VOX POPULI: Ultimately, international law our only ‘tool' to resolve conflicts
Missiles launched from Iran are seen from Jerusalem on June 13. (REUTERS/Ronen Zvulun)
Israel on June 13 mounted a sustained offensive against Iran by targeting nuclear and military sites as well as other structures.
But why now, when something of this magnitude could escalate into a global crisis?
Reading Israel's statement justifying its actions as 'self-defense' and 'pre-emptive' in nature, I recalled the words of a certain scholar of international law I interviewed years ago.
I visited Italian jurist Antonio Cassese (1937-2011) at his home to hear his views on war and the international criminal justice system. But he also went on to discuss the Iraq War and the Middle East.
When I asked his opinion on 'preventive pre-emptive strikes,' he cited an example, which went to the following effect:
'Let's say you believe Iran will use a nuclear weapon one year from now (and launch a pre-emptive strike against Iran) and justify it as self-defense, you must satisfy three conditions.
'One, you must be able to provide the United Nations with solid proof (of Iran's intent to use a nuclear weapon). Two, your pre-emptive attack must be aimed solely at 'dangerous targets,' not the Iranian government or its administrative system. And three, when you realize later that you were wrong to have attacked Iran, you must agree to be tried in an international court of law.'
But if the pre-emptive strike did not meet those three conditions, what then, I asked, and Cassese replied without missing a beat, 'Then, that's an act of aggression.'
He said conflicts cannot be resolved by armed force, only by international law, adding that multinational efforts to end conflicts are also of crucial importance.
Dutch humanist Hugo Grotius (1583-1645), widely considered the 'father of international law,' published his seminal work 'On the Law of War and Peace' exactly 400 years ago.
I feel despair when I think that we humans cannot stop going to war, even though we regret it later, every time.
I wondered how Cassese would have reacted to the latest Israeli offensive, were he alive today.
Would he have raged against Israel for ignoring his three conditions?
My sense is that he probably would have appealed to the international community to act on international law, which he believed to be the only way to resolve conflicts.
--The Asahi Shimbun, June 14
* * *
Vox Populi, Vox Dei is a popular daily column that takes up a wide range of topics, including culture, arts and social trends and developments. Written by veteran Asahi Shimbun writers, the column provides useful perspectives on and insights into contemporary Japan and its culture.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Asahi Shimbun
3 hours ago
- Asahi Shimbun
Modi coming in August to seal deal on bullet trains for India
India's Prime Minister Narendra Modi reviews the honor guard at the Government House in Bangkok on April 3. (Reuters) Japanese and Indian officials are putting the final touches on a trip to Japan in late August by Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi that will see Tokyo reaping a windfall sale of the latest Shinkansen bullet train technology to New Delhi. East Japan Railway Co. is planning to start commercial operations of its new E10 series of bullet trains in fiscal 2030, which the government has already said it is willing to share with India, according to several diplomatic sources in the two nations. 'This would be the first case of the latest model being introduced simultaneously in Japan and another country,' said a government source in Tokyo. During Modi's visit in late 2015 when Shinzo Abe was prime minister, it was agreed that India's first high-speed railway network would use Japanese technology. Initially, the E5 series used on the Tohoku Shinkansen line was to be exported to India. But then JR East in March announced plans to begin development of the next-generation E10 series of bullet trains, so officials approached their Indian counterparts about using that technology instead, according to sources. Modi last visited Japan in May 2023 as one of the invited leaders to join the Group of Seven summit in Hiroshima. One aim of the August trip is to set a pattern of reciprocal visits by the leaders of the two nations. India will host the Quadrilateral Security Dialogue, known as the Quad meeting, that groups Australia, India, Japan and the United States this autumn. Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba is expected to attend. Arrangements are now being worked out for Modi and Ishiba in August to visit the plant in Miyagi Prefecture where the E10 prototype is being developed. Modi will also get an update on a plan announced in 2022 by Ishiba's predecessor, Fumio Kishida, for Japan to invest 5 trillion yen ($34.2 billion) in India over a five-year period. The two leaders are also expected to discuss cooperation in constructing a supply chain for semiconductors and other vital products. Modi may visit China after his Japan trip to attend the Shanghai Cooperation Organization summit, according to diplomatic sources. Russia is also a member of that organization. By visiting Japan prior to China, Modi will alleviate concerns in Tokyo that New Delhi, with its longstanding nonaligned diplomatic policy, is too dependent on Beijing, a government source said. (This article was written by Nen Satomi in Tokyo and Takashi Ishihara in New Delhi.)
Yomiuri Shimbun
3 hours ago
- Yomiuri Shimbun
Europeans Press Iran on Nuclear Curbs, but Geneva Talks Yield No Breakthrough
GENEVA – European foreign ministers pressed their Iranian counterpart on Friday for curbs to Tehran's nuclear program, but the high-stakes meeting in Geneva yielded no quick off-ramp from the conflict in which President Donald Trump is threatening to bomb Iranian nuclear sites. Hours of talks at a luxury hotel ended without a breakthrough, officials said, even as all the ministers came out declaring their readiness to keep talking. The clock is ticking, though: Trump has set a two-week deadline to decide whether the United States will join Israel in the military campaign it launched last week vowing to cripple Iran's nuclear sites. Trump on Friday said that 'two weeks would be the maximum.' Washington is now in a standoff with Tehran over whether Iran should be allowed to enrich uranium at all, even for civilian purposes. After Friday's meeting, European ministers said they had pushed Tehran to restrict nuclear activities and negotiate with Washington, while Iran's foreign minister countered that Israeli strikes must stop before Tehran resumes any bargaining with the White House. A European diplomat, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive diplomacy, said that there was no date set for a future meeting but that officials intend to reconvene within two weeks – before Trump's self-imposed deadline. Trump, however, characterized the European intervention as unhelpful and unlikely to achieve results. 'Nah, they didn't help,' he said Friday afternoon. 'Iran doesn't want to speak to Europe. They want to speak to us. Europe is not going to be able to help on this one.' European leaders have been thrown off balance by Trump, who denied U.S. involvement in Israel's attack only to warn days later that he may join the Israeli campaign, which has spiraled into a deadly tit-for-tat with mounting civilian casualties and risks inflaming the region. The attacks continued Friday as the officials sat down for talks in Geneva. America's traditional European partners are deeply wary that U.S. involvement would lead to a wider, unpredictable war and that their nations could be drawn in. They have been working the phones hoping to carve out a diplomatic path before any U.S. strikes. Trump, who had promised to reach a deal with Iran over its nuclear program and lambasted the era of U.S. interventions in the Middle East, has since demanded Iran's 'UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER.' Despite the absence of a swift agreement, European officials hope Friday's meeting in Geneva – involving France, Britain, Germany and the European Union, which all had a central role in negotiating the 2015 Iran nuclear agreement along with Russia, China and the United States – leads to a more prominent mediation role for American allies that have been sidelined under Trump. European officials cast the latest diplomacy as an 11th-hour scramble to influence the crisis: to extract greater concessions from Iran, whose position they believe has now been weakened, and to get Trump to back away from his threats of a bombing campaign and suggestions of regime change. The Europeans acknowledged that it was a tall order on both fronts. It is far from clear that Trump will heed – or is even listening to – their calls for restraint. And Iran may not be willing to accept any ultimatum, officials concede. On Friday, the Europeans – French Foreign Minister Jean-Noël Barrot, British Foreign Secretary David Lammy, German Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul and the European Union's foreign policy chief, Kaja Kallas – gathered at the German Consulate in Geneva, where they conferred around a table on an outdoor terrace. They met with Iran's foreign minister, Abbas Araghchi, later Friday afternoon. 'Regional escalation benefits no one, and that's why we need to keep the discussions with Tehran open,' Kallas told reporters after the meeting. Trump's wavering and his two-week deadline opened a small window for the diplomatic bid by the Europeans – who share Washington's insistence that Iran must not obtain a nuclear weapon. The meeting was coordinated with Washington, four officials familiar with the planning said, speaking on the condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive diplomacy. Still, Araghchi told reporters that Iran was 'ready to consider diplomacy once again, once the aggression is stopped and the aggressor is held accountable.' The European diplomat said Friday's talks broached the U.S. demand of zero enrichment of uranium by Iran, though there was little movement on this and other issues. While Tehran has said it is open to negotiating over its nuclear activities, it has rejected giving up all uranium enrichment, maintaining that it has the right to enrich nuclear fuel for civilian use. Previous talks contemplated allowing Iran to continue a limited amount of uranium enrichment for civilian energy purposes. Iran in the past pledged never to acquire nuclear weapons under the 2015 deal that Trump abandoned in 2018. Barrot, France's foreign minister, has said European conditions include a path to 'a substantial and durable rollback of Iran's nuclear program, of its ballistic missile program and its regional destabilization activities.' He suggested Friday without elaborating that the Iranians appeared ready to make concessions that previously were not on the table. But Araghchi said Iran's defense capabilities, an apparent reference to ballistic missiles, were 'nonnegotiable.' France, Germany, Britain and the E.U. were central to negotiations that resulted in the landmark 2015 deal to contain Iran's nuclear activities in exchange for sanctions relief under the Obama administration. After Trump abandoned the deal and reimposed U.S. sanctions, Iran gradually increased the quality and quantity of its enriched-uranium production. The Europeans would be instrumental in enforcing a new deal, including at the International Atomic Energy Agency, the global nuclear watchdog. Trump mostly shut out the Europeans when he came into office again this year and instead kick-started negotiations with Iran, which included promises of peace until the Israeli strikes began last week. French President Emmanuel Macron said at a Group of Seven meeting this week that Trump had indicated he would seek discussions to stop the hostilities. Soon after leaving the G-7, Trump denied that he was working on a 'ceasefire' and warned Iranians to 'immediately evacuate Tehran' – the nation's capital with around 10 million residents – putting the world on edge. Tehran has warned it would retaliate against a U.S. attack by hitting American bases in the region. European calls for de-escalation have done little to move Israeli officials, who have also framed the conflict as a chance to topple Iran's leadership. Israel launched its strikes last week despite Trump's stated ambitions for diplomacy, derailing U.S. negotiations and vowing to end Iran's ability to build a nuclear weapon. Israel is widely known to possess nuclear weapons but has never publicly acknowledged such an arsenal. Though the Europeans all urge de-escalation and agree on restricting Iran's nuclear program, they are not speaking with a single voice. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz this week praised the Israeli attacks and described them as 'the dirty work Israel is doing for all of us.' Macron, meanwhile, warned against 'regime change because nobody can say what would come after that' and asked whether anyone had learned from the 2003 U.S. invasion of Iraq. The conflict has also raised questions about an E.U. review of trade ties with Israel over its devastating war in Gaza. European officials had recently toughened their criticism of Israel. But some E.U. countries, now keen to see Iran's capabilities targeted, appear less inclined to consider punitive action against Israel, which had been expected to be debated by the 27-nation bloc in the next few weeks. Israeli fighter jets continued the blitz on Iran overnight Thursday and throughout Friday, attacking sites linked to Iran's missile systems and dozens of targets in Tehran, including a weapons research center, the Israeli military said Friday. Israel's Army Radio reported that Israel assassinated an Iranian nuclear scientist, bringing the number of Iranian scientists Israel claims to have killed since it launched the conflict last week to at least 11. During an Iranian barrage Friday, some missiles broke through Israel's vaunted air defenses and hit near government buildings by Haifa's port, injuring about 31 people, a hospital said. Iranian strikes hit sites in central and southern Israel, including a building bearing the logo of a military cyberdefense training center in Beersheba. The intensifying strikes and threats have also triggered a diplomatic scramble in the Middle East, where Iran and Israel's neighbors are rattled by the prospect of an widening war. Jordanian Foreign Minister Ayman Safadi visited Paris on Thursday and described European talks with Iran as important for 'protecting the region.' Egyptian Foreign Minister Badr Abdelatty spoke with Trump envoy Steve Witkoff for the second time in a week and separately with Araghchi, urging them to 'utilize the available diplomatic channels' to halt the hostilities, the Foreign Ministry said Friday. – – – Parker reported from Cairo. Natalie Allison and Nilo Tabrizy in Washington, Lior Soroka in Tel Aviv, Victoria Bisset in London and Suzan Haidamous in Beirut contributed to this report.
Yomiuri Shimbun
3 hours ago
- Yomiuri Shimbun
Iran Says No to Nuclear Talks during Conflict as UN Urges Restraint
DUBAI/JERUSALEM/WASHINGTON, June 20 (Reuters) – Iran said on Friday it would not discuss the future of its nuclear programme while under attack by Israel, as Europe tried to coax Tehran back into negotiations and the United States considers whether to get involved in the conflict. A week into its campaign, Israel said it had struck dozens of military targets, including missile production sites, a research body it said was involved in nuclear weapons development in Tehran and military facilities in western and central Iran. Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi said there was no room for negotiations with the U.S. 'until Israeli aggression stops'. But he later arrived in Geneva for talks with European foreign ministers at which Europe hopes to establish a path back to diplomacy. U.S. President Donald Trump said on Friday he was unlikely to press Israel to scale back its airstrikes to allow negotiations to continue. 'I think it's very hard to make that request right now. If somebody is winning, it's a little bit harder to do than if somebody is losing, but we're ready, willing and able, and we've been speaking to Iran, and we'll see what happens,' he said. Speaking to reporters after his plane landed in Morristown, New Jersey, Trump said he doubted European negotiators would be able to secure a ceasefire. 'Iran doesn't want to speak to Europe. They want to speak to us. Europe is not going to be able to help in this one,' Trump said. The president said he would not discuss the potential use of ground forces in Iran, and he again disagreed with his own national intelligence director, Tulsi Gabbard, by insisting that Iran does have the capability to build a nuclear weapon. 'She's wrong,' Trump said. Gabbard testified to Congress in March that the U.S. intelligence community continued to judge that Tehran was not working on a nuclear warhead. Trump has said that he will decide whether the U.S. will join Israel in its efforts within the next two weeks. That will be enough time 'to see whether or not people come to their senses,' he said on Friday. MISSILE STRIKES Israel's military said on Friday that it had completed another wave of strikes on missile launch site in western Iran. Earlier, it had said fighter jets had struck surface-to-air missile batteries in southwestern Iran as part of efforts to achieve air superiority over the country. Explosions were heard in Iran's southwestern Khuzestan province and at least four people there were killed, IRNA news agency reported. At least five people were injured when Israel hit a five-storey building in Tehran housing a bakery and a hairdresser's, Fars news agency reported. Iranian air defences were activated on Friday evening, Fars news agency reported. Iran fired missiles at Beersheba in southern Israel and Haifa in the north, causing damage to an Ottoman-era mosque, according to Foreign Minister Gideon Saar. A foreign ministry video also showed extensive damage to a nearby high-rise building that houses a branch of Israel's Interior Ministry. Haifa is home to Israel's busiest seaport and a naval base. Saar, speaking in Haifa, said he was very sceptical about Iran's intentions. 'We know from the record of Iran they are not negotiating honestly,' he said. Fars news agency quoted an Iranian military spokesman as saying Tehran's missile and drone attacks on Friday had used long-range and ultra-heavy missiles against military sites, defence industries and command and control centres. About 20 missiles were fired in those latest Iranian strikes, an Israeli military official said, and at least two people were hurt, according to the Israeli ambulance service. Israel's envoy to the United Nations, Danny Danon, told the U.N. Security Council his country would not stop its attacks 'until Iran's nuclear threat is dismantled'. Iran's U.N. envoy Amir Saeid Iravani called for Security Council action and said Tehran was alarmed by reports that the U.S. may join the war. NUCLEAR RISKS The head of the U.N. nuclear watchdog warned against attacks on nuclear facilities and called for maximum restraint. 'Armed attack on nuclear facilities… could result in radioactive releases with great consequences within and beyond the boundaries of the state which has been attacked,' Rafael Grossi, director general of the International Atomic Energy Agency, told the Security Council. He spoke a day after an Israeli military official said it had been 'a mistake' for a military spokesperson to have said Israel had struck Bushehr, Iran's only nuclear power plant. He said he could neither confirm nor deny that Russian-built Bushehr, located on the Gulf coast, had been hit. Iran said on Friday its air defences had been activated in Bushehr, without elaborating. Israel says it is determined to destroy Iran's nuclear capabilities but that it wants to avoid any nuclear disaster. U.N. Secretary-General Antonio Guterres, also speaking at the world body's Security Council, said the Iran-Israel conflict could 'ignite a fire no one can control' and called on all parties to 'give peace a chance'. Russia and China demanded immediate de-escalation. URANIUM ENRICHMENT A senior Iranian official told Reuters Iran was ready to discuss limitations on uranium enrichment but that any proposal for zero enrichment – not being able to enrich uranium at all – would be rejected, 'especially now under Israel's strikes'. Israel began attacking Iran last Friday, saying its longtime enemy was on the verge of developing nuclear weapons. Iran, which says its nuclear programme is only for peaceful purposes, retaliated with missile and drone strikes on Israel. Israel is widely assumed to possess nuclear weapons. It neither confirms nor denies this. Israeli air attacks have killed 639 people in Iran, according to the Human Rights Activists News Agency, a U.S.-based human rights organisation that tracks Iran. The dead include the military's top echelon and nuclear scientists. In Israel, 24 civilians have been killed in Iranian missile attacks, according to authorities. Reuters could not independently verify casualty figures for either side.
