US-Iran Talks: 2nd Round to Kick Off in Rome
The second round of nuclear talks between the US and Iran is set to start on Saturday in Rome, Italy, to negotiate over Tehran's atomic ambitions.
The talks follow a first round in Muscat, Oman, which both sides described as 'positive' and 'constructive,' amid the US President Donald Trump's reiteration that he will never allow Iran to possess a nuclear weapon. Indirect Talks in Rome
The Iranian Foreign Minister, Abbas Aragchi, has arrived in Rome to participate in the second round of talks, according to a post on his Telegram account.
Aragchi is leading Iran's delegation in the negotiations with the US Special Envoy to the Middle East, Steve Witkoff. Negotiations will take the form of indirect discussions through mediators from Oman, reported Reuters. Iran's Cautious Optimism
On Friday, Aragchi said that Tehran believes that reaching a deal with Washington is 'possible' as long as the US is realistic. Moreover, the Spokesperson for Iran's Foreign Ministry, Esmail Baghaei, on Saturday emphasized that Iran is committed to diplomacy.
'Iran always demonstrated, with good faith and a sense of responsibility, its commitment to diplomacy as a civilized way to resolve issues. We are aware that it is not a smooth path but we take every step with open eyes, relying also on the past experiences,' he wrote on X.
However, Iran tried to lower expectations of a quick agreement, amid speculations that the US would lift sanctions soon. In the light of this, Iran's Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, played down expectations of a breakthrough in the talks. He said this week that he was 'neither overly optimistic nor pessimistic.' Trump's Threats
Trump has repeatedly vowed that the will not allow Iran to acquire a nuclear weapon, threatening Tehran of military action if diplomacy failed. 'I'm for stopping Iran, very simply, from having a nuclear weapon. They can't have a nuclear weapon. I want Iran to be great and prosperous and terrific,' he told reporters on Friday.
The US President has warned Iran that it would be 'in real danger' in case the talks failed. 'If it requires military, we're going to have military. Israel will obviously be very much involved in that. They'll be the leader of that,' Trump threatened earlier.
Furthermore, Washington has sent the USS Carl Vinson aircraft carrier and its striking group to the Gulf of Oman ahead of Rome talks, to support the USS Harry Truman, which has been launching strikes against the Houthis as part of the US campaign against the Iranian-backed militia in Yemen. Curbing Iran's Nuclear Ambitions
The US wants Iran to abandon its nuclear program, fearing that Tehran is pursuing an atomic bomb. 'Any final arrangement must set a framework for peace, stability, and prosperity in the Middle East – meaning that Iran must stop and eliminate its nuclear enrichment and weaponization program,' Witkoff wrote on X on Tuesday.
Witkoff also said that Iran's uranium enrichment levels should not exceed 3.67%. On Monday, he told Fox News: 'They do not need to enrich past 3.67%. In some circumstances, they're at 60%, in other circumstances, 20%. That cannot be.'
The US Special Envoy suggested that the Trump administration may consider the terms of the 2015 nuclear deal, known as JCPOA, from which Trump unilaterally withdrew in 2018, as a basis for negotiations.
'This is going to be much about verification on the enrichment program, and then ultimately verification on weaponization. That includes missiles, the type of missiles that they have stockpiled there. And it includes the trigger for a bomb,' Witkoff added. Iran Red Lines
Tehran has insisted that its defense capabilities, including its missile program, are not up for negotiation. Moreover, Iran has asked for reliable guarantees that the US will not scrap the agreement as Trump did in 2018.
Tehran's red lines also include never agreeing to dismantle its uranium enriching centrifuges, halt enrichment altogether, or reduce its enriched uranium stockpile below levels agreed in the 2015 deal, a senior Iranian official told Reuters on condition of anonymity.
The US, Israel, and Western countries worry that Iran is pursuing an atomic bomb by accelerating its uranium enrichment to 60% purity, close to the 90%-weapon-grade level.
On Tuesday, the political advisor to the Iranian Supreme Leader, Ali Shamkhani, said that Iranian negotiators have full authority to reach a comprehensive deal based on 9 principles. These include seriousness, guarantees, lifting sanctions, halting threats, containing aggressors (such as Israel), and facilitating investments, he posted on X.
Short link :
Post Views: 63
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Arabiya
6 hours ago
- Al Arabiya
Supreme Court Rejects Toy Company's Push for a Quick Decision on Trump's Tariffs
The Supreme Court on Friday rejected an appeal from an Illinois toy company pushing for a quick decision on the legality of President Donald Trump's tariffs. Learning Resources Inc. had asked the justices to take up the case soon rather than let it continue to play out in lower courts. The company argues the tariffs and uncertainty are having a massive impact on businesses around the country and the issue needs swift attention from the nation's highest court. The justices didn't explain their reasoning in the brief order rebuffing the appeal, but the Supreme Court is typically reluctant to take up cases before lower courts have decided. The company argues that the Republican president illegally imposed tariffs under an emergency powers law, bypassing Congress. It won an early victory in a lower court, but the order is on hold as an appeals court considers a similar ruling putting a broader block on Trump's tariffs. The appeals court has allowed Trump to continue collecting tariffs under the emergency powers law ahead of arguments set for late July. The Trump administration has defended the tariffs by arguing that the emergency powers law gives the president the authority to regulate imports during national emergencies and that the country's longtime trade deficit qualifies as a national emergency.
Arab News
7 hours ago
- Arab News
Targeting Iran's supreme leader is madness
The idea resurfaced last week that Israel may try to assassinate Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, as if he were just another easy military target in the fierce war between Israel and Iran, which may soon involve the US. President Donald Trump made it clear he opposed Israel's move and did not support it. This issue is far more serious than just another military objective: it could become a matter of ideology and trigger deeply dangerous cycles of revenge. There have been times in history when warring parties refrained from targeting leaders and symbolic figures for reasons beyond direct military calculation. For example, Emperor Hirohito of Japan was a ruler and a sacred symbol. Documents confirm that he authorized his military leaders to go to war, invade Manchuria, and carry out the attack on Pearl Harbor, which led to America's entry into the Second World War. But during the war, and on the recommendation of Gen. Douglas MacArthur, the US government decided not to target him. He was also excluded from the list of Japanese leaders prosecuted after the allied victory and the occupation of Tokyo. That decision paved the way for reconciliation between the US and Japan, and helped the Japanese people accept the Americans. Hirohito remained emperor and respected until his death, living for another 45 years. There have been times in history when warring parties refrained from targeting leaders and symbolic figures for reasons beyond direct military calculation. Abdulrahman Al-Rashed Ayatollah Khamenei is a spiritual leader, and any harm inflicted on him would cause wounds that may never heal — regardless of how decisive the Israeli or American victories are on the battlefield. The supreme leader is a lifelong authority, not a president. He would play a vital role in bringing about peace, just as Ayatollah Khomeini did in 1988, when he unilaterally announced an end to the war with Iraq — a war we thought would end only with the complete destruction of one or both countries. We remember that no one in the Iranian regime at that time dared to call for a ceasefire with Iraq — except the supreme leader. Some people get carried away by the intoxication of war, blinded by overwhelming military power and temporary victories, only to create hatred that could last for decades or even centuries when they could have achieved victory without doing so. There is no doubt that the Israelis possess superior intelligence capabilities and overwhelming destructive power, which allow them to penetrate deep into Iran and reach its leadership's hideouts, as they have done in Lebanon and Gaza. But Iran's supreme leader cannot be equated with Hezbollah's secretary-general Hassan Nasrallah, who was assassinated last year. The difference in symbolic weight is enormous, and the consequences of a miscalculation are grave. Ayatollah Khamenei is a spiritual leader, and any harm inflicted on him would cause wounds that may never heal. Abdulrahman Al-Rashed And even if the comparison isn't entirely accurate, the execution of Saddam Hussein on Eid Al-Adha in 2006 — though he was a Baathist and not a religious or tribal leader — came at a heavy price. US generals later attempted to reconcile with Sunni forces, but failed. Washington still suffers the consequences of that event, especially with half the Iraqi population. That grave mistake could have been avoided, and the resulting rift healed, after their military victory. Israelis are capable of stunning military victories, as they achieved in 1967 and again last year — but that doesn't mean they win the larger war. We are truly on the brink of a new and critical chapter of history that will reshape what we've known and lived through over the past half century. What's needed now is the threat of force without reaching for its maximum limits — to bring about change through consensus, as much as possible. That would benefit everyone, including Israel, the US, Iran, and all the nations in the region. Both winners and losers share an interest in reducing tensions and achieving a collective peace. • Abdulrahman Al-Rashed is a Saudi journalist and intellectual. He is the former general manager of Al-Arabiya news channel and former editor-in-chief of Asharq Al-Awsat, where this article was originally published. X: @aalrashed
Arab News
7 hours ago
- Arab News
Turkiye on high alert due to Israel-Iran strikes
Turkiye is walking a tightrope as the Iran-Israel war intensifies. Given its long border with Iran and its complicated — often tense — relations with Israel, while being one of the few regional actors maintaining backchannels with Israel, Iran and the US, Ankara's position is particularly significant. Soon after Israel launched its attacks on Iran, Ankara swiftly responded: the Foreign Ministry issued a condemnation of Israel and President Recep Tayyip Erdogan also made a statement. Turkiye's current approach is shaped by a combination of security concerns, its position within the Western alliance and its relations with both Iran and Israel. Turkiye, Iran and Israel are the three non-Arab middle powers in the Middle East whose relationships have always influenced the regional balance of power. Within this context, Turkiye would normally welcome the weakening of Iranian influence in the region. However, the unprecedented escalation of tensions between Israel and Iran, and the broader consequences of this war, are of far greater concern to Ankara than a diminished Iran. To be clear, although the Turkish ruling elite and the public are not pleased with Tehran's domestic and regional policies, they would not favor regime change in Iran — especially if it were to come at the hands of Israel or the US. The memory of what happened in Iraq and elsewhere remains fresh in the minds of the Turkish people. Relations between Turkiye and Iran have historically been far from harmonious and, in recent years, tensions have increased due to sharp divergences on Iraq, Syria, Lebanon and even the South Caucasus. However, Ankara has managed to compartmentalize its relationship with Iran, adopting a pragmatic and less confrontational approach. Even while navigating its complex relationship with Israel, this approach has helped Turkiye avoid direct confrontation. The unprecedented escalation of tensions is of far greater concern to Ankara than a diminished Iran Dr. Sinem Cengiz For Ankara, current Israeli policies pose greater risks than Iran's, particularly as Tehran has already lost significant influence in Syria following the fall of the Assad regime. While Israel takes a confrontational stance toward Iran, Turkiye prefers cautious engagement. While Turkiye seeks stability in Syria after decades of turmoil, Israel — through its airstrikes and ground incursions — appears to favor a weakened Syria. And while Turkiye advocates for Palestinian statehood and an end to the war in Gaza, Israel opposes both. Amid such a contentious climate between Turkiye and Israel, in an increasingly disorderly region, the US factor becomes highly significant. As a NATO member and part of the Western security architecture, Turkiye maintains strategic ties with Washington, while Israel remains a key American ally. Ankara is keen to avoid tensions with the US administration at this stage — a stance reflected in recent statements from Turkish officials. With the NATO Summit taking place in the Netherlands in the next few days, Erdogan is seeking a meeting with US President Donald Trump and Ankara is working to avoid any deterioration in Turkiye-US relations ahead of the event. However, continued Israeli aggression may cause new fractures in Turkiye's relations with NATO and Western countries. Still, the evolving security dynamics are seriously squeezing Turkiye's room for maneuver. Sharing a long border with Iran makes it particularly vulnerable to the fallout from this conflict. Turkiye is not only geographically close, but it is also central to this conflict in terms of energy, security and diplomacy. Therefore, the Israel-Iran war raises serious military and strategic responsibilities for Turkiye. Defense Minister Yasar Guler stated on Wednesday that Turkiye had increased security measures along its border with Iran. Although no official figures have been released, reports suggest there has been a growing flow of people traveling from Iran into Turkiye. Erdogan announced that Turkiye would soon deploy new air defense systems and increase its stock of medium- and long-range missiles to a deterrent level following Israel's attacks on Iran. He said: 'We have made, and are making, preparations for every possible negative development and scenario.' Among the risks Turkiye faces are not only regional instability and growing security threats, but also rising energy prices, the risk of sabotage targeting natural gas pipeline infrastructure, and increasing vulnerabilities along foreign trade routes. Continued Israeli aggression may cause new fractures in Turkiye's relations with NATO and Western countries Dr. Sinem Cengiz Within the domestic sphere, opposition parties also appear to be aligned with Turkiye's position. Main opposition party leader Ozgur Ozel said he will attend the Solidarity with Palestine Rally organized in Istanbul on Sunday to condemn Israel, expressing that he expects 'the strongest reaction' from the government. At this critical juncture, Turkiye's only viable option is to push for regional diplomacy. Erdogan has declared that Turkiye is ready to mediate an end to the Iran-Israel conflict. However, due to its geographic proximity and the complexity of its relations with Israel, Turkiye's traditional mediation policy may not be as easily applied here as it was in the Russia-Ukraine war. The absence of ambassador-level relations with Israel makes communication more difficult and hampers Turkiye's potential mediation role. In this case, Turkiye may try to leverage its relationships with countries that have better ties with Israel — such as Azerbaijan and the UAE — to pressure the Israeli government to bring an end to this seemingly endless war. Geography cannot be changed and Turkiye has historically paid a high price for being neighbors with unstable states. While things have slowly started to improve in Iraq and Syria after decades of instability, it is now Iran posing a challenge for Turkiye at its doorstep, but it is Israel in the broader region. An Israel-Iran war is a multidimensional test for Turkiye — one that demands the careful reevaluation of every pillar of policy: energy security, border control, diplomacy and regional strategy. • Dr. Sinem Cengiz is a Turkish political analyst who specializes in Turkiye's relations with the Middle East. X: @SinemCngz
