New tool to challenge greenwashing claims goes live as companies weigh strategy
TORONTO - It's been a year now since a new law took effect that requires companies to back up their environmental claims, but there's still a lot of unknowns about how the anti-greenwashing rules will play out.
What is clear so far is that they've already reduced what companies are choosing to say about their environmental record, even as the biggest source of worry for many — an option for the public to initiate claims — is only now kicking in.
The pullback started as soon as the law came into effect on June 20 last year, when the Pathways Alliance group of oilsands companies scrubbed all content from its website and social media feeds.
Since then there have been other high-profile moves blamed on the law, including RBC dropping its sustainable finance target and several climate metrics, and CPP Investments ditching its net-zero emission by 2050 target, but there have also been numerous other companies that have made quieter adjustments.
'I can say with 100 per cent certainty that many organizations across many industries in Canada are revisiting their disclosure,' said Conor Chell, national leader of ESG law at KPMG in Canada.
'There's a lot of disclosure that was pulled from the public domain.'
Companies have raised concerns about the broad, vague wording of the provision in Bill C-59 that requires them to backup environmental claims with 'internationally recognized methodology,' and the threat of penalties of up to three per cent of global revenues if they're found to be in violation of the law.
Many companies and groups have called for the additions to be scrapped, while the Alberta Enterprise Group and the Independent Contractors and Businesses Association have launched a constitutional challenge, alleging the law is a breach of freedom of expression protections.
The Competition Bureau has tried to address at least the uncertainty of the law by providing guidelines, with a finalized version out just over two weeks ago.
Some have said the guidelines are still too vague, while others like the Pathways Alliance say they provide no assurance at all, because the Competition Bureau isn't bound by them, while the Competition Tribunal doesn't have to adhere to them.
And it's the Competition Tribunal that many companies are especially worried about. A clause in the law that went into effect Friday allows the public to bypass the bureau, and directly ask the tribunal to hear a case.
'From the perspective of many of our clients, the real risk lies in that private right of action,' said Chell.
The clause has raised fears of a flood of cases against companies, tying them up in legal wrangling at the court-like tribunal, possibly for years, and the costs that come along with such disputes.
'We believe the amendments ... should be removed to allow businesses to speak openly and truthfully about what they are doing to improve environmental performance and without fear of meritless litigation by private entities,' said Pathways president Kendall Dilling in a statement.
But environmental groups have played down the threat.
Ecojustice finance lawyer Tanya Jemec said the narrative that there is going to be a wave of filings is overblown, since bringing a case is time consuming and resource intensive, while they will have to meet a public-interest threshold before being allowed to proceed.
'I think there is a lot of fearmongering going on out there, and efforts, whether intentional or not, to undermine these anti-greenwashing provisions.'
Some, including Green Party Leader Elizabeth May, have questioned whether the new greenwashing laws were needed at all, given deceptive marketing practices were already covered by the Competition Act.
But Jemec said the existing process takes years, with no updates along the way from the bureau, while being able to take cases to the tribunal will increase transparency and relieve pressure on the bureau.
She said the reaction to the new laws, which also set elevated standards and penalties to the existing general protections, shows they were needed.
'The fact that companies are looking at what they are saying and changing course just may be an indication that the provisions are doing their work.'
Pushing companies to make sure they can back up their environmental claims improves competition, by making room for those legitimately trying to do better, said Wren Montgomery, associate professor at Western University's Ivey Business School.
'It's often these smaller, newer, really sustainable, pure-play sustainability companies that the innovation is coming from,' she said, noting she's seen in sectors ranging from fashion to wine.
'In my research, we see that greenwash is driving them out, so it's making it really hard for them to get rewarded for bringing that value to the market.'
Others, including Calgary-based clean-tech investor Avatar Innovations, have raised concerns that the higher reporting standards could hold back startups, both because of the compliance burden and the lack of established testing standards for emerging technology.
Montgomery said there are many established standards, and more being added, to cover environmental claims.
'My larger concern is not that a reporting standard is going to inhibit innovation. It's that greenwashing is going to inhibit innovation, and I think the latter is a much bigger concern for Canada.'
It's not just smaller companies affected.
Chell at KPMG said that for a while every company was clamouring to get out net-zero targets for the competitive advantage, but that advantage kept fading as more and more did it.
He said if the law works as intended, only companies that can actually substantiate claims will be able to do so, especially for those 'big ostentatious claims like net zero, carbon neutrality.'
'So there is actually, I think, a competitive advantage for companies that can make those claims and back them up credibly.'
Whether the law is truly effective, or just forcing companies to say less out of caution, is still unclear, but it's certainly brought more focus to the problem, said Chell.
'If the intent was to draw attention to greenwashing as an issue, I would say that that objective has certainly been achieved.'
This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 22, 2025.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hamilton Spectator
an hour ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Under budget and ahead of schedule, Indigenous battery project shows how Canada could become an energy superpower
NANTICOKE, Ont. — The strong winds that once blew toxic pollution from North America's biggest coal plant over to the nearby Six Nations reserve now turn a forest of wind turbines owned by Indigenous People. With the smoke stacks at Nanticoke long gone , row upon row of solar panels blanket the areas where mountainous piles of coal used to sit. And as of April this year, Canada's largest grid-scale battery project operates a stone's throw away — planned, developed, constructed and owned with First Nations partners. At a time when Indigenous groups across the country are up in arms over federal Bill C-5 and Ontario Bill 5 , which they say bulldoze through their treaty rights to impose high priority development projects, Oneida Energy Storage shows, in the eyes of some, that another way is possible — one where Indigenous communities lead and development is delivered under budget and ahead of schedule . 'Conflict attracts attention. But progress like this is quiet,' said Matt Jamieson, president and CEO of Six Nations of the Grand River Development Corp. Matt Jamieson, president and CEO of Six Nations of the Grand River Development Corporation at the Oneida Energy Storage project in Nanticoke, Ont. Walking amid dozens of rows of colossal white batteries Friday, his words were both figurative and literal. Despite being able to provide 250 megawatts of electricity into the provincial grid — the equivalent of a mid-sized gas plant — the project is virtually silent. And, unlike the natural gas peaker plants they can replace, the batteries produce no emissions. 'It fits within our mandate for environmental conservation, protection and stewardship,' said Warren Sault, president and CEO of Mississaugas of the Credit Business Corporation. Warren Sault, president and CEO of Mississaugas of the Credit Business Corporation at the Oneida Energy Storage project in Nanticoke, Ont. Premier Doug Ford was first elected in 2018 after campaigning against renewable energy, cancelling hundreds of projects and stopping all new investment dead in its tracks. But his government has since seemingly had a change of heart, signing contracts for nearly one gigawatt of wind power and soliciting proposals for more. First Nations such as the Six Nations and the Mississaugas of the Credit River, which partnered on this project, have long been investors in renewable energy, and their experience put them ahead of the curve on recognizing that wind and solar power, because they don't produce electricity around the clock, need to be paired with batteries to achieve their full potential . The batteries charge up on excess power when it isn't needed, like the middle of the night, and pump that electricity back into the grid when demand is high, like on a hot afternoon when people crank up the A/C. 'The hotter it gets, the more the grid needs the power — and it's going to be a hot summer,' said Nick Zsofcsin, head of energy storage at Northland Power, which operates the project. 'We don't charge and discharge fully everyday, but the power is there when you need it.' When Six Nations approached the province to pitch the battery project in 2017, they were met with skepticism, said Jamieson. But after some patient explanation and negotiation, Six Nations and their development partners at Northland and NRStor were able to strike a deal to have the province's first large-scale battery project built, paving the way for an additional 2,800 megawatts of batteries the province contracted last year. 'It took a hell of a long time to convince the province to do this,' Jamieson said. 'But once we did, they turned around and said, 'We need a lot more of it.'' Grid-scale batteries are being installed at a rapid pace around the world, with 11,000 megawatts installed globally in 2022, a 75 per cent increase over the previous year. With all the batteries in the pipeline, Ontario is set to become a leader, though it still trails California, which has the world's most battery storage with more than 15,000 megawatts online. The Oneida project has a 20-year contract, guaranteeing a long-term stable revenue stream for the nearby community on the Six Nations reserve. The Mississaugas of the Credit were brought in so they could benefit, as well. The gleaming rows of batteries resemble an oversized outdoor change room, with little brass locks hanging off locker doors. Behind each door, there are 336 battery packs. With 24 lockers to a megapack and 278 megapacks on site, that's more than 2.2 million batteries all together, each one individually monitored and isolated for safety. The project has more storage capacity than 13,000 Tesla Model Ys, which is a good measure because the batteries themselves are manufactured by Tesla. Strategically located to feed power into the high-voltage transmission lines that used to connect the Nanticoke coal plant to the grid, the batteries also power the nearby Imperial Oil refinery and the Stelco steel mill, two of the province's largest users of electricity. About 40 of the 180 construction jobs were filled by members of the Six Nations, who were able to take their expertise up the road as soon as they were done to start work on an even bigger battery project in Hagersville, which is slated to open before the end of the year. At a time when legislation is being passed at the provincial and federal levels that assumes Indigenous people will be an impediment to development, Jamieson says the Oneida battery project shows how First Nations-led projects can be the key to achieving the goal of making Canada an energy superpower. 'I understand why government actors want to accelerate these large infrastructure projects, but they can't simply do it at the expense of Indigenous voices,' he said. 'Interestingly enough, we were the ones pushing them to move forward on this infrastructure project and now it's become a key component of the energy market in Ontario.'
Forbes
5 hours ago
- Forbes
Islamic ESG: A New Blueprint For Sustainable Capital
Faraz Khan, CEO & Partner at Spectreco and Yousef Khalawi, Secretary-General of AlBaraka Forum for ... More Islamic Economy at 2nd Global Islamic Economy Summit in Istanbul. Islamic ESG: A New Blueprint For Sustainable Capital Imagine going to your bank to borrow money and having an opportunity to help stipulate the lending agreement because you are the one who has to give back the money. While this seems like an unimaginable scenario for most people in the Western world, it's an example of how an Islamic moral framework called Maqasid al-Shariah is applied to the world of finance and has the potential to influence the future of sustainable capital. Globally, Islamic-finance assets were estimated to be more than US $ 5 trillion in 2024 and are projected to grow to US $7.5 T by 2028, according to Standard Chartered's 2025 industry outlook. While Islamic finance is still a niche slice of the overall system—roughly one dollar in every eighty of global financial assets—the segment's compound annual growth of approximately 10% - 12% is outpacing the broader financial system. One of the drivers of growth Islamic-finance assets is the increasing incorporation of Shariah principles into sustainable-finance and ESG products—an area where faith-aligned screening overlaps with mainstream ethical investing. Shariah-compliant funds are now offered by financial institutions including SP Funds which has North America's largest family of Shariah-compliant funds, Manulife which added Shariah-aligned funds to its i-Watch platform, and Mackenzie Investments which offers the Mackenzie Shariah Global Equity Fund. These Shariah-compliant ESG indexes go beyond conventional environmental, social, and governance criteria by embedding the fundamental objectives of Islamic law—preserving human dignity, ensuring social justice, and safeguarding the environment—into their core methodologies. The newest entry into this growing space is the AlBaraka Islamic ESG Index - Powered by Spectreco which was launched earlier this month at the 2nd Global Islamic Economy Summit in Istanbul. The AlBaraka Islamic ESG Index is distinct because it operationalizes both Shariah and ESG through real-time data, AI automation, and principles-based governance, according to Faraz Khan, CEO & Partner at Spectreco. 'This index ends the false choice between Shariah compliance, ESG values, and financial performance,' said Khan. The new index combines technology and advanced AI infrastructure with Shariah scholarship. According to Yousef Khalawi, Secretary-General of AlBaraka Forum for Islamic Economy, the AlBaraka Islamic ESG Index is the first of its kind to integrate Maqasid al-Shariah principles with global ESG frameworks and be powered by advanced AI infrastructure that delivers real-time financial performance data and dynamic, automated scoring. 'Its dual governance model, combining cutting-edge technology with rigorous Shariah oversight, ensures unparalleled transparency and accountability. This synergy produces a next-generation benchmark that harmonizes ethical integrity with market efficiency—something no traditional ESG index currently offers.' At a time when conventional ESG models are being criticized for greenwashing or lack of relevance across cultural contexts, Islamic finance, with its intrinsic emphasis on equity, justice, and stewardship may be a compelling alternative. 'Maqasid al-Shariah can offer the world not only a moral compass but a practical roadmap for sustainable financial systems,' said Khan. According to Yousef Khalawi, the impetus behind launching the AlBaraka Islamic ESG Index was a clear market need for an innovative financial instrument that bridges the gap between spiritual values and sophisticated economic demands. 'The inspiration was simple: the industry was asking for it,' said Khan. 'Whether you're an asset manager in the Gulf Cooperation Council or a regulator in Southeast Asia, the demand for values-aligned, ESG-credible, and tech-integrated tools is growing.' Albaraka and Spectreco hope the index will unlock significant opportunities for a broad spectrum of financial market professionals and participants. These include asset managers seeking Shariah-compliant, ESG-integrated portfolios, sovereign wealth funds with sustainable development objectives, banks that can use the index as a foundation for innovative Shariah-based financial products, and Islamic stock exchanges that can co-develop regional benchmarks. Khan and Yousef Khalawi have a bold vision: to transform Islamic finance into a globally recognized standard that marries financial performance with ethical responsibility. 'Ultimately, success means establishing a trusted, transparent, and scalable financial infrastructure that empowers the Islamic economy to lead global efforts in creating a just and sustainable financial future,' said Yousef Khalawi. They also hope the index will become part of the everyday infrastructure of capital markets. 'If we can redirect capital towards ventures, cities, and institutions that advance justice, equity, and environmental restoration — we'll know the index hasn't just measured values, but moved them,' said Khan. The launch of the AlBaraka Islamic ESG Index is part of a broader shift in global finance that is demanding more than incremental change. Regulators and investors are questioning the legitimacy of ESG. Civil society stakeholders are calling for financial systems to reflect a more diverse ethical worldview. In this context, the AlBaraka Islamic ESG Index has the potential to be a reinvention of what responsible finance can be when guided by values and built with modern tools. 'What makes this moment unique is the convergence of technological readiness and global capital appetite,' said Khan. 'We're seeing an evolution from compliance to conviction—where Maqasid al-Shariah can offer the world not only a moral compass, but a practical roadmap for sustainable financial systems.' The collaboration between AlBaraka Forum is a fusion of capital, tradition and technology. The Forum brings decades of expertise in Islamic economics and policy influence, while Spectreco supplies the data, digital tools, and AI-driven governance models needed to operationalize Shariah values at scale. Together, they're filling a gap in the market and helping to create a new blueprint for the future of sustainable capital.
Hamilton Spectator
7 hours ago
- Hamilton Spectator
New tool to challenge greenwashing claims goes live as companies weigh strategy
TORONTO - It's been a year now since a new law took effect that requires companies to back up their environmental claims, but there's still a lot of unknowns about how the anti-greenwashing rules will play out. What is clear so far is that they've already reduced what companies are choosing to say about their environmental record, even as the biggest source of worry for many — an option for the public to initiate claims — is only now kicking in. The pullback started as soon as the law came into effect on June 20 last year, when the Pathways Alliance group of oilsands companies scrubbed all content from its website and social media feeds. Since then there have been other high-profile moves blamed on the law, including RBC dropping its sustainable finance target and several climate metrics, and CPP Investments ditching its net-zero emission by 2050 target, but there have also been numerous other companies that have made quieter adjustments. 'I can say with 100 per cent certainty that many organizations across many industries in Canada are revisiting their disclosure,' said Conor Chell, national leader of ESG law at KPMG in Canada. 'There's a lot of disclosure that was pulled from the public domain.' Companies have raised concerns about the broad, vague wording of the provision in Bill C-59 that requires them to backup environmental claims with 'internationally recognized methodology,' and the threat of penalties of up to three per cent of global revenues if they're found to be in violation of the law. Many companies and groups have called for the additions to be scrapped, while the Alberta Enterprise Group and the Independent Contractors and Businesses Association have launched a constitutional challenge, alleging the law is a breach of freedom of expression protections. The Competition Bureau has tried to address at least the uncertainty of the law by providing guidelines, with a finalized version out just over two weeks ago. Some have said the guidelines are still too vague, while others like the Pathways Alliance say they provide no assurance at all, because the Competition Bureau isn't bound by them, while the Competition Tribunal doesn't have to adhere to them. And it's the Competition Tribunal that many companies are especially worried about. A clause in the law that went into effect Friday allows the public to bypass the bureau, and directly ask the tribunal to hear a case. 'From the perspective of many of our clients, the real risk lies in that private right of action,' said Chell. The clause has raised fears of a flood of cases against companies, tying them up in legal wrangling at the court-like tribunal, possibly for years, and the costs that come along with such disputes. 'We believe the amendments ... should be removed to allow businesses to speak openly and truthfully about what they are doing to improve environmental performance and without fear of meritless litigation by private entities,' said Pathways president Kendall Dilling in a statement. But environmental groups have played down the threat. Ecojustice finance lawyer Tanya Jemec said the narrative that there is going to be a wave of filings is overblown, since bringing a case is time consuming and resource intensive, while they will have to meet a public-interest threshold before being allowed to proceed. 'I think there is a lot of fearmongering going on out there, and efforts, whether intentional or not, to undermine these anti-greenwashing provisions.' Some, including Green Party Leader Elizabeth May, have questioned whether the new greenwashing laws were needed at all, given deceptive marketing practices were already covered by the Competition Act. But Jemec said the existing process takes years, with no updates along the way from the bureau, while being able to take cases to the tribunal will increase transparency and relieve pressure on the bureau. She said the reaction to the new laws, which also set elevated standards and penalties to the existing general protections, shows they were needed. 'The fact that companies are looking at what they are saying and changing course just may be an indication that the provisions are doing their work.' Pushing companies to make sure they can back up their environmental claims improves competition, by making room for those legitimately trying to do better, said Wren Montgomery, associate professor at Western University's Ivey Business School. 'It's often these smaller, newer, really sustainable, pure-play sustainability companies that the innovation is coming from,' she said, noting she's seen in sectors ranging from fashion to wine. 'In my research, we see that greenwash is driving them out, so it's making it really hard for them to get rewarded for bringing that value to the market.' Others, including Calgary-based clean-tech investor Avatar Innovations, have raised concerns that the higher reporting standards could hold back startups, both because of the compliance burden and the lack of established testing standards for emerging technology. Montgomery said there are many established standards, and more being added, to cover environmental claims. 'My larger concern is not that a reporting standard is going to inhibit innovation. It's that greenwashing is going to inhibit innovation, and I think the latter is a much bigger concern for Canada.' It's not just smaller companies affected. Chell at KPMG said that for a while every company was clamouring to get out net-zero targets for the competitive advantage, but that advantage kept fading as more and more did it. He said if the law works as intended, only companies that can actually substantiate claims will be able to do so, especially for those 'big ostentatious claims like net zero, carbon neutrality.' 'So there is actually, I think, a competitive advantage for companies that can make those claims and back them up credibly.' Whether the law is truly effective, or just forcing companies to say less out of caution, is still unclear, but it's certainly brought more focus to the problem, said Chell. 'If the intent was to draw attention to greenwashing as an issue, I would say that that objective has certainly been achieved.' This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 22, 2025.
