Immigrant advocates, elected officials call for release of Chicago mother detained by ICE
When Gladis Yolanda Chavez finally had a chance to speak to her attorney, two days after being detained by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents, the first thing she asked him to do was keep her daughter safe.
Chavez's 10-year-old daughter was in school when her mother was detained at an ICE check-in Wednesday, one of an estimated 20 people who were rounded up during surprise check-ins at the federal agency's Intensive Supervision Appearance Program offices in Chicago. Similar arrests were reported that day in New York, San Jose and Birmingham.
Chavez and about 20 others were still at the ICE processing center in Broadview Friday morning. Since the facility is not a detention center, something prohibited in Illinois due to the state's Way Forward Act, there are no beds. So they had been sleeping on the floor and sitting around on the few chairs available, she told her lawyers and supporters, who were finally able to see her Friday.
She'd been difficult to locate, her attorneys said, because Chavez and others recently detained had not been added to the ICE detainee online locator system, typically the only way for families to find their loved ones after they've been detained.
If you're arrested by ICE in Illinois, what happens next? Legal experts explain the process.
'We are angry, and this is not the end. We will continue to visualize how ICE is engaging and exposing their racist tactics targeting immigrants of color,' said Antonio Gutierrez, a co-founder and strategic coordinator of Organized Communities Against Deportations, where Chavez worked. 'This is fascism and racism at its finest example, while having the U.S. government doing illegal kidnapping, coercion and human trafficking without orders of removal.'
Supporters of Chavez, elected officials and her attorneys spoke at a news conference Friday in front of the Broadview processing center to demand ICE release Chavez and others detained on Wednesday.
A.J. Johnson Reyes, one of Chavez's lawyers and a member of Beyond Legal Aid, said that while an ICE agent he spoke to before showed his desire to help, he said the agent told Reyes could no longer do so because now 'he is following orders.'
'They are forced to put their humanity aside,' Reyes said. Still, he said, his team is committed to doing everything legally possible to stop Chavez's deportation.
The lawyers sought two stays of removal in an attempt to stop the deportation. The temporary stay was granted by the 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, said Reyes. Another request for a stay was submitted with ICE, but not granted.
While they remain hopeful, they're bracing for the worst.
Several migrants in restraints are escorted to vans for transport out of the Broadview Immigration Processing Center on June 6, 2025. (Antonio Perez/Chicago Tribune) Broadview police officers provide crowd control as community members and immigrant rights advocates gather outside the Broadview Immigration Processing Center on June 6, 2025, to demand the immediate release of Gladis Yolanda Chaves. (Antonio Perez/Chicago Tribune) Attorneys A.J. Johnson Reyes and Nadia Singh enter to speak with clients at the Broadview Immigration Processing Center on June 6, 2025. (Antonio Perez/Chicago Tribune) Two men try to leave a bag with supplies and money for a detainee at the Broadview Immigration Processing Center on June 6, 2025. (Antonio Perez/Chicago Tribune) Attorney Nadia Singh, of Beyond Legal Aid, community members and immigrant rights advocates gather at the Broadview Immigration Processing Center June 6, 2025, to demand the immediate release of Gladis Yolanda Chaves. (Antonio Perez/Chicago Tribune) Show Caption1 of 6Carlos Pineda and girlfriend Stephanie Tlatenchi get emotional as several vans filled with migrants leave the Broadview Immigration Processing Center on June 6, 2025. The couple were there to try to communicate with one of the detainees. (Antonio Perez/Chicago Tribune)Expand
At any point, Chavez could be put on a plane back to her native Honduras or to a detention facility across the country, said Xanat Sobrevilla, a longtime friend of Chavez and member of OCAD.
'She was completely dedicated to her daughter,' Sobrevilla said in tears.
Chavez served as a community organizer for OCAD, an organization that provides resources and legal aid to undocumented individuals facing deportation to guarantee a right to due process.
Ironically, as Chavez urged others to comply with the law, she was detained.
According to her supporters, Chavez received a message on June 2 to report to the ISAP office at 2245 S. Michigan Ave for a 'check-in,' despite already being subject to electronic monitoring via an ankle bracelet.
She arrived on Wednesday with her two attorneys, they said. But after more than 90 minutes, she was handcuffed and ICE agents ordered her attorneys to leave. She was being detained.
Chavez arrived from Honduras more than a decade ago, seeking refuge from extreme poverty and violence in her home country. She lived on the city's Northwest Side and had been attending routine check-ins with ICE for nearly eight years.
The system — which required her to also wear an ankle monitor the last two months — allowed for individuals like Chavez, who are not considered a threat or had an ongoing immigration case, an alternative to detention and deportation.
What was meant to be a routine check-in ICE has, for many, become a turning point.
Agents have broad discretion to decide whether individuals can remain in the country or face removal. But advocates warn that new quotas imposed by the Department of Homeland Security are leaving little room for discretion or compassion — even for those who have lived in the United States for more than a decade.
Though she has become the face of this most recent ICE operation in Chicago, there are dozens of families waiting for help and clarity, Gutierrez said.
And there are dozens of parents leaving behind their U.S. children, he said.
Many were detained during a surprise check-in at the ISAP Chicago office even after having complied fully with every requirement imposed by ICE, including wearing an ankle monitor, supporters said.
Outside the Broadview facility, Lawrence Benito, executive director of the Illinois Coalition for Immigrant and Refugee Rights, said that the new operations were part of 'Trump's racist agenda,' and that they are committed to continuing to organize to 'make sure that people know their rights.
Ald. Rossana Rodriguez Sanchez of the 33rd Ward, in which Chavez has been living, said that she, too, would advocate for immigrant rights despite the clash with ICE agents outside the facility on Wednesday, where she and other aldermen said they were roughed up.
'We will take the risks necessary to protect our community,' she said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
an hour ago
- Forbes
EV U.S. Sales Lag Will Reprieve ICE, Boost Hybrids
ICE versus EV getty Every other new car bought by Americans in 2030 was supposed to be electric, but as the Trump Administration clears away EV incentives and targets, the total is likely to be less than half that and offer a lifeline to gas powered vehicles and hybrids That represents an unexpected new lease of life for the likes of GM , Ford, and Stellantis brands like Chrysler, Dodge, Jeep and Ram and their combustion technology. They were highly dependent on internal combustion engines and were either slow or reluctant to embrace EVs. A combination of tax credit rollbacks, emissions standards delays and the removal of the Biden Administration and its call for a 50% share for EVs in the new car market in 2030 is a boost for ICE. Manufacturers will also be busily raising production of hybrids, plug-in hybrids, and extended range electric vehicles*. Consultants Roland Berger put it this way in a recent report. 'Delayed adoption of BEVs (EVs) will have cascading effects on the entire automotive value chain, prolonging profitability challenges for electrification-focused players and extending the window of opportunity for ICE-focused legacy players,' the report said. Analysts have been scrambling to slash their forecasts for U.S. EV sales in 2030. Investment bank UBS says EVs will only reach 24% of the new car market or 2.7 million vehicles. Four months ago UBS was predicting 32%. U.S. EV market share is currently around 10%. BloombergNEF now predicts 27%, down from almost 48%. Investment researcher Jefferies is even lower at about 20% along with Roland Berger. Roland Berger was projecting around 40% under Biden's watch. 'Actions taken by the Trump administration to loosen light vehicle emissions standards have effectively halved our forecast for U.S. electric vehicle adoption by 2030 – We now only expect about 20% BEV sales by 2030,' said Brandon Boyle, Senior Partner and Americas Automotive lead at Roland Berger. This compares starkly with Europe's ambitions. The European Union has decreed EV sales shall reach about 80% of new vehicle sales by 2030 on the way to 100% by 2035. Given current market share is barely 20% in Europe, some major humble-pie eating is on the cards. The Mazda MX-30 R-EV is an extended range electric vehicle equiped with a small rotary gasoline ... More engine (Photo by Sjoerd van) Getty Images / Sjoerd van der Wal 'The U.S. market has different dynamics (than Europe): more rural driving, less dense urban cores, and a political environment that could shift depending on the 2028 (Presidential) election,' said Curt Hopkins, CEO of MCQ Markets . MCQ Market says it is a FinTech firm making high-value assets accessible and investable. 'I wouldn't call it a comeback for ICE, but it's not going away overnight either. Hybrids and plug-in hybrids are still very much part of the transition-especially for consumers who aren't quite ready for a full battery-electric experience. Expect those to play a meaningful but gradually shrinking role through the decade,' Hopkins said. Bernstein Research analyst Daniel Roeska said at some point EV demand will accelerate again. Maybe after the 2028 election or after 2030. 'It (the expectation) won't be 50% for a long while,' Roeska said in an interview. '(General Motors, Ford and Stellantis) agreed that U.S. electrification will take a lot longer. Even if the target picture of high EV share in the U.S. has not changed, (manufacturers) are waking up to the fact that they must improve EV profitability without significant volume growth and maintain investments into legacy products for longer,' Roeska said in a recent report. Hard to bet against Tesla Tesla is the current EV market leader and despite a huge increase in competition and lower expectations for the overall market, is expected to retain its ascendancy, said MCQ's Hopkins. 'It's hard to bet against Tesla. They're vertically integrated, have a dominant brand, and continue to lead on software and over-the-air updates. As long as they maintain that pace of innovation, they'll likely still be the U.S. leader in 2030,' said Hopkins. According to Kelley Blue Book , the Tesla Model Y led the U.S. EV market in 2024 with sales of 373,000 and a market share of 28.6%, the Tesla Model 3 was next with 190,000 (14.6%). Then came the Ford Mustang Mach-E with 52,000 or 4.0%. 'That said, keep an eye on some dark horses. Chinese automakers like BYD and NIO are getting serious about international expansion, and if trade policy allows, they could become a factor in the U.S. by the end of the decade.' The All-Electric Ford Mustang Mach-E (Photo by) Getty Images 'Among the legacy automakers, Ford, GM, and Volkswagen have all shown real progress. Their ability to scale EV production and leverage existing dealer networks could help them close the gap, especially as more affordable models hit the market,' according to Hopkins. Twice the power, half the weight, half the cost He doesn't expect any game-changing battery technology before 2030, just incremental improvements in battery design. The long- promised solid-state battery revolution – twice the power, half the weight, half the cost - isn't close as researchers stumble over mass production techniques. And the trouble is that as consumers hear about this huge, imminent improvement, they are likely to be wary of buying an EV, and risk having its residual value torpedoed by game-changing technology. That could put the skids on EV demand as 2030 approaches. More bad news for EV makers came this week, courtesy of a survey of 15,000 drivers around the world by oil-giant Shell. The survey showed drivers in America are becoming more reluctant to switch to EVs from ICE vehicles. Those considering switching fell three percentage points to 31% compared with a year ago. In Europe, the reluctance was more ominous given the massive EV targets set for 2030. According to the survey, 41% said they would consider switching to an EV, down from 48% last year. Shell operates 75,000 charging points around the world including the U.S., Europe and China. *(Hybrids use computer power to combine for maximum efficiency with gasoline engines, and have relatively small batteries. They provide maybe 1 mile of electric-only driving. PHEVs have bigger batteries which can be charged independently and can provide up to 75 miles of electric-only transport. EREVs, like the Mazda MX30 R-EV, use small combustion engines to charge the battery. The MX30 R-EV is always powered by electricity.)
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Vance to visit Los Angeles on Friday amid tension over ICE raids
Vice President JD Vance is set to travel to Los Angeles on Friday amid tensions in the city over the Trump administration's immigration crackdown. Vance will 'tour a multi-agency Federal Joint Operations Center, a Federal Mobile Command Center, meet with leadership and Marines, and deliver brief remarks,' according to a readout of the vice president's travel plans. The trip comes after Los Angeles had been rocked with significant anti-ICE protests — which President Donald Trump deployed National Guard troops and Marines to subdue — drawing condemnation from Democrats as the city has become a microcosm of the nationwide struggle over the administration's immigration policy. Democrats and activists have clashed with administration officials and federal law enforcement over the issue in recent weeks, leading to inflamed tensions and even direct altercations with law enforcement agents. In an unusual act of force against a sitting lawmaker, federal law enforcement officers forcibly removed and handcuffed California Sen. Alex Padilla while he attempted to question Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem at a press briefing last week, prompting outrage from others within the Democratic Party. 'If they can handcuff a U.S. Senator for asking a question, imagine what they will do to you," Newsom said of the incident at the time. Noem and other Republicans defended the actions, with the DHS secretary saying Padilla 'wanted the scene,' and House Speaker Mike Johnson calling on him to be censured. Earlier in the month, the president of the labor union SEIU California, David Huerta, was knocked to the ground and arrested at a protest against immigration sweeps in Los Angeles, causing injuries that lead to his brief hospitalization. Huerta was released from federal custody three days later on a $50,000 bond. The protests and unrest have since quieted — Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass lifted a curfew earlier this week — but the troops have remained. And so has ICE. The Los Angeles Dodgers on Thursday said ICE agents had appeared at Dodger Stadium and 'requested permission to access the parking lots,' but were denied entry by the organization. But ICE claimed it was 'never there' in a reply to the baseball team's post on X. In a separate reply, the official Department of Homeland Security account said the presence of federal agents 'had nothing to do with the Dodgers,' and claimed 'CBP vehicles were in the stadium parking lot very briefly, unrelated to any operation or enforcement.' Later on Thursday, a federal appeals court indefinitely blocked an effort by California Gov. Gavin Newsom to retain control of the state's National Guard troops after Trump mobilized them to quell protests in Los Angeles, landing the Trump administration a win. The president touted the victory in a Truth Social post, claiming it as a 'BIG WIN' and slamming Newsom as 'incompetent and ill prepared.' 'The Judges obviously realized that Gavin Newscum is incompetent and ill prepared, but this is much bigger than Gavin, because all over the United States, if our Cities, and our people, need protection, we are the ones to give it to them should State and Local Police be unable, for whatever reason, to get the job done,' Trump wrote. 'This is a Great Decision for our Country, and we will continue to protect and defend Law abiding Americans.'
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
LEONARD GREENE: Mayor Adams should lift his press conference ban on Daily News reporter
With all that's going on in New York City these days, from elected officials being arrested by ICE agents to passengers being pepper sprayed on the subway, you would think Mayor Adams would have more important things to do than picking a fight with a reporter. But there he was, the mayor of the nation's largest city, banning a reporter from one of the city's most storied and respected news organizations from City Hall news conferences for — get this — asking a question. Adams claimed that the Daily News' Chris Sommerfeldt was being disrespectful and disruptive at a City Hall news conference last week when he repeatedly broke protocol and blurted out questions to the mayor without being called on. 'Listen, if he does that again, he's not to come into our conferences,' Adams said to his press staff. 'You do that again, you're going to stop at the gate.' 'You want to take a question from me, then?' Sommerfeldt asked. 'He did it again,' Adams said. 'Make sure security knows he's not allowed back into this room.' Adams later said that Sommerfeldt was being disrespectful to other reporters, a claim no other journalist has backed. What Adams conveniently left out is that he hadn't called on Sommerfeldt to ask a question in three months. Why not? Well, that really doesn't matter. It's probably some lingering petty beef over some stories the reporter wrote. What matters is that by singling him out and banning him from his news conferences, Adams is sending a dangerous message to other reporters who write tough stories about him. 'Banning Sommerfeldt from attending the Mayor's press conferences is plainly unconstitutional,' News attorney Matthew Leish wrote to the city's legal department , citing both First and 14th amendment issues. Leish asked the Adams administration to drop the ban by noon on Monday at the latest, and did not rule out further legal action. 'The Daily News and Mr. Sommerfeldt expressly reserve all of their rights and remedies,' he wrote. That's way more time than Adams deserves. He should lift the ban right this second, and apologize to Sommerfeldt, the press corp that covers him and the city of New York. Full disclosure: I've known and worked with Sommerfeldt at The News for nearly a decade. Further disclosure: As a former City Hall reporter, I've known and worked with Adams for more than twice that time. Over those years, Adams has been accessible, fair and well reasoned. There is no favorite in this fight. Wrong is just wrong. There is no law that says Adams has to call on a specific reporter. There is also no law that says a reporter can't shout out a question at a press conference. We've seen it a thousand times from the White House to the red carpet. By banning this one reporter, Adams did himself no favors with the rest of the media, and the timing could not have been worse with Election Day right around the corner. After the ban, news outlets were lining up to denounce the action. The New York Press Club, the Freedom of the Press Foundation, and PEN America have all called on Adams to drop the ban. The irony is that Sommerfeldt wasn't even asking the mayor a tough question. He threw Adams a softball follow-up to a question about what independent party line he was running on in his re-election bid. Given the mayor's recent legal troubles — corruption indictment, sexual harassment allegations — the shouted questions could have been a whole lot worse.
