Pixel Watch fans can now activate their cellular watches on Visible's prepaid network
Edgar Cervantes / Android Authority
TL;DR Visible is finally adding support for the cellular version of the Pixel Watch 2 or newer.
The carrier will not sell the watch directly, but you will be able to easily bring your own.
Watch support requires Visible Plus Pro, or a $10 add-on for Basic and Plus subscribers.
US consumers were previously fairly limited if they were a fan of the Google Pixel Watch and preferred a cellular model. While all three major postpaid carriers fully supported it, only a few prepaid brands did, including US Mobile and Google Fi. Now you can add one more to the list, as Visible has officially announced support for the Pixel Watch 2 or newer.
Visible has long supported the Apple Watch, so this change is welcome news for Pixel Watch fans seeking additional prepaid choices. In fact, Visible frequently ranks as my top recommendation among all carriers.
o use your Google Pixel Watch with Visible, you'll need to subscribe to Visible Plus Pro for $40 per month or pay an additional $10 per month to add smartwatch support to either Visible Plus or Basic plans. While Visible doesn't sell the Google Pixel Watch directly, it makes it easy to bring your own device.
While it's great that Visible has expanded beyond Apple Watch compatibility, I am curious why the Samsung Galaxy Watch family wasn't included. After all, both are popular Android-based options that could help attract a wider customer base. Nonetheless, Visible's ongoing expansion of device compatibility is a positive step, and hopefully, its smartwatch support will eventually match the extensive range available directly from Verizon.
Got a tip? Talk to us! Email our staff at
Email our staff at news@androidauthority.com . You can stay anonymous or get credit for the info, it's your choice.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Android Authority
13 hours ago
- Android Authority
Fastmail replaced my Gmail and I'm never going back
Nathan Drescher / Android Authority I had the digital equivalent of an epiphany the other day. I opened my inbox and saw…email. Only email. There were no ads, no AI-generated summaries, and no prompts. It was a strange, yet welcome, feeling after years of using Gmail. Checking my inbox no longer felt like an argument with an algorithm. That's because I switched to Fastmail earlier this year. It all began when I started distancing myself from American big tech platforms, where Google sits high on the list. I wanted something more private and more personal, with less bloat. Fastmail, an Australian company, caught my eye as a well-regarded alternative to Gmail. Six months in, I am confident I made the right choice. Would you leave Gmail for something more private? 0 votes Yes, already have. NaN % I'm thinking about it. NaN % Maybe, if Gmail gets worse. NaN % No, I'm staying with Google. NaN % Why I left Gmail and Google Calendar Nathan Drescher / Android Authority It wasn't only because Gmail is part of a big monopolistic American tech corporation. It wasn't only the insane amounts of data it collected. It was the cluttered UI and the push towards AI-driven features I never asked for. Google Calendar, meanwhile, does its job, but has begun to feel like it's trying to be something more than it is. Gemini is snooping more and more in Calendar, trying to be helpful but getting in the way. All of it felt more corporate than personal. What I wanted was a fast, private email that respected my time and let me work. I wanted a calendar that synced reliably across platforms without becoming another vector for distraction. I seriously considered Proton Mail. I have great respect for what the company is building. However, I have heard from others about occasional delivery hiccups, and I can't afford to miss an interview with a subject or an important follow-up with a client. Reliability was non-negotiable. Proton was out. How Fastmail fits into my daily life Nathan Drescher / Android Authority Fastmail handles all my email needs. The interface is clean and responsive. No tabs, no promotions. Just email. I can choose between a folder or tag structure, and I went with tags. It's one of the things I enjoy about Gmail. The Fastmail app is more than just email. There's a dropdown in the top left that allows me to switch to Calendar, Contacts, Notes, and even a cloud drive. The base plan comes with 50GB of storage, which isn't bad for $60 a year. The built-in calendar has been surprisingly strong. It syncs perfectly with the email side of the app, so appointments and meetings can be quickly added. I can share calendar events with others, even if they don't use Fastmail, and it looks great, as well. The base plan comes with 50GB of storage, which isn't bad for $60 a year. One feature I didn't expect to appreciate so much was the filtering system. I can control exactly how messages are sorted and what gets archived and flagged. It's like Gmail's labels, but with the user in mind. Notes are simple, but they work, and sync instantly between all devices. However, they're not as powerful or quick as Google Keep, so I still use that as my primary notetaking app. That said, I wasn't looking for a notes replacement. What I gained by switching Nathan Drescher / Android Authority The biggest gain in my life has been peace of mind. Fastmail isn't tracking me. My messages aren't being profiled, and Fastmail isn't trying to sell me anything. I pay it once a year, and it delivers my emails. I also gained reliability. Everything feels faster, with messages loading instantly and folders responding immediately. The search works great. There's no AI engine or smart features getting in the way. There's no AI engine or smart features getting in the way. Nathan Drescher Fastmail gives me control. I have control over my email and my calendar, and I can decide how things look and behave. That kind of ownership is preciously rare in modern digital services. Of course, there are still limits Nathan Drescher / Android Authority Nothing is perfect. Notes are barebones, and like I said, I don't use it often. It's certainly not a replacement for Keep. There's no deep integration with voice assistants, which could be a dealbreaker for some. I'm okay with it myself. There's also a learning curve when it comes to setting it up. I use a custom domain and had to mess around with my host's MX records, something I know little about. Once set up, however, it stayed out of the way. And it's not free. In this case, I'm happy to pay for something that works. I don't like being the product, after all. Fastmail gives me what I want Nathan Drescher / Android Authority It's a private and reliable alternative to Google's suite of apps. Sure, it doesn't have all the AI bells and whistles, but I see that as a selling point. I still use Google Keep, and I'm fine with that. I didn't set out to replace it, and the built-in notes feature that comes with Fastmail is more of an added bonus than a core feature for me. This was about finding tools that weren't American and respected my time and privacy. Fastmail has done exactly that. Fastmail is more than capable if you're looking to step away from the big tech oligopolies. You don't need to sacrifice usability, because Fastmail isn't trying to be clever. It just does its job well.
Android Authority
13 hours ago
- Android Authority
This new Chrome feature has forever changed the way I shop online
Ryan Haines / Android Authority As an avid runner in the middle of marathon training, I go through a lot of shoes — like, a lot of shoes. When averaging 50 miles per week, I can burn through a pair in a little over a month, and then it's time to treat myself. That said, I'm not made of money. I can't just run out and pay full price every time I need fresh foam under my feet. So, I have to be careful about looking for deals and spending wisely. And now, a new Chrome extension has made that easier than ever. Here's how. Chrome keeps tabs on my tabs for me Ryan Haines / Android Authority The idea of an extension to track product prices in a web browser is nothing new. My colleague Rita praised the popular Amazon tracker CamelCamelCamel when she asked me if I'd tried Google's version. At the time, I hadn't given Google's shopping insights a shot yet, but I'd used (and liked) the version that Microsoft introduced to Edge a while back. The only problem is that I mostly work on a MacBook Air, and the last thing I need is a third browser kicking around. When I found out that Google had added a similar feature to Chrome, which I use across my Android phone of the week and my laptop, I was ready to try it out. And, as it turns out, the setup process couldn't be more straightforward — open a product page, tap the Track Price button, and wait to see how it fluctuates over time. Naturally, I took it as a sign to monitor about half a dozen running shoes. I always liked Edge's shopping insights, but they're much more useful on Chrome... because I actually use it. See, right now, I'm in the market for a faster daily trainer that I can use for a few workouts. That means a relatively new launch like the Adidas AdiZero Evo SL, New Balance Rebel v5, or the Asics Novablast 5. So, I opened all their product pages, added the Skechers Aero Spark for good measure, and set up my price tracking reminders. At this point, I've only been following my selected footwear for about a week, so there hasn't been much movement. That said, a few of the shoes — the Evo SL and the Aero Spark — have been on the market for long enough that they've gained pricing history. I can slide along a timeline for both shoes, noting when they've been discounted and hoping for new deals. Would you use a Google-based shopping tracker? 0 votes Yes, I use shopping insights in Chrome already NaN % No, I use another shopping tracker NaN % No, I'm not interested NaN % Different tasks for different screens Ryan Haines / Android Authority As an elder member of Gen-Z, I've reserved different screens in my life for different purposes — or rather, purchases. Basically, the more important the product, the bigger the screen I have to buy it on. Surprisingly, it seems like Google feels the same way. For me, price tracking on my phone is mainly reserved for monitoring how much something will cost. I probably won't go through the checkout process on my Pixel, but I'll always know what I'm about to pay. With Google's price tracking in Chrome, that's perfectly fine. If you have tracked products open in other tabs, whenever you go to the Switch Tabs menu, you'll see a quick pricing badge pop up, indicating either a price increase or decrease that you can reference quickly. When you're ready to buy, it seems like Google would rather you switch to a medium screen like a Chromebook or Windows laptop. I say so because instead of throwing out price change badges, Chrome for desktop offers discount badges. When you see one, you can easily copy and paste the discount code to your cart, taking some guesswork from checking sites like RetailMeNot or SimplyCodes. I've yet to see one of these coveted discount codes, though, probably because I'm looking for relatively new running shoes. Also, as expected, Google treats iOS and iPadOS like Android in terms of shopping insights. Both platforms get price alerts and easy history tracking over discounts, which is helpful for research purposes before you open the same tab on your laptop to finish the job. How much tracking is too much? Ryan Haines / Android Authority Unfortunately, though, I think Google's shopping insights are sometimes a bit too focused. In this extended running shoe example that you're probably tired of reading about — as are many of my friends — it's pretty clear that I've narrowed down which models I'm interested in. However, I'm not nearly as picky when it comes to colors, so I've just been setting up tracking notifications for the first colorway that pops up. Sometimes it's fine, like the Novablast 5 that defaulted to an easy-to-wear beige I won't mind dirtying up. Other times, it's not so easy. I opened the product page for the Adidas Evo SL in a bright yellow colorway — think as neon as a middle school boy would wear — and set up notifications right away. At first, I thought nothing of it, figuring Chrome would also track the other colorways on Adidas's website. I was wrong. At least with shoes, when you set up notifications for one colorway, that's all you get — and only from that site. I would much prefer to know if another colorway dropped so I could consider it, or even be sent to another retailer, but that's not how Google rolls right now. And, with how I carefully research before buying, it looks like I'll have two dozen tracking insights set up before I buy a new pair of shoes. Is that too many? Yes, probably, but at least I know I'll get the best price along the way.
Tom's Guide
14 hours ago
- Tom's Guide
5 reasons why the Garmin Venu X1 could be my new favorite Apple Watch Ultra 2 alternative
Garmin has officially declared war on Apple with the launch of the Garmin Venu X1, a square-shaped wellness-tracking powerhouse with an enormous AMOLED screen, slender titanium case and several high-end smartwatch bells and whistles. In short, it looks a whole lot like an Apple Watch Ultra 2 with a similarly heady price tag to match: $799. Full disclosure: I've yet to get the Venu X1 on my wrist — my colleague Nick has — but based on specs and initial impressions alone, Garmin's new sporty smartwatch seems to have a lot going for it. Will it be enough to lure away prospective Apple Watch Ultra 2 customers? It could be! As someone who reviews smartwatches for a living, I field a lot of questions from folks considering ditching their Apple Watch for something new. While their biggest Apple Watch complaint is regarding battery life… or lack thereof, a deficiency of advanced fitness tracking and training tools is another criticism I hear a lot. That, and a shortage of support for nuanced workout types. While Garmin watches don't have nearly as many third-party apps and smart features found on the best Apple Watch models, they generally excel when it comes to battery longevity, holistic tracking reliability and high-end exercise features. The brand also supports well over a hundred workout types, including everything from disc golf to boxing. Prior to the X1, Garmin already had solid alternatives for the Apple Watch Series 10 with the Garmin Venu 3, and the Apple Watch SE (2022) with the Garmin Vivoactive series. Now, the Kansas-based brand has a potentially worthy model to take on Cupertino's premier flagship. With that in mind, here are the five biggest things the Garmin Venu X1 has going for it, along with three things that could potentially hold it back from competing with the Apple Watch Ultra 2. Not only is this Garmin's first high-end smartwatch with a square face, but the screen, which stretches from bezel edge to bezel edge, is the brand's largest ever. In fact, it's slightly bigger than even the Apple Watch Ultra 2's display. Garmin doesn't provide max brightness figures for devices, but 2,000 nits is a likely bet. That's not quite as bright as the Ultra 2's 3,000 nit max brightness figure, but it's still impressive and means that the X1 will be visible even in very bright light. At just 7.9mm, this is also Garmin's thinnest smartwatch case to date. Compare that to the Apple Watch Ultra 2's 14.4mm case depth, and suddenly it feels downright clunky. Fortunately, despite the thin case, my colleague Nick reports that it feels anything but flimsy on the wrist. On a similar note, the sapphire crystal offers peace of mind when it comes to screen protection. By the way, at 9.7mm in thickness, even the latest Apple Watch Series 10 isn't as thin as the Venu X1. For its price, the Garmin Venu X1 ought to sport Garmin's latest and greatest holistic sensor tech. Thankfully, it does, which means you're getting equally as reliable (if not more) heart rate data from the X1. Garmin's sleep tracking insights are also the best in the biz, and more detailed and actionable, IMHO, than Apple's. Plus, Garmin's workout training and recovery tools blow Cupertino's out of the water. And that's not an opinion. That's a fact. Like the Garmin Instinct 3, the sporty, new Venu X1 has a built-in LED flashlight, something you won't find on any Apple Watch. Tucked into the top of the case, the nifty onboard 'torch' has an adjustable output and can be set to white or red light. Perfect for late-night dog walks and finding items in a darkened bedroom without waking a sleeping partner, this is a feature I truly wish Apple (and Google and Samsung, etc.) would rip off and add to their own devices. The best Garmin watches aren't exactly known for their smart features. While most higher-end Garmins offer the basics, like onboard music storage, NFC payments and mirrored smartphone notifications, that tends to be where the list ends. The Venu X1 offers a bit more. It isn't Garmin's first smartwatch with an onboard microphone and speaker, but it's a nice addition for folks who want to take phone calls from the wrist, as you would with an Apple Watch Ultra 2. Of course, Garmin doesn't offer cellular connectivity on any of the brand's smartwatches, so you'll need to have a paired phone nearby to make the most of the mic and speaker. While the Garmin Venu X1 has a lot going for it against the Apple Watch Ultra 2, battery life is one area it doesn't impress. Sure, in smartwatch mode, you can get up to eight days of usage, but that drops to just two days when using the always-on screen mode. And when using GPS to track an activity, battery life is just 14 hours. By comparison, the Apple Watch Ultra 2 is good for roughly 36 hours in smartwatch mode (or 72 hours in low-power mode) with the always-on display and 12 hours when using GPS to track an activity. Another downside to the Venu X1 compared to the Ultra 2 is that the former doesn't have multiband GPS; the latter does. The advantage of multiband is better tracking reliability, particularly in areas where the sky may be obstructed. Finally, the Garmin Veny X1 has just 50 meters of water resistance. That's enough for brief periods of surface-level swimming but nothing more. The Ultra 2, meanwhile, offers 100 meters of water resistance and is suitable for scuba diving.
