This is no way to run a country. DOGE's reckless actions aren't the solution

I'm angry. In Citizens Climate Lobby (an organization that I volunteer with), we play by the rules. We work with the public and with our members of Congress to find common ground so that Congress will pass laws that make our country a better place to live.
Polluters pay for impacts of their pollution on others, and those impacted by the pollution are compensated with payments ultimately coming from polluters.
The rules don't seem to matter anymore. The Trump administration is proceeding with its dismantling of the federal government regardless of the laws appropriating funds and directing the executive branch to implement them.
They are proceeding at a pace so rapid that the courts cannot keep up with them. By the time the courts have ruled (almost always against them), the damage has been done and won't easily be repaired, even if the Trump administration complies with court rulings. So far, the record of compliance has not been encouraging.
Yes, there is massive fraud in government. People cheat on taxes to the tune of hundreds of billions of dollars a year. There was at least $9 billion in fraud when 4 trillion dollars was rapidly dispersed during the Covid pandemic.
Yes, there is waste. The waste by the U.S. military is so great that no one knows how much it is.
The solution is not to gut the government. Identifying fraud and waste is hard work. It takes skilled investigators care and time to set up processes that catch fraud and waste.
Gutting government just makes it less risky to cheat on taxes, less likely to identify waste, and harder to distribute government funds to the people who need it or will deliver the services we expect.
If someone claiming to be serious about fraud and waste fires the people who are skilled at identifying it, they are lying. They are inviting more fraud and waste.
Moreover, federal employment is only 6.6% of federal spending. Most federal spending is on payments to those who've either paid into social security and medicare or have the unfortunate inability to support themselves, on payments for vital services such as national defense and domestic security, or on payments on the federal debt.
If we automate every government function and fire every worker, government spending would decline by only 6.6%. That's not nothing, but we can't automate every government function.
Further reductions in spending would require painful reductions in payments for social security, medicare, medicaid, defense, and foreign aid. Congress makes those decisions, not the Executive branch.
If we are truly serious about reducing government waste and fraud and making it more efficient, let's apply the skill of a surgeon to government, investing in teams to automate processes that distribute funds and identify waste and fraud (ironically, one of the teams doing that was terminated by DOGE). But we must recognize that many of those government functions cannot be fully automated.
We do have a federal deficit problem. Democrats love to spend. Republicans hate taxes. If someone claiming to be serious about the deficit focuses only on restraining spending or only on increasing taxes, they are lying. Any serious attempt to address the deficit will both reduce spending and increase taxes. Extending the 2017 tax cuts is unsustainable without very painful cuts in foreign and domestic federal spending. How much must people suffer so that we can have our beloved tax cuts?
I'm angry. Our government is being dismantled, not because that is what most people voted for, not because it's reducing fraud and waste, not because it's going to reduce the federal deficit. It's being dismantled so most of us can pay 1-2% less in federal taxes and are free to pollute without paying for its impacts. Is that what you want? Tell your representatives in Congress what you want.
Climate scientist Steve Ghan leads the Tri-Cities chapter of Citizens Climate Lobby.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Yahoo

17 minutes ago

• Yahoo

Iran has little choice but to retaliate against US - as Russia faces urgent decision on how to back Tehran

Donald Trump's decision to attack Iran could trigger a wider regional or even global war, but much will hinge on how Russia and China - Tehran's most powerful allies - respond. Abbas Araghchi, the Iranian foreign minister, said he will hold "serious consultations" with Vladimir Putin on Monday morning in Moscow. His country is also in contact with Beijing. Israel-Iran live: 'Incredible success' of US strikes on Iran hailed by Hegseth Russia, China, Iran, and North Korea are regarded by Western allies as a new axis of authoritarian powers, increasingly aligned and supportive of each other. Donald Trump, though, has broken ranks from his country's traditional democratic partners to forge a closer relationship with Mr Putin than any other US leader in recent years. How much that might affect the Kremlin's calculations, as Moscow weighs up how to respond to his actions in Iran, adds a new layer of unpredictability to the crisis. Another limiting factor is the Russian military's physical capacity - should it wish - to bolster Iran with military support given its war in Ukraine. Unlike the NATO alliance, there is no formal agreement between Moscow, Beijing, Tehran, and Pyongyang to come to each other's assistance in a crisis. However, the weakening of one member of the quartet would impact on the vital national interests of the other three, making it mutually beneficial to help each other out - including with military force or at the very least by supplying weapons. Iran has little choice but to retaliate directly against the United States after three of its main nuclear facilities were struck overnight. But its ability to launch ballistic missiles and drones has been severely degraded by waves of Israeli strikes since Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu went to war with Iran a week and a half ago. Read more: What are Iran's options? US bases, warships, and aircraft across the region are well within range of Iranian missiles and drones, but the Pentagon has significantly strengthened its air defences in anticipation of an Iranian counterattack. There are plenty of softer targets, though, such as American embassies or other diplomatic missions. Iran could also choose to mine the Strait of Hormuz - a move that would have global ramifications by disrupting the flow of large amounts of oil and gas, as well as other trade. In addition, the military assets of American allies could be viewed as legitimate targets. The UK has said it played no part in the US attack. But Britain's Ministry of Defence has further increased "force protection" measures for its military bases and personnel in the Middle East to their highest level in the wake of the US strikes, it is understood. What was hit in US attack? In an operation that has been in the planning for years, American B-2 stealth bombers dropped enormous bunker-busting bombs - the GBU-57 Massive Ordnance Penetrator - on the Fordow nuclear fuel enrichment plant, around 70 miles (110km) southwest of Tehran. It was built under a mountain - about 80 to 90 metres beneath the ground - to be beyond the reach of Israel's armed forces. Only the US Air Force carries munitions large enough to penetrate the rock, earth and concrete to inflict meaningful damage. Also targeted with the enormous munitions was Iran's main uranium enrichment facility at Natanz, 155 miles (250km) southeast of the Iranian capital. In addition, US submarines launched TLAM cruise missiles against Natanz and at a site outside the city of Isfahan, which is 260 miles (420km) south of Tehran. Near-bomb-grade nuclear fuel is thought to be stored here. The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), the UN's nuclear watchdog, however, said the six buildings at Isfahan that were hit contained little or no nuclear material. Mr Trump has said he ordered the attack to destroy Iran's ability to enrich uranium to a level that could be used to make a nuclear bomb. Tehran has always insisted its nuclear programme is purely for civilian purposes. Analysts warn, though, that it would be very difficult to stop the Iranian nuclear programme through military action alone and that such a move may spur Iran to accelerate efforts to make a bomb if it has managed to protect key components. The Russian foreign ministry on Sunday strongly condemned the American strikes against Iranian nuclear sites as a "dangerous escalation" that could further undermine "regional and global security". "The risk of an escalation of conflict in the Middle East already beset by multiple crises, has increased significantly," it said in a statement. Last week, the Russian government warned the US against joining Israel's war in Iran, saying this "would be an extremely dangerous step with truly unpredictable negative consequences". The remarks came after Mr Putin held a call with his Chinese counterpart, Xi Jinping. It means the Russian government in particular - given Tehran's military support to Moscow in the Russian invasion of Ukraine - faces an urgent decision about how to support Ali Khamenei, Iran's supreme leader, whose very existence is under threat from Israel.

Fox News

17 minutes ago

• Fox News

AOC, other angry Democrats, call for Trump impeachment over attack on Iran

Progressive champion Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and a handful of other Democrats quickly floated the prospect of impeaching President Donald Trump for launching a military strike on Iran without Congressional authorization. "The President's disastrous decision to bomb Iran without authorization is a grave violation of the Constitution and Congressional War Powers," the four-term congresswoman from New York wrote on social media Saturday night, soon after the president announced the attack on Iran's nuclear facilities. Ocasio-Cortez charged that Trump "has impulsively risked launching a war that may ensnare us for generations. It is absolutely and clearly grounds for impeachment." Democrat Rep. Sean Casten of Illinois also argued that the president's order to bomb Iran's nuclear sites without seeking Congressional approval could be considered an "unambiguous impeachable offense." Casten, a four-term representative whose district covers southwestern Chicago and surrounding suburbs, wrote Saturday night on social media that "this is not about the merits of Iran's nuclear program….to be clear, I do not dispute that Iran is a nuclear threat." But he highlighted that "no president has the authority to bomb another country that does not pose an imminent threat to the US without the approval of Congress. This is an unambiguous impeachable offense." "I'm not saying we have the votes to impeach," Casten added. "I'm saying that you DO NOT do this without Congressional approval." The calls for impeachment are the most visible, and furthest reaching, representation of the party's anger with Trump for taking unilateral action against Iran. House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries of New York, the top Democrat in the chamber, wrote that the president had "failed to seek congressional authorization for the use of military force and risks American entanglement in a potentially disastrous war in the Middle East." "Donald Trump shoulders complete and total responsibility for any adverse consequences that flow from his unilateral military action," Jeffries added in a statement. While the executive branch technically doesn't have the legal authority to order a foreign military attack without the approval of Congress, previous presidents, including Bill Clinton, Barack Obama and Trump during his first term, launched comparable military actions in Libya, Sudan, Afghanistan and Iran. Congress has not actually declared war since 1941, following the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor during World War II, and legal scholars have long been divided on whether the president has the authority to unilaterally launch a military strike.

Bloomberg

18 minutes ago

• Bloomberg

Senate Can Keep Ban on State AI Rules in Trump Tax Bill

A Republican effort to block US states from enforcing new artificial intelligence regulations will remain in President Donald Trump's massive tax and spending package for now, marking a win for tech companies pushing to stall and override dozens of AI safety laws across the country. In a surprise decision, Democrats said the Senate parliamentarian ruled the provision aligns with the special budgetary process Republicans are using to consider the tax package. That process allows the GOP to avoid making concessions to Democrats, who otherwise could filibuster legislation.