New research strengthens case for age of ancient New Mexico footprints

June 19 (Reuters) - A new line of evidence is providing further corroboration of the antiquity of fossilized footprints discovered at White Sands National Park in New Mexico that rewrite the history of humans in the Americas.
Researchers used a technique called radiocarbon dating to determine that organic matter in the remains of wetland muds and shallow lake sediments near the fossilized foot impressions is between 20,700 and 22,400 years old. That closely correlates to previous findings, based on the age of pollen and seeds at the site, that the tracks are between 21,000 and 23,000 years old.
The footprints, whose discovery was announced in 2021, indicate that humans trod the landscape of North America thousands of years earlier than previously thought, during the most inhospitable conditions of the last Ice Age, a time called the last glacial maximum.
The age of the footprints has been a contentious issue.
Asked how the new findings align with the previous ones, University of Arizona archaeologist and geologist Vance Holliday, the study leader, replied: "Spectacularly well."
Homo sapiens arose in Africa roughly 300,000 years ago and later spread worldwide. Scientists believe our species entered North America from Asia by trekking across a land bridge that once connected Siberia to Alaska. Previous archaeological evidence had suggested that human occupation of North America started roughly 16,000 years ago.
The hunter-gatherers who left the tracks were traversing the floodplain of a river that flowed into an ancient body of water called Lake Otero. The mud through which they walked included bits of semi-aquatic plants that had grown in these wetlands.
Radiocarbon dating is used to determine the age of organic material based on the decay of an isotope called carbon-14, a variant of the element carbon. Living organisms absorb carbon-14 into their tissue. After an organism dies, this isotope changes into other atoms over time, providing a metric for determining age.
"Three separate carbon sources - pollen, seeds and organic muds and sediments - have now been dated by different radiocarbon labs over the course of the trackway research, and they all indicate a last glacial maximum age for the footprints," said Jason Windingstad, a University of Arizona doctoral candidate in environmental science and co-author of the study published this week in the journal Science Advances, opens new tab.
The original 2021 study dated the footprints using radiocarbon dating on seeds of an aquatic plant called spiral ditchgrass found alongside the tracks. A study published in 2023 used radiocarbon dating on conifer pollen grains from the same sediment layers as the ditchgrass seeds.
But some scientists had viewed the seeds and pollen as unreliable markers for dating the tracks. The new study provides further corroboration of the dating while also giving a better understanding of the local landscape at the time.
"When the original paper appeared, at the time we didn't know enough about the ancient landscape because it was either buried under the White Sands dune field or was destroyed when ancient Lake Otero, which had a lot of gypsum, dried out after the last Ice Age and was eroded by the wind to create the dunes," Holliday said.
Today, the landscape situated just west of the city of Alamogordo consists of rolling beige-colored dunes of the mineral gypsum.
"The area of and around the tracks included water that came off the mountains to the east, the edge of the old lake and wetlands along the margins of the lake. Our dating shows that this environment persisted before, during and after the time that people left their tracks," Holliday said.
The area could have provided important resources for hunter-gatherers.
"We know from the abundant tracks in the area that at least mammoths, giant ground sloths, camels and dire wolves were around, and likely other large animals. Given the setting, there must have been a large variety of other animals and also plants," Holliday added.
The climate was markedly different than today, with cooler summers and the area receiving significantly more precipitation.
"It is important to note that this is a trackway site, not a habitation site," Windingstad said. "It provides us a narrow view of people traveling across the landscape. Where they were going and where they came from is obviously an open question and one that requires the discovery and excavation of sites that are of similar age in the region. So far, these have not been found."

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Daily Mail​

2 hours ago

• Daily Mail​

Doctors issue warning as common sleep habit is linked to risk of early death in major study

Daytime napping may be linked to a higher risk of early death, according to a major new study. The discovery was made by researchers who tracking the sleep habits of more than 86,000 healthy middle-aged adults. They found that those who regularly napped—particularly in the early afternoon—were more likely to die prematurely than those who did not. The study, presented at the SLEEP 2025 conference, found the risk of death rose by up to 20 per cent among frequent nappers. Experts say daytime sleepiness may be a warning sign of disrupted or poor-quality night-time rest, and could point to underlying health problems such as sleep disorders, dementia, or heart failure. Professor James Rowley, from Rush University Medical Center in Chicago, who was not involved in the research, said the findings should influence how doctors ask patients about sleep. 'The major take-home message is that if a doctor asks about a patient's sleep habits, they should also be asking about napping,' he told Medscape Medical News. 'In other words, doctors should be asking their patients, 'Do you nap in the day?' The study focused on middle-aged adults who did not work night shifts and had no major health problems at the outset. This helped to rule out other explanations for excessive daytime sleepiness and suggesting that the link with earlier death may not simply be due to existing illness or lifestyle factors. The participant's sleep was assessed over a week-long period, using actigraphy—a method for monitoring a person's sleep-wake patterns using a small, watch-like device called an actigraph. Daytime napping was defined as sleep between 9am and 7pm. On average, participants napped for around 24 minutes, with approximately a third of naps taken in the morning, between 9 and 11am. During a follow-up period of 11 years, 5,189 of the participants died and overall, researchers noted that as people got older, they slept for longer later in the day. After adjusting for potentially confounding lifestyle factors such as smoking, alcohol use and nighttime sleep duration, results showed that a less consistent napping routine was associated with a 14 per cent increased risk of mortality. Scientists found the highest risk of death was seen in people who slept for the longest during the day, with people who nap between 11am and 1pm experiencing a seven per cent increased risk. Lead researcher, Professor Chenlu Gao, from Harvard Medical School, said: 'Our study fills a gap in knowledge by showing that it's not just whether someone naps but how long, how variable, and when they nap may be meaningful indicators of future health risk. 'While many studies have examined the links between sleep and mortality, they have largely focused on nighttime sleep. 'However, napping is an important component of the 24-hour-sleep-wake cycle and may carry its own health implications. 'Our findings suggest that certain patterns of napping could serve as early indications of declining health.' The researchers warned that further research is needed to better understand the biological pathways underlying these associations. They noted that longer or more irregular naps could reflect underlying health problems such as heart disease, type 2 diabetes, depression and dementia. Other studies suggest the explanation may lie with the impact on our circadian rhythms—the natural sleep-wake cycles that determine a host of bodily functions. The experts, from the Karolinska Institute in Stockholm, also argued that being asleep during the daytime could impact the brain's ability to clear waste that builds up during the day. The findings come after a landmark study last year suggested almost half of all cases of Alzheimer's disease—the most common cause of dementia—could be prevented by tackling 14 lifestyle factors. These included hearing loss, high cholesterol, vision loss and lack of exercise. Experts claimed the study, published in the prestigious journal The Lancet, provided more hope than 'ever before' that the disorder that blights the lives of millions can be prevented. Alzheimer's Disease affects 982,000 people in the UK. Alzheimer's Research UK analysis found 74,261 people died from dementia in 2022 compared with 69,178 a year earlier, making it the country's biggest killer. One 2019 estimate put the annual death toll at 70,000 people a year with the health issues caused costing the NHS £700million each year to treat. The WHO puts the annual global death toll from physical inactivity at around 2million per year, making it in the running to be among the top 10 leading causes of global death and disability.

Telegraph

4 hours ago

• Telegraph

Elio, review: Pixar's voyage to space is refreshingly weird

Elio is an agreeable junior space odyssey that's a safe bet for families in the run-up to the summer holidays, even if it's not destined to be a Pixar film for the ages. You can pick all sorts of holes in it here and there – a game for restless adults, maybe. But plenty of younger viewers will be spirited away with no complaints. Whatever the teething troubles that made its budget soar to $300 million, the film has at least been shepherded up to par. While it's unlikely to do a fraction of the $1.7 billion business Pixar's Inside Out 2 managed last year, it has a refreshingly zany take on one boy's all-consuming hobby. Elio (voiced by Yonas Asuncion Kibreab) is a recently orphaned 11-year-old, who feels lonely, despite all the best efforts of the aunt (Zoe Saldaña) who's raising him. A bit of a nerdy cipher, he seems to be somewhere on the spectrum. He's not the first neurodivergent character from this studio (take Dory in Finding Nemo), but feels a few drafts away from being as endearing as those others. If that difference is, in a sense, his 'superpower' – as this film suggests – it's puzzling how little he gets to flex it. His one solace is being obsessed with space, and he yearns for some connection in the cold reaches of the universe: life on Earth has simply not panned out the way he wants. Miraculously, his prayers are answered, well beyond making radio contact with alien civilisations. An intergalactic parliament zaps him into their midst and considers him for an ambassadorial post – gullible enough to believe he's Earth's leader, simply because he tells them so. The odd bods in this council owe much to the wibbly senators in Star Wars. There's a playful dash of Douglas Adams ' absurdity there, too. When they refuse to elect a warmongering bully named Lord Grigon (Brad Garrett), he declares Armageddon and only Elio has the guts to enter into peace talks. Grigon wears a giant armoured carapace and wields cannons, but inside looks like a tardigrade, much like his chubby son Glordon (Remy Edgerly), who dreads the day he's supposed to strap in and become a feared war machine like his dad. The oddity of Elio is that this subplot is quite a lot more touching than the hero's journey. A father-son reconciliation between these piglet-sized space slugs is the one thing in danger of moistening the eye. The film is too scattershot to be high-end Pixar. It tries to add jeopardy with a breakneck voyage through flying debris in space, a sequence that feels arbitrarily inserted. Still, this vision of the cosmos is goofy enough to keep your youngsters beguiled for 90 minutes.

The Independent

4 hours ago

• The Independent

Revealed: The AI chatbot requests that cause the most carbon emissions

A new study reveals that every query to large language models like ChatGPT consumes energy and generates carbon emissions. Complex reasoning questions, such as those in abstract algebra or philosophy, lead to significantly higher carbon emissions, up to six times more than simpler queries. Models designed for explicit reasoning processes produce substantially more carbon dioxide, with some generating up to 50 times more emissions than concise response models. The study highlights an "accuracy-sustainability trade-off," where highly accurate AI models often result in greater energy consumption and carbon footprint. Researchers recommend that users reduce emissions by prompting AI for concise answers and reserving high-capacity models for tasks that genuinely require their advanced capabilities.