How could Iran hit back after US strike?
The US military has a presence at no fewer than 20 bases in the Middle East and the surrounding regions.
The majority of these would be within the 2,000km range of Iran's Sejil-2 ballistic missile.
Its bases in Iraq and Syria would likely be first on the hit list, with Tehran then turning its attention to outposts in Arab countries.
Any attempt to strike US military facilities in the Middle East is likely to be less effective than the ballistic missile attack on two US bases in Iraq in January 2020 to avenge the assassination of Qassim Solemaini, ordered by Donald Trump at the end of his first term.
Although the attacks on the two American bases caused no fatalities, partly because Iran had issued a warning in advance, 110 servicemen suffered concussions and other brain injuries because of the force of the impact.
So great was the cause of the damage that it may have deterred Mr Trump from retaliating.
Washington also has two hulking aircraft carriers, with a third en route, deployed to the Middle East, which would be considered prime targets for Iranian missiles.
Targets
Israel has proven just how hard ballistic missiles, which are fired up high into the Earth's atmosphere before travelling to the ground at supersonic speeds, can be to intercept, even with what is considered to be one of the most sophisticated air defence systems in the world.
The US military possesses at least two tried and tested surface-to-air systems capable of intercepting ballistic missiles – Patriot and Terminal High Altitude Area Defence, known as THAAD.
And they've slowly been redeploying these systems from Asia to the Middle East for months amid mounting tensions between its ally Israel and Iran, and its Islamist proxies.
Its bases in Iraq – Erbil and Ain al‑Asad air bases – have Patriot batteries positioned at them, which have been previously used to fend off militant attacks.
American commanders also ordered for Patriots to be removed from South Korea and placed at Isa Air Base, Bahrain, and Al Udeid Air Base in recent months.
Capacity
Of course, mass barrages of ballistic missiles can confuse and overwhelm these systems, as witnessed in both Israel and Ukraine.
US servicemen and women will, however, be quietly confident that the Israel Defence Force has significantly reduced Iran's capacity to launch hundreds of missiles at once.
Iranian salvos have drastically shrunk in size in recent days. What started as 100-projectile blitzes aimed at Israel has been reduced to just dozens of missiles being fired off at any one time.
Iran's production capacity has been significantly eroded, with Israel striking various elements of the supply chain in recent days.
Fabian Hoffmann, a missile expert, said: 'Iran is heavily constricted in the missile domain.
'The likelihood that Iran can cause a large amount of damage is very, very slim.
'It could also be counterproductive because if you strike American infrastructure, there will be an even greater cost because you risk the Americans getting involved and really getting involved. So I think that's also a huge political consideration.'
Proxies
Iran's network of regional proxies was always considered its first line of defence.
Hezbollah and Hamas were responsible for keeping Israel's military occupied and unable to strike at the Islamic Republic.
The Yemen-based Houthi rebels also distracted the West by targeting commercial shipping in the Red Sea.
Militant armed by Iran have been responsible for deadly attacks on the US base in Iraq, using one-way attack drones.
It's most likely that the Houthi rebels will once again resume targeting American shipping containers travelling through the Red Sea. The militants had briefly paused attacks on American ships after Donald Trump ramped up strikes on the group.
In Iraq, Kataib Hezbollah would likely carry out its threat to 'act directly against its [US] interests and bases across the region', if the US president joins the war against Iran.
But Israel's decimation of these proxy groups - chiefly Hamas and Hezbollah - in the past year is one saving grace that will comfort the Americans.
'The fact that virtually the only missiles and drones that are launched against Israel right now are coming from Iran is striking,' Dmitri Alperovitch, chair of the Silverado Policy Accelerator think tank in Washington, said.
Strait of Hormuz
Tucked between the Arabian Peninsula and the Persian Gulf's western flank lies one of Tehran's most powerful weapons against the West.
Nothing hurts a government more than the price of oil, and this narrow stretch of water between Oman and Iran is vital in the global supply.
The Islamic Republic has the means to effectively shut down access to the strait, crippling shipping through the region, as there are no alternative routes.
The threat of its closure is perhaps why the USS Nimitz, one of America's largest aircraft carriers, is being moved into the region.
Iran could quite easily close the strait by mining it, repositioning mobile ballistic missile launchers, and using maritime drones.
It employed similar tactics during the so-called Tanker Wars of the 1980s – although it never fully succeeded, largely due to Royal Navy and later US Navy efforts to escort commercial vessels through the Gulf.
This, US officials fear, would keep American naval warships in the Persian Gulf.
'Mine clearance is one of the US Navy's few weaknesses,' Tom Sharpe, a former Royal Navy officer, wrote in the Telegraph this week.
For Tehran, closing the strait is one of the most likely ways of bringing the US into the conflict.
Mr Trump was happy to expend billions of dollars in strikes against Houthi rebels, the Iranian-backed militia, when they attempted to snarl up Western shipping through the Red Sea.
The US president is acutely aware of global oil prices, and with a fifth of global petroleum shipped through Hormuz.
Any blockages would likely lead to him sanctioning some strikes to restore shipping.
The other fact that makes this option particularly nuclear for Tehran is that China, the largest buyer of Iranian oil, uses the strait for shipping its purchases.
This hasn't stopped Iran from meddling with shipping through GPS navigation interference.
Two tankers collided and caught fire on the narrow stretch of water after allegedly being impacted by the disruption.
US officials have claimed the GPS meddling originated from the Iranian port of Bandar Abbas, located just north of the strait.
Some analysts believe Iran is unlikely to carry out such threats, fearing it would provoke Arab states into the conflict and complete Tehran's global isolation.
Oil fields
If the Iranian regime believed it faced an existential crisis or the irreversible destruction of its nuclear programme, it could play what analysts describe as its 'last big card' by also attacking energy infrastructure in the Gulf.
The world got a glimpse of what could be to come in 2019 when drone and missile strikes hit the Abqaiq and Khurais oil facilities in eastern Saudi Arabia. Yemen's Iran-backed Houthi rebels claimed responsibility – but both the US and Saudi governments accused Iran of orchestrating the attacks.
The attacks temporarily knocked out half of Saudi Arabia's oil production, triggering a sharp spike in global energy prices.
Abqaiq, which processes seven million barrels of crude a day – more than two-thirds of Saudi Arabia's production capacity – would almost certainly be a prime target if Iran followed through on its threats.
Other potential targets include oil and LNG terminals in Saudi Arabia and the UAE, as well as oil tankers moving through the region's waters. In May 2019, limpet mines damaged three tankers and a bunkering ship off the coast of Fujairah in the UAE. No one claimed responsibility, but Western officials suspected Iranian frogmen were behind the attacks.
Cyber
Over the years, Iran and its regional proxies have claimed responsibility for numerous cyberattacks against Israel.
They include destroying data, phishing campaigns and information operations.
Given the threat poses a danger to both civilian and military worlds, the US government has been appealing for information on Iranian hackers responsible for targeting critical infrastructure.
A $US10 million reward was posted for details on a group, known as CyberAv3ngers, who US officials have linked to the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps.
Experts, however, say Iran may struggle to properly deploy cyberattacks at a time when its regime is under threat.
'The regime is under existential threat. Iranian cyber is a toy,' Alperovitch said, adding that it was unlikely Tehran would lean on this as a serious offensive tool against the Americans.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News AU
32 minutes ago
- Sky News AU
Donald Trump ‘understood the nature' of Iran's nuclear threat to the world
United States Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth says US President Donald Trump 'understood the nature' of the Iranian nuclear program's threat. 'The president has made it very clear, he's looked at all of this, all of the intelligence, all of the information and come to the conclusion the Iranian nuclear program is a threat,' Mr Hegseth said. 'And was willing to take this precision operation to neutralise that threat.'
Sky News AU
32 minutes ago
- Sky News AU
Pete Hegseth divulges Donald Trump's operation to ‘neutralise' Iran's nuclear threat
United States Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth discusses US President Donald Trump's operation to 'neutralise' Iranian nuclear threats. 'This mission as not, has not been about regime change, the president authorised a precision operation to neutralise the threats to our national interest,' Mr Hegseth said. 'Posed by the Iranian nuclear program and the collective self-defence of our troops and our ally Israel.'
9 News
35 minutes ago
- 9 News
US 'does not seek war' after surprise attack on Iran, Hegseth says
Your web browser is no longer supported. To improve your experience update it here US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth says that America "does not seek war" with Iran in the aftermath of a surprise overnight attack on three of the country's nuclear sites. The mission involved decoys and deception, and met with no Iranian resistance, Hegseth and Caine said. US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth says that America "does not seek war" with Iran. (AP) "This mission was not and has not been about regime change," Hegseth added. Hegseth said it was important to note that US strikes did not target Iranian troops or the Iranian people, a veiled effort to indicate to Iran that they don't want retaliation on American targets in the region. Caine said the goal of the operation — destroying nuclear sites in Fordo, Natanz and Isfahan — had been achieved. "Final battle damage will take some time, but initial battle damage assessments indicate that all three sites sustained extremely severe damage and destruction," Caine said. Hegseth said that a choice to move a number of B-2 bombers from their base in Missouri earlier on Saturday was meant to be a decoy to throw off Iranians. He added that the US used other methods of deception as well, deploying fighters to protect the B-2 bombers that dropped 14 bunker-buster bombs on Iran's most powerful nuclear site. Joint Chiefs Chairman General Dan Caine speaks at the Pentagon in Washington. (AP) He said that all of these tactics helped the US drop the bombs without tipping off Iran's fighter jets or its air missile systems. Hegseth said the US was making multiple efforts to communicate with Iranian officials following the strikes as President Donald Trump and his top lieutenants called on the country to negotiate a diplomatic path forward. "I can only confirm that there are both public and private messages being directly delivered to the Iranians in multiple channels, giving them every opportunity to come to the table," Hegseth said. He continued, "They understand precisely what the American position is, precisely what steps they can take to allow for peace, and we hope they do so." CNN has reported that Trump made the decision to proceed with the strikes when it became clear that diplomatic efforts had stalled. The US and Iran had held five rounds of nuclear talks, led by special envoy to the Middle East Steve Witkoff, since April. A sixth round of talks set for last Sunday was cancelled following unprecedented Israeli attacks on Iranian nuclear sites and military officials. The White House had said the US remained in correspondence with Iran last week. Midnight ET (2pm on Sunday AEST): The operation began overnight Friday into Saturday morning, Caine said at a Pentagon news conference. As B-2 bombers launched from the US, some headed west as a decoy while the rest "proceeded quietly to the east with minimal communications throughout the 18-hour flight". About 5pm ET (7am on Sunday AEST): Caine said a US submarine "launched more than two dozen Tomahawk land attack cruise missiles against key surface infrastructure targets" at the Isfahan nuclear site in Iran. As the B-2s entered Iranian airspace, the US "employed several deception tactics, including decoys, as the fourth- and fifth-generation aircraft pushed out in front of the strike package at high altitude and high speed, sweeping in front of the package for enemy fighters and surface-to-air missile threats," Caine said. He added that upon approach of the Natanz and Fordow facilities, the US employed "high-speed suppression weapons" with fighter aircraft to "ensure safe passage" of the B-2 bombers. About 6.40pm ET (8.40am on Sunday AEST): The lead B-2 bomber launched two massive bunker-buster bombs at Fordow nuclear site, Caine said, and the "remaining bombers then hit their targets". Those additional targets were struck, Caine said, "between 6.40pm ET and 7.05pm ET" (8.40am and 9.05am on Sunday AEST). That places the timing of these attacks about 2.10am local time in Iran on Sunday. In total, Caine said, 16 GBU-57 Massive Ordnance Penetrators were dropped — two from the lead B-2 on Fordow, and 14 more from the remaining bombers against the two other sites. Flight back to US: The US military then "began its return home", Caine said, noting that no shots were fired by Iran at the US on the way in or out. - Additional reporting by Associated Press and CNN Iran USA Israel Middle East World conflict War Donald Trump CONTACT US Property News: The last inner Sydney suburbs where houses cost under $2m.
