DIRCO defends policy change that will enable Musk's Starlink to operate in SA as 'in the national interest

Elon Musk. Bringing billionaire Elon Musk's controversial satellite internet system, Starlink, into South Africa's airspace is in the country's national interest because it will help meet its developmental goals
Image: AFP
Bringing billionaire Elon Musk's controversial satellite internet system, Starlink, into South Africa's airspace is in the country's national interest because it will help meet its developmental goals, said Deputy Minister of the Department of International Relations and Cooperation, Alvin Botes.
During a conference on illicit financial flows, mobilising domestic resources, and financing for development, hosted at SGN Grant Thornton's offices at the end of last week, Botes said that any trade agreement would be subordinate to the Constitution and must facilitate development.
Botes also hinted at government's policy towards trade agreements with the United States following President Cyril Ramaphosa's meeting with Trump on May 21. He said that the county's policies are 'not subordinate to trade incentives'.
The Deputy Minister added: 'We can only speak about what our constitutional imperatives are.' He explained that it was important that public debates were held as government effects changes in law when public opinion focuses on certain issues.
However, Botes also said that the United States is South Africa's second largest trade partner as a country following China. 'It would be reckless to say we don't need the US,' he noted, speaking specifically about automotive exports.
During Ramaphosa's meeting with Trump, which was televised, the United States President seemingly blindsided Ramaphosa by screening videos in which then EFF leader Julius Malema chanted 'kill the boer, kill the farmer'.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Next
Stay
Close ✕
Ad Loading
Trump has been targeting South Africa for what he sees as genocide, while Musk has publicly stated that the country has 'racist ownership laws,' which may deter him from investing here, including through Starlink.
Recent proposed changes by Minister of Communications and Digital Technologies, Solly Malatsi, that will amend current laws governing the telecoms space has caused controversy and have been viewed as paving the way for Musk, who was previously close with US President Donald Trump, to operate his satellites in South Africa.
Speaking to IOL on the sidelines of the SNG conference, Botes said trade agreements must be reconcilable with nation building. When specifically asked about Starlink, the Deputy Minister said government sought to get the best outcome for South Africans still suffering the consequences of the Apartheid era.
Malatsi has proposed that the Independent Communications Authority of South Africa (ICASA) to reconsider its regulations on ownership of licences. This would include making use of alternatives to requiring companies to be 30% owned by historically disadvantaged individuals before that entity can be awarded spectrum.
Botes pointed out that not all South Africans have access to the internet and Starlink will bridge these gaps in rural areas. A release from Statistics South Africa last week showed that the percentage of households who had access to the Internet through any other means increased from 28.0% in 2010 to 82.1% by 2024.
Malatsi was 'invited' by the Portfolio Committee on Communications and Digital Technologies to explain these directives, which would essentially allow international companies to implement skills development, enterprise development, socio-economic investment, and Equity Equivalent Investment Programmes instead of ownership.
The Committee said that these directives 'appear to be in contravention of the Electronic Communications Act and in favour of low earth orbit satellite provider SpaceX, which will be providing broadband services'. Space X operates Starlink.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

The Citizen

8 hours ago

• The Citizen

Iran threatens ‘more devastating' response to Israel's attacks

Iran's President Masoud Pezeshkian warned of a 'more devastating' retaliation should Israel's nine-day bombing campaign continue, saying the Islamic republic... Crowds wave Iraqi, Iranian, and Lebanese flags during a protest in Al-Kadhimiya, Baghdad, Iraq on 21 June 2025. The rally was held by Iraqi resistance factions in response to Israeli airstrikes on Iran, drawing widespread condemnation. Picture: Ali Abdul Wahid / Middle East Images via AFP Iran's President Masoud Pezeshkian warned of a 'more devastating' retaliation should Israel's nine-day bombing campaign continue, saying the Islamic republic would not halt its nuclear programme 'under any circumstances'. Israel said on Saturday it had killed three more Iranian commanders in its unprecedented offensive, while Foreign Minister Gideon Saar claimed the campaign had delayed Tehran's alleged progress towards a nuclear weapon by two years. 'We will do everything that we can do there in order to remove this threat,' Saar told the German newspaper Bild, asserting Israel would keep up its onslaught. Israel-Iran conflict continues Israel and Iran have traded wave after wave of devastating strikes since Israel launched its aerial campaign on 13 June, saying Tehran was on the verge of developing a nuclear weapon. Iran denies seeking an atomic bomb, and on Saturday Pezeshkian said its right to pursue a civilian nuclear programme 'cannot be taken away… by threats or war'. In a phone call with French President Emmanuel Macron, Pezeshkian said Iran was 'ready to discuss and cooperate to build confidence in the field of peaceful nuclear activities'. 'However, we do not agree to reduce nuclear activities to zero under any circumstances,' he added, according to Iran's official IRNA news agency. Referring to the Israeli attacks, he said: 'Our response to the continued aggression of the Zionist regime will be more devastating.' Israel's military earlier said that a strike in Qom, south of Tehran, killed Saeed Izadi, a top Revolutionary Guards official in charge of coordination with Palestinian militant group Hamas. Two other commanders were killed overnight, it added. Israel said it had also attacked Iran's Isfahan nuclear site for a second time, with the UN nuclear watchdog later reporting that a centrifuge manufacturing workshop had been hit. US President Donald Trump warned on Friday that Tehran had a 'maximum' of two weeks to avoid possible American air strikes as Washington weighed whether to join Israel's campaign. ALSO READ: Russia warns US against 'military intervention' in Iran-Israel war 'Not prepared to negotiate' Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi arrived in Istanbul on Saturday for a meeting of the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation to discuss the conflict. Top diplomats from Britain, France and Germany met Araghchi in Geneva on Friday and urged him to resume nuclear talks with the United States that had been derailed by the war. But Araghchi told NBC News that 'we're not prepared to negotiate with them (the Americans) anymore, as long as the aggression continues'. Trump, dismissive of European diplomatic efforts, said he was unlikely to ask Israel to stop its attacks to get Iran back to the table. 'If somebody's winning, it's a little bit harder to do,' he said of Israel's campaign. Any US involvement would likely feature powerful bunker-busting bombs that no other country possesses to destroy an underground uranium enrichment facility in Fordo. Iran's Huthi allies in Yemen on Saturday threatened to resume their attacks on US vessels in the Red Sea if Washington joined the war, despite a recent ceasefire agreement. ALSO READ: Israelis stranded abroad start returning home amid conflict with Iran At a Tehran hospital, Nasrin, a 39-year-old woman who gave only her first name, said she had been thrown across a room in her home by an Israeli strike. 'I just hit the wall. I don't know how long I was unconscious. When I woke up, I was covered in blood from head to toe,' she told AFP from her hospital bed. Hundreds killed A US-based NGO, the Human Rights Activists News Agency, said on Friday that based on its sources and media reports at least 657 people have been killed in Iran, including 263 civilians. Iran's health ministry on Saturday gave a toll of more than 400 people killed and 3 056 in the Israeli strikes. Iran's retaliatory strikes have killed at least 25 people in Israel, according to official figures. ALSO READ: Iran media reports 'massive explosion' after Israeli drone strike on refinery Overnight, Iran said it targeted central Israel with drones and missiles. Israeli rescuers said there were no casualties after an Iranian drone struck a residential building. On the Mediterranean island of Cyprus, Israel said on Saturday that an Iranian terror plot targeting Israeli citizens had been 'thwarted'. 'Tired' Israel's National Public Diplomacy Directorate said more than 450 missiles had been fired at the country so far, along with about 400 drones. In Tel Aviv, where residents have faced regular Iranian strikes for nine days, some expressed growing fatigue under the constant threat from Iran. 'In the middle of the night, we have to wake the children and take them to the shelter,' Omer, who gave only his first name, told AFP. 'They are tired all day after that,' he added, explaining he still supported Israel's war aim of denying Iran a nuclear weapon. Western powers have repeatedly expressed concerns about the expansion of Iran's nuclear programme, questioning in particular the country's accelerated uranium enrichment. International Atomic Energy Agency chief Rafael Grossi has said Iran is the only country without nuclear weapons to enrich uranium to 60%. However, his agency had 'no indication' of the existence of a 'systematic programme' in Iran to produce a bomb. Grossi told CNN it was 'pure speculation' to say how long it would take Iran to develop weapons. NOW READ: What Israel–Iran conflict means for South African economy

eNCA

14 hours ago

• eNCA

'Survive, nothing more': Cuba's elderly live hand to mouth

HAVANA - With a monthly pension barely sufficient to buy 15 eggs or a small bag of rice, Cuba's elderly struggle to make ends meet in one of Latin America's poorest and fastest-ageing countries. As the communist island battles its deepest economic crisis in three decades, the state is finding it increasingly hard to care for some 2.4 million inhabitants -- more than a quarter of the population -- aged 60 and over. Sixty is the age at which women -- for men it's 65 -- qualify for the state pension which starts at 1,528 Cuban pesos per month. This is less than $13 at the official exchange rate and a mere $4 on the informal street market where most Cubans do their shopping. "Fight for life, for death is certain," vendor Isidro Manuet, 73, told AFP sitting on a sidewalk in the heart of Havana, his skin battered by years in the sun, several of his front teeth missing. AFP | YAMIL LAGE "I manage to live, survive, nothing more," he said of his meagre income that allows him to buy a little food, and not much else. As he spoke to AFP, Manuet looked on as small groups of people walked by his stall carrying bags full of food. They were coming out of Casalinda, one of several part government-run megastores that sells goods exclusively to holders of US dollars -- a small minority of Cubans. Most rely instead on informal stalls such as the ones Manuet and other elderly Cubans set up on sidewalks every morning to sell fruit, coffee, cigarettes, candy, used clothes and other second-hand goods. - 'Things are bad' - Near Manuet's stall, 70-year-old Antonia Diez sells clothing and makeup. "Things are bad, really bad," she sighs, shaking her head. AFP | YAMIL LAGE Many of Cuba's elderly have been without family support since 2022, when the biggest migratory exodus in the country's history began amid a crisis marked by food, fuel and medicine shortages, power blackouts and rampant inflation. More beggars can be seen on Havana's streets -- though there are no official figures -- and every now and then an elderly person can be spotted rummaging through garbage bins for something to eat, or sell. The Cuban crisis, which Havana blames on decades of US sanctions but analysts say was fueled by government economic mismanagement and tourism tanking under the Covid-19 pandemic, has affected the public purse too, with cuts in welfare spending. As a result, the government has struggled to buy enough of the staples it has made available for decades to impoverished Cubans at heavily subsidised prices under the "libreta" ration book system. It is the only way many people have to access affordable staples such as rice, sugar and beans -- when there is any. Diez said she used to receive an occasional state-sponsored food package, "but it's been a while since they've sent anything." - 'No future' - This all means that many products can only be found at "dollar stores" such as Casalinda, or private markets where most people cannot afford to shop. According to the University of Havana's Center for Cuban Economic Studies, in 2023 a Cuban family of three would have needed 12 to 14 times the average minimum monthly salary of 2,100 pesos (around $17) to meet their basic food needs. Official figures show about 68,000 Cubans over 60 rely on soup kitchens run by the state Family Assistance System for one warm meal per day. At one such facility, "Las Margaritas," a plate of food costs about 13 pesos (11 dollar cents). Pensioner Eva Suarez, 78, has been going there daily for 18 months. "The country is in such need. There's no food, there's nothing," she told AFP, adding her pension is basically worthless "because everything is so expensive." Inflation rose by 190 percent between 2018 and 2023, but pensions have not kept pace. Some are losing faith in communism, brought to the island by Fidel Castro's revolution, and its unfulfilled promises such as a litre of subsidised milk for every child under seven per day. "I have nothing, my house is falling apart," said Lucy Perez, a 72-year-old economist who retired with 1,600 pesos (about 13 dollars) a month after a 36-year career. "The situation is dire. The nation has no future." It's not just the elderly suffering. Cuba was rocked by unprecedented anti-government protests in 2021, and students have been rebelling in recent months due to a steep hike in the cost of mobile internet -- which only arrived on the island seven years ago. In January, the government announced a partial dollarisation of the economy that has angered many unable to lay their hands on greenbacks. by Rigoberto Diaz

IOL News

15 hours ago

• IOL News

Trump's last card: the Gulf of Tonkin false flag justification

US President Donald J Trump looks more like President George W Bush, pensive and in deep thought just before declaring war on Iraq. Image: Saul Loeb/AFP via Getty Images US President Donald J Trump looks more like President George W Bush, pensive and in deep thought just before declaring war on Iraq. He is not alone. He finds himself in the same position as many US presidents before him, who had to authorise the military to go to war, rehearsing how the justification could be elegantly and persuasively announced. The pacing up and down the lawn of the White House and in Trump's case, the silliness of the diversionary tactics, including the hosting of two 'big beautiful' poles on each side of the White House, is not a sign of preoccupation with whether or not to go to war. That decision has already been taken. The White House resident is mulling over the speech that justifies the war he has already authorised, especially on how its impact would be felt by different constituencies that make up his political and financial support base. President Trump has had a similar decision to make in his first stint as POTUS 45. He was required to authorise decapitation strikes against General Suleimani of Iran, who was on an official visit to Iraq. As provocative and illegal as the decapitation strikes are, there were no retaliatory measures or follow-up exchanges. The lesson was learnt. Pinpoint strikes against Iran will not have any consequence against the US nor its allies, for that matter. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading In his second term, having authorised the military strikes against Iranian nuclear and oil facilities, including the killing of nuclear scientists and that country's top military brass, it is difficult to imagine what, if anything… is Trump still waiting to decide in two weeks. Along came deception. The second term of DJT, Elon Musk's endearment for the Donald, is characterised by deception as the primary instrument of statecraft. Briefing journalists both in the Oval Office and inside Air Force One, President Trump struck a note of confidence, convinced that he was the ultimate America First deal maker who would get the best nuclear deal for Israel first and America second. And so at the end of the fifth round of negotiations with Iran, his decapitation drones had already left Tel Aviv to decapitate the Iranian negotiators he was negotiating with. There could be no sixth. Sometimes the deception starts with the US President calling the President of another country 'my friend'. When such endearments gain currency, he is certainly planning something unsavoury against them. While President Xi Jinping is a dear friend of Trump, with whom he got along very well, and in his words, with great respect, he was buttering him up for something nasty. On the 25th of April 2025, Trump's administration produced a fact sheet that imposed a combined tariff rate of a whopping 245%. And this was just for a dear friend, he got along with them very well and with respect. President Vladimir Putin has come to learn of this strategy of deception at great cost. Whilst Trump supported and encouraged a meeting between the Russian and Ukrainian negotiators planned for Istanbul, the US president sat with Zelensky in the hall of the Vatican and discussed something pressing. In full view of the world, they sat for 15 minutes discussing a sensitive subject which was mutually strategic for both countries, and exhilarating for the accompanying European leaders. So soon thereafter, the nuclear bombers of the Russian Federation went up in billows of smoke from drone explosions launched from smuggled trucks into various parts of the Russian Federation. The United Kingdom was quick to confirm that the success of this attack is owed to Operation Spiderweb, which had been in the making for 18 months, as far back as the time of Joe Biden. Only, Trump had to see it through as a negotiating pressure tactic against Russia. And it had plausible deniability of direct US involvement. Of plausible deniability and false flags, the US always deploy them as two successive pages of the same war book. When one is used, the other will inexorably follow. Perhaps it is that script which has popularised the adage that in politics, there are no coincidences and in war, all coincidences are suspect. The preeminent requirement for the US to refer to the war book in the first place is when a decision to go to war has already been taken. Thereafter, the usual blood-curdling rituals follow, with the demonisation of the target by the mainstream media leading the charge. Horrible things start happening to the said adversary without the US being perceived to be directly involved. That is enough plausible deniability. Suddenly, without warning, the war mongers start yearning for more blood. Considering that the administration had long acquiesced to war, all they needed was an excuse to escalate. But the war hawks know what the world knows already. They must provide their own justification in order to fully inhabit the theatre of conflict. That justification is on the very next page of the book. In the Vietnam War, it was officially called the USS Maddox incident, an infamous deception known to historians as the Gulf of Tonkin false flag operation. This Gulf of Tonkin false flag operation marked a historic milestone. It eulogises every false flag justification with a name of its own. With the resolve to topple Saddam Hussein in a full invasion, the justification had a heavy title. 'Weapons of mass destruction!' For such a loquacious group, their vocabulary is disturbingly sparse. The titling of these justifications has limits, apparently, occasioned no doubt by the need to retain shock and horror and manufactured consent. In Libya, the justification that toppled Gaddafi is shockingly called 'the weapons of mass destruction'. President Trump may not need to worry about his MAGA constituency, nor his utterances of many years that the senseless forever wars must come to an end. So much proselytising was fair game in electioneering season and accordingly was meant for votes. No normal US president can ever imagine that they would finish a term without obliging some military adventurism or spilling of blood, however infinitesimally, in some small country or exotic island. But this is deception's open season. There are no two weeks within which to decide. The strike will be within days of the announcement by the White House spokesperson. If Trump were facing re-election concerns and possible dethroning by his Democrat rivals, he would have shut this war down a long time ago. But he has been liberated from such psychological constrictions. The trillion dollars of investments from Saudi Arabia are almost ready for purchase. So is the Palace in the Sky 747 aircraft gift from the Emir of Qatar. It is humming on the tarmacs of Doha. No matter. No business is more urgent than, nor competes in importance with, Netanyahu's fabled wars with ubiquitous foes. After all, the letter from his ambassador in Jerusalem, Mike Huckabee, has confirmed that Trump is the second coming of the Messiah, to do what the Messiah is wont to do. The messianic to-do list may be a stretch for the Donald, with at least 8 billion people yearning for their reward for a lifetime of religious loyalty. All he has to do is save only that sliver of humanity who are his allies and destroy everyone else. He has an amazing name for this messianic operation, composed of many false flags. Helped by the charismatic evangelists, its haloed name is shocking for its biblical end-of-time-ish fatalism. The Gog of Magog. * Ambassador Bheki Gila is a Barrister-at-Law. ** The views expressed here do not reflect those of the Sunday Independent, Independent Media, or IOL. Get the real story on the go: Follow the Sunday Independent on WhatsApp.