logo
UN human rights chief voices concern over Bangladesh law on political party ban

UN human rights chief voices concern over Bangladesh law on political party ban

Hans India6 days ago

Geneva: United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights Volker Turk has expressed grave concern over recent legislative amendments made under the Muhammad Yunus-led interim government in Bangladesh that allowed the ban of political parties, organisations, and their related activities.
Addressing the 59th session of the Human Rights Council in Geneva on Monday (local time), the UN human rights chief urged the interim government to make meaningful advances on reforms to create the environment for free and inclusive elections.
"I am concerned about recent changes to legislation to allow the banning of political parties and organisations and all related activities. This unduly restricts the freedoms of association, expression, and assembly," said Turk.
"I am encouraged that the Interim Government and political parties in Bangladesh are making progress through dialogue. I urge meaningful advances on reforms to create the environment for free and inclusive elections," he said.
Previously, the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) presented a fact-finding report that included suggestions in certain specific domains, such as accountability and justice, police and security, civic space, political system, and economic governance.
According to the fact-finding report, the UN noted that prohibiting political parties would hinder a genuine transition to multiparty democracy and would essentially disenfranchise a significant portion of the Bangladeshi electorate.
Recently, Human Rights Watch, a US-based advocacy group, severely criticised the Yunus regime for attempting to suppress the rights of supporters of former Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina and the Awami League party.
The recent legislative initiatives by the interim government risk undermining fundamental freedoms, the rights body emphasised in a statement.
"On May 12, the interim government ordered a 'temporary' ban on the Awami League using newly introduced powers under a draconian amendment to the Anti-Terrorism Act. The ban includes, among other actions, meetings, publications, and online speech supporting the party," said Human Rights Watch (HRW).
"The ban on the Awami League will apply until party leaders have faced trial for abuses committed during their 15-year rule, a process that could last years, thus effectively proscribing the party. The interim government has prohibited all activities, including any kind of publication, media, online and social media, any kind of campaign, procession, meeting, gathering, conference, etc. by the Bangladesh Awami League, curtailing supporters' freedom of speech and association," it further added.
Last month, Bangladesh's Election Commissioner Abdur Rahman Masud, addressing a workshop relating to elections, stated that the Awami League will not be able to participate in the General Elections.
According to the Election Commissioner, the acceptability of conducting elections without the participation of the Awami League cannot be stated.
The interim government issued a gazette notification on May 12 banning all activities of Hasina's party, Awami League, and its affiliate organisations.
The ban was imposed under the Anti-Terrorism Act until the trial of the party and its leaders in Bangladesh's International Crimes Tribunal (ICT) is completed.
The ban included all activities, including any kind of publication, campaign in media, online and social media, procession, meeting, gathering, conference, etc.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Iran warns of ‘consequences' of silence and inaction over US strikes on nuclear sites
Iran warns of ‘consequences' of silence and inaction over US strikes on nuclear sites

Hindustan Times

time26 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

Iran warns of ‘consequences' of silence and inaction over US strikes on nuclear sites

Iranian foreign minister Abbas Araghchi on Monday said that silence and inaction over the US strikes on the country's three nuclear sites 'will have widespread consequences'. Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi, during an event recently.(REUTERS) In a conversation with his French counterpart, Jean-Noël Barrot, Araghchi condemned the US strikes on the Fordow, Isfahan, and Natanz nuclear facilities, calling the military action a violation of all international laws and regulations, including the United Nations Charter. According to a statement issued on his Telegram channel, Abbas Araghchi stated that the 'silence and inaction' of countries in the face of the aggression will have widespread consequences and outcomes for all countries. The Telegram release added that Barrot expressed regret over the US strikes and denied any involvement in their planning and execution. The French foreign minister expressed his concern about the escalation of tensions in the region after the strikes and called for the continuation of talks between Iran and Europe. Iran considering bill to suspend cooperation with IAEA According to state media, a parliamentary bill to suspend Iran's cooperation with the UN nuclear watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), is under consideration. The reports were confirmed by Ruhollah Motefakerzadeh, a member of parliament's praesidium. Iranian media also reported Parliament Speaker Mohammad Baqer Qalibaf stating that the proposed bill would suspend the country's cooperation with the IAEA until Tehran got objective guarantees of professional behaviour from the agency. "We in the parliament are seeking to pass a bill that would suspend Iran's cooperation with the IAEA until we have objective guarantees of the professional behaviour of this international organisation," Qalibaf said about the bill. The speaker added that Tehran was not looking to develop any sort of nuclear weapons. "The world clearly saw that the Atomic Energy Agency has not fulfilled any of its obligations and has become a political tool," he added.

'Americans Will Pay A Huge Price': Iran Leader After Trump Military Bombards Nuke Sites
'Americans Will Pay A Huge Price': Iran Leader After Trump Military Bombards Nuke Sites

Time of India

time33 minutes ago

  • Time of India

'Americans Will Pay A Huge Price': Iran Leader After Trump Military Bombards Nuke Sites

'No Rest For Maoists': Amit Shah Reveals Plan to Wipe Out Naxals From Chhattisgarh by March 2026 Home Minister Amit Shah, on the first day of his Chhattisgarh visit, reiterated his strong stance against Left-wing extremism (LWE), setting a bold deadline of March 2026 for complete eradication. Chairing a high-level anti-Maoist strategy meeting in Raipur with top police officials from 7 affected states, Shah declared that this time, Maoists will not get their usual monsoon break. He also urged misguided youth to surrender under the government's lucrative surrender policy, assuring full support and rehabilitation. In a major boost to forensic and criminal justice capabilities, Shah also laid the foundation of NFSU and CFSL in Raipur. Catch full details of his fiery speech, the roadmap for LWE eradication, and the implications of forensic modernisation for central India's justice system.#amitshah #chhattisgarh #maoists #naxalites #amitshahmaoists #maoistsdeadline #naxaldeadline #amitshahnaxals #naxaloperation #march2026 #leftwingextremism #forensics #nfsu #cfsl #breakingnews #toi #toibharat #bharat #breakingnews #indianews 701 views | 3 hours ago

Iran-Israel war: Why Iran calls Israel a ‘Zionist regime', what Zionism means, and are all Jews Zionists?
Iran-Israel war: Why Iran calls Israel a ‘Zionist regime', what Zionism means, and are all Jews Zionists?

Time of India

time35 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Iran-Israel war: Why Iran calls Israel a ‘Zionist regime', what Zionism means, and are all Jews Zionists?

Iran persists in referring to Israel as the "Zionist regime," a stance rooted in Tehran's denial of Israel's legitimacy and opposition to its policies. This terminology, employed since 1979, frames Iran's foreign policy and bolsters its alliances with anti-Israel groups. The term reflects Iran's view of Israel as a colonial project, influencing its support for groups like Hezbollah and Hamas. Disclaimer Statement: This content is authored by a 3rd party. The views expressed here are that of the respective authors/ entities and do not represent the views of Economic Times (ET). ET does not guarantee, vouch for or endorse any of its contents nor is responsible for them in any manner whatsoever. Please take all steps necessary to ascertain that any information and content provided is correct, updated, and verified. ET hereby disclaims any and all warranties, express or implied, relating to the report and any content therein. More

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store