McDonald's McCrispy Strips receive mixed reviews
McDonald's recently added McCripsy Strips to its U.S. menu and, according to one analyst, they might not be hitting the mark with all customers.
The fast-food giant first launched the McCrispy Strips in late April, with all participating restaurants across the country selling them by May 5.
Advertisement
The company said in an April 24 press release that the strips, which are McDonald's first new permanent U.S. menu item in about four years, are made with 'juicy, 100% white meat, coated with crispy golden-brown breading and bursting with a bold, new black pepper flavor.'
Loop Capital suggested in a research note that some consumers have been less than impressed by their appearance in comparison to the Chicken Selects that McDonald's once sold and chicken strips currently offered by other fast-food chains, Barron's reported.
In the note, Loop Capital analyst Alton Stump said the investment firm had 'hoped the superior taste profile of the new chicken strips would overcome the product's appearance' but has 'received predominantly negative customer feedback to date,' according to the outlet.
On the social media platform Reddit, some users have voiced criticism of the McCrispy Strips.
Advertisement
3 The fast-food giant first launched the McCrispy Strips in late April, with all participating restaurants across the country selling them by May 5.
McDonald's
'These are horrible and taste like oversized Dino nuggets,' one user said. A different user said they 'don't hold a candle to the chicken selects of the past.'
Another called them 'so stringy,' saying McNuggets 'are definitely better.'
Others, meanwhile, praised the McCrispy Strips on Reddit.
Advertisement
One user said they were 'my favorite thing at McDonald's now,' while another said the McCripsy Strips were 'so good.'
3 On the social media platform Reddit, some users have voiced criticism of the McCrispy Strips.
Christopher Sadowski
'They were good and loved the sauce!' another said.
Stump said Loop Capital had previously thought McDonald's U.S. sales would get more of a lift from the McCrispy Strips debut, as well as the fast-food giant bringing back the Snack Wrap next month, but it now has reservations because of the negative customer feedback, according to Barron's.
Advertisement
McDonald's is set to bring the snack wrap back to menus starting July 10 with spicy or ranch flavor options, roughly nine years after the fan-favorite was discontinued nationwide.
The snack wrap will have a McCrispy Strip inside it as well as shredded lettuce and cheese, McDonald's said this month.
Stump suggested how some customers feel about the McCrispy Strips might be a bad sign for the upcoming snack wrap, but the tortilla 'will mostly cover up the underwhelming appearance of the new chicken strip,' according to Barron's.
McDonald's will see a 2% increase in its U.S. comparable sales during the second quarter and a 1.2% jump over the entirety of the year, Loop Capital reportedly projected.
3 McDonald's is set to bring the snack wrap back to menus starting July 10 with spicy or ranch flavor options.
McDonald's
The company declined to comment on the Loop Capital research note.
Some other firms have reportedly had more rosy views on the McCrispy Strips.
Advertisement
For instance, Morgan Stanley analyst Brian Harbour said in a research note that they should have a positive impact on sales, along with the snack wrap and McDonald's plan to offer more drinks, Barron's reported.
When the snack wrap returns, it will be a permanent offering on McDonald's menus.
The passion that McDonald's customers have for snack wraps has prompted the fast-food giant to stage a comeback for the menu item.
Other fast-food companies like Popeye's and Wendy's currently sell chicken wraps.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Upturn
an hour ago
- Business Upturn
RDDT FRAUD ALERT: Reddit, Inc. Investors are Reminded of Ongoing Securities Fraud Class Action — Contact BFA Law by August 18 Legal Deadline (NYSE:RDDT)
NEW YORK, June 22, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Leading securities law firm Bleichmar Fonti & Auld LLP announces that a lawsuit has been filed against Reddit, Inc. (NYSE: RDDT) and certain of the Company's senior executives for potential violations of the federal securities laws. If you invested in Reddit, you are encouraged to obtain additional information by visiting: Investors have until August 18, 2025, to ask the Court to be appointed to lead the case. The complaint asserts claims under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 on behalf of investors who purchased Reddit securities. The case is pending in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California and is captioned Tamraz, Jr. v. Reddit, Inc., at al. , No. 25-cv-05144. Why was Reddit Sued for Securities Fraud? Reddit owns and operates the eponymous social news aggregation, forum, and social media platform. Reddit receives a significant portion of its user traffic from individuals seeking answers to questions using Google Search. The complaint alleges that Reddit misrepresented and downplayed the impact that Google's use of Artificial Intelligence ('AI') technology in Google's search results had on Reddit's user growth. In truth, Google's use of AI dented Reddit's user growth by eliminating the need for individuals to visit and click through to Reddit to get answers to their questions. Rather, the answers appeared through Google's AI search results. The Stock Declines as the Truth is Revealed On May 1, 2025, Reddit reported a significant slowdown in daily active user growth. On this news, the price of Reddit stock declined $4.96 per share, or more than 4%, from $118.79 per share on May 1, 2025, to $113.83 per share on May 2, 2025. Then, on May 21, 2025, Wall Street analyst Baird cut its Reddit stock price target over concerns that Google's AI capabilities are stifling Reddit's user growth. On this news, the price of Reddit stock fell $9.79 per share, or over 9%, from $105.64 per share on May 20, 2025, to $95.85 per share on May 21, 2025. Click here for more information: What Can You Do? If you invested in Reddit you may have legal options and are encouraged to submit your information to the firm. All representation is on a contingency fee basis, there is no cost to you. Shareholders are not responsible for any court costs or expenses of litigation. The firm will seek court approval for any potential fees and expenses. Submit your information by visiting: Or contact:Ross Shikowitz [email protected] 212-789-3619
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Reddit Warns Burned-Out Denturist: 'Even If You Think You Understand All the Risks, You Probably Don't'
It's good for people to look for additional ways to boost their income. Increasing your earnings gives you more flexibility and can help you retire sooner. One burned-out denturist who earns $300,000 per year and owes $1 million on a mortgage is looking to acquire a business that has more than $500,000 in annual profits. While this move can boost the denturist's income, Redditors offered plenty of warnings against business acquisition. "Even if you think you understand all the risks, you probably don't," one commenter said. Don't Miss: Maker of the $60,000 foldable home has 3 factory buildings, 600+ houses built, and big plans to solve housing — Peter Thiel turned $1,700 into $5 billion—now accredited investors are eyeing this software company with similar breakout potential. Learn how you can Commenters offered a few suggestions for the denturist to deal with burnout and look for opportunities to earn more money. One of the top comments came from a Redditor who suggested figuring out the cause of your burnout before jumping into any new ventures. Starting or acquiring a business requires a lot of work, and it's probably the last remedy that you'd consider for solving burnout. The commenter suggested that travel could be the cause of burnout and encouraged the denturist to look for a similar role that "reduces travel while maintaining similar benefits." The commenter mentioned that they were burned out and switched jobs to solve the issue. Working for a more stable company with better management support may be worth it, even if you have to take a small pay cut. Trending: Maximize saving for your retirement and cut down on taxes: . While one commenter advised the Redditor to identify why they feel burned out, most commenters warned about some of the downsides of acquiring a business. They emphasized how things don't always go smoothly, and a company that is delivering solid profits right now may not do so well in a few years. Companies that earn $500,000 in annual profits usually reach that milestone because of an effective leader. Acquiring a business may mean losing that leader, and if you don't know how to run a business, your investment can quickly turn sour. Good business leaders see their companies fall apart due to factors out of their control, and it's even worse for people who are just getting started. One commenter also mentioned that it won't be $500,000 in annual profit since a large portion of those earnings will have to go toward monthly payments toward the loan used to finance the denturist specifically wanted to acquire a business in an industry that they didn't know very well. That makes an uphill battle even more challenging, and one commenter came up with a solution. Instead of acquiring a business in a field that you don't know, the denturist can start a denturist business. The original poster said that they have their own clinic and haven't put much cash into it. However, the higher income gives the denturist more flexibility with funding the clinic, and that seems to be the new route. The denturist may have continued to neglect this opportunity if a commenter didn't offer the suggestion. It demonstrates the value of starting a business in your industry instead of acquiring a business in an industry where you have zero experience. Read Next: Image: Shutterstock UNLOCKED: 5 NEW TRADES EVERY WEEK. Click now to get top trade ideas daily, plus unlimited access to cutting-edge tools and strategies to gain an edge in the markets. Get the latest stock analysis from Benzinga? APPLE (AAPL): Free Stock Analysis Report TESLA (TSLA): Free Stock Analysis Report This article Reddit Warns Burned-Out Denturist: 'Even If You Think You Understand All the Risks, You Probably Don't' originally appeared on © 2025 Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Should I Retire Early at 49 With $1.3 Million in Investments and $150K Passive Income?
Choosing when to retire can be difficult for many reasons. Common retirement advice involves saving a certain multiple of your annual salary by a certain age. How much to save for retirement and when to retire depends heavily on your planned lifestyle in retirement. The $23,760 Social Security bonus most retirees completely overlook › As always, The Motley Fool cannot and does not provide personalized investing or financial advice. This information is for informational and educational purposes only and is not a substitute for professional financial advice. Always seek the guidance of a qualified financial advisor for any questions regarding your personal financial situation. If you'd like to submit your question for feedback, you can do so here. Everyone has a different journey in terms of reaching retirement and saving enough to fund their daily expenses and potential aspirations later in life. Some work their entire life and are unfortunately still living paycheck to paycheck, while others may hit it big early and be able to retire in their 20s and 30s. For many, saving enough to retire comfortably involves working for a good 30 to 40 years and making smart financial decisions. Today, I will take a look at one Reddit question that asks: Should I retire early at 49 with $1.3 million in investments and $150,000 in passive income? Here is the initial question from Reddit: Should I retire early? I'm 49, military + VA retired, two rental homes, $1.3M in investments, and $150K+ in passive income. What would you do?byu/Maleficent_Wrap_3635 inFire First, we should applaud this savvy investor. Having a $1.3 million investment portfolio at the age of 49, as well as enough passive income from rentals to make $150,000 in annual income, shows this person has invested well and made smart financial decisions thus far. Now, whether to retire boils down to several factors, but first, we can look at professional investment advice and use publicly available data to see how this Reddit user is doing. According to Fidelity, which manages trillions of dollars worth of retirement assets, by the time one reaches the age of 50, they should have saved six times their salary. This is based on several assumptions, including a person saving 15% of their income annually starting at the age of 25, investing more than half of their savings in stocks over their lifetime, retiring at the age of 67, and planning to maintain the same lifestyle in retirement as they had before retirement. Assuming we go by this advice, if this person's annual earnings are $150,000, then they should have saved $900,000 by age 50, which this person has easily eclipsed. However, this Reddit user also said they teach. If we assume their annual income is closer to $225,000, this person, according to Fidelity, should have saved $1.35 million by this time, which is right around where they are. This is all mostly theoretical, of course. We can also look at how much people have actually saved for retirement by age 50. According to data compiled by Motley Fool, the average 401(k) balance of people in the 45-54 age bracket is $168,646, although the median number is $60,763. Based on Fidelity's advice, this Reddit user is right where they need to be, although Fidelity does assume in its guidance that people will work to 67. But when we look at actual data, the Reddit user looks to be well ahead of the average person in terms of savings. If I use a retirement calculator and assume this person starts with $1.3 million, invests for another 18 years (until 67), generates an 8% return annually, and invests a quarter of their $150,000 in annual passive income each year ($37,500), this person would be able to grow that $1.3 million to about $6.6 million. Fidelity recommends having 10 times your annual salary saved by age 67. Even if this person is making $250,000 per year, they would easily have enough savings to carry them through retirement. The Reddit user also mentioned being able to eventually get Social Security and income from their pension. Of course, this means the Reddit user probably can't splurge too much or dip into their savings early because they would still be investing a quarter of their passive income each year and keeping their initial $1.3 million invested in the market. It all comes down to what this person's plans in retirement are. They specifically wrote on Reddit that they want to "build that dream business, travel, and write more." If this is the case, I would tell this person that it's probably OK to give up their teaching gig if it is no longer rewarding and they would rather spend their time writing or traveling. However, I would keep the rentals up and running because that's valuable passive income they can live off of and invest. When compounded, they should be able to generate strong savings over the next 18 years, leading to even more financial freedom later on in life. If you're like most Americans, you're a few years (or more) behind on your retirement savings. But a handful of little-known could help ensure a boost in your retirement income. One easy trick could pay you as much as $23,760 more... each year! Once you learn how to maximize your Social Security benefits, we think you could retire confidently with the peace of mind we're all after. Join Stock Advisor to learn more about these Berkowitz has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Should I Retire Early at 49 With $1.3 Million in Investments and $150K Passive Income? was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
