Cabinet approves National Labour Migration Policy to regulate foreign employment
Cosatu has welcomed the Cabinet approving the National Labour Migration Policy (NLMP) White Paper 2025 for implementation.
The paper will mark a significant step in regulating the movement and employment of foreign nationals in South Africa.
Minister in the Presidency Khumbudzo Ntshavheni said that the policy seeks to provide a framework to enforce proper and orderly movement and employment of foreign nationals in the country. 'It aims to achieve a balance across several areas, including addressing South Africans' expectations for job prospects, in light of rising unemployment and the perception that foreign nationals restrict labour market access.'
Cabinet said that the NLMP introduces quotas on the total number of documented foreign nationals with work visas that can be employed in major economic sectors such as agriculture, hospitality and tourism, as well as construction, among others. 'The policy complements other interventions such as enforcement of a list of sectors where foreign nationals cannot be allocated business visas and amendments to the National Small Enterprise Act, 1996 (Act 102 of 1996), as amended, to limit foreign nationals establishing small, medium and micro enterprises, and trading in some sectors of the economy.'
Cabinet added that the NLMP is the first comprehensive National Labour Migration Policy aimed at managing labour migration both into and out of the country. 'The policy is designed to promote a 'brain gain' by attracting skilled workers to South Africa, while also addressing the 'brain drain' caused by the emigration of skilled professionals. The Employment Services Amendment Bill goes hand-in-hand with the NLMP and has been created to make it legal for the government to regulate the employment of immigrants in South African businesses.'
One of the bill's more contentious features is the potential introduction of employment quotas, which would limit the number of immigrants that businesses can hire and require employers to prioritise the hiring of South African citizens, the Cabinet said.
Matthew Parks, Parliamentary Coordinator for Cosatu, said that he welcomes Cabinet's approval of the National Labour Migration Policy and the Employment Services Amendment Bill. 'Cosatu extensively engaged on both the Policy and the Bill at Nedlac and looks forward to the Bill's processing and adoption by Parliament and their implementation. The Bill and the Policy provide a long overdue response to the flood of undocumented migrant labour into the economy over the past decade.'
Parks said this will enable the Minister for Employment and Labour to set limits on the number of documented migrant workers that can be employed in a workplace and an economic sector.
'These limits are critical for an economy battling dangerously high and rising unemployment levels of 43.1% overall and 72% among youth. We have seen countless unscrupulous employers in certain sectors, in particular agriculture, petrol stations, restaurants, and construction, among others; preferring to employ undocumented migrant labour as their vulnerability opens them to wildly abusive exploitation."
Parks said they hope that the Department of Employment and Labour's recruitment drive for an additional 20 000 labour inspectors will provide a decisive boost to efforts to crack down on such violations of workers' hard-won labour rights.
It is crucial that the Critical Skills List be continuously assessed by government with business and labour at Nedlac to ensure that it is positioned to attract scarce skills to South Africa, to upskill local workers and to ensure unemployed South Africans with such needed skills are prioritised, he said.
'Whilst migration is ingrained with history and South Africa is no exception, the current levels into South Africa are unsustainable, more so given the high levels of unemployment. The Bill and Policy seek to find the correct balance and to ensure the state is better capacitated to set limits and protect the needs of workers. These are badly needed, and their implementation must be expedited,' Parks said.
BUSINESS REPORT
Visit: www.businessreport.co.za
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
an hour ago
- IOL News
Survival is not enough: Why SA's SMMEs must learn to let go of old habits
The author points to SweepSouth as a great example of good entrepreneurship. Long before scaling, they spent time in communities speaking to domestic workers and potential clients. In the first four months of this year alone, 482 South African businesses shut their doors. It's a haunting number not only for our economy but for the families in crisis and the employees out of work. What went wrong? The hard truth is that many of these businesses probably thought they were doing everything right. They had loyal customers. They survived hard times before. But yet, this time they didn't. One of the most dangerous things in business is the belief that you already know your customer, what worked before will work again and experience equals insight. Longevity isn't the same as relevance. Just because you've been in business for ten years doesn't mean you know what your customers need right now. Often, business owners mistake time served for insights gained. We assume that because we've been in business for years, we have nothing new to learn and we continue to do things the same way we always have. We live with a blind belief of our customers loyalty. Meanwhile, our customers' lives have shifted under our feet. Their habits, budgets, and priorities change frequently and too many businesses fail to notice until it's too late. Lessons from start-ups In the incubator space, early-stage entrepreneurs are coached to question everything, taught to assume nothing and to approach every idea with curiosity. They are guided to understand that just because they believe it, it doesn't mean it's true for their customer. Ironically, it's often these first-time founders with no track record who are more open to listening than seasoned business owners. They learn to ask critical questions about what is happening in their customers' world and how it has changed. They know that being sure is the first step in being wrong. SweepSouth is a great example. Long before scaling, they spent time in communities speaking to domestic workers and potential clients. They listened. They tweaked. They tested. That's what helped them succeed - not just a good app, but gaining a deep understanding of their customers' needs. Empathy: the missing ingredient The test small approach is an empathy-first approach. Many businesses think they know their customers because they've sold to them before. But selling and understanding are not the same thing. Real empathy means asking: What's changed in your customer's world? What are they struggling with? What are they frustrated by? And here's the uncomfortable part: empathy takes time. It takes curiosity. It takes stepping away from your agenda and genuinely engaging with your customer's life, not just their wallet. It's within this space where opportunity lives. It's where old products evolve into new services. It's where pivoting happens. It's where an entirely new business is born. Testing in the real world Of course, it is one thing to listen. It is another to act on what you hear. In design thinking, we talk about testing and prototyping – fancy words for trying things out in the real world. It is about taking an idea, even a half-thought-through concept, and bravely sharing that with your customer. Not in a focus group, but in real life, where wallets open and close, and where value is either obvious or absent. Even big players do this. Nedbank redesigned its home loan process after learning that paperwork was a major pain point. They tested solutions inside their app, made tweaks based on feedback shared directly by their customers, and ultimately delivered something more useful to customers, all without risking a massive rollout. The courage to change The small businesses that are thriving today are not the ones with the flashy marketing or slickest tech. They are the curious. They ask the questions, they challenge their assumptions and they stay humble throughout. They don't want the ground to crumble; they change because they are paying attention. Perhaps that is the swift needed for South Africa's small business culture. We are brilliant at hustling. We are resourceful and always make a plan. But we forget to question ourselves. We treat change like it is a crisis instead of a habit and necessity. The world doesn't stand still, and neither should SMME businesses. Customer needs evolve, the markets shift and new competitors appear. The businesses that are set to thrive are the ones that stay curious and have teams that are continuously tweaking their services and models, always learning from their customers, and most importantly, always listening.
The Citizen
an hour ago
- The Citizen
Floyd Shivambu has been 'a total failure as a politician'
After being removed as the MK party secretary general earlier this month, Shivambu was dealt another blow. Former MK party secretary-general Floyd Shivambu has been described as 'a total failure.' Shivambu was removed from his position earlier this month and was expected to be sent to serve in Parliament. However, he was left off the list of names announced by the party on Saturday. The former EFF deputy president soon after made a public appeal for progressive volunteers. ALSO READ: Zuma's point man touted to replace Shivambu as MK party SG 'Failed politician' Columnist Bhekisisa Mncube told Newzroom Afrika, Shivambu has 'squandered leadership opportunities.' 'Fraud Shivambu, as he's normally called in some circles, is a total failure as a politician. I wrote about this very first week when he ditched his home in the EFF for the wilderness in the uMkhonto weSizwe party, something that really is held together by mixed tape. 'We all know he doesn't have a future. We all know that it is dependent on the help of the leader, Msholozi, the one who achieves nothing and says he's going to tell us all the secrets, but he never does. So, it was quite clear from the beginning that this was the beginning and end of Shivambu's political career,' Mncube said. WATCH: Floyd Shivambu being described as a 'failed politician' Columnist Bhekisisa Mncube says Floyd Shivambu has been 'a total failure as a politician,' claiming he has squandered leadership opportunities. #Newzroom405 Watch: — Newzroom Afrika (@Newzroom405) June 22, 2025 'No charisma' Mncube says Shivambu 'lacks what other politicians have.' 'Something that is taken for granted, it is called charisma. Shivambu doesn't have that'. The Citizen has reached out to Shivambu for comment, and this will be included in the story once received. Despite being removed as secretary-general and not making the Parliament list cut, Shivambu last week said that he would not be leaving the MK party or forming a new political party, but instead would engage with community leaders on a possible way forward. Support In a video address posted on Sunday morning, Shivambu spoke of the positive response he had received since his announcement on Thursday. 'We want to take this opportunity to convey our most sincere thankfulness and gratitude to the millions of South Africans for the messages of solidarity and support that we received after the press conference on Thursday,' said Shivambu. The former MK party secretary-general said the appetite for another political option was strong, and that he would be widening the consultative process. ALSO READ: MK party removes Floyd Shivambu as SG
Daily Maverick
3 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
US joining war on Iran creates major political headache for SA
With the world on tenterhooks following the US bombing of Iranian nuclear sites, South African politicians have been notably cautious in articulating their initial positions. By sunset on Sunday, 22 June, as news of the extraordinary US bombing of Iran's nuclear facilities at Israel's behest continued to ricochet globally, barely a single South African politician seemed willing to come out publicly with a position on the matter. Fikile Mbalula. Gayton McKenzie. Herman Mashaba. These are hardly shrinking violets when it comes to making their views known on forums like X — yet on the matter of the Iranian bombing, at the time of writing, there was a deafening silence from them. Neither was there yet an official statement available from either the DA or the ANC, suggesting that SA's two biggest political parties were to some degree agonising over what, exactly, to say. From Parliament's committee on international relations: niks. The Department of International Relations and Cooperation (Dirco) was mute on Sunday too, and a Daily Maverick query to its spokesperson, Clayson Monyela, went unanswered. Ramaphosa issues mild reprimand of US By mid-afternoon, President Cyril Ramaphosa had grasped the nettle — kind of — and released a statement that said relatively little. 'President Cyril Ramaphosa and the South African government have noted with a great deal of anxiety the entry by the United States of America into the Israel-Iran war,' it read, followed by a weak rebuke of the Trump administration. 'It was South Africa's sincerest hope that President Donald Trump would use his influence and that of the US government to prevail on the parties to pursue a dialogue path in resolving their issues of dispute.' The statement concluded, as is on brand for Ramaphosa, with a call for 'peaceful resolution'. Despite the fact that Tehran and Pretoria enjoy warm diplomatic relations, Ramaphosa's statement revealed the diplomatic egg dance that the situation presents to the South African government. South Africa cannot risk alienating the Trump administration further, with the relationship still on life support from the buildup to the Trump-Ramaphosa Oval Office showdown in late May. The Israel factor is a significant complication The difficulty for Pretoria is that the Iranian strike was overtly carried out at the behest of Israeli President Benjamin Netanyahu. Trump's brief televised announcement, confirming that US fighter jets had targeted multiple nuclear research sites in Iran, ended not only with 'God bless the Middle East' and 'God bless America' but also, specifically, 'God bless Israel' — a closing flourish that left little doubt about whose interests were being prioritised. South Africa has positioned itself internationally as one of the staunchest critics of Israel's conduct, culminating in its landmark International Court of Justice case accusing Israel of genocide in Gaza. Pretoria has also publicly cut diplomatic ties with Israel, formally downgrading the embassy. In the face of this new regional escalation, it must now consider how to balance that principled commitment with its allegiance to Iran, a fellow BRICS member — while simultaneously avoiding direct confrontation with a still-dominant United States. With that in mind, the silence of the political class on Sunday was, frankly, understandable. BRICS buddies band together? South Africa and Iran have shared membership of BRICS since an invitation was issued to the latter at the 2023 Johannesburg summit. Other BRICS states were less hesitant in responding to the bombing. The Chinese foreign ministry issued an unambiguous condemnation: 'China strongly condemns the U.S. attacks on Iran and bombing of nuclear facilities under the safeguards of the IAEA [International Atomic Energy Agency]. The actions of the U.S. seriously violate the purposes and principles of the UN Charter and international law, and have exacerbated tensions in the Middle East. China calls on the parties to the conflict, Israel in particular, to reach a ceasefire as soon as possible, ensure the safety of civilians, and start dialogue and negotiation.' Saudi Arabia, whose new BRICS membership sits awkwardly with its often-fraught relationship with Iran, struck a more guarded tone. Its official English-language X account posted: 'The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia is following with great concern the developments in the sisterly Islamic Republic of Iran, represented by the targeting of Iranian nuclear facilities by the United States of America.' The United States, meanwhile, was vocally backed by a handful of close allies. UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer offered a firm endorsement of the bombing, posting on X: 'Iran's nuclear programme is a grave threat to international security. Iran can never be allowed to develop a nuclear weapon and the US has taken action to alleviate that threat.' But from other corners of the West, the reaction was unease rather than celebration. Carl Bildt, co-chair of the European Council on Foreign Relations, called the bombing a 'clear-cut violation of international law'. UN Secretary-General António Guterres said he was 'gravely alarmed' by the use of force by the US. A massively unpopular war Complicating the picture for South Africa is the fact that this conflict is likely to be widely unpopular across the globe — including among Western populations. Comparisons are already being drawn with the disastrous US invasion of Iraq in 2003, and social media suggests a growing generational divide in how such conflicts are understood as the post-World War 2 political consensus crumbles. Young people in particular are questioning why Israel, which has not signed the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty and possesses undeclared nuclear weapons, is held to a radically different standard than Iran, which remains under international inspections by the International Atomic Energy Agency. This is also a moment when support for Israel is at an all-time low. Tens of thousands of protesters flooded European capitals over the weekend, voicing opposition to the ongoing bombardment of Gaza. In June, a YouGov poll showed support for Israel in Western Europe had sunk to its lowest levels ever recorded. In Germany, France and the UK, only between 13% and 21% of respondents now hold favourable views of Israel, compared to 63% to 70% expressing negative sentiments. As South Africa mulls its response, the stakes are particularly high. The government has sought to portray itself as a champion of the Global South, a defender of international law, and a broker of multipolar diplomacy. The entrance of the United States into open hostilities against Iran, with Israel applauding from the wings, tests every aspect of that narrative. DM
