DWP to confirm exactly when PIP claimants will be cut off from payments

DWP to confirm exactly when PIP claimants will be cut off from payments
A government bill to be published this week will outline when people on Personal Independence Payment (PIP) who no longer qualify once changes are implemented will lose their support
The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) is preparing to announce a 13-week transitional period for individuals who will lose their Personal Independence Payment (PIP) under upcoming reforms
(Image: John Myers )
The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) is preparing to announce a 13-week transitional period for individuals who will lose their Personal Independence Payment (PIP) under upcoming reforms. The Welfare Reform Bill, set to be unveiled this week, will outline that those no longer qualifying for PIP will continue to receive payments for 13 weeks before they are discontinued.
Dr Simon Opher, GP and MP for Stroud, revealed on BBC Radio 4's Today programme on Saturday June, 14 that during this transitional period, Carer's Allowance will remain payable but will stop once the PIP payments end.
In response to the proposed changes, Dr Opher stated he intends to 'rebel' in the forthcoming vote, noting that "a number of colleagues are in the same situation."
"It's a slight delay in the disability cuts - it's 13 weeks rather than four weeks," he said. "So it's something, but not very much really." For money-saving tips, sign up to our Money newsletter here
Dr Opher further commented on the inadequacy of the proposed adjustments, saying: "And it doesn't change the basic fact that they're planning to cut disability payments to quite a lot of people really. So not terribly impressed, but it's something at least," reports the Daily Record.
The government has encountered criticism from within its ranks due to the proposals, which aim to curb the figures of working-age individuals receiving sickness and disability benefits.
Article continues below
As it stands, approximately 3.7 million people across Great Britain are currently claiming PIP, with expectations from the UK government that this number will increase to four million by the end of the decade.
Dozens of Labour MPs last month called on Prime Minister Keir Starmer to reconsider, saying the proposed reductions are "impossible to support".
Asked whether he would defy party lines in a Commons vote on the issue, Dr Opher said: "I am going to rebel.
"And this comes hard to me, I've never actually voted against the Government and I know a number of colleagues in the same situation.
"So I just urge the Government really to just consider parts of this again."
A Green Paper suggested measures for "transitional protection for those who are no longer eligible for PIP", while the UK Government elaborated this week, specifying the duration of this safeguard as 13 weeks.
DWP minister Liz Kendall told The Guardian recently: "When we set out our reforms we promised to protect those most in need, particularly those who can never work.
"I know from my 15 years as a constituency MP how important this is. It is something I take seriously and will never compromise on.
"That is why we are putting additional protections on the face of the Bill to support the most vulnerable and help people affected by the changes."
She added: "These protections will be written into law, a clear sign they are non-negotiable."
The UK Government anticipates these reforms will contribute to an annual saving of £5 billion by 2030 and ensure the endurance of PIP for people in the future.
An impact assessment from the UK Government, published alongside the reforms, estimates that 250,000 individuals, including 50,000 children, across England, Scotland and Wales could fall into relative poverty after housing costs due to these changes.
Proposed PIP alterations and online consultation
A proposed package of reforms to overhaul the welfare system has been put forward:
Ending reassessments for disabled people who will never be able to work and people with lifelong conditions to ensure they can live with dignity and security.
Scrapping the Work Capability Assessment to end the process that drives people into dependency, delivering on the UK Government's manifesto commitment to reform or replace it.
Providing improved employment support backed by £1 billion including new tailored support conversations for people on health and disability benefits to break down barriers and unlock work.
Legislating to protect those on health and disability benefits from reassessment or losing their payments if they take a chance on work.
The UK Government has made decisions to improve the sustainability of the welfare system and protect those most in need, ensuring it is available for those with the greatest needs now and in the future. These include:
Article continues below
Reintroducing reassessments for people on incapacity benefits who have the capability to work to ensure they have the right support and are not written off.
Targeting PIP for those with higher needs by changing the eligibility requirement to a minimum score of four on at least one of the daily living activities to receive the daily living element of the benefit, in addition to the existing eligibility criteria.
Rebalancing payment levels in Universal Credit to improve the Standard Allowance.
Consulting on delaying access to the health element of Universal Credit until someone is aged 22 and reinvesting savings into work support and training opportunities through the Youth Guarantee.
Alongside the publication of the Green paper, the DWP has also launched an online consultation on the new proposals. The consultation can be completed by anyone and is open until June 30, 2025 - you can find full details on GOV.UK here.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Daily Mirror

an hour ago

• Daily Mirror

'Right way' to use mosquito repellent on holiday

Travellers should always check NaTHNaC's information pages for specific location-based information regarding disease risks Mosquito bites aren't just frustratingly itchy - they can pose a considerable health risk when travelling to different parts of the world. Malaria, dengue, Zika and yellow fever are all diseases transmitted by these insects, potentially causing severe illness, which can sometimes be deadly. It's important to check the proper advice for your summer holiday destination, and equally important to use repellent correctly. Repellents need to be applied both day and night, indoors and outdoors, in regions where mosquito-borne diseases are prevalent. ‌ Government advice, updated in 2023, suggests: "A product with 50% DEET is recommended as a first choice. If DEET is not tolerated, use of a repellent containing the highest strength formulation available of either icaridin (20%), eucalyptus citriodora oil, hydrated, cyclised or 3-ethlyaminopropionate is recommended." ‌ While you may be tempted to apply repellent before sunscreen, the Government warns that it should always be used afterwards for the most effective results. Using suncreams with an SPF of 30 to 50 is also key, as DEET can reduce their potency. Most repellents must be reapplied frequently, especially in hot countries and after spending time in the pool or sea. However, users are encouraged to read each repellent's packaging for more specific guidance. "50% DEET is safe for those pregnant and breastfeeding and for babies older than two months," the Government's guidance adds. "Get advice before you travel from your doctor or pharmacist if your baby is aged under two months. READ MORE: PMDD red flags as Vicky Pattison opens up about health battle "Take insect repellents with you—in case of shortages at your destination." It's also worth wearing long-sleeved clothing, trousers, long dresses, and socks to stop mosquitoes from reaching the skin. Nets treated with insecticide are recommended too, particularly in situations where you might be sleeping outdoors or in a space without air conditioning. ‌ The Government adds: "Check your net for rips and tuck the ends under the mattress. There may also be a risk of bites from ticks and other insects; the same protective measures will help reduce bites from these too..." Travellers should always check NaTHNaC's information pages for more specific location-based information regarding disease risks. Four to six weeks before a trip, visiting a practice nurse, GP, or pharmacist is generally advisable, as vaccinations and medications may be encouraged in certain situations. ‌ "Yellow fever vaccine is recommended for certain countries, and antimalarial tablets may be advised to protect against malaria for some destinations," the Government adds. "If you have health problems, are pregnant or planning pregnancy it is particularly important to get tailored pre-travel advice six to eight weeks before travel. With careful preparation, most pregnant women are able to travel without experiencing health problems." You can also head to the Government's website for further insights. Three key ways to prevent mosquito bites while travelling Use mosquito nets in situations where you are sleeping outside or in spaces without air conditioning Frequent and correct application of insect repellent - putting it on after sun cream Wear long-sleeved clothes, socks, trousers and long skirts where possible

ITV News

5 hours ago

• ITV News

Health Secretary says Asissted dying will take 'time and money' away from the NHS

Wes Streeting has warned that legalising assisted dying would take 'time and money' away from other parts of the health service. The Health Secretary, who opposed the legislation in the Commons, said better end-of-life care was needed to prevent terminally ill people feeling they had no alternative but to end their own life. Streeting, writing on his Facebook page, said he could not ignore the concerns 'about the risks that come with this Bill' raised by the Royal College of Psychiatrists, the Royal College of Physicians, the Association for Palliative Medicine and charities representing under-privileged groups. The Government is neutral on the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill which cleared the Commons with a majority of 23 votes on Friday. Streeting, who was one of the most senior opponents of the legislation, said: 'Gordon Brown wrote this week that 'there is no effective freedom to choose if the alternative option, the freedom to draw on high-quality end-of-life care, is not available. "Neither is there real freedom to choose if, as many fear, patients will feel under pressure to relieve their relatives of the burden of caring for them, a form of coercion that prioritising good end-of-life care would diminish.' He is right. 'The truth is that creating those conditions will take time and money. 'Even with the savings that might come from assisted dying if people take up the service – and it feels uncomfortable talking about savings in this context to be honest – setting up this service will also take time and money that is in short supply. 'There isn't a budget for this. Politics is about prioritising. It is a daily series of choices and trade-offs. I fear we've made the wrong one.' Streeting said his Department of Health and Social Care 'will continue to work constructively with Parliament to assist on technical aspects of the Bill' as it goes through the House of Lords. Assisted dying campaigner Dame Esther Rantzen urged peers not to block the landmark legislation. Dame Esther told BBC Radio 4's Today programme: 'I don't need to teach the House of Lords how to do their job. 'They know it very well, and they know that laws are produced by the elected chamber. 'Their job is to scrutinise, to ask questions, but not to oppose. 'So yes, people who are adamantly opposed to this Bill, and they have a perfect right to oppose it, will try and stop it going through the Lords, but the Lords themselves, their duty is to make sure that law is actually created by the elected chamber, which is the House of Commons who have voted this through.' Dame Esther, who turns 85 on Sunday and has terminal cancer, acknowledged the legislation would probably not become law in time for her to use it and she would have to 'buzz off to Zurich' to use the Dignitas clinic. Paralympian and crossbench peer Baroness Tanni Grey-Thompson told BBC Breakfast: 'We're getting ready for it to come to the Lords and from my personal point of view, about amending it to make it stronger. 'We've been told it's the strongest Bill in the world, but to be honest, it's not a very high bar for other legislation. 'So I do think there are a lot more safeguards that could be put in.'

North Wales Chronicle

5 hours ago

• North Wales Chronicle

Streeting: Assisted dying will take ‘time and money that is in short supply'

The Health Secretary, who opposed the legislation in the Commons, said better end-of-life care was needed to prevent terminally ill people feeling they had no alternative but to end their own life. Mr Streeting, writing on his Facebook page, said he could not ignore the concerns 'about the risks that come with this Bill' raised by the Royal College of Psychiatrists, the Royal College of Physicians, the Association for Palliative Medicine and charities representing under-privileged groups. The Government is neutral on the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill which cleared the Commons with a majority of 23 votes on Friday. Mr Streeting, who was one of the most senior opponents of the legislation, said: 'Gordon Brown wrote this week that 'there is no effective freedom to choose if the alternative option, the freedom to draw on high-quality end-of-life care, is not available. Neither is there real freedom to choose if, as many fear, patients will feel under pressure to relieve their relatives of the burden of caring for them, a form of coercion that prioritising good end-of-life care would diminish.' He is right. 'The truth is that creating those conditions will take time and money. 'Even with the savings that might come from assisted dying if people take up the service – and it feels uncomfortable talking about savings in this context to be honest – setting up this service will also take time and money that is in short supply. 'There isn't a budget for this. Politics is about prioritising. It is a daily series of choices and trade-offs. I fear we've made the wrong one.' Mr Streeting said his Department of Health and Social Care 'will continue to work constructively with Parliament to assist on technical aspects of the Bill' as it goes through the House of Lords. Assisted dying campaigner Dame Esther Rantzen urged peers not to block the landmark legislation. Dame Esther told BBC Radio 4's Today programme: 'I don't need to teach the House of Lords how to do their job. 'They know it very well, and they know that laws are produced by the elected chamber. 'Their job is to scrutinise, to ask questions, but not to oppose. 'So yes, people who are adamantly opposed to this Bill, and they have a perfect right to oppose it, will try and stop it going through the Lords, but the Lords themselves, their duty is to make sure that law is actually created by the elected chamber, which is the House of Commons who have voted this through.' Dame Esther, who turns 85 on Sunday and has terminal cancer, acknowledged the legislation would probably not become law in time for her to use it and she would have to 'buzz off to Zurich' to use the Dignitas clinic. Paralympian and crossbench peer Baroness Tanni Grey-Thompson told BBC Breakfast: 'We're getting ready for it to come to the Lords and from my personal point of view, about amending it to make it stronger. 'We've been told it's the strongest Bill in the world, but to be honest, it's not a very high bar for other legislation. 'So I do think there are a lot more safeguards that could be put in.' Conservative peer and disability rights campaigner Lord Shinkwin said the narrow Commons majority underlined the need for peers to take a close look at the legislation. He told Today 'I think the House of Lords has a duty to expose and to subject this Bill to forensic scrutiny' but 'I don't think it's a question of blocking it so much as performing our duty as a revising chamber'. Lord Shinkwin added: 'The margin yesterday was so close that many MPs would appreciate the opportunity to look at this again in respect of safeguards as they relate to those who feel vulnerable, whether that's disabled people or older people.' Labour MP Kim Leadbeater, who steered the Bill through the Commons, told the PA news agency she hoped peers would not seek to derail the legislation, which could run out of parliamentary time if it is held up in the Lords. She said: 'I would be upset to think that anybody was playing games with such an important and such an emotional issue.'