, Debi Prasad Mishra, Senior Vice President, Headquarters, has been entrusted with coordinating activities and programmes between the various wings of the party. (ANI)

Business Standard

18 minutes ago

• Business Standard

Trump's Iran gamble tests his pledge to keep US out of 'stupid wars'

President Donald Trump expressed certainty that his big gamble to directly assist the Israelis delivered a knockout blow to Iran's nuclear programme even as many supporters and detractors alike were warning that US military action could draw the US into an expansive regional conflict. Trump, in brief remarks to the nation on Saturday evening from the White House, said the strikes obliterated three critical Iranian enrichment facilities and the bully of the Middle East must now make peace. But it's a risky moment for Trump, who has belittled his predecessors for tying up America in stupid wars" and has repeatedly said he was determined to keep the US and the Middle East from another expansive conflict. There will either be peace or there will be tragedy for Iran," Trump said. He added, If peace does not come quickly, we will go after those other targets with precision, speed and skill." The US has struggled for decades to deal with the threat posed by Iran and its proxies. Iran-backed Hezbollah carried out the 1983 US Embassy bombing in Beirut, the Beirut barracks bombing that same year and the 1996 Khobar Towers bombing. And Iranian-backed militias were responsible for hundreds of Americans killed during the US war in Iraq. Trump took note of the long history of animus, and took credit for taking action. For 40 years, Iran has been saying death to America. Death to Israel. They have been killing our people, blowing off their arms, blowing off their legs with roadside bombs. That was their specialty, Trump said. I decided a long time ago that I would not let this happen. It will not continue." The possibility of US involvement had been building for days. Still, the strikes, which were carried out early Sunday morning in Iran, carried an element of surprise. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt on Thursday had said that Trump would decide whether to move forward with US strikes on Iran within two weeks. But on Saturday afternoon, commercial flight trackers identified multiple US aerial refueling tankers on a path suggesting that they were accompanying aircraft from the Midwest to the Pacific, raising speculation that something was afoot. Those aircraft may have been a decoy they were not part of the mission. Trump returned from his New Jersey golf club just after 6 p.m., and had a previously scheduled evening meeting with his national security team. Less than two hours later, the president announced the strikes had been completed. The White House posted photos of Trump in the White House Situation Room with top advisers as he monitored the strikes, wearing a red Make America Great Again hat. The action by Trump immediately raised some concerns among US lawmakers that the president had exceeded his authority. Rep. Thomas Massie, R-Ky., quickly posted on the social media site X: This is not Constitutional. Rep Ro Khanna, D-Calif., said on social media that Trump hit Iran without congressional authorisation and lawmakers should pass a resolution he's sponsoring with Massie to prevent America from being dragged into another endless Middle East war. The decision to directly involve the US comes after more than a week of strikes by Israel on Iran that have moved to systematically eradicate the country's air defenses and offensive missile capabilities, while damaging its nuclear enrichment facilities. The US military used 30,000-pound bunker busters on Fordo, while US submarines also participated in the attacks, launching about 30 Tomahawk land attack missiles, according to a US official who was not authorised to comment publicly and spoke on the condition of anonymity. Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei warned the United States in advance that strikes targeting the Islamic Republic would result in irreparable damage for them. And Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Esmail Baghaei declared any American intervention would be a recipe for an all-out war in the region. Trump had initially hoped that the threat of force would motivate the country's leaders to give up their nuclear programme peacefully. Ultimately, Trump made the calculation at the prodding of Israeli officials and many Republican lawmakers that Israel's operation had softened the ground and presented a perhaps unparalleled opportunity to set back Iran's nuclear programme, perhaps permanently. The Israelis have said their offensive had already crippled Iran's air defences, allowing them already significantly to degrade multiple Iranian nuclear sites. Trump went forward with the strikes even as there is some murkiness about the US intelligence community's assessment on how close Iran was to building a nuclear weapon. In March, Tulsi Gabbard, the national intelligence director, told lawmakers that it was not building a nuclear weapon and its supreme leader had not reauthorised the dormant programme even though it had enriched uranium to higher levels. Trump earlier this week dismissed the assessment, saying Gabbard was wrong. I don't care what she said, Trump told reporters. It's unclear if the US has developed fresh intelligence since Gabbard's March testimony, but she insisted following the public pushback from Trump that the two of them were on the same page about Iran. Trump's decision for direct US military intervention comes after his administration made an unsuccessful two-month push including with high-level, direct negotiations with the Iranians aimed at persuading Tehran to curb its nuclear programme. For months, Trump said he was dedicated to a diplomatic push to persuade Iran to give up its nuclear ambitions. And he twice in April and again in late May persuaded Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to hold off on military action against Iran and give diplomacy more time. The US in recent days has been shifting military aircraft and warships into and around the Middle East to protect Israel and US bases from Iranian attacks. All the while, Trump has gone from publicly expressing hope that the moment could be a second chance for Iran to make a deal to delivering explicit threats on Khamenei and making calls for Tehran's unconditional surrender. We know exactly where the so-called Supreme Leader' is hiding, Trump said in a social media posting. He is an easy target, but is safe there - We are not going to take him out (kill!), at least not for now." The military showdown comes seven years after Trump withdrew the US from the Obama administration-brokered agreement with Iran, calling it the worst deal ever. The 2015 deal, signed by Iran, the US and other world powers, created a long-term, comprehensive nuclear agreement that limited Tehran's enrichment of uranium in exchange for the lifting of economic sanctions. Trump decried the deal as giving Iran too much in return for too little, because the agreement did not cover Iran's non-nuclear malign behaviour.

Economic Times

19 minutes ago

• Economic Times

US strikes Iran: Saudi Arabia says 'no radioactive effects' detected in Gulf

Following US airstrikes on Iranian nuclear facilities, Saudi Arabia reports no nuclear effects in the Gulf. Iran confirms no contamination at Isfahan, Fordo, and Natanz. Despite Iran's condemnation and warnings of retaliation, initial assessments indicate no radioactive release. US President Donald Trump calls the operation successful. Evacuations from Israel begin amid rising tensions and threats from Iran-backed groups. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Following US strikes on Iranian nuclear sites, Saudi Arabia on Sunday said that here is 'no nuclear effects' detected in Iran had confirmed there were 'no signs of contamination' at its nuclear sites at Isfahan, Fordo and Natanz after US airstrikes targeted the state media quoted the country's National Nuclear Safety System Centre, which published a statement saying its radiation detectors had recorded no radioactive release after the atomic energy agency described US strikes on three key nuclear facilities as a 'savage assault.'The 'lawless actions' won't cause 'the development of this national industry to be halted,' the Atomic Energy Organization of Iran said in a statement, according to the state-run IRNA news agency.'There is no danger to the residents living around the aforementioned sites,' the statement Israeli airstrikes on nuclear sites similarly have caused no recorded release of radioactive material into the environment around the facilities, the International Atomic Energy Agency has President Donald Trump announced that American bombers carried out airstrikes on Iran's three main nuclear facilities, including Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan, marking a major escalation in Middle East tensions The Fordow site, located deep underground, was targeted with powerful 'bunker buster' bombs. Trump called the operation 'very successful' and claimed that the aircraft had exited Iranian airspace safely. He announced he would address the nation later and emphasized that 'now is the time for peace.'The strikes represent the most consequential foreign policy move of Trump's presidency and come despite warnings from US allies and global bodies like the UN's nuclear watchdog, which urged against targeting nuclear facilities due to the risk of radiation and safety breaches. Trump's decision follows a week of Israeli attacks across Iran and defies intelligence assessments indicating Iran had not committed to building a nuclear responded by condemning the attacks as 'aggressions,' with explosions confirmed near Natanz and Isfahan. Tehran has warned of retaliation, which may include cyberattacks or strikes on American assets in the Iran-backed Houthi rebels have issued new threats, and Iranian officials are calling the US a 'partner in crime' with Israel. US officials have begun evacuating citizens from Israel, signaling concerns over potential fallout.