'Took a page from Elon Musk's book of parenting': Billionaire CEO sparks outrage with sci-fi parenting plan to ‘stay relevant' in AI age
— vitrupo (@vitrupo)
The Neuralink Dream, or Nightmare?
Silicon Valley's Wild Take on Parenthood
Parenting by Plug-In
You Might Also Like:
Bill Gates predicts only three jobs will survive the AI takeover. Here is why
The First AI-Native Generation?
Forget diapers, cribs, or college funds. For Alexandr Wang , billionaire CEO of Scale AI and a rising architect of artificial superintelligence at Meta, the decision to have children hinges on something far more futuristic: brain-computer interfaces . Specifically, he's waiting for Elon Musk 's Neuralink—or similar tech—to become advanced enough to merge babies' brains with AI from birth.Yes, you read that right. The 28-year-old AI wunderkind is putting off parenthood until brain implants are ready for newborns.In a recent episode of The Shawn Ryan Show, Wang explained, 'I want to wait to have kids until we figure out how Neuralink or other brain-computer interfaces start working.' He believes that if children grow up with this tech embedded from the earliest years—when the brain is most malleable—they could evolve into a generation that "uses [AI] in crazy, crazy ways."This revelation, which some have called visionary, others outright dystopian, has ignited a social media firestorm—and prompted many to question how far Silicon Valley is willing to push the human-machine frontier.Wang's reference point is Musk's Neuralink, which hit a major milestone in early 2024 when a paralyzed patient successfully posted a tweet using only their thoughts. Since then, developments like 'Blindsight'—a device aiming to restore vision via neural stimulation—have pushed the boundaries of what brain-computer integration can achieve.Wang's logic rests on the concept of neuroplasticity—the brain's ability to reorganize and adapt, especially during early childhood. 'Kids born with these technologies will learn how to use them like second nature,' he predicted, drawing parallels to how today's toddlers swipe iPads before they can even talk.But even Wang acknowledged the risks, conceding, 'It is potentially dangerous… but we just are gonna have to do it if humans are to remain relevant.'Wang's statement has drawn fierce backlash online. Reddit users were quick to label his reasoning as detached from human reality. 'Holy s**, installing it in a baby is a huge leap and needs to wait until we have thoroughly vetted it,'* one user posted. Others compared Wang's parenting ambitions to Elon Musk's infamous 'legion of children' plan.'He's clearly taken a page from Elon's book of parenting,' one commenter quipped, referencing Musk's goal to populate the Earth with dozens of genetically gifted offspring—often through unconventional or surrogate means.This isn't the first time Wang has raised eyebrows with his philosophical musings about AI. As one of the youngest self-made billionaires, his bold vision often blurs the lines between technological ambition and science fiction. But with this latest comment, critics fear the ambition has crossed into something more troubling—viewing children not as individuals, but as conduits for digital evolution.The deeper issue critics raise is the underlying ideology: that human biology is too slow to keep pace with AI, and therefore must be 'upgraded' from birth. It's a mindset that seems to ignore the emotional, ethical, and medical complexities of child-rearing in favor of transhumanist ideals.Mary Sabat, a nutritionist who has commented on the role of neurodevelopment in childhood, wasn't directly addressing Wang's ideas—but her concerns over early-life tech integration resonate. 'It's important to focus on developmentally balanced exposure,' she noted in a separate USA TODAY report on nutrition and brain health in children.Wang's perspective, on the other hand, reimagines children as native users of superintelligence—born not just to live in a digital world, but to be fused with it.If Neuralink and its rivals—like Synchron and Motif Neurotech—continue progressing, Wang's AI-native child may not remain hypothetical for long. Synchron is already working with Apple to turn brain signals into smartphone inputs. Motif is testing mood-stabilizing implants for mental health disorders.Still, bioethicists and tech-watchers warn that the race toward AI-human integration shouldn't come at the cost of consent, safety, or childhood innocence.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
Meta wanted to buy a $30 billion AI startup: report. What it is trying instead.
Meta Platforms stock has climbed this year in response to the social media company's progress with artificial-intelligence. Now, it is reportedly stepping up its efforts, trying to acquire a major AI start-up and recruiting new AI executives. Meta looked to buy Safe Superintelligence earlier this year but was rebuffed by its founder Ilya Sutskever, CNBC reported late Thursday, citing people familiar with the matter. Safe Superintelligence was valued at $30 billion in a funding round in March. Meta and Safe Superintelligence didn't immediately respond to requests for comment. On the face of it, such an acquisition would have been an odd move. Safe Superintelligence hasn't released any products, as it concentrates on developing supersmart AI. Meta has also been getting along perfectly well on its own, with its stock up 19% so far this year. The real attraction of such a deal likely would have been to get Sutskever and his key employees on board. Sutskever was previously chief scientist at OpenAI, where he helped develop the technology behind ChatGPT. He left OpenAI last year following a break with its CEO Sam Altman, and subsequently launched Safe Superintelligence. Thwarted in his efforts to bring Sutskever on board, Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg has instead negotiated to recruit Safe Superintelligence's CEO Daniel Gross, as well as former GitHub CEO Nat Friedman, according to CNBC. Gross and Friedman are partners in the investment fund NFDG, which has backed several AI start-ups. So far, Meta has relied on in-house AI models, as opposed to acquiring or funding an AI start-up as Microsoft has done with OpenAI and has with Anthropic. However, there have been signs that Zuckerberg feels Meta's AI team needs bolstering. Last week, Meta completed an investment in Scale AI. The Wall Street Journal reported that Meta would pump $14 billion into the data-labeling company in exchange for a 49% stake and that Scale AI founder Alexandr Wang would join Meta. The bigger picture here is that multiple AI companies have delayed the releases of their next flagship models amid concerns they don't show sufficient improvement. That suggests the industry's 'scaling law," the idea that larger and more complex models are automatically more intelligent, is breaking down. Meta is among those struggling to make a breakthrough. Its 'Behemoth" model, originally meant to be released in April, is being delayed until fall or later, according to the Journal. The response from AI companies has been the development of so-called reasoning models that break down problems step-by-step. However, a recent paper from researchers at Apple found 'fundamental limitations" in such models. At tasks beyond a certain level of complexity, these AIs suffered 'complete accuracy collapse," according to the researchers. That suggests the industry will need to adopt new techniques to push AI to the next level of intelligence. Meta will hope that its new recruits can get there first.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Haves' guide to the lives of have-yachts
Great wealth brings great isolation, and a siege mentality The most expensive car is worth only around $30mn and the most expensive watch, $55mn. If you're a billionaire, neither will make you stand out in a 'crowd' of 3,000-plus other billionaires, collectively worth over $16tn. But stand out you must, because 'esteem' or 'status' is the fourth rung of the human hierarchy of needs, as psychologist Abraham Maslow declared 82 years ago. You could buy a mansion, but the costliest on the market is worth some $300mn. On a good day, Elon Musk makes twice as much. Yachts are a better bet. The costliest is rumoured worth $4.8bn – just shy of Trump's net worth – and even relatively modest ones, like Jeff Bezos' $500mn 'Koru', cost many thousands of dollars per hour to maintain. There's no return on investment here, only loss, and if you're brave enough to bleed dollars without noticing, sociologists will now place you above the 'haves' as a 'have-yacht'. In his new book The Haves and Have-Yachts, New Yorker writer Evan Osnos dwells on this super-wealthy class and its quirks. In 2022, he'd written an article – The Floating World – focused on owners of 'gigayachts', that is yachts longer than 295ft, which already numbered around 100 then. But the book, which is a collection of his New Yorker essays on the super-wealthy – hence subtitled Dispatches on the Ultrarich – explores their attitudes, illustrated by actions. While Musk, possibly the wealthiest man in history, talks about settling Mars, other ultrarich have been making D-Day plans for Earth. Osnos writes about Reddit co-founder Steve Huffman, who got eye surgery done at 33 to improve his odds of surviving a disaster. Antonio Garcia Martinez, who used to be product manager at Facebook, bought five acres of woods on an island, and installed generators and solar panels there. What raised eyebrows, though, was his decision to bring thousands of rounds of ammunition. 'I think people who are particularly attuned to the levers by which society actually works understand that we are skating on really thin cultural ice right now,' he told Osnos. This survivalist streak also drives yacht-buying, says Osnos. Billionaire Peter Thiel, whose name crops up regularly in connection with America's rightward swing, has been known to fund the Seasteading Institute, whose mission is to 'enable floating societies which will allow the next generation of pioneers to test new ideas for govt'. Their website mentions 'building startup communities that float on the ocean with any measure of political autonomy.' Read together, 'new ideas for government' and 'political autonomy' suggest a real estate analogue of cryptocurrency. One of Osnos' essays, 'Ghost in the Machine', offers a peek inside the money-making empires of tech moguls. For example, when Facebook Live faced the problem of livestreamed suicides, its chief technology officer sent an internal memo: 'Maybe it costs a life by exposing someone to bullies. Maybe someone dies in a terrorist attack coordinated on our tools. And still we connect people. The ugly truth is that we believe in connecting people so deeply that anything that allows us to connect more people more often is de facto good.' To ordinary mortals, who satisfy Maslow's fourth level of needs with a new bag or a pair of shoes, these ideas and attitudes may be troubling, but it's important to be acquainted with them, to understand the forces shaping our world. Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email Disclaimer Views expressed above are the author's own.
Time of India
6 hours ago
- Time of India
Robotaxi launch: Event date, place, time and all news about Tesla's new autonomous vehicle
Elon Musk 's dream of a robotaxi is coming true, but it hasn't been easy. Tesla 's robotaxi service is finally going to launch in Austin, Texas, after months of delays and problems. Here's when it will happen, why it's important, and what you can expect. Why is this launch so significant for Tesla and its future? Tesla's robotaxi service wants to change the way people get around, starting with a small rollout and possibly spreading across the country. If it works, it could change the self-driving car market and Tesla's future in a big way. Following three consecutive sessions of gains, Tesla (TSLA) shares are up Wednesday as a result of new social media posts from CEO Elon Musk. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Dhoni's Exclusive Home Interior Choice? HomeLane Get Quote Undo What is the confirmed launch date and where will it happen? When a user inquired about the start date of Tesla's robotaxi program on Tuesday night, Musk replied that it would happen "tentatively, June 22,' as per a report by Investopedia. 'We are being super paranoid about safety, so the date could shift," Musk wrote in a tweet. He added that the first Tesla that will drive itself from the factory directly to a customer's door should be delivered about a week later, on June 28, as per a report. Live Events ALSO READ: Jennifer Garner may soon join Hollywood's billionaire club — here's how she's doing it While Musk had previously stated that the program was on track to launch sometime this month, Bloomberg reported last month that Tesla was aiming for a June 12 launch for the autonomous ridesharing service. The Tesla X account responded to another user who shared a video of what looked to be a Tesla being tested on Austin, Texas, roads without a driver in the driver's seat and posted a robot and car emoji in its own post, which was made hours before Musk's. The vehicle test confirms that "a key component of our TSLA thesis has officially begun playing out," according to a Tuesday report by Piper Sandler analysts, who have a $400 price target. Although specifics regarding the possible launch have not yet been made public, Elon Musk has stated that Tesla's plans for a more reasonably priced Tesla model are also on track to launch this month. What challenges is Tesla facing? Elon Musk has provided explanations for why it might not launch this week. While Waymo is formally in the "deployment" phase of autonomous driving operations in the city, the company is listed as being in the "testing" phase. Garrett Nelson, a CFRA analyst, predicts that Tesla's unsupervised robotaxi service launch will be largely unimpressive and will not have the same fanfare as last October's Robotaxi Day. What will the first robotaxi service in Austin be like? Initially, the company will observe about a dozen driverless Model Y cars using Full Self-Driving technology in a geofenced area of Austin, Texas, under remote performance supervision. The most crucial metrics will be how many incidents and interventions the cars record over the next few months, as well as how fast TSLA can turn off remote supervision and enter new markets outside of the geofenced area. Are there any delays or hurdles holding the robotaxi back? Elon Musk's announcement of the Austin trial last month sparked a stir among Tesla bulls who have been eager for robotaxis to go on the road. Even though the dream is still alive, investors are likely to face more obstacles in the future due to the recent detours. There will be more turbulence for the robotaxi rollout due to the unsettling developments of late. Elon Musk chose Texas because it is his home state and has far more lenient laws governing autonomous vehicles (AVs) than California. But lawmakers in Texas have sent a dismal message just days before the start of the process. An Austin-based organization advised Tesla to wait until September 1, when the new AV regulations go into effect. Safety checks and more precise compliance guidelines are part of the new regulations. According to reports, seven Texas lawmakers have signed the hold-off on the rollout. FAQs When and where will the Tesla robotaxi be launched? The launch date is tentatively scheduled for June 22 in Austin, Texas. Will robotaxis be available anywhere? Not yet, it will begin with a small area in Austin, with plans to expand later.
