Trump Administration Considers Adding 36 Countries to Travel Ban List
Jabin Botsford / The Washington Post
U.S. President Donald Trump and Secretary of State Marco Rubio during a Cabinet meeting in March.
The United States is considering restricting entry to citizens of an additional 36 countries in what would be a significant expansion of the travel ban announced by the Trump administration early this month, according to a State Department memo reviewed by The Washington Post.
Among the new list of countries that could face visa bans or other restrictions are 25 African nations, including significant U.S. partners such as Egypt and Djibouti, plus countries in the Caribbean, Central Asia and several Pacific Island nations.
A State Department spokesperson said the agency would not comment on internal deliberations or communications. The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Such a move would mark another escalation in the Trump administration's aggressive crackdown on immigration.
The memo, which was signed by Secretary of State Marco Rubio and sent Saturday to U.S. diplomats who work with the countries, said the governments of listed nations were being given 60 days to meet new benchmarks and requirements established by the State Department. It set a deadline of 8 a.m. Wednesday for them to provide an initial action plan for meeting the requirements.
The memo identified varied benchmarks that, in the administration's estimation, these countries were failing to meet. Some countries had 'no competent or cooperative central government authority to produce reliable identity documents or other civil documents,' or they suffered from 'widespread government fraud.' Others had large numbers of citizens who overstayed their visas in the United States, the memo said.
Other reasons included the availability of citizenship by monetary investment without a requirement of residency and claims of 'antisemitic and anti-American activity in the United States' by people from those countries. The memo also stated that if a country was willing to accept third-country nationals who were removed from the United States or enter a 'safe third country' agreement it could mitigate other concerns.
It was not immediately clear when the proposed travel restrictions would be enforced if the demands were not met.
The countries facing scrutiny in the memo: Angola; Antigua and Barbuda; Benin; Bhutan; Burkina Faso; Cabo Verde; Cambodia; Cameroon; Democratic Republic of Congo; Djibouti; Dominica; Ethiopia; Egypt; Gabon; Gambia; Ghana; Ivory Coast; Kyrgyzstan; Liberia; Malawi; Mauritania; Niger; Nigeria; Saint Kitts and Nevis; Saint Lucia; Sao Tome and Principe; Senegal; South Sudan; Syria; Tanzania; Tonga; Tuvalu; Uganda; Vanuatu; Zambia; and Zimbabwe.
The list represents a significant expansion of a presidential proclamation issued June 4, when the United States fully restricted the entry of individuals from Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, Republic of Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen. The United States also had partially restricted the entry of travelers from Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela under that order.
Democrats and other critics of the Trump administration have described its efforts to issue blanket travel bans on selected nations as xenophobic and bigoted, pointing to President Donald Trump's efforts to block travel from Muslim-majority nations in his first term and the high number of African and Caribbean nations targeted during this term.
Early in his first term, Trump attempted to restrict travel from Iran, Iraq, Syria, Somalia, Sudan, Yemen and Libya. The initial version of the ban caused confusion and chaos at airports. It faced numerous legal challenges until the Supreme Court upheld the third version of it in June 2018.
While the travel ban was rescinded under the Biden administration, Trump repeatedly pledged to reinstate it on the campaign trail, stating it would be 'bigger than before.'
On Inauguration Day, the White House issued an executive order calling on U.S. agencies, including the State Department, to look for 'countries throughout the world for which vetting and screening information is so deficient as to warrant a partial or full suspension on the admission of nationals from those countries.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Asahi Shimbun
4 hours ago
- Asahi Shimbun
U.S. urges China to dissuade Iran from closing Strait of Hormuz
A map showing the Strait of Hormuz and Iran is seen behind a 3D printed oil pipeline in this illustration taken June 22, 2025. (REUTERS) WASHINGTON--U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio on Sunday called on China to encourage Iran to not shut down the Strait of Hormuz after Washington carried out strikes on Iranian nuclear sites. Rubio's comments on Fox News' 'Sunday Morning Futures with Maria Bartiromo' show came after Iran's Press TV reported that the Iranian parliament approved a measure to close the Strait of Hormuz, through which around 20% of global oil and gas flows. 'I encourage the Chinese government in Beijing to call them about that, because they heavily depend on the Straits of Hormuz for their oil,' said Rubio, who also serves as national security adviser. 'If they do that, it will be another terrible mistake. It's economic suicide for them if they do it. And we retain options to deal with that, but other countries should be looking at that as well. It would hurt other countries' economies a lot worse than ours.' Rubio said a move to close the strait would be a massive escalation that would merit a response from the U.S. and others. The Chinese embassy in Washington did not immediately provide comment. U.S. officials said it 'obliterated' Iran's main nuclear sites using 14 bunker-buster bombs, more than two dozen Tomahawk missiles and over 125 military aircraft. The strikes mark an escalation in the ongoing Middle Eastern conflict. Tehran has vowed to defend itself. Rubio on Sunday warned against retaliation, saying such an action would be 'the worst mistake they've ever made.' He added that the U.S. is prepared to talk with Iran.
The Mainichi
4 hours ago
- The Mainichi
Editorial: US attack on Iran facilities a high-handed use of force going against reason
The administration of U.S. President Donald Trump has launched attacks on three nuclear facilities in Iran, saying its goal is to destroy Iran's nuclear development capabilities and prevent a nuclear threat. Intervention by the U.S. military could lead to the spread of war in the Middle East, deepening global chaos. It is imperative to put an end to the conflict as soon as possible. Several large "bunker buster" bombs designed to penetrate deep in the ground before exploding were used to strike the underground Fordo nuclear facility in central Iran. In an announcement, Trump said the strikes "completely and totally obliterated" Iran's key nuclear enrichment facilities, and threatened continued attacks unless Iran makes peace with Israel. He also hinted at the possibility of a regime change in Iran. Two days before the strikes, Trump had said he would decide whether or not to attack Iran within two weeks, leaving room for negotiations with the country, but went ahead with military action without waiting for direct talks. Israel had requested the U.S. military's attack on Iran's nuclear facilities. In a video message, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu praised Trump's "bold decision" to target the facilities, and stated that in its action, "America has been truly unsurpassed." Fostering further confusion The strikes drew a backlash from Iran, which criticized them as "outrageous." Iran downplayed the damage as being limited, and revealed its intention to continue nuclear development. Admittedly, while Iran claims that its nuclear development is for "peaceful use," it has taken actions raising suspicions of nuclear weapons development. It is said to be producing highly enriched uranium close to weapons-grade levels. The facility at Fordo is built deep underground, protected by bedrock, and is believed to house highly enriched uranium. However, this does not justify the U.S. attacks. Under international law, the use of force against another country is only permitted in cases of self-defense or if there is a United Nations Security Council resolution. The exercise of self-defense is premised on either retaliating after being attacked or facing an imminent threat, but neither applies here. In the first place, Israel's preemptive strike against Iran violates international law. The U.S. military's attack is tantamount to complicity in this illegal act. Trump has stressed that Iran's nuclear development poses a serious threat to international society. If that's indeed the case, then the logical thing for him to do would be to go to the United Nations Security Council and present evidence of it. Trump's actions, completely disregarding rules and procedures to attack another country's territory at will, go against reason and cannot be overlooked. Attacks on nuclear facilities carry the risk of radioactive leaks and are ethically unacceptable. Previously during the Iraq War, which was initiated under the pretext of removing weapons of mass destruction, the Saddam Hussein regime was toppled, yet no evidence of such weapons was found. Even within the ruling Republican Party, there have arisen claims that not consulting Congress on the use of force is unconstitutional. It is only natural that U.N. Secretary-General Antonio Guterres stated he was "gravely alarmed" by the use of force by the United States against Iran and warned that it poses a "direct threat to international peace and security." The concern is that the entire Middle East could be plunged into war, severely impacting the world. Diplomacy as a means of resolution Iran has indicated it could retaliate with strikes against U.S. military bases in the Middle East. There is a risk that pro-Iranian armed groups rooted across the Middle East could join the conflict. If that happens, Western nations and Israel's confrontation with Arab and Islamic countries will intensify. Russia and China are likely to harden their stance against the West. Iran has suggested that it could close the Strait of Hormuz leading to the Persian Gulf, a vital artery for oil transportation. The surge in oil prices would severely impact a world already suffering from inflation. The wars in Europe and the Middle East are likely to increase distrust among emerging and developing countries collectively known as the Global South, which are already bearing the economic brunt of the conflicts. Japan's position is also under scrutiny. Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba condemned Israel's attack on Iran as "absolutely unacceptable," but regarding the U.S. attack, only stated that "early stabilization is of utmost importance." In Asia, North Korea is manufacturing nuclear warheads and deploying numerous ballistic missiles capable of carrying them. The threat level is more severe than that of Iran. The U.S. previously considered attacking North Korean nuclear facilities but refrained from doing so due to the risk of Asia plunging into chaos. As an ally, Japan must not overlook the United States' unilateral use of military force. It should collaborate with Europe to encourage restraint. Solutions by force create future sources of trouble, leading to repeated tragedies. Only a diplomatic resolution can fundamentally address the root issues.
The Mainichi
5 hours ago
- The Mainichi
'Hate war, not people': Cornerstone of Peace monument in Okinawa marks 30th anniversary
NAHA -- This Okinawa Memorial Day, June 23, marks the 30th anniversary since the "Cornerstone of Peace" monument was erected in the city of Itoman, Okinawa Prefecture, with the names of more than 240,000 war dead, both Japanese and Americans, inscribed on it. On June 23, the prefecture observed the day of remembrance for the victims of the Battle of Okinawa during the final stages of World War II. This year marks the 80th anniversary of the ground battles waged in 1945 between Japanese and American forces, which claimed the lives of approximately 200,000 people, including residents. The Cornerstone of Peace commemorates the names of all war dead regardless of nationality or affiliation. Choko Takayama, 90, a Naha resident who was involved in the monument's creation in 1995 as a senior prefectural official, reflected, "In just three months, the lives of these many people were lost. This monument is a testament to their existence." The Battle of Okinawa intensified after U.S. forces landed on the central part of Okinawa's main island on April 1, 1945, continuing combat until the organized resistance of the Japanese forces ended in late June. Takayama, who was 10 years old at the time, lived in the town of Motobu in the northern part of the island. The advancing U.S. forces unleashed heavy attacks on the north. As his family fled after Japanese military units, they witnessed the grim sights of fallen people and military horses. "It was tragic and cruel," he recalled. While taking shelter from the rain under a house's eaves, Takayama saw two men carry away a boy soldier, who was severely injured and groaning. The boy pleaded, "Please don't throw me away." His voice still lingers in Takayama's memory. The late Okinawa Gov. Masahide Ota proceeded with the erection of the Cornerstone of Peace as part of a project commemorating 50 years since the war's end. He had also experienced the battlefield as a student mobilized in the "Blood and Iron Student Corps." The monument was designed to inscribe the names of all victims, regardless of nationality or whether they were military or civilian. Takayama explained, "Okinawa has a peace philosophy established over the course of its long history: Hate war, not people. This is what Mr. Ota called 'the heart of Okinawa.'" Ota passed away in 2017 at the age of 92. The project to establish the monument began in earnest in 1992. Officials conducted surveys to identify all the war dead to be inscribed, with cooperation from municipalities in the prefecture and Battle of Okinawa survivors. To include the names of deceased American soldiers, Gov. Ota and Takayama, then the head of the governor's office, visited the U.S. Department of Defense to request a list of names. Coordination and verification continued until just before the completion of the monument. On the unveiling day, June 23, 1995, many prefectural residents and others gathered at the monument, shedding tears upon seeing the inscribed names and tracing them. There are still many people whose locations of death during the Battle of Okinawa are unknown as their remains have never been found. Takayama contemplated, "The wandering souls of the victims may have found their way back here upon seeing their names on the Cornerstone of Peace." Thirty years since its installation, the monument added the names of 342 newly identified victims, including those from the United States, bringing the total inscriptions to 242,567. Some names remain unknown, marked as "Child of XX" or "Eldest son of XX." Takayama asserted, "The Cornerstone of Peace vividly tells the story of how tragic and brutal the Battle of Okinawa was." Conflicts are continuing to erupt worldwide. On the morning of June 23 this year, many people were seen visiting the Cornerstone of Peace to mourn family members and others lost to the war. Takayama noted, "I hope more people will know about this place as a symbol of peace with the aim of achieving a society without war."
