Trump Team Vows To Ban Artificial Food Dyes, Calls It "Existential Threat"
Washington:
President Donald Trump's administration on Tuesday announced plans to remove synthetic dyes from the US food supply, marking a rare point of bipartisan convergence in an otherwise sharply divided political climate.
Health Secretary Robert F Kennedy Jr has vowed to overhaul America's food system under the banner of his "Make America Healthy Again" (MAHA) agenda, and the push would phase out the eight approved artificial food dyes by the end of 2026.
It builds upon a prohibition on Red Dye 3 by the government of former president Joe Biden but accelerates the timeline and also calls on the National Institutes of Health to carry out comprehensive research on how additives impact children's development.
"For the last 50 years, American children have increasingly been living in a toxic soup of synthetic chemicals," Food and Drug Administration commissioner Marty Makary said at a news conference, surrounded by young families and MAHA supporters.
He cited studies linking synthetic dyes to conditions including attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), diabetes, cancer, genomic disruption, gastrointestinal issues and more.
Kennedy, for his part, called the issue of dyes and additives more generally an "existential" threat.
"When my uncle was president in the 1960s, we had the healthiest people in the world -- and one of the basic assumptions of our country was that because we were robust people... that was responsible for our country being the land of the brave and the home of the free," he said.
Of the eight synthetic dyes derived from petroleum, Yellow 5, Yellow 6 and Red 40 make up the lion's share of those in use, Peter Lurie, president and executive director of the nonprofit Center for Science in the Public Interest, told AFP.
They are found in a range of products, from beverages and candies to cereals, sauces and dairy products.
Under the new plan, the FDA would revoke authorization for two of the eight dyes, while relying on the food industry to voluntarily eliminate the other six, but Kennedy said they have been receptive in talks.
"None of them convey anything of any nutritional significance, and what they're really there for is to mislead -- to make food appear somehow redder, somehow bluer, somehow fruitier or more attractive than it is," said Lurie.
"And the purpose of all that is to drive up sales, it's not anything that benefits the American public."
Bipartisan momentum
Momentum has been building at the state level. In March, Republican-leaning West Virginia enacted a broad ban on synthetic dyes, following California's 2024 decision to restrict them in public schools.
While Red Dye 3 was previously targeted for phaseout in foods and drugs by 2027 and 2028 respectively due to cancer concerns, the remaining dyes have been linked to behavioral issues such as attention deficit disorder in children.
In Europe, these dyes are not banned outright -- but the requirement to carry warning labels has led many companies to switch to natural alternatives.
Kennedy's stance puts him in rare alignment with mainstream scientific consensus -- a shift from his controversial record of promoting vaccine misinformation, downplaying the country's worst measles outbreak in years, and suggesting bird flu should be allowed to spread naturally among poultry.
Still, opposition from the food industry may yet surface. Manufacturers have long resisted tighter regulations, though Kennedy insisted they are ready to adapt.
"They want clear guidelines, they want to know what they can and can't do, and we're going to give them that," he said.
Lurie remained skeptical.
"All I know is that industry wasn't up there on the podium," he said. "If they were so clearly on board, you have to ask yourself why they weren't there."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
23 minutes ago
- Time of India
'When this president speaks, the world should listen': US briefs on Iran strikes codenamed 'Midnight Hammer'
The United States defence department on Sunday briefed the media on Operation 'Midnight Hammer', confirming its success in "obliterating" Iran's nuclear ambitions. It informed that US military conducted targeted strikes at Iran's nuclear sites in Fordow, Isfahan and Natanz and the operation was being planned for "months". US secretary of defence, Pete Hegseth, categorically hinted at Donald Trump's warnings against Iran's possession of nuclear weapon and said, "When this President speaks, the world should listen, and the US military, we can back it up." "When POTUS says 60 days that he seeks peace and negotiation, he means 60 days of peace and negotiation. Otherwise, that nuclear program, that nuclear capability will not exist. This is not the previous administration. President Trump said no nukes. He seeks peace and Iran should take that path," he added. Follow live updates on Iran-Israel crisis Here are key points from the briefing: Successful strikes: US defense secretary Pete Hegseth confirmed successful precision strikes on Iran's Fordow, Isfahan, and Natanz nuclear facilities, ordered by US President Trump. Strategic planning: The operation was the result of months and weeks of planning and coordination, particularly with Israel, indicating it was not a spontaneous decision. Coordinated effort with Israel: Hegseth credited Israel as a key ally in the operation, acknowledging their role in the joint preparation and execution of the mission. Mission objective: The goal was to destroy or severely degrade Iran's nuclear program; Hegseth said the mission 'obliterated' Iran's nuclear ambitions. No regime change goal: Hegseth clarified that the mission was not aimed at regime change in Iran. No civilian targets: The operation specifically avoided targeting Iranian troops or civilians. Clear deterrence message: The operation was intended to reassert American deterrence and demonstrate that the US will act swiftly and decisively to protect its people, interests, and partners. Trump's longstanding warning: Hegseth emphasized Trump has warned Iran for over a decade against developing nuclear weapons, asserting this operation fulfilled that stance. Military strength: He highlighted the operation as proof of America's unmatched military capability and restored global deterrence. 'Bunker busters' used: The strike featured the longest B-2 Spirit bomber mission since 2001 and marked the first operational use of the Massive Ordnance Penetrator (MOP) — a powerful bunker-busting bomb designed to target deeply buried facilities. Iran's reaction: Iran condemned the strikes as illegal and vowed to continue its nuclear program despite the attack.
Time of India
28 minutes ago
- Time of India
'We have other goals': Israeli army vows to continue Iran offensive; reviews aftermath of US strikes on nuclear sites
The Israeli military on Sunday declared it has "other goals" in Iran and will press forward with its military campaign, hours after US air strikes hit key Iranian nuclear facilities. "We have other goals and we will continue to act until we attain them," said Israeli army spokesperson Effie Defrin during a televised briefing. The statement came amid escalating regional tensions after US President Donald Trump confirmed American forces had carried out a "very successful attack" on three nuclear sites in Iran's Fordo, Isfahan and Natanz, ending weeks of speculation about potential US involvement in the conflict. Israel-Iran conflict: Follow live updates Defrin said Israel was still assessing the impact of the US strike on the heavily fortified Fordo enrichment facility. 'It's too soon to determine whether Iran's enriched uranium was destroyed or removed," he said. 'We are constantly checking the situation. It is too soon to determine. I suppose we will know later on." The Israeli army launched its own fresh round of attacks on Sunday morning, including strikes on Iranian missile launchers. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 40代以上でPC持ってるなら、このゲームはあなた向け！ Hero Wars ゲームをプレイ Undo 'We are continuing and are determined to achieve the objectives of the operation: eliminating the existential threat to the state of Israel, damaging Iran's nuclear programme and destroying its missile system," Defrin added. Tehran, meanwhile, has accused both the US and Israel of inflaming the crisis. Iranian foreign minister Abbas Araghchi said the attacks marked a serious escalation. 'The US and Israel have crossed a red line by attacking Iran's nuclear facilities,' he said at an Organisation of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) summit in Istanbul. Araghchi also stated that Iran was still evaluating the extent of the damage. Despite the strikes, Iran's Red Crescent chief Pir Hossein Kolivand reported that there were no fatalities from the US raids. 'Fortunately, we did not have any martyrs in last night's events of the US aggression against Iran's nuclear facilities," he said on state TV. Israel first launched its large-scale assault on Iran on June 13, targeting what it said were nuclear and military assets. The operation has included hundreds of airstrikes, assassinations of military officials, and the killing of around ten nuclear scientists. Iran has denied ever seeking to develop nuclear weapons. As of Saturday, Iranian authorities said more than 400 people had died and over 3,000 were injured in Israeli attacks, mostly civilians. Israel, in turn, reported 25 deaths caused by Iranian missile and drone strikes.
Hindustan Times
31 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Donald Trump's plan, 125 aircraft, over 24 Tomahawk missiles: Pentagon reveals key details of Iran strikes
US defence secretary Pete Hegseth on Sunday dubbed the US strikes against Iran's nuclear sites as an "incredible and overwhelming success". He said the United States obliterated Tehran's nuclear ambitions with its triple strikes. US defense secretary Pete Hegseth and joint chiefs chairman Gen. Dan Caine speak during a news conference at the Pentagon.(AP) Top US military official, General Dan Caine, said that the United States used 14 bunker-buster bombs, more than two dozen Tomahawk missiles and over 125 military aircraft in the operation. Hegseth, however, said the strikes were not aimed at a regime change. "Iran's nuclear ambitions have been obliterated," Hegseth told reporters in a briefing, adding that the strikes did not target Iranian troops or people. Donald Trump planned the operation He also warned that the world should listen when President Donald Trump speaks. "The operation President Trump planned was bold and it was brilliant, showing the world that American deterrence is back. When this president speaks, the world should listen," Hegseth added. He said Donald Trump "seeks peace and Iran should take that path". "This mission was not, and has not, been about regime change. The president authorised a precision operation to neutralise the threats to our national interests posed by the Iranian nuclear program and the collective self-defence of our troops and our ally Israel," he added. The Pentagon further said the US forces used deception, decoys, and fighters to protect US bombers that dropped 14 bunker-buster bombs. Also read: What Russia, China said on US strikes on Iran nuclear sites: 'Dangerous escalation...' Announcing the strikes, Donald Trump said on Saturday that many other targets were left, and if peace didn't come swiftly, the US may go after them. Also read: PM Modi speaks with Iran's president, calls for de-escalation, dialogue, diplomacy "Remember, there are many targets left,' Trump said Saturday in a three-minute address from the White House. 'Tonight's was the most difficult of them all, by far, and perhaps the most lethal. But if peace does not come quickly, we will go after those other targets with precision, speed and skill.' Trump said US forces hit nuclear sites at Natanz, Fordow and Isfahan, calling the strikes 'a spectacular military success." Also read: Iran reacts to EU's negotiation call after US strikes: 'Can't return to something it never left' Iran, meanwhile, has vowed revenge. Russia and China, two of the US's biggest rivals in geopolitics, have condemned the attack. With inputs from AFP, AP, Reuters
