Wildfires can have dramatic effect on water quality, UBC research finds
While the smoky greenhouse gas emissions get most of the attention, new research from the University of British Columbia suggests wildfires may be producing several other troubling environmental impacts.
Research by the Institute for the Oceans and Fisheries raised concerns that runoff from wildfire zones could both be harming water quality and ecosystems and be speeding up the process of climate change.
In one recent study, professor Brian Hunt and research scientist Emily Brown focused on the Fraser River, combing through 20 years of historical wildfire and water data.
They concluded that more than 16 per cent in the variation of water quality could be linked to fires.
'We saw that wildfires lead to increases in the concentrations in metals and nutrients, including things like lead, copper and nitrogen, which could eventually lead to downstream negative effects on river and ocean ecosystems including impacting fish and shellfish and the aquatic ecosystems overall,' Brown said.
Story continues below advertisement
1:50
Canada's summer forecast raises fears for worsening wildfires
Wildfires are a natural part of the province's environment, Brown said, meaning the presence of such materials shouldn't necessarily ring alarm bells.
Get breaking National news
For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen. Sign up for breaking National newsletter Sign Up
By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy
But she said with climate change increasing the frequency and intensity of the fires B.C. sees, there is room for concern.
High concentrations of metals can end up in fish and shellfish, both harming them and causing potential health hazards for humans that eat them. High concentrations of nutrients can cause algae to bloom, potentially sucking oxygen from the water and releasing toxins.
'So the concern is more that if this continues to happen, then we can see negative impacts,' she said.
Also troubling is the potential for wildfire-tainted runoff to reinforce the cycle of climate change itself.
Story continues below advertisement
That finding, published in another recent study, revolves around 'black carbon,' a material of tightly-clustered carbon atoms that forms when carbon that is in trees or vegetation is burned.
1:38
Canada's 2023 wildfires released more carbon than most of the world's top economies
Because those tightly packed molecules are hard to break down, scientists believe they could help sequester carbon, keeping it out of the atmosphere, Brown explained.
'But what our research is showing is that as the climate is changing and the Fraser River is changing from being more snow-driven to maybe a bit more driven by rain, we could be seeing smaller particles of black carbon entering the ocean and ones that are easier to break down,' she said.
'And that could reduce the ability of black-carbon to sequester carbon from the atmosphere, and it could be broken down when it enters the ocean more quickly and then released back as carbon dioxide.'
Story continues below advertisement
Brown said the research is another reminder of the importance of local action, like respecting fire bans, and broader climate action.
She said it also points to the importance of prescribed and cultural burning, which can help ensure the province's forests are more resilient to wildfires.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Global News
11 hours ago
- Global News
‘The biggest betrayal': A year on, staff grieve Ontario Science Centre's snap closure
In the year since the abrupt closure of the Ontario Science Centre, the cost of a new site at Ontario Place has escalated, its opening date has been pushed back, there is no sign of a temporary location – and the old building's roof that was said to be at risk of collapse appears to be intact. Workers say they've dealt with a rodent and raccoon infestation at a building where science centre materials are stored, and the department that builds exhibits is at a virtual standstill. It's been a year of demoralizing changes, they say. Government officials announced midday on June 21, 2024, that the science centre at its original, east Toronto location would permanently close at the end of the day, citing an engineering report on the state of the building's roof. Critics have blasted the decision, noting that the report presented several options other than full closure, and have suggested the whole plan to move the science centre to a revamped Ontario Place was designed to lessen the heat a more controversial tenant — a waterpark and spa by European company Therme — has generated. Story continues below advertisement Infrastructure Minister Kinga Surma has said she did not want to jeopardize anyone's safety with the science centre's roof panels at risk of collapse. The workers do not buy it. Toronto set a weather record in 2024 with 1,145 millimetres of precipitation, which included two 'once-in-a-century' storms that flooded thousands of homes last summer and the city's snowiest winter in years. 'And the science centre is still standing,' said Raluca Ellis, the president of Local 549 of the Ontario Public Service Employees Union. 'It just seems like it was a manufactured crisis and that's the biggest betrayal.' NDP infrastructure critic Jennifer French also takes issue with stated reason for the closure. 'The roof managed to get through winter snow loads and a lot of rain this spring, and the only thing falling apart is the government's plan for a new science centre,' she said. The opening of the science centre at Ontario Place has already been pushed back from 2028 to 2029. A report from the auditor general late last year found that the cost estimate for building and maintaining the new science centre has increased by nearly $400 million from the government's spring 2023 business case for relocating it. Meanwhile, the government has said it will look for a space to house a temporary science centre until the new one opens. A request for proposals seeking a temporary location was released just days after the abrupt closure. It said the government was working 'expeditiously' to find an interim site and wanted it to open no later than Jan. 1, 2026. Story continues below advertisement No such location has yet been announced, nearly one year later. Get daily National news Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day. Sign up for daily National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy Jason Ash, of the group Save Ontario's Science Centre, said it is a shame children are missing out. 'The bottom line, one year out from the closure of the science centre on Don Mills Road, is that a generation of Ontario kids and youth are without a world-class institution to learn about STEM (science, technology, engineering and mathematics) education,' he said. 'Regardless of any of the other aspects that enter into the story … it's a real failure of the government's educational policy to have let down so many children.' The science centre is currently operating two pop-up exhibits at Harbourfront Centre and the CF Sherway Gardens mall in Toronto, and has had staff and small exhibits at various events around the city. As workers moved everything out of the old building last fall, one of the new storage locations presented a number of problems. All of the science centre's education materials were moved to a building by Highway 401 in Etobicoke. The building on Resources Road, which has become the science centre's official mailing address, is used as a warehouse of sorts where workers can gather experiments and small exhibits and other goodies for their visits to classrooms. That building had been vacant for more than a decade. Story continues below advertisement Problems began immediately, said four employees with knowledge of what's been happening there. They asked not to be named for fear of repercussion. They said workers discovered mouse, and possibly rat, excrement throughout the basement and on the second floor of the building. And there were also signs of a raccoon infestation, they said. The workers found droppings and little hand prints that suggested a raccoon, or a family of raccoons, was living in the building. The building's manager laid out 'a ton' of rodent traps and one large raccoon trap after workers complained to science centre management, the sources said. There was no running water for a time, with very few power outlets and reams of extension cord snaking throughout the area, they added. Workers also discovered asbestos in the building. 'The entire ordeal moving to Resources Road has been very frustrating,' said one worker. 'The topper was the mouse and raccoon s–t.' The infestation was eventually fixed, the sources said, though it took months. The science centre declined requests for interviews with management, saying no one was available. It referred questions about the problems with the building to Infrastructure Ontario, which did not respond to multiple questions from The Canadian Press by deadline. Story continues below advertisement The local union also declined to discuss problems at the building. Ontario Science Centre CEO Paul Kortenaar pointed to ongoing pop-ups, special events and satellite locations for children to enjoy. 'Planning is underway for our new home at Ontario Place, with a competitive design process for our new flagship location on Toronto's waterfront,' Kortenaar said in a statement. Management is working on a 10-year master plan for the new science centre, he wrote. 'This work reflects our broader vision: we are reimagining what a science centre can be — not only a building, but a dynamic, provincewide platform for learning, discovery and connection.' The connection between management and workers has frayed since the closure. Working from home is not in the employees' DNA, said Ellis, the Local 549 president. 'We are not working in ideal conditions and many ask why we put up with this and the answer is because we love the science centre, but ever since we were shut down, we've lost that essence of what the science centre is,' she said. More than 20 union members have taken buyout packages over the past year, Ellis said, most due to the sudden change in job conditions. Story continues below advertisement And the hope that workers could reunite in person at a new interim location was recently dashed. 'They told me the timeline for the interim location has been changed, that the process has paused and we don't know what the new timeline is,' Ellis said. For union steward Martin Fischer, who works in the education department, the loss of the original building has been 'heartbreaking.' 'It's been extremely difficult,' said Fischer, who describes himself and many colleagues as neurodivergent. 'I'm somebody who needs a physical workplace, I thrived in the environment at the science centre, being with classes a few hours a day, it could be kindergarten, it could be a high school class, it'd be adult and then I'd maybe go talk to the shops to help design and build stuff for the school program, but that's all gone now,' he said. He still goes to schools for presentations, but he also spends a lot of time at home in front of his computer. 'It's just not the same,' he said. Melis Tokgoz, vice president of the local union and an exhibit designer at the science centre, said she too has struggled since the closure. With the fabrication shop shuttered, there are far fewer designs to make, limited largely to the pop-up spots, she said. The science centre is looking at a few spots to restart designing and making exhibits for other science centres, but that work has largely stopped, Tokgoz said. Story continues below advertisement 'We keep getting these reassurances that one day we'll be back in the business of designing exhibits, but again, it is really hard to build that trust when you have no evidence otherwise,' she said. That joie de vivre among employees is missing, she said. 'There's this sense of grief amongst many employees, missing what their jobs once were, missing the fulfilment, and I'm no different.' 'The energy has been sad and melancholic and a bit depressing the whole time.'
Global News
2 days ago
- Global News
SpaceX Starship rocket explodes into massive fireball during routine test
A SpaceX rocket exploded Wednesday night, sending a dramatic fireball high into the sky during a routine test for an upcoming launch in Texas. The explosion was broadcast on a livestream of the SpaceX facility. In the footage, the fireball appears to come from the top of Starship 36 before the entire screen turns white due to the brightness of the explosion. After that, a large fire was seen at the site, along with scattered debris around the test site area, while the fire continued to burn for two hours following the explosion. SpaceX said the Starship rocket 'experienced a major anomaly' at about 11 p.m. while on the test stand preparing for the 10th flight test at Starbase, SpaceX's launch site in Texas. 'A safety clear area around the site was maintained throughout the operation and all personnel are safe and accounted for,' SpaceX said in a statement on X. 'Our Starbase team is actively working to safe the test site and the immediate surrounding area in conjunction with local officials.' Story continues below advertisement The Elon Musk-led company added that there are 'no hazards to residents in surrounding communities.' It also warned people not to approach the area while it was conducting safety operations with local officials at the test site and surrounding area. On Wednesday, June 18 at approximately 11 p.m. CT, the Starship preparing for the tenth flight test experienced a major anomaly while on a test stand at Starbase. A safety clear area around the site was maintained throughout the operation and all personnel are safe and accounted… — SpaceX (@SpaceX) June 19, 2025 After the explosion, SpaceX CEO Musk took to X and wrote, 'Just a scratch.' Just a scratch — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) June 19, 2025 Story continues below advertisement He also shared a post saying, 'RIP Ship 36,' with a meme of a man watching the explosion attached. RIP Ship 36 🫡🫡 — Space Sudoer (@spacesudoer) June 19, 2025 Wednesday night's explosion is the latest setback for SpaceX following multiple failed launches of its Starship rocket. Get breaking National news For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen. Sign up for breaking National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy In May, the Starship rocket was launched on its ninth expedition and briefly left the Earth's atmosphere before spinning out of control and breaking apart over the Indian Ocean. Musk had planned to launch eight simulator satellites following liftoff, which did not happen because the spacecraft's doors failed to open fully. Shortly after, it began to spin out of control. The company later confirmed that the spacecraft experienced 'a rapid unscheduled disassembly,' adding in an online statement that its team 'will continue to review data and work toward our next flight test.' Story continues below advertisement Despite its scattered descent into the Indian Ocean, the organization said Starship's ninth flight test 'marked a major milestone for reuse with the first flight-proven Super Heavy booster launching from Starbase, and once more returned Starship to space,' adding that data reviews were underway as staff prepared for its next launch. 1:25 SpaceX's Starship launches successfully but breaks apart during reentry There was also a late-stage explosion during SpaceX's eighth test flight of its Starship rocket in March, leaving a barrage of blazing shrapnel visible in the skies that disrupted air traffic. The first-stage booster landed safely back at the launch pad shortly after takeoff. Minutes later, the rocket's engines lost power, sending the vessel into an uncontrollable spin that the company said was caused by 'an energetic event in the aft portion of Starship (which) resulted in the loss of several Raptor engines.' The rocket reached nearly 150 kilometres in altitude before it ran into trouble. Ground crews lost communication with the vessel about nine-and-a-half minutes after lift-off, SpaceX confirmed. Story continues below advertisement Flights were temporarily grounded at Orlando International Airport as a result of the explosion. 1:58 SpaceX Starship debris streak across sky after test flight ends in explosion In January, SpaceX launched its seventh test flight of the Starship rocket, but the spacecraft was destroyed following a booster catch back at the pad. SpaceX said Starship broke apart, calling it a 'rapid unscheduled disassembly.' The rocket appeared to lift off from SpaceX's launchpad at its Starbase facility but eight-and-a-half minutes into the mission, ground control announced that it had lost all communication with the ship. 1:04 SpaceX's Starship explodes in flight test, forcing airlines to divert due to debris Flights near the Turks and Caicos Islands were spotted diverting to avoid the debris from the explosion and footage was shared of debris falling from the sky in the area. Story continues below advertisement Musk shared a video of the debris falling, writing, 'Success is uncertain, but entertainment is guaranteed!' Success is uncertain, but entertainment is guaranteed! ✨ — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) January 16, 2025 — With files from Global News' Rachel Goodman and The Associated Press
Global News
3 days ago
- Global News
Wildfires can have dramatic effect on water quality, UBC research finds
While the smoky greenhouse gas emissions get most of the attention, new research from the University of British Columbia suggests wildfires may be producing several other troubling environmental impacts. Research by the Institute for the Oceans and Fisheries raised concerns that runoff from wildfire zones could both be harming water quality and ecosystems and be speeding up the process of climate change. In one recent study, professor Brian Hunt and research scientist Emily Brown focused on the Fraser River, combing through 20 years of historical wildfire and water data. They concluded that more than 16 per cent in the variation of water quality could be linked to fires. 'We saw that wildfires lead to increases in the concentrations in metals and nutrients, including things like lead, copper and nitrogen, which could eventually lead to downstream negative effects on river and ocean ecosystems including impacting fish and shellfish and the aquatic ecosystems overall,' Brown said. Story continues below advertisement 1:50 Canada's summer forecast raises fears for worsening wildfires Wildfires are a natural part of the province's environment, Brown said, meaning the presence of such materials shouldn't necessarily ring alarm bells. Get breaking National news For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen. Sign up for breaking National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy But she said with climate change increasing the frequency and intensity of the fires B.C. sees, there is room for concern. High concentrations of metals can end up in fish and shellfish, both harming them and causing potential health hazards for humans that eat them. High concentrations of nutrients can cause algae to bloom, potentially sucking oxygen from the water and releasing toxins. 'So the concern is more that if this continues to happen, then we can see negative impacts,' she said. Also troubling is the potential for wildfire-tainted runoff to reinforce the cycle of climate change itself. Story continues below advertisement That finding, published in another recent study, revolves around 'black carbon,' a material of tightly-clustered carbon atoms that forms when carbon that is in trees or vegetation is burned. 1:38 Canada's 2023 wildfires released more carbon than most of the world's top economies Because those tightly packed molecules are hard to break down, scientists believe they could help sequester carbon, keeping it out of the atmosphere, Brown explained. 'But what our research is showing is that as the climate is changing and the Fraser River is changing from being more snow-driven to maybe a bit more driven by rain, we could be seeing smaller particles of black carbon entering the ocean and ones that are easier to break down,' she said. 'And that could reduce the ability of black-carbon to sequester carbon from the atmosphere, and it could be broken down when it enters the ocean more quickly and then released back as carbon dioxide.' Story continues below advertisement Brown said the research is another reminder of the importance of local action, like respecting fire bans, and broader climate action. She said it also points to the importance of prescribed and cultural burning, which can help ensure the province's forests are more resilient to wildfires.
