Social Security Boss Reveals His DOGE Plans Are Just Getting Started Despite Musk's Exit
Elon Musk is gone but not forgotten at the Social Security Administration, as the head of the agency considers himself 'fundamentally a DOGE person.'
Social Security Commissioner Frank Bisignano said in a recent interview that he plans to use the engineers Musk brought in with the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) to revamp the agency to rely more heavily on technology and artificial intelligence for providing customer service, the Wall Street Journal reported.
The interview was conducted before Musk's spectacular falling out last week with President Donald Trump. The president is reportedly dragging all of MAGA into the war and forcing them to choose sides, meaning Bisignano could ultimately be forced to distance himself from Musk.
For now, though, Bisignano says he wants to use DOGE to make his department a 'digital-first organization.' The former Wall Street executive took over the embattled agency on May 7 after Googling what the job entailed.
He faces an uphill battle in winning over both the public and agency staffers after Musk's DOGE cut thousands of jobs, forced its way into databases containing Americans' personal data, and threatened to close offices, the Journal reported.
The agency was already at historically low staffing levels, with average call-in wait times of about 60 minutes, USA Today reported last month. Since DOGE and the Trump administration came in, wait times are up to 90 minutes on average.
Such a high average means that some people are waiting even longer—up to 150 minutes, USA Today found—or not getting through at all. Of the 380,000 people who call in each day, about half fail to get through to a representative, according to the Journal.
For those visiting field offices in person, drop-ins are no longer allowed, and many people have to join a waitlist just to make an appointment, according to USA Today.
In a statement to USA Today, Bisignano's predecessor blamed Biden-era work-from-home policies and diversity initiatives for the increase in wait times during the Trump administration.
The increases coincided with the agency offering buyouts to 3,000 of the agency's 57,000 employees, with officials planning to shed about 7,000 more jobs, according to USA Today.
Bisignano wants to use DOGE personnel to cut wait times and speed up the processing of retirement, survivor, and Medicare benefits, according to the Wall Street Journal. The agency had already been using AI to respond to 1-800 calls, with bots handling 17 percent of calls last October. In March, the number was up to 44 percent.
Kathleen Romig, director of Social Security and disability policy at the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, told the Wall Street Journal she had heard about callers getting stuck in loops with the bots.
Bisignano said AI integration is 'a long journey,' but that Musk's DOGE personnel, including eight engineers, will continue to 'refine the intelligence' to provide better answers.
The team includes Marko Elez, a 25-year-old engineer who once wrote on social media that he wanted to 'normalize Indian hate' and that 'you could not pay me to marry outside my race.'
In the meantime, the Supreme Court this week gave DOGE access to agency records 'in order for those members to do their work.' A lower court had found that giving DOGE access violated federal law and put millions of people's data at risk.
Before the ruling, Bisignano had assured the Wall Street Journal that Americans' personal data was secure, and that DOGE is only focused on the agency's technology.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
34 minutes ago
- USA Today
Tesla's robotaxis launch in Texas with 10-vehicle trial run: See photos
Tesla's "fully autonomous" robotaxis made their debut in Austin, Texas this weekend. On Sunday, June 22, a small fleet of Tesla's taxis began offering rides to people in the state's buzzing capital, according to Reuters. It marks the first time Tesla's self-driving cars picked up paying riders. The launch was a "culmination of a decade of hard work," Tesla CEO Elon Musk wrote in a post on his social media platform X. "Super congratulations to the @Tesla_AI software & chip design teams on a successful @Robotaxi launch!!" Musk added. Tesla did the trial run with 10 vehicles in the a neighborhood called South Congress, reported Reuters. While no one was in the driver's seat, a front-seat rider acted as a "safety monitor" during the trial. It is unclear how much control safety monitors had over the car. Some people, however, gathered to show their disapproval of the new self-driving taxis. Photos captured protesters gathered on Saturday with signs that stated, "No Robotaxi in Austin." Proceed with caution: Texas enacts robotaxi rules on the eve of Tesla's Austin rollout See photos from the launch. Photos show Tesla robotaxis debut in Austin Contributing: Reuters Julia is a trending reporter for USA TODAY. Connect with her on LinkedIn, X, Instagram and TikTok: @juliamariegz, or email her at jgomez@
42 minutes ago
Support for solar energy, offshore wind falls among Democrats and independents: poll
Americans' support for green energy tax credits and renewable energies like wind and solar power has decreased in recent years, according to a new poll, driven by a softening in support from Democrats and independents. The poll from The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research finds that U.S. adults' support for tax credits for electric vehicles and solar panels has weakened, as well as their enthusiasm for offshore wind farm expansion. While Democrats remain the strongest supporters of these initiatives, the poll reveals signs of growing cynicism within their ranks. The poll results coincide with sweeping changes President Donald Trump's Republican administration is making to regulations related to energy and climate change, including slashing the federal workforce in these departments. And although Democrats and independents have weakened their support for some green energy initiatives, there has not been an increase in support for Trump's energy policies. The poll found only about 4 in 10 U.S. adults — including only 1 in 10 Democrats and about 2 in 10 independents, along with three-quarters of Republicans — approve of the way Trump is handling climate change, which largely tracks with his overall approval rating. About 6 in 10 Democrats, 58%, favor tax credits for purchasing an electric vehicle, down from about 7 in 10 in 2022. Among independents, support declined from 49% in 2022 to 28%. Only one-quarter of Republicans supported this policy in 2022, and that hasn't changed measurably. 'As far as the pollution goes ... the vehicles nowadays put out very little emissions to the air,' said JD Johnson, a 62-year-old Democrat from Meadowview, Virginia, who somewhat opposes tax credits to purchase an electric vehicle. That's partly because he sees the electric vehicle manufacturing process as energy intensive and believes gasoline-powered vehicles have made improvements with the pollutants they emit. The decline in favoring solar panel tax credits was across the board rather than being concentrated among Democrats. 'For solar panels, in all honesty, I don't think they're that efficient yet,' said Glenn Savage, 78, a left-leaning independent from Rock Hill, South Carolina. 'I'd rather see them pour money into research and try to get the solar panels more efficient before they start giving tax breaks to the public. I may be wrong on that, but that's just my thought.' Scientists say transitioning to renewable energies and ditching fossil fuels that release planet-warming emissions are essential to protect the planet. Billions of dollars in project grants for clean technologies awarded during President Joe Biden's Democratic administration have been canceled by the Trump administration, and the offshore wind sector has been stunted by Trump's executive order that paused approvals, permits and loans for wind energy projects. Fewer than half of U.S. adults, 44%, now say that offshore wind farms should be expanded in the U.S., down from 59% in 2022. About half favor expanding solar panel farms, while about two-thirds were in support in 2022. When people are concerned about the economy and their personal finances, environmental issues are sometimes prioritized less, said Talbot Andrews, an assistant professor in the department of government at Cornell University who was not involved in the poll. 'I think it makes people anxious to think about increased taxes or increased spending on environmental issues when the cost of eggs are going through the roof,' Andrews said. Trump has championed the expansion of offshore oil drilling, as well as domestic coal production. Despite a decline in support for expanded renewable energies, the new poll shows that only about one-third of U.S. adults think offshore drilling for oil and natural gas should be expanded in the U.S., and only about one-quarter say this about coal mining. In both cases, Republicans are much more likely than Democrats to support expanding these energy sources. Trump has sought to open up national monuments for oil drilling, but more U.S. adults oppose than support auctioning off more public space for oil drilling. Only about one-quarter of U.S. adults favor this, while 4 in 10 are opposed. Republicans are much more likely than independents or Democrats to be in support. The Energy Star program that certifies appliances, such as dishwashers and refrigerators, as energy efficient recently appeared in headlines when the EPA made plans to scrap the program. The blue and white logo is well recognized, and experts say the program has long had bipartisan support until recently. The poll found three-quarters of Democrats support providing consumer rebates for efficient home appliances, compared with 6 in 10 Republicans. Patrick Buck, 54, from Chicago, describes himself as a liberal Republican and is a fan of the consumer rebates for energy-efficient appliances. 'It seems to work in terms of transforming what people have in their houses, because a lot of people have a lot of old appliances and just can't afford new ones,' he said. The poll found only about 2 in 10 U.S. adults are 'extremely' or 'very' confident in the federal government's ability to ensure the safety of their drinking water, the air they breathe and the meat, poultry, fruits and vegetables they buy in grocery stores. About 4 in 10 U.S. adults are 'somewhat' confident in the federal government's ability to ensure the safety of each of these, and about 4 in 10 are 'not very' or 'not at all' confident. The Trump administration has announced plans to roll back rules and policies related to limiting pollution and greenhouse gas emissions, such as rules that limit pollution from power plants and blocking California's efforts to phase out cars that run on gas. The federal government has also cut staff at the Food and Drug Administration, the federal agency tasked with protecting public health and ensuring food supply safety. ___ The AP-NORC poll of 1,158 adults was conducted June 5-9, using a sample drawn from NORC's probability-based AmeriSpeak Panel, which is designed to be representative of the U.S. population. The margin of sampling error for adults overall is plus or minus 4 percentage points. ___ The Associated Press' climate and environmental coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. The AP is solely responsible for all content. Find the AP's standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at
CNBC
an hour ago
- CNBC
Here's the salary Americans say they now need to earn to live comfortably
With higher prices now firmly entrenched, and President Donald Trump's tariffs fueling inflationary concerns, most Americans say they need an income boost to get by, according to a new report. Nearly half, or 45%, of all adults said they would need to make $100,000 or more a year to feel financially secure, Bankrate's financial freedom survey found. Roughly one-quarter, or 26%, said they need to make $150,000 or more. Fewer — 16% — put the bar at over $200,000. By comparison, the median household income in 2023 was a little over $80,000, according to the latest U.S. Census Bureau estimates. Altogether, the share of Americans who said they do not feel completely financially comfortable rose to 77% in 2025, up from 75% in 2024 and 72% in 2023, according to Bankrate's survey, which polled more than 2,200 in May. Here's a look at other stories affecting the financial advisor business. While Americans might have different definitions of what living comfortably entails, being in "a financial sweet spot," often means "you are able to cover your bills and everyday essentials but also have money left over for eating out and vacations," said Bankrate's economic analyst Sarah Foster. However, the recent period of high inflation and economic uncertainty has chipped away at most consumers' buying power, according to Carolyn McClanahan, a certified financial planner and founder of Life Planning Partners in Jacksonville, Florida. "One major issue is that wages have been stagnant for a large majority of the population over that time, and prices continue to rise," said McClanahan, who also is a member of CNBC's Advisor Council. "Add that to the backdrop of political instability everyone is feeling, and I think that is a perfect formula for people not feeling financially secure." Further, households are also facing surging child-care expenses, ballooning auto loans, high mortgage rates and record rents along with the resumption of student loan payments. But a deterioration of the American dream has been decades in the making, according to Bankrate's Foster. "It starts long before the pandemic," she said. "There has long been this perception that we used to be in this golden age where you could own a home, a car, and get by on a single income — that is a bygone era." A separate survey by Edelman Financial Engines from 2024 had similar findings: 58% of adults said they would need to earn $100,000 on average to not worry about everyday living expenses, and one-quarter said they would need to earn more than $200,000 to feel financially secure. In most cases, feeling financially secure is not based on how much you earn, but rather a commitment to save more than you spend and maintain a well-diversified portfolio, experts often say.
