Celebrity chef Colin Fassnidge shares his shocking My Kitchen Rules salary: 'Below minimum wage'
He's one of the most well-know celebrity chefs on Australian television.
But My Kitchen Rules star Colin Fassnidge was paid a shockingly low salary when he joined the show.
The Irish-born chef, 51, has revealed he was paid just $40,000 for his time on My Kitchen Rules in 2013, when he joined the show's fourth season.
'My first MKR, I got paid $40,000 for the year. That's below minimum wage,' Colin told the Confessions of a Reality Star podcast.
'I was still learning. And then after, when I saw what everyone else was getting paid, I was like, we need to have a chat.'
From A-list scandals and red carpet mishaps to exclusive pictures and viral moments, subscribe to the DailyMail's new showbiz newsletter to stay in the loop.
View this post on Instagram
A post shared by CONFESSIONS OF A REALITY STAR PODCAST (@confessionsofarealitystar)
In 2013, the minimum wage salary for full-time workers based on 38 hours was $622.20 a week, which works out to $32,354 a year, slightly less than what Colin earned.
While many believe a stint on a reality TV series is a passport to fame and riches, often the opposite is true.
Sadly, the latter seems to be the case for the current crop of contestants on the long-running series My Kitchen Rules.
In September, an unnamed contestant from the 2024 season revealed to Daily Mail Australia that the going rate for burgeoning TV chefs was $1100 per week - barely above minimum wage.
The Australian minimum wage is currently $24.10 per hour, or $915.90 per week based on 38 hours.
The contestant said appearing on the reality show meant taking a pay cut for many, claiming that one castmate ended up in the red after filming.
'It certainly didn't cover our usual salaries,' they claimed.
'I think one of our castmates was in debt after filming.'
Despite the series drawing a huge audience each season, the show's popularity is often not reflected in how the contestants are compensated, according to a Seven casting executive.
'A lot of people still think getting on TV will make you rich and famous. It doesn't,' they said.
They added the excitement of being selected for the show often outweighs the meagre remuneration.
'By the time you have seen your contract most applicants are so excited to be picked, they don't care about money. That's what producers expect,' the source revealed.
A former MKR participant also revealed to Daily Mail Australia that, during their time on the show, they were forced to work well outside hours expected of someone earning just above average minimum wage.
'The shoots were longer than we were told. There was no overtime,' the contestant revealed.
'We were not expecting how long we were required to be there. Some days we would be filming well into the night.'
The unnamed casting executive also pointed out the disparity between what the hosts of reality shows can earn versus the pay packets of the contestants who drive interest in the shows for Australian audiences.
'TV is wild. If you are the host of the show you could be making millions. However, if you are the main character and usually the reason why people are talking about your series - you are on as low as $70 a day,' they said.
A source also revealed to Now To Love that contestants were paid $1000 but had to pay for groceries out of that amount to practice.
'It's hard. We were spending up to $600 a week on food because you're encouraged to cook as much as possible,' the insider said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
2 hours ago
- BBC News
Sydney Opera House: The one man on speed dial for 50 years
Since the Sydney Opera House opened over 50 years ago, countless musical stars, world leaders and awestruck patrons have visited its iconic outside forecourt has been blanketed by thousands of bare bodies in the name of art and, inside, an only slightly less naked Arnold Schwarzenegger even won a body-building title. There have been renovations and controversies, protests staged and history the constant, through it all, is Terry been tuning the building's pianos for half a century, working behind the scenes to make sure the uber-technical instruments are ready for the world's best a family legacy started by his father when the Opera House first opened in 1973 - and one that ended this week, with Terry's retirement. The 69-year-old still remembers the first time he stepped into the half-finished Opera House, as a wide-eyed child."The sails were up, but it was all very bare," he tells the BBC, gesturing to the edges of the grand Concert Hall."There was nothing inside… You could see out to the harbour on both sides."At the time, he had no inkling he'd spend most of his life inside the iconic venue. His dad, on the other hand, no doubt had grand plans, Terry then, Liverpool emigrant Ron Harper was renowned on the Sydney music scene as both a piano tuner and a performer."He would take me to these nightclubs as a [kid] in my little school uniform. And I would be seeing all of these world-class acts," Terry recalls. He rattles off a list including Welsh songstress Dame Shirley Bassey, stage icon Liza Minelli, and British TV and music darling Cilla Black – whom they even drove home after her performance one night."It was an interesting childhood," Terry surmises, with a it's one which instilled in him a love of music – even if he wasn't particularly interested in making it ironically, Terry admits he spent about a year learning piano before giving it up, dabbling with the drums and his school choir was in 1973, shortly after the Opera House was officially opened by Queen Elizabeth II, that his father Ron got his fateful call-up."One day, the Sydney Symphony was rehearsing downstairs, and the piano hadn't been tuned particularly well by whoever had been in in the morning," Terry says. "One of the people working here knew my dad." Three years later, a 19-year-old Terry would join Ron under the sails, after completing a one-year piano tuning course when he left started on rehearsal pianos in the backroom, while building up his skills and confidence, before finally taking over when his dad retired a decade days, he can walk into a room and immediately know if the piano is out of tune."I always had a very good sense of pitch," he says, "[but] it's difficult to master."And it's all done by on the piano in front of him, he explains this one has 243 strings. For most of the keys, three separate steel wires combine to make the note."Once they start to deviate from the same frequency, they cause these things which we call beats, and that's what we're listening for when we're tuning.""Can you hear this?" he asks, I – a music pleb - cannot."It's not like tuning a guitar," he says, offering me some solace. The process can take up to 90 minutes, and each of the 30 pianos in the building need to be tuned basically every time they're used."There's so many strings in there that can wander out of tune, especially when you're playing big piano concertos," Terry explains."I refer to these as being F1 racing cars… They're really gunning them."It can be a demanding and relentless job."It doesn't stop. And it's night times, it's early mornings, it's two and three times a day," Terry the perks – which include brushing shoulders with some of the globe's most-decorated musicians and easy access to the most sought-after tickets in town - aren't to be scoffed at, he hastens to has also tuned pianos in many other notable locations - from the Royal Albert Hall and Abbey Road Studios to the BBC broadcast none occupy a spot in his heart like the Opera House."For me, it's a very happy place. It's pretty much been my life." Earlier this year, after five decades, Terry decided it was time to hang up the tools."I got quite cozy during Covid, not having to work," he son couldn't be tempted to take up the family business – "he's into computer stuff, like all good young men are" – and so Friday also marked the end of the Harper legacy inside the Sydney Opera venue has opened a tender for a new contractor to tune their pianos – and Terry says he's heard a rumour they could be replacing him with several tuners."I think somebody owes me some money… I've been doing the work of six people," he aside, he admits that as his departure has crept closer, a wave of emotions came with it."Piano tuners, we're fairly solitary," he says. "We like to be in a room by ourselves with quiet, because you have to focus and listen to what you're doing… [but] I've always had the camaraderie of all the people that work here.""I'm going to miss the place."
The Guardian
3 hours ago
- The Guardian
Tell us: what are your experiences of buying a home in Australia?
Australia has one of the most unaffordable property markets in the world, arguably made worse by tax breaks for investors. The share of investors buying homes has consistently grown over the past 25 years at the expense of prospective owner-occupiers. That trend threatens to accelerate again as younger buyers get priced out of the market amid another surge in property prices. A lack of housing stock has meant properties in favourable locations, near schools and transport networks, are subject to fierce competition between investors and those looking for a family home. We would like to hear your experiences of buying a home. How long have you been actively looking to purchase a property? What have been the worst of your near misses? Are you being outbid by other home buyers or investors? If you have recently bought a property – did you have to make any sacrifices in your search? Did your toughest competition come from owner-occupiers or investors? Tell us the suburb and city Please include as much detail as possible. Please include as much detail as possible. Your contact details are helpful so we can contact you for more information. They will only be seen by the Guardian. Your contact details are helpful so we can contact you for more information. They will only be seen by the Guardian. If you include other people's names please ask them first. If you're having trouble using the form, click here. Read terms of service here.
The Guardian
3 hours ago
- The Guardian
The line between entertainment and reality is getting fuzzier. But making the distinction is more important than ever
Gina Chick, David Genat, Guy Sebastian, Poh Ling Yeow, Elon Musk and Donald Trump don't have a lot in common – except that they are the living embodiment of the essential truth of reality television: there can only be one winner. Gina, David, Guy, Poh and countless others have turned their success at surviving, dancing, cooking and singing into brilliant careers probably beyond their wildest dreams. Donald Trump applied the same single-mindedness to become the most powerful man in the world. For more than a decade he was in the living rooms of millions of Americans most weeks, picking winners, barking his judgment. Viewers did not see the squadrons of producers, camera operators, sound people, makeup artists, fixers and fawners. Truthiness trumps honesty as most of us understand the concept of accuracy. As a nearly 80-year-old, DJT has instinctively absorbed the lessons of television all his life. While others struggled to make sense of communications scholar Marshall McLuhan's theory that 'the medium is the message', he lived it. He strove to be an influencer before the term was invented; he was, and continues to be, the ultimate product placement. The sneers of others fed him. For all the talk about the power of social media, Elon Musk, learned at his expense that while his platform is great for proclamations, self-promotion and advertising, its narrative power still does not match the ingrained habits of television storytelling. 'I regret some of my posts about President @realDonaldTrump last week. They went too far,' he posted, waving a white flag on X. Meanwhile, the rest of us nodded sagely, we knew this would happen, pass the popcorn, enjoy the show. Except this is not a show, even though the logic of television we have all grown up with encourages us to think it is. The man at its centre has the capacity, literally, to destroy the world. This fact that no doubt lingered in the minds of other world leaders as he made a typically attention-winning departure from the G7 Canadian summit last week. He quickly slapped down the French president, Emmanuel Macron, who with typical candour, suggested the president had left to broker peace in the Middle East. Like all stars, DJT also has an enormous capacity to charm. Jeffrey Goldberg, the editor of the Atlantic who did enormous (temporary) damage to the new regime when he revealed he had been included in a classified group chat on Signal organised by Mike Waltz, who not long afterwards ceased to be the president's national security adviser. Goldberg describes a subsequent meeting in the gilded Oval Office: 'What I found on this particular meeting was a Trump who was low-key, attentive and eager to convince us that he is good at his job and good for the country. It isn't easy to escape the tractor beam of his charisma, but somehow we managed.' While a young DJT was absorbing the lessons of the age of television in midtown Manhattan, 50 blocks south, Neil Postman, a brilliant scholar at New York University, feared where this new manufactured reality might lead. In his erudite, yet snappily titled treatise, Amusing Ourselves to Death, Postman described the way the methods of television had transformed, and in his mind debased, the public sphere. Entertainment and emotion prevail; the worst tendencies in human nature pandered to; truthiness is enough. Postman had little objection to television as entertainment, what worried him was when these methods and rituals were also adopted in news and current affairs, in the serious programs that provide the information that inform big decisions. As we would say now, nuance and complexity are lost. He turned time and again to Aldous Huxley to make sense of what he feared was unfolding. 'He was trying to tell us that what afflicted the people in Brave New World was not that they were laughing instead of thinking, but that they did not know what they were laughing about and why they had stopped thinking.' We are the poorer for not knowing what Postman would make of this moment. He died a year before the first season of The Apprentice went to air in 2004, with 'decent ratings and mocking reviews'. DJT took an elevator 21 floors down to the pretend boardroom on the fourth floor of Trump Tower, where contestants who had been set tasks to rescue his failing enterprises awaited his judgment. As Emily Nussbaum documents in Cue the Sun, at that point no one understood how he would use the platform as a stepping stone to his grander ambition. When he did, one of the early apprentices urged voters to look beyond the artifice of television and recognise the risk. Celebrity was transformed into a vocation. The real world a B-roll backdrop. Australian networks were quick to adopt the formats of reality television, in the process creating some of the best in the genre. Our Housewives of … are considered some of the greatest, and Alone has restored a lost sense of authenticity. Despite Pauline Hanson dancing with the stars, there is still a line between public life and entertainment. But it is getting fuzzier as the attention seeking demands of the contemporary online media environment reward froth and emotion more than substance. Preserving this distinction between real and make-believe is more important than ever. Julianne Schultz is the author of The Idea of Australia, the co-editor of First Things First (Griffith Review) and the librettist of the multi-award-winning opera Black River
