logo
Concern Stormont MLAs delivering pre-scripted remarks for social media clips

Concern Stormont MLAs delivering pre-scripted remarks for social media clips

Almost a year and a half since the Northern Ireland Assembly was restored, Mr Poots has written to MLAs about the standards of debate in the chamber.
Stormont Speaker Edwin Poots (Liam McBurney/PA)
He also made his points at the start of the plenary session on Tuesday.
Mr Poots, who has been elected to the Assembly for almost three decades, said he has witnessed 'political giants who passionately articulated their own case', but also engaged in debate and 'realised that they had to give as good as they could take'.
'Our standards of debate are often referred to in the context of the first element – the standard of remarks made about other members. However, there has been a decreased focus on the second element – the concept of debate,' he said.
'If the Assembly is to be serious about its scrutiny role, having a strong culture of parliamentary debate is vital.'
Mr Poots said requiring MLAs to take care in their language and have civility in exchanges 'is not intended to, and should not, prevent passionate and robust debate'.
'In my time in the Assembly since 1998, I have been privileged to witness political giants, who passionately articulated their own case, engaging in debate,' he said.
'However, they also realised that they had to give as good as they could take.
'The freedom to challenge and to express different views in debate are core to this Assembly's core functions of exercising scrutiny, holding ministers to account and representing our constituents.
'Proper debate is about both having the opportunity to state your own views and listening, responding to and challenging the views of others.
'Some members increasingly concentrate only on stating their own opinions.
'Technology has created a temptation for members to deliver a pre-scripted text in the Chamber, shortly after which they leave to issue a clip of their speech on social media.
'If debate was only about a series of members reading out pre-scripted thoughts on an issue, without interaction, there would be no need for an Assembly Chamber – we could do it by email.'
He added: 'I am also concerned about the tendency to raise Points of Order with the chair about the normal cut and thrust of debate, rather than challenge those points themselves.'
He went on to say he is expanding the Ten Practical Principles of Debate circulated in 2021 to 'ensure they focus not only on interactions between members, but also on having a strong culture of debate and challenge'.
'When the Assembly has responsibility for making legislation which impacts on people's lives, it is vital that members are able to probe all the arguments before the Assembly takes a decision,' he said.
'It is my role to encourage the conditions for members to be able to exercise effective scrutiny and accountability in the Chamber.
'I therefore ask all members to take the time to reflect on the principles I have set out in the attachment and to adhere to them in debate.'
Leader of the Opposition at Stormont Matthew O'Toole.
Opposition leader Matthew O'Toole backed the comments from the Speaker.
'The comments from the Speaker today echo concerns the SDLP Opposition has raised for some time,' he said.
'Repeatedly we've seen Executive parties and their MLAs treat the Assembly Chamber as an inconvenience, rather than a core part of their role.
'Since the return of devolution, we've seen too much time wasted on meaningless motions, ministers avoiding scrutiny, and MLAs using debates to drive their social media channels instead of focusing on the job of governing.
'Even at today's Opposition Day, Sinn Fein failed to vote and other parties failed to show up. In contrast, the SDLP continues to ask tough questions and push for higher standards in debate and democratic scrutiny because we believe the current Executive performance is not good enough and hasn't delivered for people in Northern Ireland.'
He added: 'The Speaker's intervention underlines the importance of a constructive Opposition to hold the Executive accountable and ensure Assembly time is treated with the seriousness it deserves.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Alison Johnstone to stand down from Holyrood ahead of 2026
Alison Johnstone to stand down from Holyrood ahead of 2026

The Herald Scotland

time7 hours ago

  • The Herald Scotland

Alison Johnstone to stand down from Holyrood ahead of 2026

She told The Times: "I was elected in 2011 and it was always my intention that this would be my last term in Holyrood. 'I came from a wholly non-political background and got involved in a campaign to save a school playing field​. Read More: 'I was not in a political party but campaigned for the creation of a Scottish parliament​ and I then worked as an assistant for Robin Harper, the first-ever Green parliamentarian in the UK elected to the first-ever Scottish parliament.​' She was elected unopposed as presiding officer in May 2021, the second woman to hold the role and the first Scottish Green MSP. Ms Johnstone was recently involved in a row with Douglas Ross, the former leader of the Scottish Conservatives, after she ejected him from the chamber during First Minister's Questions. Here is the moment Douglas Ross was kicked out of the Chamber today during FMQs @heraldscotland — Hannah Brown (@HannahMargBrown) May 29, 2025 The MSP was warned over heckling before being excluded by the presiding officer. The former Tory leader accused Ms Johnstone of constitutional bias, suggesting she treats pro-union parties more harshly than those who supported independence in the 2014 referendum.

The assisted dying debate is not ‘Parliament at its best'
The assisted dying debate is not ‘Parliament at its best'

Spectator

timea day ago

  • Spectator

The assisted dying debate is not ‘Parliament at its best'

MPs are coming to the end of the assisted dying debate. The speeches can be roughly divided into the following camps: those who, like the Bill's sponsor Kim Leadbeater, are very much in favour of the Bill and confident in its drafting; those who are in favour of the principle of assisted dying but who are so concerned about the drafting of the Bill that they are opposed to it; and the implacable opponents to the principle. The speeches from the latter two camps largely focused on the argument that today's vote is not about the principle of assisted dying but about the Bill as it stands. The proponents of the legislation, though, have largely focused on the need to back assisted dying as a principle. Leadbeater argued in her speech that if the Commons did not vote for the Bill today, then MPs would be leaving more people to die without dignity. She said: I say to colleagues who are supportive of a change in the law but are hesitant about whether now is the time, that if we do not vote for a change in the law today, we will have many more years of heartbreaking stories from terminally ill people and their families, of pain and trauma… There will be stories of suicide attempts, post traumatic stress disorder, lonely trips to Switzerland, police investigations and everything else we have all heard of in recent months. Leadbeater was followed by James Cleverly, who argued 'about the practicalities of the Bill', but did also point to the way the legislation would change 'the relationship between medial professionals and those they serve.' He also highlighted that while most professional bodies in the medical world are 'neutral on the topic of assisted dying', they were 'opposed to the provisions within this Bill in particular'. Cleverly, like many other opponents, argued that MPs needed to do their job properly in scrutinising this particular Bill rather than campaigning for a principle. That argument was made with even greater force by a furious Sarah Olney, one of the Lib Dems opposed to the Bill. She told the Chamber that MPs should not act like activists pushing for a cause but as legislators, which is what they had been elected to do. One of the best speeches against came from Diane Abbott, who started by saying she was in favour of assisted dying, but then spoke powerfully against the Bill, saying: I have heard talk today of the injustices of the current situation. What could be more unjust than someone losing their life because of poorly drafted legislation? She spoke of coercion and of the vulnerability of someone who 'all their life has lacked agency' and has not, like MPs, 'been confident in dealing with authority and institutions'. Vicky Foxcroft gave her first speech on the backbenches since resigning last night. She said she based her opposition to the Bill on her experience as shadow minister for disabled people, where she found that most disabled people and almost all the organisations representing them were opposed to and in fear of assisted dying. She had voted for the previous attempt to introduce assisted dying in 2015, but would be voting against today. Peter Prinsley spoke from his experience as a doctor, saying he had started his medical career opposed to assisted dying, but what he had seen in his professional practice had changed his mind about the need to give people dignity and choice over the end of their lives. Other supporters of the Bill spoke of constituents and family members who had desperately wanted that dignity. The margin of the result will be narrow, which will create problems if the Bill does pass. The speeches today have largely been considered and well-argued, though far too many MPs have congratulated themselves with the dreadful phrase: 'Parliament at its best'. Perhaps they have reached that conclusion because MPs have mostly been polite to one another – which stands in contrast to some of the very ill-tempered debates over the past decade, particularly around Brexit. But this is not an example of Parliament at its best on legislating, which is after all its primary role, rather than a forum for people to parade their politeness.

Guernsey Election 2025: Lindsay de Sausmarez tops Guernsey vote as Ferbrache misses out by 21 votes
Guernsey Election 2025: Lindsay de Sausmarez tops Guernsey vote as Ferbrache misses out by 21 votes

ITV News

time2 days ago

  • ITV News

Guernsey Election 2025: Lindsay de Sausmarez tops Guernsey vote as Ferbrache misses out by 21 votes

The people of Guernsey have voted in their next set of 38 Deputies, with the previous Environment and Infrastructure President, Lindsay de Sausmarez, topping the poll. She received 10,721 votes, getting the backing of around 44% of those who cast their ballots. Speaking to ITV News shortly after the announcement, she said: "I'm still absolutely stunned, I have not managed to get my head around it yet. I wasn't expecting it at all. "My thoughts are all over the shop because I have not had a chance to really sit down and even have a look at who my colleagues are going to be. I know that we've lost some real talent from the Assembly, a lot of experience, and I'm sad to see some colleagues go. "But I think we have had some really strong new candidates come through, so I'm excited about what they can bring to the Assembly as well." Also in the top three, Yvonne Burford with 9,427 votes and Charles Parkinson receiving 9,294. Turnout was just over 72%, lower than last time but still high when compared to other elections across the British Isles. There were 116 rejected ballots, with 43 blank papers and 73 spoiled papers. 72.13% Turnout 19,686 Number of voters 116 Rejected ballots Former Chief Minister Peter Ferbrache, who was ousted from the top job in late 2023, stood for re-election but missed out by just 21 votes. The island's only political party, Forward Guernsey, put forward six candidates - three were elected, including former Chief Minister Gavin St Pier with 8,577 votes. There will be around a 50-50 split of new and returning Deputies, with 18 politicians re-elected and 20 who are not currently in the States. Just under a third of the successful candidates are women. The full list of 38 elected candidates is as follows: Lindsay de Sausmarez - 10,721 Yvonne Burford - 9,427 Charles Parkinson - 9,294 Steve Falla - 9,017 Paul Montague - 8,884 Sasha Kazantseva-Miller - 8,794 Gavin St Pier - 8,577 Tina Bury - 8,496 Jonathan Le Tocq - 8,002 Chris Blin - 7,664 George Oswald - 7,613 Marc Laine - 7,556 Aidan Matthews - 7,312 Marc Leadbeater - 7,292 Andy Cameron - 7,177 Sally Rochester - 7,119 Adrian Gabriel - 7,069 Lee Van Katwyk - 7,063 Liam McKenna - 7,040 Mark Helyar - 6,980 Steve Williams - 6,950 John Gollop - 6,860 David Goy - 6,703 Tom Rylatt - 6,689 Jennifer Strachan - 6,683 Simon Vermeulen - 6,228 Munazza Malik - 6,215 Jayne Ozanne - 6,197 Dr Andy Sloan - 6,081 Bruno Kay-Mouat - 6,051 Haley Camp - 5,886 Garry Collins - 5,876 Andrew Niles - 5,846 Rob Curgenven - 5,738 Neil Inder - 5,651 David Dorrity - 5,644 Rhona Humphreys - 5,630 Sarah Hansmann Rouxel - 5,458 Follow our live blog below: Want the inside track on the key issues that will shape Guernsey's Election this June? Listen to Guernsey Votes, an ITV Channel podcast packed with expert guests, local insight and analysis you can trust...

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store