Michael Vick hire brings 82% increase to Norfolk State ticket prices
The post Michael Vick hire brings 82% increase to Norfolk State ticket prices appeared first on ClutchPoints.
With Fall fast approaching and Michael Vick gearing up for his debut season with Norfolk State, ticket prices to watch the Spartans are anticipated to rise significantly. In April, Norfolk State released its full football schedule, including five home games. The announcement revealed that season tickets will cost $200 in 2024, an 82% increase from the previous price of $110.
Advertisement
The price increase comes as no surprise, with more football fans likely eager to watch Vick take on the role of an HBCU head coach. This aligns with Norfolk State's broader strategy to boost revenue for its athletics program and maintain competitiveness across all sports. Additionally, the House v. NCAA Settlement provides a new opportunity to support these efforts.
Norfolk State is one of several HBCUs participating in the House settlement, enabling the Spartans to explore the NCAA's revenue-sharing plan established by the House vs. NCAA agreement. Under this new model, a portion of every ticket sale will directly benefit Spartan student-athletes.
'Our decision to join the NCAA's revenue-sharing plan emphasizes Norfolk State's unwavering commitment to our student athletes,' Norfolk State Director of Athletics Dr. Melody Webb said in a statement. 'This choice to opt into the principles of the House Settlement underscores our dedication to advancing our athletics department as we prepare for a new era in collegiate athletics. As we join other institutions in adopting this evolving revenue-sharing model, we remain committed to navigating this journey for the benefit of our student-athletes. We are resolute in our goal to not only stay competitive but also achieve championship success.',
The settlement compensates former and current athletes who were denied the opportunity to benefit from their name, image, and likeness (NIL) before the NCAA policy changes in 2021. Additionally, football teams can now exceed the 63 equivalency scholarships if their budgets allow it. It will be interesting to see how the competitive landscape of HBCU football in Michael Vick's first year with Norfolk State will be in this new era.
Related: HBCUs make huge move on NCAA House settlement
Related: Son of Florida Gators legend transfers to Florida AM
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Major projects bill expected to pass before MPs leave for the summer
OTTAWA — If you blink, you might miss it. Prime Minister Mark Carney's controversial major projects bill was set to finish its dash through the House of Commons today — the final day of the sitting before summer — with support from the Conservatives and not-so-quiet grumblings from the other opposition parties. 'Usually, on the last day of sitting before the summer, everyone is smiling, we're in a good mood, we pat ourselves on the backs. But today, I would say that's not really the case,' said Bloc Québécois MP Xavier Barsalou-Duval during a speech on Friday. The final vote on Bill C-5 in the House is set to happen shortly after 5 p.m. before making its way to the Senate for a final adoption expected within a week, on Friday, June 27. The legislation has two parts. The first, which has more support across party lines, aims to eliminate internal trade and labour mobility barriers in Canada. The second part, which would give cabinet sweeping powers to approve natural resource and infrastructure projects deemed in the national interest, has raised considerably more concerns. Indigenous communities, environmental groups, opposition parties and even some Liberal MPs have said they are uncomfortable with the lack of consultation with First Nations, Inuit and Metis people prior to tabling the bill, but also the extent of the powers that would give the government of the day the power to ignore other federal laws for five years. 'Pretending that this unprecedented power grab was ever discussed in the election is a sham, and we can add an 'e' to that. It's a shame,' said Green Party leader Elizabeth May. C-5 was rushed through committee earlier this week. Despite that, opposition parties managed to pass amendments which include exempting a number of laws — such as the Indian Act and the Conflict of Interest Act — from being ignored when considering major projects and publishing a list of national interest projects with timelines and costs. 'These amendments matter,' said Shannon Stubbs, energy and natural resource critic for the Conservatives when describing the changes in the House. 'They bring transparency, accountability, more certainty, more clarity and integrity to a bill that originally had none.' Stubbs said despite those changes, 'major concerns' remain. She cited the need to prevent ministers from removing projects from the national interest list at any time but also add in the bill clear timelines to approve projects to increase certainty for investors. On Friday, opposition parties claimed a small victory. NDP MP Jenny Kwan, with the help of the Bloc's Marilène Gill, argued the Speaker of the House should divide C-5 into two distinct parts so that MPs could vote on the portions on internal trade and major projects separately at third reading. Speaker Francis Scarpaleggia granted their request. 'While they are ultimately designed to strengthen the Canadian economy, they deal with different issues that could very well stand independently from one another,' he explained. The passage of C-5 concludes in a dramatic way a packed four-week spring sitting that saw Carney's government table significant omnibus bills, very fast, but adopt very few. The government tabled C-2, the Strong Borders Act, which seeks to secure the Canada-U.S. border, fight organized crime and fentanyl and boost the fight against financial crimes. It is facing criticism for sweeping new powers that would allow officials to obtain information without a warrant and for restricting the asylum claim process, among others. It also tabled C-4, the Making Life More Affordable for Canadians Act, which includes some of the government's campaign promises on affordability like a middle-class tax cut and removal of the GST on new homes for first-time homebuyers. However, the bill has been criticized as it also seeks to exempt federal political parties from modern privacy laws. Unlike the major projects bill, C-2 and C-4 were not fast-tracked, meaning that they will continue to make their way through the legislative process during the fall sitting. Interestingly, the first legislation to pass all stages in this new Parliament was not a government bill. Last week, MPs unanimously approved C-202, a Bloc bill to protect the supply management system which regulates the price and production of dairy, poultry and eggs, from future trade deals. That same bill was stalled in the Senate in the last legislature and ended up dying on the order paper when the election was called. This time, the Senate approved C-202 on division, and it is now awaiting royal assent. National Post calevesque@ Doug Ford apologizes to Ontario First Nations for his 'passionate' comments 'We have to get that balance right': Liberal MPs express worries about major projects bill Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
From tax on tips to SALT deductions: Senate tweaks bring change to Trump's big tax bill
The Senate released its revisions to the legislation dubbed the "One Big Beautiful Bill" by President Donald Trump this week, but whether it's better for average Americans than the House bill might be questionable, some experts say. The Senate's version of the mega tax bill keeps popular benefits like no taxes on overtime and tips, an additional tax deduction for those 65 years and older, and a deduction for state and local taxes (SALT). However, the Senate's tweaks, if passed, may make those tax benefits less beneficial for individual taxpayers, some accountants said. Eliminating taxes on tips and overtime pay is one of President Donald Trump's most popular campaign promises, and the Senate kept it – but with a cap. For tips, the Senate offers a maximum $25,000 deduction for both overtime pay and tips, but it would begin to phase out for single filers earning, with a modified adjusted gross income (MAGI), $150,000, and couples over $300,000. It would reduce the deduction by $100 for every $1,000 of income over those thresholds. MAGI begins with the adjusted gross income, whch is basically the sum of all income, which commonly can include items like dividends, interest, capital gains, rental income, self-employment income, taxable alimony, Social Security, pensions, annuity income, and a few more things. The AGI is then adjusted or 'modified' further to get to the MAGI. For a single filer, the deduction is completely phased out if income is $250,000 over the MAGI threshold. The House version didn't have a cap or a phase out. Instead, it excluded highly compensated employees who make at least $160,000 in 2025. 'For both no tax on tips and no tax on overtime, the House version is more beneficial to the average taxpayer as there are no caps on the deduction,' said Richard Pon, a certified public accountant in San Francisco. The Senate proposed a $6,000 'bonus deduction' for those aged 65 and older, but eligibility is capped at $75,000 in income for single filers and $150,000 for couples. The deduction would be available from 2025 through 2028, and would supplement, but not replace, the existing extra standard deduction already available to older adults. For 2025, a single filer age 65 or older can claim an extra $2,000, while married couples filing jointly can add $1,600 for each spouse over 65 in addition to the standard deduction available to all taxpayers. The Senate's bonus deduction would be on top of those. The House agreed on a $4,000 bonus deduction with similar eligibility parameters and duration. Bonus deductions are meant as a substitute for Trump's promise of no tax on Social Security because the budget reconciliation process doesn't allow provisions related to Social Security, according to the Bipartisan Policy Center Since tax deductions only reduce taxable income, not tax owed directly, those who pay little to no federal income tax may benefit very little if at all from the bonus deduction, analysts said. Individual taxpayers could lose big under the Senate's version of the controversial SALT, or state and local tax, deduction. In 2017, Trump's first major tax bill capped SALT at $10,000. Before that, it was uncapped, meaning individuals could deduct all their state and local taxes on their federal tax returns. The cap was seen as mostly hurting many big Democratic states like New York with high state and local taxes. As a workaround, many states adopted Pass-Through Entity (PTE) taxes, which allow the entity to pay state income tax at the entity level and take the tax deduction. Only individuals, not entities, are subject to the SALT cap. The House plan raises the cap to $40,000 for individuals earning $500,000 or less. The Senate kept the current $10,000 cap and said passthrough entity taxes (PTE) would now be subject to the $10,000 limit, Pon said. 'I think the cap may be raised slightly -- most likely by doubling the cap to $20,000 for married taxpayers,' Pon said. But 'the proposal to stop the PTE workaround, I think, will pass as it raises revenue which is needed to get the deficit under control.' Medora Lee is a money, markets, and personal finance reporter at USA TODAY. You can reach her at mjlee@ and subscribe to our free Daily Money newsletter for personal finance tips and business news every Monday through Friday. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Senate tweaks to Trump tax bill take president's promises down a notch Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Judge rules Reggie Bush must pay Lloyd Lake $1.4 million in defamation case
Former USC running back Reggie Bush must pay Lloyd Lake, the man accused of paying Bush and his family during his career with the Trojans in violation of NCAA rules, after Lake filed a defamation lawsuit against the former Trojan. (Wally Skalij/Los Angeles Times) Lloyd Lake, the San Diego man at the center of the Reggie Bush extra benefits saga, scored a major legal victory this week over the former USC running back after a Van Nuys judge upheld an arbitrator's decision to award Lake nearly $1.4 million in his defamation suit against Bush. Lake filed the suit against Bush back in February 2023 — along with his parents, Roy and Barbara Gunner — alleging that Bush publicly disparaged and defamed him during a podcast appearance and in social media posts and, as such, violated the non-disparagement clause they agreed upon in a previous settlement. The comments, according to Lake and his parents' complaint, 'created a firestorm of vitriol' that saw the Gunner home vandalized with graffiti and left them fearing for their safety. Advertisement The judge's decision this week came more than 15 years after the first explosive lawsuit between the two men was settled. That suit, which Lake first filed in 2007, claimed that he and another businessman, Michael Michaels, had provided Bush and his family with cash, a car, rent-free use of a house and other gifts while he played at USC in 2004 and 2005 with the expectation Bush would sign with Lake and his fledgling sports management company, New Era Sports & Entertainment. The first case was settled in April 2010, just before Bush and Michaels were scheduled to be deposed. But Lake's account of their arrangement, which violated NCAA rules, had already prompted a firestorm, one that ultimately ended in severe sanctions for USC's football program, the vacating of the Trojans' 2004 national title and the return of Bush's Heisman Trophy. Read more: Reggie Bush and USC get Heisman Trophy back 14 years after it was forfeited As college athletes were allowed to receive compensation for use of their name, image and likeness and public opinion began shifting toward Bush, the legendary Trojan running back began sharing more about his experience and the saga that would come to define him. In an appearance on the 'I Am Athlete' podcast, Bush opened up about the emotional toll the case and losing his Heisman Trophy took on him and his family. Bush eventually succeeded in having the Heisman returned to him in 2024. Advertisement Neither of the two men had spoken publicly about the other in more than a decade, abiding by the non-disparagement agreement in their 2010 settlement. At the time of that agreement, all parties involved — including Bush's mother and stepfather — agreed to "not make any statements or representations to any person that may cast another Party to this Agreement in an unfavorable light, that are offensive to or disparage them, or that could adversely affect their name and reputation." But during the 2022 podcast interview, Bush went on to accuse Lake of blackmail and exaggerate Lake's criminal record, which he said was 'as long as the Cheesecake Factory menu.' Months later, in a Twitter post, Bush falsely accused Lake of being a convicted rapist. The same week the podcast was published, the Gunners' home was vandalized with graffiti. The threatening message left behind, written in red spray paint on an outside wall, read: 'Help Reggie Bush Get His Trophy Back F— Crook.' The number '187' was also spray painted on the wall, which the plaintiff attorneys say referred to the state Penal Code number for murder. They blamed the graffiti on 'unknown bad actors' working 'on behalf of or at the direction of Bush.' Read more: An interview with the man jurors in McNair vs. NCAA wanted to hear from: Lloyd Lake Advertisement Lake's attorneys first sought to bring the case to a jury trial. But a judge ruled in June 2024, that Lake's lawsuit against Bush would go to binding, confidential arbitration, per the terms of their original settlement. The arbitrator in the case, Jeffrey G. Benz, ultimately ruled in Lake's favor, awarding him $500,000, as well as $764,640 in attorneys' fees and $116,780 in other costs, according to court documents. Still, Bush's attorneys continued to challenge the ruling by arguing that Benz had exceeded his authority as the arbitrator. Their latest challenge was quashed this week by Van Nuys Superior Court Judge Eric Harmon, who took only a few hours to reaffirm the arbitrator's decision. But Bush and his legal team succeeded, in one respect: Bush's responses to Lake's petition, as well as other supporting exhibits and documents pertaining to Bush's side of the case, remain under seal or heavily redacted. Sign up for more USC news with Times of Troy. In your inbox every Monday morning. This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.
