AP conspiring to illegally divert Godavari water to non-basin areas: Harish Rao

HYDERABAD
The Bharat Rashtra Samithi (BRS) has accused the Andhra Pradesh Government of conspiring to 'divert Godavari water on a large-scale, 200 tmc ft a year initially and 400 tmc ft later, to outer basin areas in that State, particularly to the Krishna and Penna basins at the cost of riparian rights of Telangana within the basin'.
'However, our Chief Minister A. Revanth Reddy was keeping mum on the issue, and so were the two Union Miniters G. Kishan Reddy and Bandi Sanjay Kumar,' senior BRS leader and former minister for irrigation T. Harish Rao alleged while making a detailed powerpoint presentation on the Polavaram (Godavari)-Banakacherla (Krishna) Link here on Saturday.
'AP is conspiring for huge water theft without seeking any clearances and approvals, including by the Godavari and Krishna River Management boards (GRMB & KRMB), the Apex Council and statutory agencies such as the Central Water Commission (CWC), GWDT and KWDT and others,' Mr. Harish Rao said.
He added that tenders for the project to be taken up with ₹80,000 crore were being called in the month-end and the Centre had also offered 50% of the funding as part of the interlinking of rivers (ILR) and the remaining as borrowing facility beyond the Fiscal Responsibility and Budget Management (FRBM) limits.
He reminded that the Centre had deducted Telangana's borrowing for the Kaleshwaram project from PFC (Power Finance Corporation) and REC (Rural Electrification Corporation) from FRBM limits.
AP CM Chandrababu Naidu had written to the Centre and CWC against the Kaleshwaram (June 13, 2018) project even after it was given all approvals as an ongoing project in place of Pranahita-Chevella, the BRS leader said. He also wrote against Kalwakurthy LIS, Palamuru-Rangareddy LIS, Bhakta Ramadasu LIS (SRSP tail-end), Tummilla LIS (RDS) and others, all aimed at serving the designed ayacut, to meet shortage of flows in the original plan.
He alleged that AP was conspiring to divert Godavari water to claim rights on it in the future by seeking re-allocation of water by the GWDT (Godavari Water Disputes Tribunal). He stated that Telangana had allowed AP to draw 72.2% of the Krishna water (577 tmc ft) against the adhoc arrangement of 512 tmc ft during the last water year. Similarly, for the first time since its formation Telangana had drawn 244 tmc ft (27.8%) against its adhoc share of 34% (299 tmc ft).
Mr. Harish Rao demanded that the Telangana Government convene and all-party meet to stop exploitation by AP, convene a special session of the Assembly to discuss the issue, move the Supreme Court and also stop lining of the Srisailam Right Main Canal of the Srisailam Right Bank Canal project to allow carry 90,000 cusecs of water from Pothireddypadu Head Regulator (PRP-HR) from the existing 44,000 cusecs.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

The Hindu

3 hours ago

• The Hindu

Prof. Kodandaram of TJS urges Centre to stop Polavaram-Banakacherla link

HYDERABAD Telangana Jana Samithi (TJS) president and MLC Prof. M. Kodandaram has demanded that the Centre stop the Polavaram-Banakacherla Link Canal project taken up by Andhra Pradesh in violation of the AP Reorganisation Act and without the appraisal and approval of the river boards, Apex Council and other statutory agencies. Speaking to newspersons here on Friday, he suggested that the Centre could go ahead with processing the appraisal of the Polavaram-Banakacherla project only after making allocation of water to the ongoing and contemplated projects of Telangana including the future needs in the Godavari Basin or else it would amount to violation of the riparian rights of Telangana. Prof. Kodandaram said neither Bharat Rashtra Samithi (BRS) president K. Chandrasekhar Rao nor his party leaders had any moral right to speak on the Polavaram-Banakacherla project. He also wondered by the Bharatiya Janata Party leaders from the State were keeping silent on the project that was bound to harm the interests of Telangana permanently. Against the allocation of 518 tmcft water to it, AP was already utilising over 630 tmcft, while Telangana was not utilising even half of the 968 tmcft allocated to it in the Godavari Basin. With the Polavaram-Banakacherla project, AP was conspiring to take away over 300 tmcft of water more to the non-basin areas at the cost of basin areas in Telangana. Meanwhile, BRS senior leader T. Harish Rao has criticised Chief Minister A. Revanth Reddy for his comments on the Polavaram-Banakacherla project in Delhi on Friday. He accused the Chief Minister of coming to a tacit understanding with his AP's counterpart and political guru N. Chandrababu Naidu to allow AP to have its way in illegally diverting the Krishna and Godavari waters to the non-basin areas. He pointed out that KCR had been demanding at least 1,950 tmcft water share in the Godavari surplus waters of over 3,000 tmcft in addition to the 968 tmcft of assured water allocated to Telangana by the Godavari Water Disputes Tribunal. Against the BRS demand of 2,918 tmcft, Mr. Revanth Reddy was conspiring to limit Telangana's share to just about 1,000 tmc ft, he alleged. Similarly, Mr. Revanth Reddy was talking about only 500 tmcft share in Krishna waters against 763 tmcft being demanded by KCR all along. Mr. Harish Rao sought to know the rationale behind Mr. Reddy's silence on not demanding the Apex Council meeting on the Polavaram-Banakacherla issue.

The Hindu

3 hours ago

• The Hindu

Manipur districts tense after day of violence

GUWAHATI Two districts of Manipur remained tense on Friday (June 20, 2025), a day after unknown gunmen injured a Meitei farmer and a Kuki woman was shot dead later. A shutdown was observed across the Churachandpur district, dominated by the Kuki-Zo people, to protest the woman's killing. She was identified as Hoikholhing Haokip, the wife of the chief of Langchingmanbi village adjoining the Bishnupur district, where the Meitei farmer was attacked. The Indigenous Tribal Leaders' Forum had called the shutdown, demanding 'immediate action against those responsible for this atrocity, concrete steps from the Centre to ensure the protection of tribal lives and territory, and an independent investigation into the repeated buffer zone violations.' The people of Bishnupur, one of the five districts comprising the Meitei-majority Imphal Valley, continued to block a highway leading to the Churachandpur district. They demanded the arrest of the assailants of farmer Ningthoujam Biren Singh, who was shot in his left arm on Thursday. Earlier, the Manipur Police said the security forces came under fire from unknown armed miscreants after the farmer was shot in Bishnupur's Phubala area. '...the forces retaliated accordingly. During the crossfire, one woman from Langchingmanbi village was found dead with a bullet injury,' it said. Manipur, scarred by the ethnic conflict between the Kuki-Zos and Meiteis, was relatively calm after the imposition of the President's Rule on February 13 this year. More than 250 people had died and some 60,000 were displaced in the clashes that had erupted on May 3, 2023. Also read | Manipur marks two years of ethnic violence by remembering victims Meanwhile, the All Manipur United Clubs' Organisation (AMUCO) condemned the Phubala incident, saying it suspected a conspiracy between the attackers and the security forces. It said the incident happened near a bunker of the Sashastra Seema Bal, whose personnel were inactive. The organisation underlined the importance of holding accountable the security personnel found complicit or negligent, apart from the attackers. 'The people of Manipur express deep dissatisfaction with the Ministry of Home Affairs' performance, as the region continues to grapple with ongoing conflicts and violence despite the government's claims of working towards restoring normalcy,' the AMUCO said. The organisation also questioned the work done by security adviser Kuldiep Singh, who was sent by the Centre to resolve the ongoing crisis plaguing the State.

New Indian Express

3 hours ago

• New Indian Express

Row erupts after J&K CM Abdullah opposes flow of Indus water to Punjab; AAP, Congress, Akali Dal hit back

CHANDIGARH: A row has erupted after Jammu and Kashmir Chief Minister Omar Abdullah opposed the flow of water from the three rivers of the Indus system in Jammu and Kashmir to Punjab, reminding the neighboring state of how it had 'maltreated' J&K for years. Political parties in Punjab including the Aam Aadmi Party, Congress and Shiromani Akali Dal have hit back, saying it's the responsibility of the Centre, which had put the Indus treaty in abeyance, to appropriately distribute the water and give Punjab its rightful share. Reacting to Omar Abdullah's statement that J&K will not give water from the Indus river to Punjab, AAP Punjab spokesperson Neel Garg accused him of deliberately politicizing the issue. Garg said the authority to decide on river waters lies with the Centre and Omar Abdullah cannot take a unilateral decision on the matter. He emphasized that Punjab should also get a share of the Indus water. Garg pointed out that, like Jammu and Kashmir, Punjab is also a border state. Whenever war occurs, Punjab becomes the battleground, and when the country needs food grains, it becomes the granary of the nation. Now that there is water available, Punjab has a legitimate claim over it. "In the process of filling the nation's granaries, we have been deprived of our own water. Now that the Indus Water Treaty has been annulled, Punjab has the primary right over this water because it will not only bring relief to our barren lands but also boost our agriculture. When farmers prosper, the nation prospers," he said. Punjab Congress president Amarinder Singh Raja Warring also criticized Omar, saying it was unbecoming of the JK CM to make such remarks. He regretted that Omar was now trying to politicize the issue and score some brownie points. 'Where will you send the water and where will you divert the canals?' he asked, pointing out that Punjab would be the natural course of flow for the canals. He noted that the statement smacks of partisan political rhetoric.