Trump undergoes first physical since retaking
12 Apr 2025 10:53
(The New York Times)US President Donald Trump, the oldest man to be inaugurated as president, visited Walter Reed National Military Medical Center for a physical Friday, the first of his new administration and one that he said included cardiology and cognitive tests.Trump, 78, said Friday evening that the results would be released Sunday. "I don't know what to tell you other than I got every answer right,' he said."Overall, I felt I was in very good shape,' Trump said. "Good heart. A good soul. A very good soul.' He then mocked his immediate predecessor, Joe Biden, whose mental acuity he has long attacked, saying he "wanted to be a little different than Biden.'The physical could offer the first glimpse of the health of Trump, who has often been guarded about even the most basic medical information since he was shot in an assassination attempt at a campaign rally in July.He has long been phobic about germs and disease. According to many of his former presidential and business aides, Trump has tried to avoid ever appearing sick.In 2015, his physician at the time, Dr. Harold Bornstein, wrote in a note to the news media that Trump, then a presidential candidate, had "extraordinary' strength and stamina. Bornstein told CNN in 2018 that Trump had personally dictated the letter.That year, the White House physician at the time, Dr. Ronny Jackson, said that Trump had a calcium score of 133, indicating plaque in his arteries but at a level fairly common for a man of his age.But the president at times has offered few details about his health. He went for an unexplained visit to Walter Reed in 2019; aides said after his term ended that it was for a colonoscopy. In October 2020, Trump went to Walter Reed as he was battling a far more aggressive case of COVID than his advisers had revealed, one that had infiltrated his lungs. Public health officials from his administration later said privately that had Trump not been given monoclonal antibodies as a treatment, he may not have survived.Biden was previously the oldest man to enter office, also at 78. Trump, who had a four-year gap between presidencies, was five months and six days older than Biden when he was inaugurated.During his campaign in 2020, Trump became preoccupied with proving that his own mental acuity was fine, describing to an interviewer a sample of the kind of cognitive test he took and the words he said he had to remember and repeat in the right order: "Person. Woman. Man. Camera. TV.' The moment became the theme of late-night talk show coverage.
Trump has frequently mocked the age and mental acumen of Biden, who declined visibly during his term. Trump was more visible than Biden during the 2024 campaign and held some form of an event in front of news cameras multiple days a week. But he has had his own verbal stumbles.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
an hour ago
- The National
Polling on Iran attack shows Donald Trump faces uphill battle to win public support
Polling conducted before the US attack on Iranian nuclear sites suggests US President Donald Trump could face an uphill battle to convince a majority of Americans to support the military strikes. A survey from The Washington Post before Saturday's attack found 45 per cent of respondents opposed the idea of US air strikes against Iran, 25 per cent supported strikes, while 30 per cent were unsure. 'We are deeply distracted by our own issues here at home,' said Brian Katulis, a senior fellow of the Washington-based Middle East Institute, pointing to economic and cultural issues preoccupying many Americans. Recent ' No Kings ' protests against Mr Trump's sweeping use of his executive authorities has also helped consolidate opposition to his Iran plans. 'These were protests that had deep concerns about President Trump overreaching on executive authority, and this action last night will continue those debates on that,' Mr Katulis said. He added that the crucial thing for Mr Trump, based on the Post 's polling, would be to convince the 30 per cent who were unsure about the idea of US strikes on Iran. Republican Congressman Thomas Massie has described Mr Trump's military action on Iran as 'not constitutional'. But Republicans sharing that view were almost non-existent on Sunday, with most supporting Mr Trump's actions. The White House said the strikes did not attack Iranian troops or civilians. During an appearance on NBC on Sunday, Vice President JD Vance echoed that message. 'We're not at war with Iran, we're at war with Iran's nuclear programme,' he said. 'We actually want peace, but we want peace in the context of them not having a nuclear weapons programme.' Despite Mr Trump initially claiming 'spectacular' success, Pentagon officials cautioned that an in-depth assessment of Saturday's strikes on Iran would take some time. If it becomes apparent that the strikes were not as effective as initially advertised, support for Mr Trump's decision to attack Iran could falter, Mr Katulis said. 'At the [Pentagon] news conference, they hedged a bit more,' Mr Katulis said, referring to Gen Dan Caine, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, who urged patience while the US studies long-term battle damage assessments of the attacks.
Zawya
3 hours ago
- Zawya
World awaits Iran's response after Trump says US 'obliterates' nuclear sites
ISTANBUL/WASHINGTON/JERUSALEM: The world awaited Iran's response on Sunday after President Donald Trump said the U.S. had "obliterated" Tehran's key nuclear sites, joining Israel in the biggest Western military action against the Islamic Republic since its 1979 revolution. With the damage visible from space after 30,000-pound U.S. bunker-buster bombs crashed into the mountain above Iran's Fordow nuclear site, Tehran vowed to defend itself at all costs. It fired another volley of missiles at Israel that wounded scores of people and flattened buildings in Tel Aviv. But perhaps in an effort to avert all-out war with the U.S. superpower, it had yet to follow through on its main threats of retaliation against the United States itself - either by targeting U.S. bases or trying to choke off global oil supplies. Speaking in Istanbul, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi said Tehran would consider all possible responses. There would be no return to diplomacy until it had retaliated, he said. "The U.S. showed they have no respect for international law. They only understand the language of threat and force," he said. Trump, announcing the strikes in a televised address, called them "a spectacular military success". "Iran's key nuclear enrichment facilities have been completely and totally obliterated. Iran, the bully of the Middle East, must now make peace. If they do not, future attacks would be far greater and a lot easier," he said. Still, his administration stressed that no order had been given for any wider war to overthrow the hardline Shi'ite Muslim clerical establishment that has ruled Iran since 1979. "This mission was not and has not been about regime change," Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth told reporters at the Pentagon. "The president authorised a precision operation to neutralise the threats to our national interests posed by the Iranian nuclear programme." U.S. Vice President JD Vance said Washington was not at war with Iran but with its nuclear programme, adding this had been pushed back by a very long time due to the U.S. intervention. In a step towards what is widely seen as Iran's most effective threat to hurt the West, its parliament approved a move to close the Strait of Hormuz, the entrance to the Gulf where nearly a quarter of the oil shipped around the world passes through narrow waters that Iran shares with Oman and the United Arab Emirates. Iran's Press TV said closing the strait would require approval from the Supreme National Security Council, a body led by an appointee of Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Attempting to choke off Gulf oil by closing the strait could send global oil prices skyrocketing, derail the world economy and invite almost certain conflict with the U.S. Navy's massive Fifth Fleet, based in the Gulf and tasked with keeping it open. U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio, in a Fox News Sunday interview, warned Iran on Sunday against retaliation for the U.S. strikes, saying such action would be "the worst mistake they've ever made." Rubio separately told CBS's "Face the Nation" talk show that the U.S. has "other targets we can hit, but we achieved our objective." He later added: "There are no planned military operations right now against Iran unless - unless they mess around." The U.N. Security Council was due to meet later on Sunday, diplomats said, at the request of Iran, which urged the 15-member body "to address this blatant and unlawful act of (U.S) aggression, to condemn it in the strongest possible terms." BUNKER BUSTERS Israel, which started the war with a surprise attack on Iran on June 13, has long said its aim was to destroy Iran's nuclear programme. But only the United States possesses the massive 30,000-pound bombs - and the huge batwing B2 bombers that drop them - designed to destroy subterranean targets like Iran's uranium enrichment plan at Fordow, built beneath a mountain. Satellite images obtained by Reuters following the attack appeared to show damage both to the mountain above the site and to entrances nearby. The U.N. nuclear watchdog, the IAEA, said no increases in off-site radiation levels had been reported after the U.S. strikes. A senior Iranian source told Reuters that most of the highly enriched uranium at Fordow had been moved elsewhere before the attack. While it is clear that U.S. airstrikes had hit the Fordow site, it was not yet possible to assess the damage done underground there, IAEA Director General Rafael Grossi told CNN. Iranians contacted by Reuters described their fear at the prospect of an enlarged war involving the United States. "Our future is dark. We have nowhere to go - it's like living in a horror movie," Bita, 36, a teacher from the central city of Kashan, said before the phone line was cut. Much of Tehran, a capital city of 10 million people, has emptied out, with residents fleeing to the countryside to escape Israeli bombardment. Iranian authorities say over 400 people have been killed since Israel's attacks began, mostly civilians. Iran has been launching missiles back at Israel, killing at least 24 people over the past nine days, the first time its projectiles have penetrated Israel's defences in large numbers. The elite Revolutionary Guards said they had fired 40 missiles at Israel in the latest volley overnight. Air raid sirens sounded across most of Israel on Sunday, sending millions of people to safe rooms. In Tel Aviv, Aviad Chernovsky, 40, emerged from a bomb shelter to find his house had been destroyed in a direct hit. "It's not easy to live now in Israel (right now), but we are very strong. We know that we will win,' he said. During the past nine days of war, Israel killed much of Iran's military leadership with strikes that targeted bases and residential buildings where senior figures slept. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has spoken openly of the possibility of pressing on until the Islamic Republic's clerical rulers are toppled, while denying that was his primary objective. Trump had veered between offering to end the war with diplomacy or to join it, at one point musing publicly about killing Iran's supreme leader. His decision ultimately to join the fight is the biggest foreign policy gamble of his career. Netanyahu congratulated Trump on a "bold decision". Israeli opposition leader Yair Lapid also praised Trump, saying the world was now a safer place.
Middle East Eye
4 hours ago
- Middle East Eye
US strikes Iran: Israelis hail attack and hope it will end the war
Israelis awoke on Sunday to the dramatic news that the United States had launched air strikes on three Iranian nuclear facilities, marking Washington's entry into the war Israel began against Iran just over a week ago. But celebrations were short-lived. By 7:30am, air raid sirens wailed across the country as Iran fired a wave of missiles. As Israelis waited in bomb shelters, the missiles struck Tel Aviv and Haifa, wounding several and causing significant damage. Despite the attacks, many Israelis expressed support for US President Donald Trump's decision to heed Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's call to join the fight. "The US has bombs we don't have. That's what should have happened," said Stav, a Tel Aviv resident. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters Another local, Tal, told Middle East Eye he hoped the strikes would "end the war more quickly and reduce the missile fire", adding he wished they would "eliminate Iran's nuclear programme and ballistic missiles". Many in the Israeli media were also satisfied by the attack. Senior journalist Ben Caspit, who is considered one of Netanyahu's harshest critics, wrote on X: "History. We waited for it for 15 years. We will wait for the damage assessment and the Iranian response. Thank you, President Trump." 'Iran can't escalate their response too much' - Tal, Tel Aviv resident Yaron Avraham, the political correspondent for Channel 12, Israel's leading news channel, did not wait for the attack's assessment to heap praise on Netanyahu. "A tremendous success for Netanyahu, who is currently writing a legacy in the field that he first warned about, even when everyone ridiculed him and few believed," he wrote on his X account. According to Avraham, Netanyahu's success was expressed in the initiative to attack Iran first and the recruitment of Trump to join the attack, which gave "a decisive blow to the three significant nuclear facilities, first and foremost, Fordow". Tal also praised the collaboration between Trump and Netanyahu. "They put on a good show. If it will destroy Iran's nuclear programme, then you can say that they did a good job," he told MEE. Stav said that Trump and Netanyahu "did a great job. Bibi [Netanyahu] restored Israel's honour with the war in Iran after what happened in Gaza". 'Iran can't escalate' Support for the US attack cut across political lines in Israel, with both right- and left-leaning figures praising the move. Tomer Persico, an academic who is considered in Israel to be a left-leaning Zionist, wrote this morning on his X account that "the subjugation of Iran is a significant basis for the establishment of a Middle East of regional alliances and not of terrorist proxies". "From here, we must move towards a regional agreement that includes normalisation with Saudi Arabia and a move towards the final condition for a new Middle East: the establishment of a Palestinian state," Persico added. Iranians say their hopes of peace have been buried by US bombs Read More » Despite public support, life in Israel remains far from normal. The Home Front Command has restricted activity across the country, allowing only essential workers to report to their jobs. In Tel Aviv, streets remain noticeably emptier than usual for a Sunday, as many residents stay near shelters for a second consecutive week. Stav, one of many Israelis unable to work due to the war, said this is "what we have to go through. There's no other choice". "I hope it will end as soon as possible, and we can live with Iran in peace," Stav said of the possibility that the war would escalate now. Tal is less worried about a potential escalation in the war. "Iran can't escalate their response too much," he told MEE. "Iran will want to make some kind of agreement. I don't know how long it will take, but it's worth it,."
