Vadra skips ED summons again, cites court's permission to travel abroad

Robert Vadra, the businessman husband of Congress MP Priyanka Gandhi Vadra, skipped his scheduled deposition before the Enforcement Directorate for the second time in a money laundering case linked to UK-based arms consultant Sanjay Bhandari, official sources said on Tuesday.
Vadra's lawyer said his client was travelling abroad with the "prior" permission of the court to attend his daughter's graduation ceremony.
He was asked to appear on Tuesday (June 17) after he failed to do so on June 10. The federal probe agency may issue him a fresh date after examining his reply.
The permission to travel (on June 17) was obtained well before the service of the latest summons and an intimation has been sent to the ED also, advocate Suman Jyoti Khaitan said.
"Mr Vadra has repeatedly stated that he is available to extend his fullest cooperation with the ED as he has done on all prior occasions, both upon his return from abroad and also for recording his statement through video conference during his stay abroad if required by them," he said.
The businessman had skipped the June 10 summons saying he had flu-like symptoms on June 9 and had undertaken a Covid test as per protocol.
The agency is understood to be summoning Vadra to record his statement under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) and subsequently file a charge sheet in the case.
The federal probe agency had questioned the businessman for three consecutive days in April in a separate money laundering case linked to alleged irregularities in a 2008 land deal in Haryana. He is being investigated in three money laundering cases by the ED.
Bhandari (63), an alleged associate of Vadra, fled to London in 2016, soon after the Income Tax Department raided him in Delhi.
A UK court earlier this month refused an application filed by the Indian government seeking permission to appeal in Britain's Supreme Court against the discharge of Bhandari in an extradition case, virtually ruling out chances of him being brought to the country to face the law.
The ED filed a charge sheet in this case in 2023, alleging that Bhandari acquired the 12, Bryanston Square house in London in 2009 and got it renovated "as per the directions of Robert Vadra, who provided the funds for the renovation".
Vadra has denied that he owns any London property directly or indirectly.
Terming the charges a "political witch hunt", Vadra said he was being "hounded and harassed" to subserve political ends.
The ED is also investigating Vadra in a separate money laundering case linked to alleged financial irregularities in a land deal in Rajasthan's Bikaner.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Time of India

29 minutes ago

• Time of India

Next-gen netas add flavour to old jaat-paat politics in battle for Bihar

Family Drama: The romance saga involving Lalu's older son Tej Pratap Yadav (right) has become a political issue. It has also created a rift with brother Tejashwi The forthcoming 2025 Bihar assembly election promises to be interesting in many ways. First, it is shaping up to be an election dominated by youth—or, at least, by leaders who are being projected as 'youthful' by their parties. Leaders like RJD chief Tejashwi Yadav , Lok Janshakti Party (Ram Vilas) chief Chirag Paswan, Deputy CM Samrat Choudhary, election strategist-turned-politician Prashant Kishor, former Bihar CM Jitan Ram Manjhi's son Santosh Kumar Suman, and the UK-return Pushpam Priya Choudhary are actively holding public rallies and campaigning across Bihar's villages, towns, and bastis. Although most of these leaders are aged between 35 and 55, many young voters in Bihar identify with them. They are seen as relatively fresh, energetic alternatives to older politicians, and not 'phunka hua teer' (a spent, ineffective arrow) or 'chala hua khokha' (an empty, fired shell of a bullet), colloquial jabs that youth often use to describe those past their political prime. Still, this is less a break from the past than a rebranding of it. Except for Kishor, most of these contenders are inheritors of political legacies—sons and daughters stepping into dynastic shoes. There is also speculation that Nishant Kumar, the son of Bihar chief minister Nitish Kumar, may contest because of concerns over his father's health. This generational churn reflects Bihar's demographic reality: according to Census data, 57% of its population is under 25—the highest proportion of young people in the country. That youth bulge is beginning to reshape the political conversation. Second, adding a dramatic subplot to the political theatre is the ongoing family saga involving Tej Pratap Yadav, the elder son of Lalu Prasad Yadav. In a twist worthy of a prime-time soap opera, Tej Pratap recently declared his love for Anushka Yadav on social media, claiming a 12-year-long relationship—despite still being married to Aishwarya Rai, the granddaughter of former CM Daroga Prasad Rai. Though he later claimed his Facebook account was hacked and the photos doctored, Lalu responded by expelling his son from the RJD for six years, citing 'irresponsible behaviour' and actions 'not in accordance with our family values and traditions.' This is no longer just a private family 'affair'—it has entered the political sphere and is likely to influence the election discourse. The controversy has triggered heated inter-generational debates across Bihar, especially between youth and parents in rural and urban areas. Some critics seized the opportunity to question the moral character and family values of RJD, framing the situation as an injustice against Tej Pratap's estranged wife Aishwarya Rai. While many RJD leaders have been on the defensive, some have pointed to similar precedents—such as Ram Vilas Paswan's second marriage — to argue for personal freedom. Among young voters, opinion is split. Some, especially those under-25 voters, seem to sympathise with Tej Pratap and feel Lalu was unnecessarily harsh on his son. Others, particularly in rural Bihar, are uncomfortable with the spectacle and the social media melodrama, especially given the unresolved allegations of domestic abuse from his marriage to Aishwarya. Beyond the controversy, this younger (or young-adjacent) generation of politicians does appear to have injected new energy into the campaign. Their social media battles are flashier, complete with rap tracks and viral videos. More significantly, they are foregrounding issues such as employment, education, youth welfare, public health, and development. Tejashwi Yadav—who focused on unemployment and migration in the 2020 campaign—has promised a 100% domicile policy and job opportunities for locals if voted to power. Prashant Kishor, too, has laid out a vision aimed at reversing Bihar's migration crisis and boosting employment. This shift signals a possible transformation in Bihar's political culture—one that may be inching away from traditional identity politics toward more development-centric narratives. Still, it would be naïve to assume that jaat-paat no longer matters; parties know full well how caste arithmetic can make or break electoral fortunes. No surprise then that, besides nationalism, the NDA is expected to counter the Mahagathbandan's narrative by focusing on its own initiative to include caste data in the upcoming national Census. In a state as politically fragmented as Bihar, it's tough to tell which of these leaders or coalitions will get the upper hand. But what's clear is that the voices and aspirations of young Biharis will dominate the discourse—by sheer demographic force, if nothing else. And in the background, the saga of Tej Pratap Yadav will likely continue to echo through the campaign— reminiscent of the age-old tota-maina stories with love, loyalty and betrayal. Narayan is director, G B Pant Social Science Institute

Indian Express

31 minutes ago

• Indian Express

CBI raids in Bihar, Jharkhand in Rs 100 crore GST fraud; customs officers in the dock

The CBI on Saturday searched seven locations in Bihar and Jharkhand in connection with a `100-crore scam, allegedly executed by claiming GST through bogus export bills. Five customs officers, including the additional commissioner GST, Patna, have been named in the fraud, officials said. The CBI conducted searches at two locations in Patna, two in Purnea, and one each in Jamshedpur, Nalanda, and Munger, finding seven bars of gold, each weighing 100 grams, they said. The scam was unearthed when an abnormal increase in exports of tiles and automobile parts to Nepal was noticed in Land Customs Stations (LCS) in Jaynagar, Bhimnagar and Bhittamore during 2022-23, officials said. According to the CBI FIR, around 30 exporters have been named in it, having been accused of showing fake export of tiles and automobile spare parts from the three LCS to get tax refund from the GST office. It is alleged that four customs superintendents — Neeraj Kumar and Manmohan Sharma in Jayanagar, and Tarun Kumar Sinha and Rajeev Ranjan Sinha in Bhimnagar — colluded with Additional Commissioner Ranvijay Kumar to extract tax refunds against fake export claims, in return for bribes. All officials, along with 30 suspected exporters, and a Kolkata-based clearing agent, Ganga Singh, have been named in the FIR as accused. The agency has alleged that fake export bills were created for amounts less than `10 lakh, which is the highest amount that a customs superintendent is allowed to clear. The CBI FIR alleged that, in all, fake exports to the tune of `800 crore were shown by these superintendents with goods carrying GST duties of 28% and 18%, two of the higher GST slabs, which enabled them to claim refunds of around `100 crore. The investigation also showed that the firms were not functioning from their registered address. The abnormal increase in exports was allegedly ignored by Ranvijay Kumar, who gave 'oral instructions' to the superintendents to process Let Export Order (LEO) in respect of shipping bills. Besides this, he allegedly used to pass the details of fake exports to be processed at these LCS either directly or through Ganga Singh, the CBI said.

Indian Express

an hour ago

• Indian Express

Doctor booked for facilitating illegal stay of two Uzbek women, performing plastic surgery without formalities

A case has been registered against a Lucknow-based doctor for allegedly facilitating the illegal stay of two women from Uzbekistan and performing plastic surgery on them without completing the required formalities, police said. The women did not possess valid passports or visas, the police said, claiming they lost the documents two years ago. Besides Dr Vivek Gupta, the police have filed the FIR against Thrijin Raj alias Arjun Rana, a native of Kerala residing in Lucknow on rent, for also allegedly arranging accommodation for the two women. The matter came to light following a tip-off from the Foreigners Regional Registration Office (FRRO), Lucknow, after which the police raided a flat and found the two Uzbekistan women staying illegally. Dr Gupta is accused of performing plastic surgery on the women to help alter their identity, allegedly without completing the necessary documentation and legal formalities. An FIR has been lodged against Dr Vivek Gupta and Thrijin Raj alias Arun Rana at the Sushant Golf City police station. The case has been filed under section 318 (4) (cheating) of the BNS. Police also invoked the Foreigners Act against accused, said a police officer. When contacted, Sushant Golf City Station House Officer Upendra Singh said that no arrests have been made in the case so far. According to police, they received a tip-off from the FRRO, Lucknow, on Friday, stating that foreign nationals were staying illegally in a flat without informing the FRRO, local police, or administrative authorities. A police team raided the flat and found two foreign women living there. The women identified themselves as Holida and Nilofar and claimed that their passport and visa documents were lost after they arrived in India. Police have not ruled out the possibility of the foreign nationals being involved in illegal or suspicious activities. When asked to provide a copy of the lost documents, the women claimed they had informed their associate, Lola Kayumova, to file a complaint but had no knowledge of whether she actually did so. They further alleged that Lola, who has been living in India for some time, had facilitated their and others' arrival in the country. They also stated that it was through Lola that they were introduced to Dr. Vivek Gupta, who runs hospitals at two locations and had performed plastic surgery-related procedures on them. The women claimed Lola later introduced them to Arjun Rana, who lives in a separate rented accommodation. They alleged that both Arjun Rana and Dr. Vivek Gupta were responsible for arranging their stay in Lucknow.