How is uranium enrichment used to make nuclear bombs?

Israel targeted Iran's nuclear facilities at Natanz, Isfahan, and Fordow, killing several scientists. These sites are crucial for uranium enrichment, a process that is used to produce nuclear power but can be exploited to make nuclear weapons. How does it work? read more
Natanz and Fordow are Iran's uranium enrichment sites, and Isfahan provides the raw materials, so any damage to these sites would limit Iran's ability to produce nuclear weapons. Image for Representation. Reuters
Late last week, Israel targeted three of Iran's key nuclear facilities – Natanz, Isfahan and Fordow, killing several Iranian nuclear scientists. The facilities are heavily fortified and largely underground, and there are conflicting reports of how much damage has been done.
Natanz and Fordow are Iran's uranium enrichment sites, and Isfahan provides the raw materials, so any damage to these sites would limit Iran's ability to produce nuclear weapons.
But what exactly is uranium enrichment and why does it raise concerns?
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
To understand what it means to 'enrich' uranium, you need to know a little about uranium isotopes and about splitting the atom in a nuclear fission reaction.
What is an isotope?
All matter is made of atoms, which in turn are made up of protons, neutrons and electrons. The number of protons is what gives atoms their chemical properties, setting apart the various chemical elements.
Atoms have equal numbers of protons and electrons. Uranium has 92 protons, for example, while carbon has six. However, the same element can have different numbers of neutrons, forming versions of the element called isotopes.
This hardly matters for chemical reactions, but their nuclear reactions can be wildly different.
Uranium-238 vs Uranium-235
When we dig uranium out of the ground, 99.27 per cent of it is uranium-238, which has 92 protons and 146 neutrons. Only 0.72 per cent of it is uranium-235 with 92 protons and 143 neutrons (the remaining 0.01 per cent are other isotopes).
For nuclear power reactors or weapons, we need to change the isotope proportions. That's because of the two main uranium isotopes, only uranium-235 can support a fission chain reaction: one neutron causes an atom to fission, which produces energy and some more neutrons, causing more fission, and so on.
This chain reaction releases a tremendous amount of energy. In a nuclear weapon, the goal is to have this chain reaction occur in a fraction of a second, producing a nuclear explosion.
A nuclear power plant. Image for Representation. Pixabay
In a civilian nuclear power plant, the chain reaction is controlled. Nuclear power plants currently produce 9 per cent of the world's power. Another vital civilian use of nuclear reactions is for producing isotopes used in nuclear medicine for the diagnosis and treatment of various diseases.
What is uranium enrichment?
To 'enrich' uranium means taking the naturally found element and increasing the proportion of uranium-235 while removing uranium-238.
There are a few ways to do this ( including new inventions from Australia), but commercially, enrichment is currently done with a centrifuge. This is also the case in Iran's facilities.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Centrifuges exploit the fact that uranium-238 is about 1 per cent heavier than uranium-235. They take uranium (in gas form) and use rotors to spin it at 50,000 to 70,000 rotations per minute, with the outer walls of the centrifuges moving at 400 to 500 metres per second.
Commercially, enrichment is currently done with a centrifuge. File image/ Reuters
This works much like a salad spinner that throws water to the sides while the salad leaves stay in the centre. The heavier uranium-238 moves to the edges of the centrifuge, leaving the uranium-235 in the middle.
This is only so effective, so the spinning process is done over and over again, building up the percentage of the uranium-235.
Most civilian nuclear reactors use 'low enriched uranium' that's been enriched to between 3 per cent and 5 per cent. This means that 3–5% of the total uranium in the sample is now uranium-235. That's enough to sustain a chain reaction and make electricity.
How does enrichment make nuclear weapons?
To get an explosive chain reaction, uranium-235 needs to be concentrated significantly more than the levels we use in nuclear reactors for making power or medicines.
Technically, a nuclear weapon can be made with as little as 20 per cent uranium-235 (known as 'highly enriched uranium'), but the more the uranium is enriched, the smaller and lighter the weapon can be. Countries with nuclear weapons tend to use about 90 per cent enriched, 'weapons-grade' uranium.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
According to the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Iran has enriched large quantities of uranium to 60 per cent. It's actually easier to go from an enrichment of 60 per cent to 90 per cent than it is to get to that initial 60 per cent. That's because there's less and less uranium-238 to get rid of.
This is why Iran is considered to be at extreme risk of producing nuclear weapons, and why centrifuge technology for enrichment is kept secret.
Ultimately, the exact same centrifuge technology that produces fuel for civilian reactors can be used to produce nuclear weapons.
Inspectors from the IAEA monitor nuclear facilities worldwide to ensure countries are abiding by the rules set out in the global nuclear non-proliferation treaty. While Iran maintains it's only enriching uranium for 'peaceful purposes', late last week the IAEA board ruled Iran was in breach of its obligations under the treaty.
Kaitlin Cook, DECRA Fellow, Department of Nuclear Physics and Accelerator Applications, Australian National University
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Indian Express

35 minutes ago

• Indian Express

Israel-Iran conflict: Day after Israeli attack, nuclear watchdog confirms damages to key under-construction reactor near Tehran

The International Atomic Energy Agency (IEAE) has confirmed that Israel's strikes on Friday resulted in damages to key buildings at the partially constructed Khondab (formerly known as Arak) Heavy Water Production Plant including its distillation unit. The nuclear watchdog's statement comes a day after the global body said no damages were 'initially visible'. 'While damage to the nearby Heavy Water Production Plant was initially not visible, it is now assessed that key buildings at the facility were damaged, including the distillation unit,' the IEAE's latest statement on 'Updates on developments in Iran' said. No damage has been observed at Iran's other nuclear sites so far, it added. No radiological consequence was expected, IEAE's Director General Rafael Mariano Grossi said. This has been attributed to the reactor not being operational and not containing any nuclear material. 'There is a lot of nuclear material in Iran in different places, which means that the potential for a radiological accident with the dispersion in the atmosphere of radioactive materials and particles does exist,' he added, stressing on the possible nuclear safety risks. IAEA, in its statement, also sought to receive timely and regular technical information about the nuclear facilities and their respective sites in the country. 'This information is needed to promptly inform the international community and ensure an effective response and assistance to any emergency situation in Iran,' Director General Grossi said. He added that the agency was also in constant contact with other countries in the region amid the ongoing tensions in the Middle East. The Khondab reactor was hit on Thursday (June 19) as the both Israel and Iran continued to trade strikes on the seventh day of the conflict. The Israeli strikea also damaged the nearby plant that makes heavy water. Heavy-water reactors can be used to produce plutonium which, like enriched uranium, can be used to make an atom bomb. So far, Israel has announced that its attacks have hit prominent Iranian nuclear sites in Natanz, Isfahan, Arak and Tehran itself. With AP inputs

News18

42 minutes ago

• News18

What Is Operation Sindhu? Why Was It Launched? Top Queries Demystified Amid Israel-Iran War

Last Updated: Unlike Operation Sindoor, Operation Sindhu is not a military strike. It is non-combatant and evacuation-focused. Months after Operation Sindoor, the government of India has launched Operation Sindhu. The similar sounding names have led to confusion among some people. While Operation Sindoor was in retaliation to Pakistan-sponsored terrorism, Operation Sindhu has been initiated amid the Iran-Israel conflict. What's The Difference Between Operation Sindoor & Operation Sindhu Unlike Operation Sindoor, Operation Sindhu is not a military strike. It is non-combatant and evacuation-focused. Sindhu was launched on June 18 to evacuate Indian nationals from Iran amid rising fears of an all-out Israeli-American military strikes on Iran. What Was The Need For Operation Sindhu? The operation was initiated following the June 13 Israeli airstrikes on Iranian territory, a significant escalation in the ongoing Israel-Iran conflict, which heightened safety concerns for foreigners in Iran. Facing growing instability, the government launched this mission to quickly evacuate citizens before the situation escalated further. Who are being evacuated as part of the mission? Indian students, professionals, seafarers, pilgrims and others located in Iran's conflict zones. The first group of 110 Indian students was moved overland to Armenia, then flown to New Delhi on Wednesday. They landed at Delhi's Indira Gandhi International Airport on Thursday. Among them, 90 are from Jammu and Kashmir. Flights have been planned, possibly via Turkmenistan, to evacuate more Indians. Meanwhile, the MEA control rooms are operating round-the-clock for people in distress. Why Was Operation Named 'Sindhu?' While there has been no official word on the reason, historically Sindhu is known as a river. In Sanskrit, 'Sindhu' literally means 'river' or 'ocean'. It's also the name of Indus river, one of the major rivers in the Indian subcontinent. Another historical significance is that India is said to derieve its name from Sindhu. The Persians pronounced 'Sindhu' as Hindu, which eventually became India in Greek and Latin usage. The operation's title likely symbolizes a large journey — representing India's commitment to crossing borders for the safety of its citizens. Execution Strategy Of Operation Sindhu Evacuation Routes & Transport The primary route is the overland escorted travel from northern Iran (e.g., Urmia) into Armenia, then onward by chartered flights from Yerevan to New Delhi. An arrangement has been made for alternate corridors too, which includes transit through Turkmenistan, leveraging commercial or special flights. Who Are Involved In Evacuation Mission? The Indian Air Force and commercial carriers like IndiGo are involved in flying back Indian citizens from Iran. There are Ministry of External Affairs-led 24×7 embassy helplines and crisis-control centers. The government has been coordinating with Armenian, Iranian, and Turkmen authorities for safe passage of Indian residents. First Published: June 19, 2025, 13:20 IST

Time of India

44 minutes ago

• Time of India

Israel's missile shield is failing, and shows Trump's Golden Dome unlikely to protect US from Russian and Chinese hypersonic nuke threats

Israel much-vaunted multi-layered defensive system to protect from aerial attacks including missiles, drones, rockets and artillery shells has blunted the enemy attack on several occasions, starting 2011 when it was first deployed. Taking a cue from Israel's success, US President Donald Trump in May 2025 announced the Golden Dome missile umbrella for America, an ambitious space-based defensive system. Israel claims threats from terror groups like Hamas, Hezbollah, Houthis, and countries like Iran, Syria, Türkiye, Jordan and Egypt. None of them posses any technological/ military edge over or even parity with Israel. Unlike Israel, which has nuclear weapons, the others have no nukes in their arsenal. Israel's Iron Dome is designed to intercept and destroy short-range rockets and artillery shells at a range of 4 to 70 kilometres, while David's Sling, and Arrow 2 and 3 along with the US Terminal High-Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) batteries can take out threats at a longer range, even in space. Play Video Pause Skip Backward Skip Forward Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration 0:00 Loaded : 0% 0:00 Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 1x Playback Rate Chapters Chapters Descriptions descriptions off , selected Captions captions settings , opens captions settings dialog captions off , selected Audio Track default , selected Picture-in-Picture Fullscreen This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Opacity Opaque Semi-Transparent Text Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Opacity Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Caption Area Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Opacity Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Drop shadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Yet, after one week of missile and drone barrage by Iran following the June 13, 2025, strike by the Israel Defense Forces (IDF), Jerusalem's missile shield seemed to be overwhelmed and bleeding, in terms of their response time as well the cost. From a claimed success rate of almost "80 to 90 percent" in the first couple of days of Iranian attack, the Israeli defense is now able to only intercept only 65% of the incoming missiles. NBC News quoted a "senior intelligence official in Israel" as stating that on June 19 only 65 per cent of Iranian missiles launched in the last 24 hours were intercepted. Live Events You Might Also Like: Sejjil, Iran's highly maneuverable new missile a major threat to Israel; know all about it The Iranians, too, seemed to have changed their strategy. Starting with ballistic missiles and drones, Iran is now launching highly maneuvrable hypersonic projectiles to hits targets in Israel. As revealed by the Israeli defense officer above, from just 10 percent of Iranian missiles finding their targets, the percentage has gone up to almost 35. Israel also claims that Iranians are now firing a lot less missiles than they did in the first couple of days. From a reported 150 on the first day on June 13, the number of Iranian missiles flying towards Israel has come down to about three dozen. But many of attacks in the last couple of days have seen Iran firing hypersonic missiles like Fattah-1 and Sejjil, which have tested Israel's defense to the extreme and also punched holes through it. Stopping one missile costs several interceptors, sometimes going up to even double digits. Yet, as the Israelis are increasingly finding out, there is no guarantee that the incoming missile will be blown up in the skies by its interceptors. According to Israeli financial daily The Marker, Jerusalem is spending nearly 1 billion shekels ($285 million) each nigh in defending the country from Iran's barrage. The cost an Arrow interceptor is $3 million. Moreover, there is a limited number of interceptors left with a Wall Street Journal report on June 18 claiming for Israel has just enough for the next 10 to 12 more days if the Iranian armed forces continue with their current rate of firing missiles. You Might Also Like: Hypersonic missiles are stirring fears in the Iran-Israel conflict. Here's why Lessons for Trump's proposed Golden Dome US faces formidable adversaries like Russia and China, and to a lesser extent North Korea and Iran. Russia, China and North Korea have nukes as well as the means to deliver them at targets thousands of miles away. While the Americans claims to have better technology and a massive military, which can hit a target anywhere on the globe, its rivals are no pushover. Compared to Israel, the US have a near-equal and in some areas a technologically advanced enemy. Russia is the world largest nuclear power with a huge array of intercontinental ballistic missiles. The country has in the last few years rapidly developed and deployed highly maneuvrable hypersonic missiles. It's almost a similar case with China which is going ahead with rapid military expansion and the use of cutting-edge technologies. North Korea, too, has tested missiles which can reach the western coast of the US. You Might Also Like: Blind radar, blistering speed: How Israeli jets crippled Iran's air defence in 48 hours, something Russia couldn't do in 3 years To counter such threats, Trump in May 2025 announced the Golden Dome defence system. Estimated to cost around $175 billion, Trump stated that the shield would be operational by 2029, just before his term as the 47th President of the United States comes to an end. Mirroring Israel's system that has been active since 2011 but is essentially able to intercept short and medium range rockets and missiles, the US shield will face ICBMs and hypersonic missiles. As seen in the ongoing Israel-Iran was, a salvo of missiles can overwhelm a defensive shield leading to some of the projectiles hitting targets on ground. Golden Dome's big advantage is touted to be the ability to keep and eye from space and detect a missile in the boost stage, the short span of time when it is being launched. A boost phase lasts about a minute, and is detectable even from space-based assets. While it's theoretically possible to target missiles during the boost phase, to be able to track missile launches by Russia and China, both of which can do so from almost any part of the globe, is a Herculean task. American Enterprise Institute senior fellow in the Foreign and Defense Policy program Todd Harrison says such a capability needs hundreds, even thousands of satellites. "It takes about 950 interceptors spread out in orbit around the Earth to ensure that at least one is always in range to intercept a missile during its boost phase," he to told Citizen Tribune news portal. If Russia or China fire multiple missiles simultaneously, the number of US satellites required goes up exponentially. A launch of five missiles together by any one of the US rivals means over 4,500 spy satellites. Moreover, any US move to operationalize the Golden Dome will be countered by Russia and China with the deployment of more missiles, many of them nuclear tipped, and use of their space-based capabilities. You Might Also Like: Golden Dome to guard US from 'anywhere, even Space': What you need to know about Trump's $175 billion missile shield