Mukhtar Abbas Naqvi interview: ‘Waqf change an administrative reform, not religious… Only those who enjoyed a legal licence to loot are scared'

The Waqf (Amendment) Act has been challenged in the Supreme Court by several individuals and organisations. In an interview with The Indian Express, former Union minister and BJP leader Mukhtar Abbas Naqvi backs the law, saying India is a country of reforms and that the Waqf system needed reform, and that the amendments brought by the government rectify problems administratively without encroaching on matters of faith. Excerpts:
The amendment is an administrative reform and not a religious one. Only those who thought they had a legal licence to loot are scared of this correction. The law does not pertain to any community but is the law of the land, whose beneficiaries will include Waqf stakeholders, including Muslims.
Some people are trying to communalise it (the Act) by creating an imaginary legal confusion and want communal conflict by creating fear. Everyone must understand that India is a nation of reform, and has seen many kinds of reforms – be it social, economic, administrative, electoral, educational, agricultural or health – before and after Independence.
We are not a closed country with a touch-me-not approach to legislation. They tried to make the entire system of Waqf a touch-me-not one. This approach is neither in national interest nor in the interest of society. The idea (of the Act) is to bring the system within the Constitutional hierarchy to benefit stakeholders.
People must understand that when they talk about (land going back to) 1913, baat niklegi to door talaq jaayegi (a lot of other things will come up).
The Judicial Committee of the British Privy Council held in 1894-95 that this is a system of the worst kind. Countries under British rule then reformed their Waqf systems. I was Union Minority Affairs minister for a long time and studied this issue in depth.
In India, the Muslim League went for communal polarisation. They politically exploited the issue. In 1910, (Muhammad Ali) Jinnah became a member of the Imperial Legislative Council from Bombay in connivance with the British. The 1913 Act was a product of Jinnah's connivance with the British… Even in Pakistan, the Waqf system has been reformed in 1959, 1960, etc.
They claim Hindus have been included in the Waqf Council and Waqf boards, but we need to understand that after Partition, Muslims went to Pakistan in large numbers while Hindus and Sikhs came to India in large numbers. The Muslims who chose to leave India left their properties behind, while those Hindus and Sikhs who chose India left theirs in Pakistan. The Muslims (in Pakistan) were allowed to occupy the vacant properties, and today own them. But Hindus who chose India are neither owners nor tenants of those properties that the Muslims left behind. A sword constantly dangles over their heads. Hence, non-Muslims are also stakeholders in the Waqf system.
(Religious) conversions are dangerous, particularly if they are forced, taken up by fraudulent means or are funded. When one speaks about tribals, they should ask for whom the Waqf system exists? It is for Muslims and only those practising Islam can do Waqf.
As I said earlier, non-Muslims are also stakeholders in the Waqf system as they left everything they owned in Pakistan. Their stakes need to be respected. People in many states say things like… 'We got this shop in 1949 when our family came to India from Pakistan, but I still get notices and have to pay hafta to retain them'. So, legal correction is the need of the hour.
Please remember that people have been claiming half the country's property as Waqf. They say Parliament, roads, fields, trees and rivers are Waqf properties. This kind of criminal anarchy needed to be remedied by bringing it within the bounds of the Constitution. Faith is protected under the law but administrative problems need to be addressed.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Business Standard

32 minutes ago

• Business Standard

Roads connecting Nashik to be upgraded ahead of Simhastha Kumbh: Fadnavis

Maharashtra Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis has said all roads leading to Nashik will be upgraded ahead of the Simhastha Kumbh Mela, which will begin on October 31 next year. A high-level meeting concerning the highways connecting Nashik was held in the presence of Union Minister for Road Transport and Highways Nitin Gadkari, a release from the Chief Minister's Office said on Sunday. Considering the large number of devotees and the need for traffic management during the mega congregation in Nashik, Gadkari has given in-principle approval for the development and construction of necessary road infrastructure through his ministry, it said. The Simhastha Kumbh Mela will begin on October 31, 2026, with Dhwajarohan' (flag hoisting) at Trimbakeshwar and Ramkund in Nashik. The flag will be taken down on July 24, 2028, marking the conclusion of the event, which is held once every 12 years. Citing the growing faith of devotees and expected rise in footfall during the Kumbh Mela, Fadnavis had requested Prime Minister Narendra Modi for central support to boost road infrastructure, the release said. Accordingly, a high-level meeting was held at the CM's Office in Nagpur in the presence of Gadkari and state senior officials, and these decisions were taken, it said. Nashik is connected by eight major routes, including from Mumbai, Palghar, Pune, Ahilyanagar, Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar, Dhule and neighbouring Gujarat state. While these roads will play a crucial role during the Kumbh Mela, internal roads in and around Nashik that connect to national highways were also discussed in the meeting. Gadkari has given in-principle approval to nearly all proposed roads, and it was decided that the required funds to complete the work would be provided soon, the CMO said. Fadnavis said the expected surge in traffic during Kumbh will be managed effectively through an expanded road network, ensuring safer travel for devotees. Approval was granted for the Nashik Ring Road, and a decision was made to widen the Nashik-Trimbakeshwar road into a six-lane highway, the release said. To ensure smooth traffic within Nashik, it has been decided to enhance the infrastructure at Dwarka Circle. Like the Kalamboli junction in Navi Mumbai, Nashik's Dwarka Circle will be developed in two phases, one before Kumbh and the other after the event, the release added. (Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

Scroll.in

an hour ago

• Scroll.in

What two deaths say about ‘peninsular' India's insular view of the North East

In June, North East India witnessed two related deaths: Raja Raghuvanshi from Indore was murdered in Meghalaya and Roshmita Hojai, a woman from Assam's Dimasa tribe, drowned in Rishikesh in Uttarakhand. The North East link was common to both incidents but most media outlets in peninsular India had widely contrasting reactions. Racist stereotypes emerged first. A national daily declared Meghalaya as a region of ' crime-prone ' hills with no mention of how many murders or other crimes had been committed in an area where tourism is central to the local economy. One crime was all it took for mainstream and social media to condemn Meghalaya's residents as 'criminals', without bothering to mention that the villagers around Sohra, where Raghuvanshi was murdered by the wife he had recently married and her accomplices, held a candlelight vigil to mourn the killing of a complete stranger. This piece of yellow journalism is what the ToI is reduced to? Armchair reportage at its worst.. Disgusting and slanderous.. — patricia mukhim (@meipat) May 29, 2025 On the other hand, newspapers devoted a two-inch column to Hojai, who was aspiring to be a civil servant, and added that two men accompanying her were detained for questioning. There was a complete absence of journalism on how the life of a young woman was nipped in the bud. These contrasting reactions are not exceptions. Stereotypes abound in peninsular India about the people of the North East as 'terrorists', 'secessionists' and immoral women. Every few months, there are reports of women from the northeastern states were molested in Delhi. After one attack, a message was circulated in one of the universities that the women were assaulted because they do not dress like Indians. In December 2021, when security forces gunned down six young men returning home from daily wage work in Mon in Nagaland, social media groups were filled with messages that the men were secessionists who deserved to die. For over six decades, much of the North East has been under the Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act, which gives extraordinary powers to the security forces. It grants the forces the impunity to gun down innocent people, as they did in Nagaland, if they claim to have done it in good faith on the line of duty. I have heard a few who call themselves human rights activists and oppose the murder of civilians in the rest of India saying that the stringent law is needed in the North East because of secessionism. This assertion is rarely backed by an effort to find out how many 'secessionists' there are or why there are conflicts in the region. The 'conflict zone' itself is an exaggerated stereotype. The more than 45 million people of the North East live with the disadvantage of distance with peninsular India, which they call the 'mainland' because of its insular view of their region. This distance and relative isolation are physical as well as psychological and political. For the British colonial regime, the North East was used as an isolated buffer zone between the rest of India and China and Burma. That isolation has continued after Independence. Decades after three wars were fought in the region in the 1960s – against China in 1962, Pakistan in 1965 and following the creation of Bangladesh in 1971 – the North East continues to be a buffer zone for national security. Most North Easterners feel that peninsular India, which views itself as the 'mainstream' centered on the Gangetic Valley Hindu dominant-caste male culture, does not understand them and that 'mainstream' India stops at Kolkata. To most 'mainstream' Indians, the North East is a vague territory between Kolkata and Myanmar about which they know little. One murder case involving both victim and perpetrators from a different state. Case worked out swiftly. And still Meghalaya is continuously trying to bolster confidence about state being a safe tourist destination. — Piyush Rai (@Benarasiyaa) June 18, 2025 During the last decade, this 'distant land of conflicts' has become 'the land of injustice' for the lakhs of immigrants excluded from the National Register of Citizens – like in Assam. But for that the North East rarely enters mainstream Indian thinking. Even the national anthem exalts 'Vindhya, Himachala, Yamuna, Ganga' and ignores the Brahmaputra, which is longer than the Ganga, is the fifth largest river in the world and confers an identity on the North East. But it is not an all-India sacred river. Efforts are being made of late to confer some sacredness on it but by connecting it to the Ganga, not in its own right. Another verse of the national anthem includes 'Punjab, Sindh, Gujarat, Maratha, Dravida, Utkala, Vanga', in other words, an Aryan-Dravidian India in which the people of the North East do not exist. Lakhs of people from the region are forced to go to 'mainland' India because of the high unemployment and poor education infrastructure of the North East. Because of their Mongoloid features, they are often referred to as 'chinki', a pejorative and racist term for the 'enemy' Chinese. Women among them often face sexual harassment because of their looks and their being perceived as open to sexual advances. These stereotypes have had disastrous consequences in times of crisis. In 2020, after the Covid-19 pandemic broke out in China and later spread globally, there were reports of North East people in peninsular India being harassed, evicted from housing or denied entry because of their 'Chinese' features. A group of Naga students was refused entry to a mall in Mysuru, as were two Manipuri students in Hyderabad. A nurse in Bengaluru reported that a child ran away from her screaming 'coronavirus'. Alana Golmei, who hails from Manipur and lives in Delhi, said that on three different occasions when she and a companion from Meghalaya entered the National Council of Educational Research and Training campus, staff taunted them with 'coronavirus'. The pandemic of racism endures even after the real one subsided. For 'mainstream' India, with its insular outlook and geographical distance from the North East, most conflicts in the region appear to 'secessionist'. Instead, it must recognise that the people of the region are searching for an identity of their own, within the Indian nation and not by joining the 'mainstream' that equates national unity with uniformity. They demand unity in diversity that respects their specificity. They want national security to mean the security of their people while belonging to a pluralist India that respects the ethnic specificity, culture, religion, language and worldview in which they find their identity. That is the pluralistic India mandated by the Constitution and it is time that the North East experiences it as well. The two deaths are an opportunity for peninsular India to look at North East India afresh.

First Post

an hour ago

• First Post

Are divisions in the EU deepening over Israel?

Cracks within the EU widen as member-states disagree over how to approach the tensions in West Asia. While some EU nations are calling out Israel's conduct in Gaza Strip and Iran, others emphasise that the Jewish nation has the right to defend itself read more French Minister for Europe and Foreign Affairs Jean-Noel Barrot, British Foreign Secretary David Lammy, German Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul and European Union High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, Kaja Kallas, talk over lunch at the offices of the honorary Consul of the Federal Republic of Germany in Geneva, Switzerland during a meeting of European foreign ministers on Friday. Reuters As the tensions in West Asia continue to escalate, a major division has emerged over how the European Union should respond to Israel's war in Gaza and its ongoing conflict with Iran. The decision became more apparent after the regional body released a report which suggested that Israel was breaching human rights obligations in the Gaza war. The document obtained by Reuters stated that Israel's conduct in Gaza and the West Bank was a 'moral and methodological failure.' The review report was sent to the EU officials ahead of a foreign minister's meeting on Monday. Soon after it was released, Israel slammed the report, noting that it had failed to consider Israel's challenges and was based on inaccurate information. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'The Foreign Ministry of the State of Israel rejects the document … and finds it to be a complete moral and methodological failure,' they said in a statement, adding that it should be dismissed entirely. The European Union have remained largely divided over Israel's conduct in West Asia. While countries like the Netherlands, Spain, Belgium and Sweden push for punitive action, others notably Germany, Hungary and Austria resist citing strategic ties, historical responsibilities and political caution. The division is becoming more severe over how the bloc is reacting to Israel's operation in Iran. On Gaza Earlier this year, the European Commission launched an investigation into whether Israel may have breached its human rights obligations under the association agreement after a majority of EU countries called for a review of Israeli conduct amid the humanitarian crisis. The findings of the report turned out to be one of the most contentious foreign policy decisions facing the EU. The body is also concerned after US President Donald Trump decided to drag the United States into the conflict by striking Iran's three nuclear facilities . On Monday, the findings of the report will be presented by Kaja Kallas, the EU's high representative for foreign affairs to the ministers from EU governments. The bloc will then decide what steps can be taken over the matter. According to Politico, potential actions range from 'doing nothing' to limiting trade with Israel and even suspending the entire agreement. However, that would require a unanimous agreement from the bloc's 27 countries, which is quite unlikely to happen. On Iran Not all EU nations believe that Israel's attack on Iran is legal under international law. Last week, the regional bloc issued a statement calling 'on all sides to abide by international law, show restraint and refrain from taking further steps which could lead to serious consequences such as potential radioactive release," Euro News reported. One of the major points of contention was whether in the statement the EU should state 'Israel has a right to defend itself' in the context of its attacks against Iran. Around 15 member states including Austria, Czechia, France, Germany, Hungary, Italy and the Netherlands wanted to add the line but it was not agreed unanimously. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Meanwhile, other countries noted that it wasn't sufficiently mentioned that Israel has the right under international law to launch its offensive against Iran. It is pertinent to note that According to international law, and the UN Charter, a state may exercise its right to self-defence in case of an armed attack or imminent attack. Any necessary action should also be proportionate. Hence, it remains unclear whether Europe would ever be united on the question of Israel.