This Minnesota couple was charged with running a $15M medical fraud scheme out of their suburban home
After a six-year investigation, a Minnesota couple has been charged in a $15 million fraud scheme that has left the community of Eden Prairie reeling.
The pair, 39-year-old Gabriel Luthor and 42-year-old Elizabeth Brown, allegedly defrauded Medicare, Medicaid and private insurers out of millions through a neurofeedback therapy business.
I'm 49 years old and have nothing saved for retirement — what should I do? Don't panic. Here are 5 of the easiest ways you can catch up (and fast)
Nervous about the stock market in 2025? Find out how you can access this $1B private real estate fund (with as little as $10)
Thanks to Jeff Bezos, you can now become a landlord for as little as $100 — and no, you don't have to deal with tenants or fix freezers. Here's how
"The whole thing, you couldn't make it up," neighbor Sue Donkersgoed, who lives across the street from Luthor and Brown, told KARE 11 News.
Luthor and Brown were reported to have lived an extravagant lifestyle that involved wild parties at their 9,000-square-foot home. Neighbor complaints got law enforcement's attention, which led them to dig deeper.
It turned out that Luthor and Brown, who ran a business called Golden Victory Medical, providing neurofeedback therapy and other medical services, had allegedly been overbilling insurers and pocketing the difference since 2018.
Brown, the company's founder, at one point claimed to serve more than 451 patients a day, according to one search warrant, reports KARE 11.
Golden Victory also allegedly submitted claims repeatedly to insurers using medical codes that did not cover the neurofeedback services the company provided. According to court documents, the business also combined billing codes that could not be combined and used codes indicating that patients were treated for a longer period of time than they actually were.
In addition to wild parties, neighbors say Luthor and Brown drove luxury cars, all paid for by the fraudulent funds they collected, according to an analysis by KARE 11 of hundreds of pages of search warrants recently made public. Those warrants also showed that in just one month, Luthor spent almost $100,000 at various nightclubs in the Minneapolis area. He also spent more than $32,000 at restaurants during that same month-long period.
Luthor did share the wealth a bit — but in the form of allegedly sending about $5,000 during that same month to various women on Tinder.
Luthor and Brown are also alleged to have used some of the fraudulent $15 million they collected to purchase their Eden Prairie mansion and cover the living expenses of other girlfriends of Luthor's who lived with the couple and, according to the indictment, helped them carry out the fraud scheme by submitting insurance claims. However, they didn't benefit financially from it and therefore haven't been charged.
As KARE 11 reports, Luthor also has a criminal past, having been convicted of credit card fraud 15 years ago under a different name. He was later allowed to legally change his name.
Luthor and Brown were arrested in Las Vegas and released on bond. The couple is scheduled to appear in federal court on April 30.
Read more: The US stock market's 'fear gauge' has exploded — but this 1 'shockproof' asset is up 14% and helping American retirees stay calm. Here's how to own it ASAP
Health care fraud is problematic on the basis of it being illegal. But the issue here goes beyond that. The other problem is that when medical providers defraud insurers, everyone loses out.
'Defrauding critical healthcare [sic] programs like Medicaid and Medicare burden systems designed to serve patients and puts them at risk,' said Special Agent in Charge Alvin M. Winston Sr. of FBI Minneapolis in a press release.
'The FBI and our partners will not tolerate those who abuse the healthcare [sic] system for personal gain and will pursue justice on behalf of taxpayers and patients.'
The FBI reports that health care fraud can take on different forms. It can mean double billing, billing for services not provided, submitting multiple bills for the same services or billing for more expensive procedures than what patients actually receive.
The United States Sentencing Commission says that, in 2023, 9.2% of fraud cases were health care fraud. The National Health Care Anti-Fraud Association (NHCAA), meanwhile, estimates that financial losses from health care fraud amount to tens of billions of dollars each year.
The more criminals that are able to get away with health care fraud, the more it's apt to cost Americans on a whole in the form of higher insurance premiums. Plus, health care fraud has the potential to put patients' health at risk. Providers might subject patients to needless, and in some cases, risky, procedures just to inflate their bills and receive more money from insurers.
That's why it's important for patients to be vigilant about health care fraud, and to loop their insurers in if they suspect it. Reviewing all health care bills carefully and questioning procedures or billing codes that don't look right could open the door to further investigation. Patients can also report health care fraud individually and flag issues to their insurance companies.
Want an extra $1,300,000 when you retire? Dave Ramsey says this 7-step plan 'works every single time' to kill debt, get rich in America — and that 'anyone' can do it
Rich, young Americans are ditching the stormy stock market — here are the alternative assets they're banking on instead
Here are 5 'must have' items that Americans (almost) always overpay for — and very quickly regret. How many are hurting you?
This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Miami Herald
2 hours ago
- Miami Herald
Senate official rejects food aid cuts proposed by Republicans in megabill
A top Senate official on Friday night rejected a bid by Republicans to slash federal food aid payments as part of their sweeping legislation carrying President Donald Trump's domestic agenda, sending party leaders scrambling to find another way to help offset the massive cost of the bill. The measure passed by the House last month and on track to be considered in the Senate next week would cover part of the cost of extending and expanding large tax cuts by cutting social safety net programs including Medicaid and nutrition programs, including SNAP, formerly known as food stamps. Republicans are moving the bill through Congress using special rules that shield it from a filibuster, depriving Democrats of the ability to block it. But to qualify for that protection, the legislation must comply with a rigorous set of budgetary restrictions meant to ensure that it will not add to the deficit. And the Senate parliamentarian, an official appointed by the chamber's leaders to enforce its rules and precedents, must evaluate such measures to ensure that every provision meets those requirements. Elizabeth MacDonough, the parliamentarian, ruled that the SNAP measure, which would push some of the costs of nutrition assistance onto the states, did not. That sent Republicans back to the drawing board to find another strategy for covering tens of billions of dollars of the bill's cost. She also said Republicans could not include a provision that would bar immigrants who are not citizens or lawful permanent residents from receiving SNAP benefits, according to Sen. Jeff Merkley of Oregon, the top Democrat on the Budget Committee. The House-passed bill would require all states to pay at least 5% of SNAP benefit costs, and more if they reported a high rate of errors in underpaying or overpaying recipients. That provision was estimated to save roughly $128 billion. Senate Republicans were unsettled by that plan, arguing it would tee up insurmountable budget shortfalls for their states. They softened it, advancing a lower share for states to shoulder than that set forward by the House proposal. On Saturday, Sen. John Boozman, R-Ark., the chair of the Agriculture Committee, said GOP senators would continue to try to find a way to cut food assistance that complied with Senate rules. 'To rein in federal spending and protect taxpayer dollars, the committee is pursuing meaningful reforms to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program to improve efficiency, accountability and integrity,' Boozman said in a statement. He said he was looking at options 'to ensure SNAP serves those who truly need it while being responsible stewards of taxpayer dollars.' Sen. Amy Klobuchar of Minnesota, the top Democrat on the Agriculture Committee, cheered the parliamentarian's decision, saying she had 'made clear that Senate Republicans cannot use their partisan budget to shift major nutrition assistance costs to the states that would have inevitably led to major cuts.' Several fiscal hawks in the House and Senate have complained that the legislation does not do enough to cut federal spending. With the parliamentarian's ruling, Republicans will have to find another way to slash a huge sum of money that their members also feel comfortable voting for. The ruling was just one piece of a broader review the parliamentarian is conducting of the Republican-written legislation. She was expected to work through the weekend evaluating the measure and instructing Republicans to strip out any provision she deems out of order. Should they fail to do so, Democrats could challenge the bill on the floor, forcing Republicans to muster 60 votes to advance it, which would effectively kill it since Democrats are solidly opposed. The parliamentarian also will determine whether Republicans can keep a provision that would block states from regulating artificial intelligence for a decade, and whether they can use a budget trick that would make extending the 2017 tax cuts appear to be free. This article originally appeared in The New York Times. Copyright 2025
Newsweek
4 hours ago
- Newsweek
Donald Trump Calls Green Tax Credits in 'Big Beautiful Bill' 'Scam'
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. President Donald Trump criticized his own federal budget legislation in a post on Truth Social Saturday. "I HATE 'GREEN TAX CREDITS' IN THE GREAT, BIG, BEAUTIFUL BILL," the president said, adding "They are largely a giant SCAM." The bill, which includes $4.9 trillion package packed with tax breaks, budget cuts and new Medicaid work requirements, made it past the House last month in a close 215-214 vote, with two Republicans breaking ranks to vote "no," Newsweek previously reported. The next hurdle, opposition and infighting in the Senate. Now, Trump has stated even he has problems with outlined initiatives. "I would much prefer that this money be used somewhere else, including reductions. 'Anywhere' would be preferable!" Trump exclaimed. "Windmills, and the rest of this "JUNK," are the most expensive and inefficient energy in the world, is destroying the beauty of the environment, and is 10 times more costly than any other energy," the President explained, adding "None of it works without massive government subsidy (energy should NOT NEED SUBSIDY!). Also, it is almost exclusively made in China!!! It is time to break away, finally, from this craziness!!!" This is a breaking news story. Updates to come.
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Oscar Health (OSCR) Soars 13% on Fourth Straight Day, Here's Why
Oscar Health, Inc. (NYSE:OSCR) is one of the Oscar Health extended its winning streak to a fourth consecutive day on Friday, jumping 13.05 percent to close at $21.22 apiece as investor sentiment was influenced by the previous days' surge. During the shortened, four-day trading week, shares of Oscar Health, Inc. (NYSE:OSCR) already grew by 52 percent, with analysts pointing to meme trading as having buoyed its share prices. Additionally, investor sentiment was supported by a new proposal for Medicare that would allow individuals and employers to enroll in a new version called 'Part E.' A close up of a patient and a healthcare professional engaging in conversation, showing the company's commitment to patient care. While this would heighten competition with private insurers such as Oscar Health, Inc. (NYSE:OSCR), the voluntary enrollment could potentially delay or prevent Medicare's sooner-than-expected insolvency. While we acknowledge the potential of OSCR as an investment, our conviction lies in the belief that some AI stocks hold greater promise for delivering higher returns and have limited downside risk. If you are looking for an extremely cheap AI stock that is also a major beneficiary of Trump tariffs and onshoring, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: 20 Best AI Stocks To Buy Now and 30 Best Stocks to Buy Now According to Billionaires. Disclosure: None. This article is originally published at Insider Monkey. Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data
