Prof. Kodandaram of TJS urges Centre to stop Polavaram-Banakacherla link

HYDERABAD
Telangana Jana Samithi (TJS) president and MLC Prof. M. Kodandaram has demanded that the Centre stop the Polavaram-Banakacherla Link Canal project taken up by Andhra Pradesh in violation of the AP Reorganisation Act and without the appraisal and approval of the river boards, Apex Council and other statutory agencies.
Speaking to newspersons here on Friday, he suggested that the Centre could go ahead with processing the appraisal of the Polavaram-Banakacherla project only after making allocation of water to the ongoing and contemplated projects of Telangana including the future needs in the Godavari Basin or else it would amount to violation of the riparian rights of Telangana.
Prof. Kodandaram said neither Bharat Rashtra Samithi (BRS) president K. Chandrasekhar Rao nor his party leaders had any moral right to speak on the Polavaram-Banakacherla project. He also wondered by the Bharatiya Janata Party leaders from the State were keeping silent on the project that was bound to harm the interests of Telangana permanently.
Against the allocation of 518 tmcft water to it, AP was already utilising over 630 tmcft, while Telangana was not utilising even half of the 968 tmcft allocated to it in the Godavari Basin. With the Polavaram-Banakacherla project, AP was conspiring to take away over 300 tmcft of water more to the non-basin areas at the cost of basin areas in Telangana.
Meanwhile, BRS senior leader T. Harish Rao has criticised Chief Minister A. Revanth Reddy for his comments on the Polavaram-Banakacherla project in Delhi on Friday. He accused the Chief Minister of coming to a tacit understanding with his AP's counterpart and political guru N. Chandrababu Naidu to allow AP to have its way in illegally diverting the Krishna and Godavari waters to the non-basin areas. He pointed out that KCR had been demanding at least 1,950 tmcft water share in the Godavari surplus waters of over 3,000 tmcft in addition to the 968 tmcft of assured water allocated to Telangana by the Godavari Water Disputes Tribunal. Against the BRS demand of 2,918 tmcft, Mr. Revanth Reddy was conspiring to limit Telangana's share to just about 1,000 tmc ft, he alleged.
Similarly, Mr. Revanth Reddy was talking about only 500 tmcft share in Krishna waters against 763 tmcft being demanded by KCR all along. Mr. Harish Rao sought to know the rationale behind Mr. Reddy's silence on not demanding the Apex Council meeting on the Polavaram-Banakacherla issue.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Time of India

27 minutes ago

• Time of India

Won't share Indus waters with other states: Omar

JAMMU: Days after Union home minister Amit Shah declared that Indus waters will be taken to Rajasthan's Sri Ganganagar through canals within three years, J&K chief minister Omar Abdullah on Friday opposed sharing such flows with other states. 'I will never allow this (divert water from J&K to other states). Let's use our water for ourselves first,' Omar said when asked about the Centre's proposal for a 113-km canal to redirect surplus waters from Indus, Jhelum and Chenab to Punjab, Haryana and Rajasthan. Shah had announced the canal plan in Madhya Pradesh's Pachmarhi on June 14 against the backdrop of the Centre putting Indus Waters Treaty with Pakistan 'in abeyance' in the aftermath of the April 22 Pahalgam attack. Speaking on the sidelines of an outreach office's inauguration in Jammu on Friday, Omar made it clear that he would not allow any proposal to build a canal and divert surplus water to other states. 'I am not going to give approval. Let us be allowed to use our water first, then we will talk about others,' the J&K chief minister said. Among the three states mentioned in the water-sharing plan, the CM specifically questioned Punjab's inclusion. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Egypt: New Container Houses (Prices May Surprise You) Container House | Search Ads Search Now Undo 'Why should I send water to Punjab? Punjab already has water under Indus Waters Treaty. Did they give us water when we needed it?' Omar said. Among the three states mentioned in the water-sharing plan, the CM specifically questioned Punjab's inclusion. 'Why should I send water to Punjab? Punjab already has water under Indus Waters Treaty. Did they give us water when we needed it?' Omar said. He alleged that Punjab had kept J&K waiting for years on two key projects, Ujh Shahpur Kandi. 'The water of the three rivers is for us. We will use it for ourselves and then think about others,' Omar said. The CM slammed PDP president Mehbooba Mufti and People's Conference chief Sajjad Lone for criticising his National Conference (NC) govt over high reservations in J&K, alleging the two were politicising the issue. 'Where was she when she had the opportunity to raise this issue?' Omar asked. The allusion was to Mehbooba's term as chief minister in coalition with BJP from 2016 to 2018. Omar pointed out that a cabinet sub-committee set up by his government had submitted its report on reservations and the law department was examining it. Asked if his govt would move Supreme Court to have J&K's statehood restored, Omar expressed hope that PM Narendra Modi and the Centre would stand by their commitment on such a move. 'Will see whether we have to go legally or not for statehood but till then, we are waiting for the Prime Minister and home minister (Shah) as they have assured that statehood will be restored,' the CM said.

Time of India

2 hours ago

• Time of India

Productive part of life lost in hunt for govt job, youth told

Panaji: Youth in several states of India are losing the most productive part of their lives taking competitive exams in the hope of securing govt jobs, said Shamika Ravi , a member of the Prime Minister's Economic Advisory Council. She said this fascination with govt jobs is not only skewing the unemployment rate of the country but also creating a scarcity of skilled personnel for manufacturing and corporate sectors. Ravi, who delivered a lecture on Viksit Bharat @2047 at ICG, said that economists have noticed a peculiar trend called graduate unemployment, where youth between the ages of 18 and 29 willingly decide not to work in the hope of the ideal job. 'We do have, in some states of the country particularly, an unusual fascination for govt jobs. So, there is something where people in their 20s are taking exams after exams, for five to six years,' Ravi said. She said Centre and some states have begun working on policies to 'demystify' govt jobs to make them less desirable. 'That's why we keep saying that govt jobs need to become less attractive not just in terms of salary. It is the leisure, the benefits that come along,' Ravi said. She also noted that unemployment has a close link with a state's governance and business reforms. 'Goa's unemployment rate is around 10%. So, what is it about these states that are developed with very high unemployment?' Ravi said. 'Unemployment is inversely related to how business-friendly the state is. Wealth creation is linked to job creation.' States that are doing well economically are the ones really creating jobs, she said. States that stand out, she said, such as Punjab, Kerala, and Goa, are low on the ease-of-doing-business index. She said, 'We really have to become more business-friendly.' She pointed out that the country's private sector faces an acute shortage of human resources at the mid-management level. 'All industry surveys are telling us that firms are finding it difficult to grow, not because they can't find finance, but because they can't find skilled people,' Ravi said. She added, 'The industry does not just value your degree; it wants actual skills, and there is a gap between the degree and the skill that the market needs. The gap is wide.'

Indian Express

3 hours ago

• Indian Express

Judge orders release of Columbia protester Mahmoud Khalil from US detention

A federal judge has ordered the release of Mahmoud Khalil, a former Columbia University graduate student, from immigration detention, the Associated Press (AP) reported on Friday. Khalil has been held since early March as the Trump administration tried to deport him over his involvement in pro-Palestinian protests. He was the first student arrested under President Donald Trump's efforts to remove students who took part in campus protests against Israel's military action in Gaza. US District Judge Michael Farbiarz announced his decision in a New Jersey court, AP said. The judge said Khalil should be freed after his lawyers asked either for his release on bail or for him to be moved from a Louisiana jail to New Jersey so he could be closer to his wife and newborn son. 'The government cannot continue to hold Mr Khalil on these grounds,' Judge Farbiarz said, according to AP. The government argued that Khalil, a legal US resident, was being held because he allegedly lied on his green card application. Khalil denies this, saying he answered truthfully. Khalil was detained on 8 March at his home in Manhattan. His lawyers say his arrest is part of an effort to limit free speech. AP said he is not accused of breaking any laws during the protests at Columbia. Khalil, who was studying international affairs, acted as a spokesperson and negotiator for the student protesters. He was not among those arrested at the demonstrations, but his public role drew attention. According to AP, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio has said Khalil's presence in the US could harm foreign policy. The Trump administration has said it wants to expel noncitizens who take part in such protests, claiming their views are antisemitic.